[pool][dbcp] instrumentation

2007-11-18 Thread Phil Steitz
I have been working on adding logging to pool and dbcp per previous discussion here. I started with a partially instrumented version of pool 1.3 that I have been using to investigate bug reports and test performance. I used jdk logging with the following guidelines * Finest (trace) level for det

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 3)

2007-11-18 Thread sebb
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > This is the third attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > > Changes since the last try: > - The manifest used in the artifacts now has the correct (non-SNAPSHOT) > version in it Two of the manifests don't have versions: javadoc

[VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 3)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi This is the third attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last try: - The manifest used in the artifacts now has the correct (non-SNAPSHOT) version in it - The file build-testing.xml is included in the distribution Release Notes: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Rel

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
This vote has been canceled. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last try: - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct place in all distributables - A couple of minor bugs were fixed Release No

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Dennis Lundberg wrote: sebb wrote: On 18/11/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last try: - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread sebb
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 18/11/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > >>> > >>> Changes since the l

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Oliver Heger wrote: Don't know how important this is, but the "Implementation-Version:" entry in the manifests of the jars seems to be incorrect. It runs "1.1.1-SNAPSHOT". That's a blocker to me. I'll look into it. This was because logging uses its own manifest file,

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Oliver Heger wrote: Don't know how important this is, but the "Implementation-Version:" entry in the manifests of the jars seems to be incorrect. It runs "1.1.1-SNAPSHOT". That's a blocker to me. I'll look into it. Building the source distribution with maven 1 and 2 works for me, however the

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) failed

2007-11-18 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jaxme development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
sebb wrote: On 18/11/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last try: - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct place in al

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Oliver Heger
Don't know how important this is, but the "Implementation-Version:" entry in the manifests of the jars seems to be incorrect. It runs "1.1.1-SNAPSHOT". Building the source distribution with maven 1 and 2 works for me, however the artifacts produced by maven 1 also have the -SNAPSHOT suffix.

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
sebb wrote: On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sebb wrote: On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last try: - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread sebb
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > >> > >> Changes since the last try: > >> - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE an

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread sebb
On 18/11/2007, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > > > > Changes since the last try: > > - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct > >

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Not sure. Maybe I didn't 'svn up' locally between r595118 and tagging... I've seen that happen a couple of times in the past. The correct files were tagged though, so no big deal. Rahul Akolkar wrote: Why did tagging [1] generate noise? -Rahul [1] http://tinyurl.com/36fl8g On 11/18/07, Den

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
sebb wrote: On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last try: - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct place in all distributables - A couple of minor bugs were f

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/18/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 18, 2007 6:48 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Why did tagging [1] generate noise? > > You can tag (or copy) with changes in your own local copy - examples: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=549565 > h

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Nov 18, 2007 6:48 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why did tagging [1] generate noise? You can tag (or copy) with changes in your own local copy - examples: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=549565 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=595980 Niall > -Rahu

Re: [JEXL] svn commit: r595987 - /commons/proper/jexl/trunk/pom.xml

2007-11-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/18/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 17, 2007 9:39 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Author: niallp > > > Date: Sat Nov 17 11:09:28 2007 > > > New Revision: 595987 > > > > > > URL: http://svn.

Re: [JEXL] svn commit: r595987 - /commons/proper/jexl/trunk/pom.xml

2007-11-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Nov 17, 2007 9:39 PM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: niallp > > Date: Sat Nov 17 11:09:28 2007 > > New Revision: 595987 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=595987&view=rev > > Log: > > Add in Checkstyle,

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Why did tagging [1] generate noise? -Rahul [1] http://tinyurl.com/36fl8g On 11/18/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > > Changes since the last try: > - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in t

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread sebb
On 18/11/2007, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > > Changes since the last try: > - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct > place in all distributables > - A couple of minor bugs were fi

[VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 2)

2007-11-18 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi This is the second attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. Changes since the last try: - The Maven 2 build now packages LICENSE and NOTICE files in the correct place in all distributables - A couple of minor bugs were fixed Release Notes: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.