Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime

2009-04-06 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > The project is completely different from other > commons projects, because it contains platform native > code beside java api. Commons Daemon already does that and seems to cover some of the same functionality. Would it make sense to merge

Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime

2009-04-06 Thread Rainer Jung
On 06.04.2009 21:32, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Sounds good. Who currently works on the Tomcat code and are they happy > for it to come here as well. Very basic commit statistics on repos/asf/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni, not including data about how big each of the commits was: Count id 391 mturk

Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime

2009-04-06 Thread Niall Pemberton
Sounds good. Who currently works on the Tomcat code and are they happy for it to come here as well. Also has there been any interest from other project committers (you mention mina)? Niall On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi all > > This is not official project manifest, just

Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime

2009-04-06 Thread Mladen Turk
Matt Benson wrote: --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Mladen Turk wrote: From: Mladen Turk Subject: Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime To: "Commons Developers List" Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 8:59 AM Paul Libbrecht wrote: This sounds good to me as an initiative. I am bit worr

Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime

2009-04-06 Thread Matt Benson
--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Mladen Turk wrote: > From: Mladen Turk > Subject: Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime > To: "Commons Developers List" > Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 8:59 AM > Paul Libbrecht wrote: > > This sounds good to me as an initiative. > > I am bit worried

Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime

2009-04-06 Thread Mladen Turk
Paul Libbrecht wrote: This sounds good to me as an initiative. I am bit worried with the title apr (or is it acr?) since it overlaps a lot with apache httpd's apr (which is widespread in many distributions as one of the bases of httpd). I thought the name should be (Apache Commons Runtime). T

Re: New sandbox project -- Apache Commons (Portable) Runtime

2009-04-06 Thread Paul Libbrecht
This sounds good to me as an initiative. I am bit worried with the title apr (or is it acr?) since it overlaps a lot with apache httpd's apr (which is widespread in many distributions as one of the bases of httpd). Wouldn't ajr be better a term since it's about a java binding? Is tomcat nati

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-04-06 Thread commons-compress development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-04-06 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati