On 08.03.2008, at 13:44, James Carman wrote:
All, The wicket folks are investigating using Commons Proxy and they don't want to have to decide which implementation (jdk, cglib, javassist) to use themselves. They would like us to split up Commons Proxy into 3 jars, commons-proxy, commons-proxy-cglib, commons-proxy-javassist. Any thoughts?
Is the discovery such a big problem with proxy? ...in general I prefer the static discovery type. But someone has to do it.
My 2 cents cheers -- Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
