On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
> Rahul Akolkar wrote:
>
>> Help is usually quite welcome, the sandbox is open to all Apache
>> committers. Ofcourse, [dbutils] isn't in the sandbox -- though you
>> should be able to start a JDK 1.5 branch in the sandbox if you want.
>
> Do you
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Help is usually quite welcome, the sandbox is open to all Apache
committers. Ofcourse, [dbutils] isn't in the sandbox -- though you
should be able to start a JDK 1.5 branch in the sandbox if you want.
Do you mean that, as an Apache committer, I already have sandbox karma?
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:02 AM, wrote:
> Author: jukka
> Date: Fri Feb 6 11:02:37 2009
> New Revision: 741531
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=741531&view=rev
> Log:
> IO-193: Broken input and output streams
>
> Added the proposed BrokenInputStream and BrokenOutputStream classes.
> Also
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Dan Fabulich wrote:
>
> I just submitted a big patch to DbUtils to update the API to use Java 5
> features (generics, varargs).
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-48
>
> There really aren't very many bugs left in this project; almost all of them
> hav
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Ken Tanaka wrote:
> I submitted a small documentation fix for the pipeline_basics tutorial.
> After uploading the initial documentation, I noticed that some of the code
> examples had extra line feeds, mainly the xml configuration samples that use
> color also use b
On 06/02/2009, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Pushing out a first RC for CLI-1.x. It's a bit of an odd duck in that
> it uses CLI2's site.
>
> ---
>
> Tag:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/cli/tags/cli-1.2-RC1
>
> Site:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/cli-1.2-rc1/
>
> Binari
Henri,
On Thu, 2009-02-05 at 23:46 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Pushing out a first RC for CLI-1.x. It's a bit of an odd duck in that
> it uses CLI2's site.
>
I built and installed into my local Maven repository a
commons-cli-1.2.jar from my Git clone of the Subversion repository fully
updated.
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:36 PM, contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
wrote:
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=141109&projectId=155
That page is read-protected even after I registered an account on the
Continuum instance.
> FilesystemObserverTestCase
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=141109&projectId=155
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 6 Feb 2009 07:33:28 -0800
Finished at: Fri 6 Feb 2009 07:36:13 -0800
Total time: 2m 44s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Hi,
Commons IO trunk is already using Java 5 features (which is nice), but
I was wondering about how we can make the next IO release usable in
environments that still run Java 1.4. For example I've just added a
few extra classes (see IO-192 and IO-193) that I'd like to start using
in projects like
Hi Corey,
as my colleagues say - "The problem sits between the keyboard and the
display".
+) I'm well aware of the patches but I needed to fix the HTML layout
problem since my customers were also complaining :-)
+) and I'm glad that you still support commons-email
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
+1
Henri Yandell wrote:
Pushing out a first RC for CLI-1.x. It's a bit of an odd duck in that
it uses CLI2's site.
---
Tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/cli/tags/cli-1.2-RC1
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/cli-1.2-rc1/
Binaries:
http://people.apache.org/builds/co
> I'm thinking that we stop thinking of CLI 1.x and CLI 2.0 (branches of
> one product); but rather CLI and CLI2; ie) two separate components
> with their own sites. That might free each to stop being hamstrung by
> the other.
+1
IMO that's what a change in the major version number means anyway.
13 matches
Mail list logo
