Does anyone have any opinions on the exception hierarchy changes
suggested in MATH-195?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-195
I would like some input from the more active math committers before I
perform any modifications.
Thanks,
Brent Worden
On 3/8/08, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody know if it is possible to generate a release notes skeleton
> automatically from JIRA?
Sure. When you click "Browse Project" and you select Net (if it's not
already selected), there's a "Release Notes" link under "All
Projects."
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The bug entries for projects that have moved to JIRA were removed from
> > Bugzilla as part of a recent upgrade. There's an open issue to remove
On 3/8/08, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, one could just try and see what classes are available in the
> classpath. This could be easily be done in a wrapper class as you
> suggested.
So, what do you think we should do about PROXY-11?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROXY
> And can I register for news group and how?
Gmane serves up the commons mailing lists as news groups:
nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.user
nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.commons.devel
HTH,
Brent Worden
On 08.03.2008, at 15:25, James Carman wrote:
On 3/8/08, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 08.03.2008, at 13:44, James Carman wrote:
All,
The wicket folks are investigating using Commons Proxy and they
don't
want to have to decide which implementation (jdk, cglib,
javassist)
I have added new hierarchical configuration implementations based on the
node handler approach.
There is now a new AbstractHierarchicalConfiguration class providing
basic functionality for dealing with hierarchical structures.
Derived from that is InMemoryConfiguration, which is almost equiva
Does anybody know if it is possible to generate a release notes skeleton
automatically from JIRA?
Rory
Niall Pemberton wrote:
I added the clirr report and it shows quite a few incompatible changes
from the 1.4.1 release - this should be at least highlighted in
release notes.
Niall
On Mon, Ma
I've taken into account the suggestions proposed by various people wrt
the TFTP server classes and accordingly made some changes. Thanks for
the feedback.
Rory
sebb wrote:
On 07/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:04 AM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bug entries for projects that have moved to JIRA were removed from
> Bugzilla as part of a recent upgrade. There's an open issue to remove the
> links in JIRA, so that people are not following broken links.
>
OK. Unfo
The functional tests seem to be broken right now, due to the remote
server being unavailable. These don't get run by default anyways, so I
think we should just leave this for now, unless someone can suggest a
different server.
Rory
Oberhuber, Martin wrote:
Also, I get unit test failures in
The bug entries for projects that have moved to JIRA were removed from
Bugzilla as part of a recent upgrade. There's an open issue to remove the
links in JIRA, so that people are not following broken links.
--
Martin Cooper
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could be this is an issue for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Links to Bugzilla tickets in JIRA are failing for me, as are attempts
to look up old bugs by BZ number. Anyone know why this is the case?
See, for example, the BZ ID link in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-22
Phil
--
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Hello,
> I just subscribe for mailing list,
Welcome to the mailing list!
> And can I register for news group and how?
Actually, I don't know, but this mailing list is anyway a good place
to discuss the code.
> but in fact what I want is to send an issue report to your developer.
For that, we hav
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 11:24 AM, alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just subscribe for mailing list, but in fact what I want is to send an
> issue report to your developer. And can I register for news group and how?
>
> The issue I encounter is about .net api, I found out your UnixFT
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=62812&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 10:30:46 -0800
Finished at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 10:31:35 -0800
Total time: 49s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=62812&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 10:30:46 -0800
Finished at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 10:31:35 -0800
Total time: 49s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Hello,
I just subscribe for mailing list, but in fact what I want is to send an issue
report to your developer. And can I register for news group and how?
The issue I encounter is about .net api, I found out your UnixFTPEntryParser
can't recognize the date of Feb 29, if there is file created at
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 05/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (by
> >> mistake) it had used a patched copy of the
> >> maven-project-info-
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:45 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 08/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: bayard
> > Date: Sat Mar 8 01:40:15 2008
> > New Revision: 634917
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=634917&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Oops; u
Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > I just re-published all the component sites and notice that (b
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by RolandWeber:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/FrontPage
The comment on the change is:
updated link
---
On 3/8/08, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 08.03.2008, at 13:44, James Carman wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > The wicket folks are investigating using Commons Proxy and they don't
> > want to have to decide which implementation (jdk, cglib, javassist) to
> > use themselves. They wo
On 08.03.2008, at 13:44, James Carman wrote:
All,
The wicket folks are investigating using Commons Proxy and they don't
want to have to decide which implementation (jdk, cglib, javassist) to
use themselves. They would like us to split up Commons Proxy into 3
jars, commons-proxy, commons-proxy
All,
The wicket folks are investigating using Commons Proxy and they don't
want to have to decide which implementation (jdk, cglib, javassist) to
use themselves. They would like us to split up Commons Proxy into 3
jars, commons-proxy, commons-proxy-cglib, commons-proxy-javassist.
Any thoughts?
J
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=62784&projectId=538
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 03:58:47 -0800
Finished at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 03:59:16 -0800
Total time: 28s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Number:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=62783&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 03:55:23 -0800
Finished at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 03:55:46 -0800
Total time: 23s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=62783&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 03:55:23 -0800
Finished at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 03:55:46 -0800
Total time: 23s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
In which case the build files probably need to be updated accordingly.
On 08/03/2008, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> NOTE: This just made Codec JDK 1.4 dependent.
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:00 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Author: bayard
> > Date: Sat Mar 8 01:00:24 2008
On 08/03/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Sat Mar 8 01:40:15 2008
> New Revision: 634917
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=634917&view=rev
> Log:
> Oops; use replaceAll, not replace - stop trying to optimize for ^
But how can the longer stri
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=62762&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 01:30:51 -0800
Finished at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 01:31:29 -0800
Total time: 38s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=62762&projectId=159
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 01:30:51 -0800
Finished at: Sat 8 Mar 2008 01:31:29 -0800
Total time: 38s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Numb
NOTE: This just made Codec JDK 1.4 dependent.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 1:00 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: bayard
> Date: Sat Mar 8 01:00:24 2008
> New Revision: 634911
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=634911&view=rev
> Log:
> Applying my second patch from CODEC-60; adding
34 matches
Mail list logo
