+1 (binding)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton a écrit :
>> BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-rc3/
>
> +1
>
> Luc
>
>>
>> I have tested this with JDK 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6.
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:12 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:13 PM, James Carman
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Have we addressed the clirr errors that show up in the report?
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:13 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Have we addressed the clirr errors that show up in the report?
>
> The clirr errors shown are only vs the 1.8.0-BETA release and the
> consensu
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 7:13 PM, James Carman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have we addressed the clirr errors that show up in the report?
The clirr errors shown are only vs the 1.8.0-BETA release and the
consensus was it was OK to break compatibility with a beta version:
http://commons.markmail.o
Have we addressed the clirr errors that show up in the report? There
are some methods (MethodUtils.setCacheMethod) that clirr reports as
being added, yet they don't have a @since tag.
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Luc Maisonobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niall Pemberton a écrit :
>> BeanUti
Niall Pemberton a écrit :
> BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-rc3/
+1
Luc
>
> I have tested this with JDK 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. This RC is built with JDK
> 1.5
> (building with JDK 1.4, has the following problem:
> http://com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Author: luc
> Date: Fri Aug 29 08:46:22 2008
> New Revision: 690308
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=690308&view=rev
> Log:
> Changed the Complex.equals() method so that it considers +0 and -0 are equal,
> as required by IEEE-754 standard.
> JIRA: MATH-221
T
Am I totally wrong or they are issues in the test suite?
Will have a closer look when I am back from vacation. About to walk
out the door. Back online in two weeks.
Should I open a JIRA for this and attach a patch?
Sounds good :)
AFAICT the try/catch test works fine once the testsuite as
Hi all,
i looked in depth in some test failure for javaflow and I think some of
them are bugs in the test suite and not in the code.
E.g:
1) the class ClassAccess2.java does not have a Continuation.suspend()
so it is ok that the caller does not fine a Continuation. Adding a
Continuation.su
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, JRockit can now run the tests
Great, thanks Jörg
+1 from me as well
Niall
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>> BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-rc3/
>>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 9:56 PM, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 15:28 +0200, Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> commons-net still uses "commons-net" as the groupId. Other commons
>> components (including the parent POM) seems to have changed to
>> org.apache.commons. I
+1, JRockit can now run the tests
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> BeanUtils 1.8.0 RC3 is available for review here:
> http://people.apache.org/~niallp/beanutils-1.8.0-rc3/
>
> I have tested this with JDK 1.3, 1.4, 1.5 and 1.6. This RC is built with
> JDK 1.5 (building with JDK 1.4, has the following pr
13 matches
Mail list logo
