Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1963
Yes, but the PR is scheduled for 4.11.
On Feb 23, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Syed Mushtaq Ahmed
mailto:notificati...@github.com>> wrote:
@mike-tutkowski<https://g
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1963#discussion_r102793622
--- Diff:
engine/storage/datamotion/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/motion/StorageSystemDataMotionStrategy.java
---
@@ -711,6 +711,7
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1962
@syed Hey - I was also working on a feature like this, but related to both
XenServer and VMware (adding in VMware-specific code on the resource side). Do
you need these changes for 4.10
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1962
@syed Yes, I can include you as a reviewer for the relevant PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
This code LGTM. I reviewed the code, but don't have the ability to run
tests at the moment as I'm in the process of testing RC1 for 4.10. We have
updates to two unit tes
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
I should be able to do so over the weekend.
On Mar 10, 2017, at 11:26 AM, serg38
mailto:notificati...@github.com>> wrote:
@mike-tutkowski<https://github
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
I have run the following use cases successfully:
PS = Primary Storage
ST = Storage Tag
CO = Compute Offering
DO = Disk Offering
V = Volume
Create PS_1
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
I should have a chance to look through this later tonight. In the
meanwhile, perhaps we can re-push the code to kick off Travis again (since its
most recent run has a failure). Thanks
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994
OK, this LGTM (as long as Travis shows green before we merge). Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
following articles:
[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/MojoExecutionException
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
By the way, the message I'm responding to from Daan is actually 8 days old
(it just appeared in my inbox about 10 mins ago), so we may or may not
still be at 11 blocker bugs. :)
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> It would
dayjob stuff) going
> to try and reduce our remaining blokker issue list from 11 items to
> empty. You might find that some are actually blokkers. Or that some
> may be resolved. Please let me know if the first is true.
>
> Any one, please?
>
> thanks
> --
> Daan
>
--
split Management-server instruction from KVM in ubuntu and rhel
> instructions
>
> 5. Does HyperV require upgrade particular instruction ?
>
>
>
> Pierre-Luc
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
mpile(getattr(tokenize,
'open', open)(__file__).read().replace('\r\n', '\n'), __file__, 'exec'))"
install --record /tmp/pip-jLn1ua-record/install-record.txt
--single-version-externally-managed --compile failed with error code 1 in
/private/tmp/pip_bu
Looks like I sent this e-mail out a bit too soon. I found a solution:
sudo su - export CFLAGS=-Qunused-arguments export
CPPFLAGS=-Qunused-arguments pip install ansible exit
Then run:
sudo pip install tools/marvin/dist/Marvin-0.1.0.tar.gz
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Mike Tutkowski
; >>
> >> We need to test the upgrade instructions.
> >>
> >> Please chime in, either as a reply to this or by sending a pr to the
> >>docs.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >>
> >> -Sebastien
>
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*™*
account name of "admin" and an id of "2" (in my
case, both are correct); however, the UUID is different each time I run the
createStoragePool command.
I assume the UUID should be what's in the account table for the applicable
row, right?
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Tha
t; >>
> >> >> When I seeing once again our release schedule shift, I think we have
> no
> >> option but to move feature freeze for the next release forward.
> >> >> This is the only way it seems we can reduce the complexity of the
> total
>
t;
> Please add your thoughts/suggestions/comments.
>
>
>
> Ref:
> http://www.draconianoverlord.com/2013/09/07/no-cherry-picking.html
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJ-CpGsCpM0
>
> ~Rajani
>
>
>
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
is required from you. Your message
will be reprocessed automatically once the list owner releases the list.
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
<http://solidfire.com/soluti
n Turner
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: 30 May 2014 18:48
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] git workflow
>
> I think this flow is something we should seriously consider.
>
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks! :)
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed while executing the createStoragePool command that the following
> does not work entirely as expected:
>
> Account csAccou
Thanks, Daan
I logged the following ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6815
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> h Mike, sounds like a bug to me :)
>
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> > Any thoughts on th
> committers. I don't think we have or should have a policy on those but
> we run the risk of losing work this way and people running old
> releases won't benefit from the fixes in those forward branches.
>
> --
> Daan
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStac
feature will not transfer all IOPS from shared storage to local
>> storage (because high IOPS partition can be another high IOPS shared
>> storage) and require less money than buying new storage solution.
>>
>> What do you think ? If possible, may I write a proposal in CloudStac
with VMs which have both golden image and
> child image in NFS. The boot time of each VM is also decrease. ('cause
> golden image in SSD only reduced READ IOPS).
>
> Do you think this approach OK ?
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow
Also, give some thought in your design as to how VM migration will work.
Thanks!
On Monday, June 2, 2014, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> It is an interesting idea. If the constraints you face at your company can
> be corrected somewhat by implementing this, then you should go for it.
>
&g
've been getting them all day about my polemic wiht Marcus. All mail
> > went through though so I didn't give them my second braincel.
> >
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> > > wrote:
> >> I know it says no action is required on my pa
t rule that make the sum of
> volumes' throughput not to exceed the bandwidth between hypervisor and
> storage network SW?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Noji
>
>
> 2014-06-01 23:50 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski :
> > Thanks, Punith - this is similar to what I was going to
ose-1.3.3-py2.7.egg/nose/plugins/manager.py",
line 167, in simple
result = meth(*arg, **kw)
File
"/Library/Python/2.7/site-packages/Marvin-0.1.0-py2.7.egg/marvin/marvinPlugin.py",
line 155, in handleError
self.tcRunLogger.fatal("%s: %s: %s" %
AttributeError:
1]:
>
> http://support.citrix.com/proddocs/topic/xendesktop-rho/cds-choose-scheme-type-rho.html
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > wrote:
>
> > It is an interesting idea. If the constraints you face at your
rings.py -a tags=advanced
> --zone="zone" --hypervisor="xenserver"
>
> Thanks!
> Santhosh
>
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 3:14 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
gt; Review Board: hieulq
>
> Thanks !
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yes, please feel free to add a new Wiki page for your design.
> >
> > Here is a link to ap
s child
> vhd's parent is removed.
>
> thanks
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Hieu LE wrote:
>
>> Mike, Punith,
>>
>> Please review "Golden Primary Storage" proposal. [1]
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://cwiki
5) We need to understand how this new model impacts storage tagging, if at
all.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi Hieu,
>
> Thanks for sending a link to your proposal.
>
> Some items we should consider:
>
> 1
javac but could not parse the error.
> > Error1-javac:invalid target release:1.7
> >
> > I tried to figure out the problem but in vain. It would be great if you
> > can help me out with this issue.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Smruthi Elapavuluri
> >
>
image could be placed
(specifying a storage tag or tags for a golden primary storage probably
would not be useful).
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> 5) We need to understand how this new model impacts storage tagging, if at
> all.
es of the issues.
>
> Given that we are in release period I can not take an issue that has not
> been for more then a week serious as blocker. What can we say about the
> rest. I don't hear to much noise on the list about blockers.
> These are the most serious things we should
Jun 5, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Hieu LE wrote:
>
> > Mike, Punith,
> >
> > Please review "Golden Primary Storage" proposal. [1]
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Golden+Primary+Storage
am trying to install "DevCloud". I donwloaded the OVA, imported it to
> > VirtualBox then started the VM up. It asked me to login. I used the
> login =
> > root and thr Password= password It strangely refuses to accept this
> > combination.
> > What can be the problem ? (
6) The copy_vhd_from_secondarystorage XenServer plug-in is not used when
you're using XenServer + XS62ESP1 + XS62ESP1004. In that case, please refer
to copyTemplateToPrimaryStorage(CopyCommand) method in the
Xenserver625StorageProcessor class.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Mike Tutk
. This would require a change to your delivery
> group.
> >
> >
> Sorry but I did not use MCS or XenDesktop in my company :-)
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> &
Just heard from Seif.
It was a character-encoding issue with his keyboard.
On Friday, June 6, 2014, ilya musayev wrote:
> I'd boot it into single user mode and reset the password.
>
> On 6/5/14, 6:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>
>> Hey Edison,
>>
>> Sei
27; -
> 'CLOUDSTACK-6445: Simulator enhancements Refer FS -
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Simulator+enhancements
> '
> blame 953167808c3e9a9c40a6f7be6e16ebf32c608a4c 'Jessica Wang
> ' - 'Jessica Wang ' -
> 'BUG-ID: CS-19795: UI &
> 2. things that were reverted in the branch (8 occurs so that is a
> >>> minus 16 dropping the number under 100)
> >>>
> >>> this leaves a lot of things though.
> >>>
> >>> Please have a look in the list below or execute the commands your
gt;> Finally - what do you think you need from ASF infra to make this
> > > > happen?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's currently about 10 servers with two networks. One network
> is
> > > > > static with IPMI to PXE boot the machines. The other network is
> the
> > > > actual
> > > > > data network that CloudStack uses. That's actually just enough for
> > > > > XenServer and KVM. In order to accommodate for HyperV, Bare Metal,
> > > LXC,
> > > > > (which we do not have any test cases in the automation suits
> > currently)
> > > > we
> > > > > will need even more machines. We might be able to use nested
> > > > > virtualization for the hypervisors to maintain server count at ten
> > or a
> > > > > little more than ten but we haven't explore that yet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The CI process is up and running on those machines but because we
> > > > didn't
> > > > > have CI running on master before, automation tests that were
> passing
> > > for
> > > > > 4.3 are now broken again on 4.4. and master. I think Sudha already
> > > > > reported on the list that QA is busy trying to fix all the
> automation
> > > > tests
> > > > > to bring CI on 4.4-forward and master back to 100% pass rate.
> > > > > Unfortunately, it's been delaying our effort to put this out in
> the
> > > > public
> > > > > and let the community try this themselves.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --Alex
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So the board just approved a 3 month budget, but the new board will
> > > > > have to take up the remainder of the FY budget shortly after coming
> > > > > into office. Perhaps worth coming up with an estimate of what this
> > > > > will cost/need and getting it to president@ before that new budget
> > is
> > > > > taken up.
> > > > >
> > > > > --David
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
ebate this thread generates and then we can talk about
voting on it a bit later - if it sounds like something people are
interested in.
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
Right - we need to decide as a community what a forward branch really means.
On Monday, June 9, 2014, Koushik Das wrote:
>
> On 09-Jun-2014, at 12:56 PM, sebgoa >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Jun 8, 2014, at 7:25 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote:
> >
> >> Y
ld be
used for fixes that need to make their way into 4.4 and for fixes that do
not need to be in 4.4, but rather in 4.4.1, should such a release ever
happen.
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:23 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> > Right -
ection, showing different
> properties depending upon listed storage providers.
>
> any suggestions and feedbacks ?
>
> thanks
>
> --
> regards,
>
> punith s
> cloudbyte.com
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@s
--David
> > >
> > > Just as an additional comment.
> > > CF was using gerrit, and apparently dropped it in favor of GH Pull
> > > Requests plus automated testing with Travis-CI.
> > > I know folks like abayer and jfarrell are working on turning on
> > &
to the storage
driver when it's asked to create (or update) a volume and the storage
driver can decide what each and every key/value pair means.
What do you think about this approach?
Thanks
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi Punith,
>
> This kind of a fe
re using MCS for you golden image? What version of XD?
> > > Given
> > > > you are using pooled desktops, have you thought about using a PVS BDM
> > iso
> > > > and mount it with in your 1000 VMs? This way you can stagger reboots
> > via
> > > >
old Xen plugin
> into a XenServer specific one since Xen Project isn't currently supported,
> and files have moved. Also please ensure you don't use the term "Xen" in
> your code/docs to avoid any future confusion when the Xen Project work
> starts to materialize.
&
x27;s participation in the project and commitment to the
> project and
> >> the Apache Way.
> >>
> >> Please join me in congratulating Pierre-Luc!
> >>
> >> PS: Nice work on the documentation
> >>
> >> -Sebastien, on behalf of the CloudSt
; and also like you mentioned about exposing a new api, is it okay if i
> expose our own api in my util by extending the PlugableService like in
> network plugins ?
>
> thanks.
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wro
I plan to draw up a design document surrounding generic key/value pairs
today.
Perhaps you can take a look at it when you have time, Punith?
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi Punith,
>
> Yeah, I hear you abou
com.netapp:jndmp:jar:3.0 pom.xml
> /cloud-plugin-api-netapp line 268Maven Dependency
> Problem
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
as will I. (He is also working on another
related task not listed here.)
Feel free to join us, if you have time available, as we can divide out
coding and testing among the three of us.
Talk to you later!
Mike
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
I'll send out a [PROPOSAL] e-mail so others who may not be following this
e-mail thread have a better chance to comment on the feature.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Here is that design document I was referring to, Pun
we
would provide a nice entry dialog to make this easier in the GUI). These
key value pairs can be passed into the storage driver when it's asked to
create (or update) a volume and the storage driver can decide what each and
every key/value pair means, if anything.
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutk
;>>
> >>> (Updated June 10, 2014, 4:06 a.m.)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland, Kelven Yang, Koushik
> >>>Das, and Santhosh Edukulla.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Repository: cloudstack
Good idea
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Kelven Yang wrote:
> Maybe utilizing special java annotation would get developer heads-up?
> Content in comments text is easily skipped as it is not usually considered
> as mandatory language constructs
>
> Kelven
>
> On 6/10/14, 4:2
Yep :) This is what we talked about at CCCEU13.
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> On 06/11/2014 12:26 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please feel free to review the following proposal for 4.5:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/con
ementing @usedPrivate ?
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> > Good idea
> >
> > On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Kelven Yang wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe utilizing special java annotation would get developer heads-up?
> >> Cont
e the priorities for individual
> developers. It might be a different story if we were in a corporate
> shop and could control what folks work on, it might be a different
> story.
>
> --David
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
t; language like Java.
>
> Kelven
>
>
>
>
> On 6/11/14, 9:32 AM, "Mike Tutkowski"
> wrote:
>
> >I am not aware of any existing annotation for that purpose (not that that
> >means it doesn't necessary exist).
> >
> >Kelven - Do you know of one?
com> wrote:
> On 6/11/14, 9:36 AM, "Mike Tutkowski"
> wrote:
>
> >Yeah, I am concerned about 4.4 getting farther behind schedule, as well,
> >but I agree with David that we should not cancel it.
> >
> >I know it might be a pain, but I wonder if the RM woul
tect
> 855-OK-CLOUD (855-652-5683) x1101
> - - -
>
> *CloudOps*420 rue Guy
> Montréal QC H3J 1S6
> www.cloudops.com
> @CloudOps_
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, I am concern
t;>niche use-case.
> >>>
> >>>In fact I think that no one should alter the default prio of any issue
> >>>without discussing it on list.
> >>>
> >>>more nagging to follow,
> >>>Daan
> >>>
> >>>On Wed,
cks us from releasing. Not
> just in this stage but always. (I think I am repeating myself a tad)
> In fact I feel we must treat those 90 critical issues the same way and
> I dare not start to think about all the other bugs of lower prios.
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Mike Tutk
Thanks, Leo!
On Wednesday, June 11, 2014, Leo Simons wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> On 6/11/14, 6:36 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" > wrote:
> >Yeah, I am concerned about 4.4 getting farther behind schedule, as well,
> >but I agree with David that we should not cancel it.
>
we can club together, i can start working on this proposal for
> data disk and get the prototype ready.
> what do you think ?
>
> thanks.
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll send out a [
tion,
>
> which existing volume api are we gonna use for changing disk
> offerings(properties) dynamically ?
> since resize api will not allow unless the disk is detached !
>
> thanks.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire
would like to have an irc meeting on a weekly basis from now until
> >>> we have 4.4 out.
> >>>
> >>> agenda:
> >>>
> >>> - code quality
> >>> - blockers
> >>> - other issues (count and triaging)
> >>> - actual release
Actually, this coming Monday at that time will be hard for me to make it,
but generally speaking I should be able to attend.
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Sounds good...on cloudstack-dev?
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 201
Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> Yes. I¹ll create an annotation
>
> Kelven
>
> On 6/11/14, 9:59 AM, "Mike Tutkowski"
> wrote:
>
> >Yeah, and when a tool like Eclipse says a private variable is not in use,
> >I
> >ca
nly a problem for XenServer for the VDI to have its size
changed dynamically.
I plan to draw a flowchart for this soon. Once I do that I think it will be
easier to talk in detail.
Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> From what I un
generic key-values to drivers would eliminate tags. As
> I understand them, tags are used to establish valid combinations of drivers
> (e.g. mutual exclusion) to avoid defining an unimplementable infrastructure
> configuration. While I agree with the desire to eliminate them, I don’
let me know if you'd like more clarification on this. You can also
examine the SolidFire plug-in to get a feel for how this new field is utilized.
- Mike Tutkowski
On June 16, 2014, 1:36 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> ---
&
be like this:
if (StoragePoolType.NetworkFilesystem.toString().equals(protocoltype))
This should avoid a NullPointerException if protocoltype is ever 'null'.
- Mike Tutkowski
On June 16, 2014, 1:36 p.m., punith s wrote:
>
> --
>
> http://wilderness.apache.org/archives/cloudstack-meeting-16_06_2014-5933.html
>
> next week same time (if still needed)
> --
> Daan
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
o, i can
> block out some time in my calendar.
>
> Thanks,
> ilya
> On 6/16/14, 8:09 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
>> I can't connect to irc.freenode.net
>>
>> anybody else got problems with it?
>>
>>
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStac
code is: 503, ReasonPhrase:Service Temporarily Unavailable. for
project net.juniper.contrail:juniper-contrail-api:jar:1.0-SNAPSHOT -> [Help
1]
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses
> On June 16, 2014, 3:30 p.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> > I was curious about the resizing of the VDI to take up all of the space of
> > the SR.
> >
> > This is actually what I initially did in 4.2; however, it later dawned on
> > me that - if you want to tak
This failed twice this morning, but seems to be OK for me now.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anyone else seeing this issue when trying to build the codebase under
> either 4.4 or master?
>
> Thank
y.apache.org/index.html
>
> I'd imagine you are working from .m2 cache.
>
>
> On 17 June 2014 17:19, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
>
> > This failed twice this morning, but seems to be OK for me now.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Mike Tutkowsk
ageMgr.storagePoolHasEnoughIops, so a cluster wide primary storage
> would be allocated more volumes than its designated IOPS capacity.
>
> Is there any difference between a zone wide primary storage and a cluster
> wide primary storage except its scope?
> If it is a bug, I'll fix
Instructions for how to unsubscribe:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 9:38 PM, abhisek basu wrote:
>
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the worl
y thought. Could you review it?
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/
>
> Regards,
> Noji
>
>
> 2014-06-17 19:19 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski :
> > I can comment on the IOPS part.
> >
> > The IOPS are currently only relevant when using managed storage (which is
>
Sorry...I didn't see until later in my e-mail that you had submitted code.
It looks good to me.
Is this something you'd like checked in right away or are you planning to
add to this patch?
Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
ailable(HttpParser.java:212)
> at org.mortbay.jetty.HttpConnection.handle(HttpConnection.java:404)
> at
> org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectChannelEndPoint.run(SelectChannelEndPoint.java:410)
> at
> org.mortbay.thread.QueuedThreadPool$PoolThread.run(QueuedThreadPool.java
mail to the users list but this one looks as the better
> destination.
> >>
> >> I'm new to the CloudStack platform and I'm wondering why the platform
> >> does need the vCenter API and can not use ESXi directly,
> >>
> >> Can anyone e
Or I'd like to know if it doesn't work (as is the case for Hyper-V until I
get time to add that kind of support for it).
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> I know, for example, that I'd like to test out that managed
t expect things with the VMware Hypervisor (what they refer to
> standalone ESXi) to work out of the box. Since you can't cluster things,
> I'd expect only raw iSCSI to work, but it's been years since I've worked
> with raw ESXi.
>
> -tim
>
>
&
egards,
> Noji
>
>
>
>
> 2014-06-18 9:15 GMT-06:00 Mike Tutkowski :
> > Sorry...I didn't see until later in my e-mail that you had submitted
> code.
> >
> > It looks good to me.
> >
> > Is this something you'd like checked in right awa
;>it?
> > >>
> > >> We can delete template without any issues.
> > >>
> > >> -Sanjeev
> > >>
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Rafael Weingartner [mailto:rafaelweingart...@gmail.com
> ]
> > >>
w a flowchart for this soon. Once I do that I think it will
> be easier to talk in detail.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
>> From what I understand about the resizeVolume API, to chang
agePool, Long capacityBytes, Long
> capacityIops);
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Amit
> *CloudByte Inc.* <http://www.cloudbyte.com/>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > wrote:
>
>> I just wanted to update those wh
ith either approach.
On Friday, June 20, 2014, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Unfortunately, at the time being, the updateStoragePool API (from the
> public-facing API) only takes in bytes, IOPS, and storage tags...not
> details (createStoragePool takes in a lot more parameters...including
> deta
1501 - 1600 of 2809 matches
Mail list logo
