On Feb 18, 2008 4:42 PM, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to follow along with the documentation on preparing for a
> release here:
>
> http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
>
> I think I've got most of it, but I don't know about the changelog.
> I'm trying to cut a 1
This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2.
The zips / tars are here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/
The site included in the binary distro is here:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/docs/
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-RC3/RELEASE-NOTES.t
I am trying to follow along with the documentation on preparing for a
release here:
http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
I think I've got most of it, but I don't know about the changelog.
I'm trying to cut a 1.0 release for Proxy. It has never been released
before. Do I still need a
All,
Oliver Dupuy pointed out
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROXY-6) a problem with the
current site. The sandbox version of the Proxy site is still up. He
got to it through Google. Should we put a redirect page there so that
folks go to the "proper" site? Is there any way to clear th
Sorry, there is an error in the changelog. I need to fix an create
another RC.
This vote is cancelled.
Phil
On Feb 18, 2008 12:05 AM, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons Math 1.2.
>
> The zips / tars are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/math-1.2-R
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Oliver Heger a écrit :
- New package name, with no version number please. I suggest
org.apache.commons.config
I prefer going with the commons standards here. I am against a config
package because it is unrelated to the existing configuration package. A
package name of configuration2 shows that
Oliver Heger wrote:
> In most points I agree. Some comments below:
>
> Emmanuel Bourg schrieb:
[snip]
>> - New package name, with no version number please. I suggest
>> org.apache.commons.config
> I prefer going with the commons standards here. I am against a config
> package because it is unrel
Hi Emmanuel,
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I noticed that the artifactId changed to
> commons-configuration2 on the
> 2.x branch. Is it necessary to change it? Couldn't we keep
> commons-configuration since the groupId has already changed to
> org.apache.commons?
aside from all args in the discussion,
