Hello
Adam, you told me to use the mailinglist, so I did.
Could you or anybody else, concerning VFS, answer my mail.
Carlos
> -Original Message-
> From: Carlos Sonderegger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sonntag, 22. Juni 2008 11:17
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: VFS SMB and
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 5:05 PM, James Carman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Are we opposed to using Cobertura coverage reports in Apache Commons
>> project sites?
>
> Its fine to use it as part of a components webseit,
I updated the Maven 1 descriptor, I wasn't sure Gump was using it.
Emmanuel Bourg
Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
Hi all,
the problem here is that Gump uses the Maven 1 and the Maven 1
descriptor doesn't seem to know about compress' new dependency on
commons-io.
Should we
* switch to build commons
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yup, a reserved package name makes sense ("internal" is fine, and
>> atleast a couple of Apache projects use it). If there aren't any
>> objections, we should document this and start using the
Hi all,
the problem here is that Gump uses the Maven 1 and the Maven 1
descriptor doesn't seem to know about compress' new dependency on
commons-io.
Should we
* switch to build commons-compress with Ant or Maven 2?
* fix the Maven 1.x descriptor?
* do both ;-)
Stefan
