I would like to help in generifying collections.
How we generally plan? Through emails only or something else?
-v
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 3:47 AM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks, Richard! That'd be great! What we need to do is come up
> with a plan. If we split this thin
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Thi
Ok, thanks, Richard! That'd be great! What we need to do is come up
with a plan. If we split this thing up, it should be pretty quick
work. Are there any other volunteers? I can apply Richard's patches.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:11 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carman writes:
> > I
James Carman writes:
> Is anyone actively working on that branch? I was thinking of throwing
> my hat in the ring to try to help generify collections. I really have
> no idea what has been done as of yet. If need be, I can create my own
> branch.
I offered to help with this last year before
1. Change the root-level package name to
org.apache.commons.collections4 (we should jump major version numbers;
go to 5 perhaps?)
2. Remove the "functors" from Collections and have collections depend
on Commons Functor (Matt Benson has done some great work on functor
already!).
3. Since the pa
Is anyone actively working on that branch? I was thinking of throwing
my hat in the ring to try to help generify collections. I really have
no idea what has been done as of yet. If need be, I can create my own
branch.
-
To unsu
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Hendrik Maryns
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Emmanuel Bourg schreef:
>> Hendrik Maryns a écrit :
>>
>>> Here, one problem is the getValue() method and its relatives. It is not
>>> possible to derive from the context which type of value it is supposed
>>> to return.
Emmanuel Bourg schreef:
> Hendrik Maryns a écrit :
>
>> Here, one problem is the getValue() method and its relatives. It is not
>> possible to derive from the context which type of value it is supposed
>> to return. The method getValue() itself returns an object, but all
>> usage examples I have
Hendrik Maryns a écrit :
Here, one problem is the getValue() method and its relatives. It is not
possible to derive from the context which type of value it is supposed
to return. The method getValue() itself returns an object, but all
usage examples I have seen until now return Strings and eve
Hi,
I just wanted to share my experiences here with generifying some of the
commons packages. I’ve been through several of them, when I needed
them. The last one, just not, is CLI.
Here, one problem is the getValue() method and its relatives. It is not
possible to derive from the context which
10 matches
Mail list logo
