--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: dennisl
> Date: Fri Aug 3 15:46:07 2007
> New Revision: 562609
>
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=562609
> Log:
> Make the tests work.
Dennis:
_Do_ the tests work for you, now? I still get
failures on everything that needs the xml res
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: dennisl
> Date: Fri Aug 3 14:31:43 2007
> New Revision: 562590
>
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=562590
> Log:
> First attempt at a Maven 2 build for jxpath. The
> tests currently fail, so that needs to be looked
> into. Site generation
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
> > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Tim O'Brien wrote:
> >>> On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Matt Benson wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tim O'Brien wrote:
On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
Thanks for your response, Dennis:
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 13:48 -0700, Matt Benson wrote:
> --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I sense I'll not be able to escape M(1|2). Groan, I
> was hoping to avoid M2 for some time yet... Let me do
> some research to see exactly what I'm getting into if
> I opt to switch JXPath.
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tim O'Brien wrote:
> > On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Matt Benson wrote:
> Thanks for your response, Dennis:
>
> --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTE
--- Tim O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Matt Benson wrote:
> > > > Thanks for your response, Dennis:
> > > >
> > > > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 12:23 -0700, Matt Benson wrote:
> Is the fact that the sites can be made uniform the
> driving reason to use Maven 1 or 2? If,
> hypothetically speaking, there were a third option
> that could generate the site identically, would there
> be a good reason to forbid its use?
Henri Yandell wrote:
Seems good to me. Unit test should confirm symmetry between the two methods too.
Of interest:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=291000e179b5162d5ae0d03c598e0:WuuT?bug_id=6176992
Hen
There is a new enhancement request for this feature, including a pat
Tim O'Brien wrote:
On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
Thanks for your response, Dennis:
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The site for jxpath builds fine for me using
Maven
1.0.2. It looks as
go
On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Matt Benson wrote:
> > > Thanks for your response, Dennis:
> > >
> > > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> The site for jxpath builds fine for me using
> > Maven
> > >>
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Benson wrote:
> > Thanks for your response, Dennis:
> >
> > --- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> The site for jxpath builds fine for me using
> Maven
> >> 1.0.2. It looks as
> >> good as any of the other components sites
Matt Benson wrote:
Thanks for your response, Dennis:
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The site for jxpath builds fine for me using Maven
1.0.2. It looks as
good as any of the other components sites that are
build with M1.
Which reports that are generated is configured in
the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Th
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
Th
Thanks for your response, Dennis:
--- Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The site for jxpath builds fine for me using Maven
> 1.0.2. It looks as
> good as any of the other components sites that are
> build with M1.
>
> Which reports that are generated is configured in
> the section
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Though I am an avid reader of fantasy fiction, I
> > don't think magic has much place in the realm of
> > software development. For this reason I
> despair--and
> > I say this in awareness th
On 8/3/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Though I am an avid reader of fantasy fiction, I
> > don't think magic has much place in the realm of
> > software development. For this reason I despair--and
> > I say this in awareness
The site for jxpath builds fine for me using Maven 1.0.2. It looks as
good as any of the other components sites that are build with M1.
Which reports that are generated is configured in the section
of the file project.xml. Most of the plugins in Maven 1 can be tweaked
by adding or changing pr
On 8/3/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though I am an avid reader of fantasy fiction, I
> don't think magic has much place in the realm of
> software development. For this reason I despair--and
> I say this in awareness that I may offend some
> folks--whenever I am forced to work wi
Though I am an avid reader of fantasy fiction, I
don't think magic has much place in the realm of
software development. For this reason I despair--and
I say this in awareness that I may offend some
folks--whenever I am forced to work with Maven. I can
never figure out what's going on, and any
d
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1.
> >
> > Lets get a release out and have a plan for the next release too.
>
> Sounds good, do you have any suggestions? IMO it was important that
> this release was compatibile for all
On 8/1/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its been nearly three years since the last BeanUtils release (1.7.0)
> and quite a few bug reports and enhancement have been made since then.
> Since BeanUtils is widely used this Beta version is being released to
> hopefully facilitate wider
Hi
I have switched to "Wiki Enabled Field Config Scheme" for the Commons
Logging project in JIRA. This allows users to use a simple wiki style
syntax to format the descriptions and comments. It does show the wiki
syntax in the emails that are sent out as well, but the syntax is pretty
unintru
Failed build logs:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/~commons/nightly/logs//20070803/math.log
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
31 matches
Mail list logo
