[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Rahul Akolkar
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yup, a reserved package name makes sense ("internal" is fine, and
>> atleast a couple of Apache projects use it). If there aren't any
>> objections, we should document this and start using the convention.
>
> I'm really good with whatever everyone else likes. No real issues
> with either way we go on this one. Just let me know and I'll follow
> the guidelines. :)
Well, at least we may exclude the javadoc of the internal classes. If we find
an common pattern we can configure the javadoc plugin in the parent POM.
- Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
