Congrats on 4.3 release!

The little "feature" that re-creates router vms on reboot REALLY saved us a lot of time. Cool! Thanks for your hard work and congratulations on what looks like a great release! :-) Kind regards, Remi Bergsma

Re: Congrats on 4.3 release!

t; >> On 28 Mar 2014, at 04:05, "ilya musayev" >> wrote: >> >> Remi >> >> Thanks for the friendly update. >> >> Do you mind mentioning which version do you upgrade from? >> >> Thanks >> ilya >>> On 3/27/14, 10:47 AM

Re: Return VPC ID of VM

Hi René, I just posted some screenshots on the PR that show a VM can be part of more than one VPC (mail wouldn’t allow screenshots) so please have a look at Github. Regards, Remi On 10/03/2017, 17:52, "Rene Moser" wrote: Hi I created https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1999

Re: Return VPC ID of VM

wonder how to do it but that is another story :) René On 03/11/2017 08:40 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi René, > > I just posted some screenshots on the PR that show a VM can be part of more than one VPC (mail wouldn’t allow screenshots) so please hav

Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken

Hi all, While I haven’t investigated this issue, it does sound similar to what I fixed in Cosmic (our fork) last month. This code does a down/up of the VPN connection: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py#L547-L548 We found t

Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken

trying to find a >> working configuration, but when xl2tpd is stopped, it goes down hard and >> when it comes back up it can't find the same tunnel, so the tunnel is >> dropped. >> >> I will review your config to see how you are handling this. >> >> Tha

Re: [4.10] VPN disconnected while network changes taken

will have a fix if people start to complain. :P *Will STEVENS* Lead Developer <https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: > I dont think the remote access feature is used a lot in our deploys, so I > would as

Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0

Hi Wido, When we had similar issues last year, we found that for example comparing the iptables rules one-by-one is 1000x slower than simply loading them all at once. Boris rewrote this part in our Cosmic fork, may be worth looking into this again. The PR to CloudStack was merged, but reverted

Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0

n Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > Hi Wido, > > When we had similar issues last year, we found that for example comparing > the iptables rules one-by-one is 1000x slower than simply loading them all > at once. Boris rewrote this part i

Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0

l requests. Regards. From: Remi Bergsma Sent: 03 May 2017 16:58:18 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Very slow Virtual Router provisioning with 4.9.2.0 Hi, The patches I talked about: 1) Iptables speed i

Re: [proposal] allow mac address to be specified for vm and nic creation

Hi Nathan, Great feature! I've also been in situations where we had to keep the mac adress the same. Until now hacked the DB to make it happen, so this is way better. Will see if I can test it in the coming days. Thanks, Remi _ From: Nathan Johnson mailto:njohn...@e

Re: Advise on multiple PODs network design

Hi, We solved this problem by splitting the network in an underlay and overlay network. The underlay is the physical network, including the management traffic and storage from hypervisors and such. The simpler, the better. In the overlay there’s your services layer, for example the guest networ

Re: 4.9 / 4.10 KVM + openvswitch + vpc + static nat / secondary ip on eth2?

Hi Sven, Frank, We hit this issue too last year in our CloudStack fork, and this is how we resolved it: https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloudOldRepos/cosmic-plugin-hypervisor-kvm/pull/14 Shouldn’t be too hard to port to current CloudStack, but I have no time to do it and test it. We have been

Re: [4.11] VLAN, VXLAN same bridge - Tags are not defined for physical network in the zone id=1

Hi Lucian, Not 100% sure but it looks like you have multiple physical networks with type=guest? If that’s the case, you need tags to distinguish between the two. You’d tag the physical networks, and also do that in network offerings. Then CloudStack knows which one to use. Regards, Remi On

Re: [DISCUSS] VR upgrade downtime reduction

Hi Daan, In my opinion the biggest issue is the fact that there are a lot of different code paths: VPC versus non-VPC, VPC versus redundant-VPC, etc. That's why you cannot simply switch from a single VPC to a redundant VPC for example. For SBP, we mitigated that in Cosmic by converting all non

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.0.0

Thanks Rohit, looks nice! +1 (binding) Did some basic testing, works fine so far! Remi From: Rohit Yadav Sent: 12 March 2019 07:33 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.0.0 Thanks all for testing, we need o

CLOUDSTACK-7184

Hi guys, We had some serious corruption today, described in CLOUDSTACK-7184 (XenServer specific). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7184 Some discussion/help on how to prevent these issues is appreciated. Thx! Kind Regards, Remi Bergsma

Re: CLOUDSTACK-7184

Hi Tim, No, we do not use XenServer HA. Remi On 7/25/14, 5:46 PM, "Tim Mackey" wrote: >Remi, > >Did you have the native XenServer HA enabled at the same time? > >-tim >On Jul 25, 2014 8:31 AM, "Remi Bergsma" >wrote: > >> Hi guys, >&g

Re: CLOUDSTACK-7184

gs. I'm wanting >to see why XenServer allowed a vm to start with the same disk on two >hosts. >On Jul 25, 2014 8:53 AM, "Remi Bergsma" >wrote: > >> Hi Tim, >> >> No, we do not use XenServer HA. >> >> Remi >> >> >> &

Remember this one? CLOUDSTACK-7319

Hi, This summer we had some serious issues with creating snapshots on XenServer, see CLOUDSTACK-7319 for details. Long story short, to copy the ‘dd’ command was used and that hammered dom0 until it would crash/fence. The script that did the copy at the time was vmopsSnapshot. We added two flags

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wilder Rodrigues

Congratz Wilder! Enjoy the ride :-) Sent from my iPhone > On 01 Mar 2015, at 11:14, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Wilder Rodrigues to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that he has accepted. > > Keep up the go

Re: Add virtual disk to kvm guest vm but the console fail

Hi Marcus, Are the tweaks required to use centos7 as a hypervisor documented somewhere? Does the same count for 4.6 aka master? I will be looking into centos7 with kvm soon so would be cool to know what has already be figured out :-) Thanks, Remi Sent from my iPhone On 11 Mar 2015, at 04:26,

Re: Add virtual disk to kvm guest vm but the console fail

Will have a look and give it a try, thanks. Sent from my iPhone > On 11 Mar 2015, at 08:17, Marcus wrote: > > Look at the 4.5 vote thread, hopefully it will be rolled into the release > notes. > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Remi Bergsma > wrote: >> Hi Ma

Item for ACS 4.5 release notes

Hi, It might be worth noting in the release notes of ACS 4.5 that CLOUDSTACK-7595 is resolved, as this changes behaviour. We ran into this in 4.4 already where we suddenly had timeouts that were not there before and it’s not immediately clear why that happens. job.cancel.threshold.minutes in p

Re: Item for ACS 4.5 release notes

I’m happy to learn ;-) Regards, Remi On 11 Mar 2015, at 18:49, sebgoa wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It might be worth noting in the release notes of ACS 4.5 that >> CLOUDSTACK-7595 is resolved, as this changes be

Re: Item for ACS 4.5 release notes

you want me to > revert the commits on master then? > > On Thursday 12 March 2015 03:53 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: >> Hi Sebastien, >> >> Thanks for the pointer, I’ve send pull requests to add it to 4.4 and 4.5. >> Not sure if we want to add it to master as well? C

Re: [ASK] Is it possible to sort lists in Cloudstack UI?

Hi, I almost forgot about this :-) If we can come up with something we all agree on, I can give it another try and create a pull request. In the original tread we said we didn’t want to do it on the server side. Do we still agree? We talked about sorting domain drop down lists but there’s prob

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: 4.4 for centos7

Hi, The rpm installed just fine and I was able to add the centos7 box to CloudStack 4.4.2 We do have some extra patches in our 4.4.2 version (all committed back to ACS and should become 4.4.3) but I don't think that makes any difference for this rpm. Thanks Daan! Sent from my iPhone > On 2

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request:

Hi Daan, Let's have a look tomorrow, ghxandsky refers to changes in CentOS6 package and what we deployed is CentOS7. I do agree CentOS6 should still work (we still need it as well). Regards, Remi Sent from my iPhone > On 24 Mar 2015, at 18:24, DaanHoogland wrote: > > Github user DaanHoogla

Re: Thoughts on CloudStack while starting as new VP

Congratulations Sebastien! Totally agree :-) It would really help in speeding up the release cycle and achieve high quality at the same time. We should aim for a release every month if you ask me. I know that sounds impossible now, but let's discuss with such a goal in mind and see what we can

Re: The state of IPv6 support

Hi, I recently discussed this with Funs as we want this as well. As a first step, we could build 6to4 support on the VPC. Everything behind it can then still be IPv4 while stuff is reachable over IPv6 as well. This is a first step only. In the end we need native support for IPv6 within CloudS

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rohit Yadav as new PMC member of CloudStack

Congratz Rohit, well deserved! :-) Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Mar 2015, at 09:08, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack are pleased to > announce that Rohit Yadav has accepted our invitation to join the PMC. > > Please join me in congratula

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.4.3 rc

Hi Daan, If your doing another RC, consider including the fixes to the kvmheartbeat script. There’s a final PR I just submitted to make it work reliably. We’ve tested it in our employee cloud and it works fine. Regards, Remi On 09 Apr 2015, at 11:27, Nux! wrote: > Daan, > > "33744ed658bbf2

ApacheCon talk / meetup

Hi all, If you happen to be at ApacheCon this week, it'd be cool to meet. I’m already in Austin with Funs and Daan. Just ping us! Tomorrow I'll do a talk [1] about automating CloudStack operations. Over the past year and a half at Schuberg Philis I wrote quite some handy scripts to help migrat

Upgrade 4.4.x to 4.5.x and above fails with sql error

+-----+--------+ 5 rows in set (0.01 sec) On 09 Apr 2015, at 06:00, Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/09/2015 12:26 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: Hi Daan, If your doing another RC, consider including the fix

Re: Upgrade 4.4.x to 4.5.x and above fails with sql error

15:26, Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> wrote: Hi Daan, This is probably something we want to fix in 4.4.3? If I try an upgrade from 4.4.x to 4.5 and above, then there's a SQL upgrade command failing: ERROR [c.c.u.d.ScriptRunner] (main:null) Error executing: ALT

Re: Upgrade 4.4.x to 4.5.x and above fails with sql error

I’ve just sent a PR to fix this issue in master. We do need to port it to 4.4 and 4.5 though. Regards, Remi On 13 Apr 2015, at 16:11, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Noem Rohit in de pull request. zijn bug > > On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Remi Bergsma > wrote: >> Hi, >>

KVM plugs public nic twice in non-VPC router

Hi, We’re testing KVM and noticed that a virtual router (non-VPC) gets two pubic ip nics plugged. This is in 4.4.2 when using Open vSwitch on CentOS 7 (advanced zone). The reason for this, is that the first nic gets plugged by provisioning the nic. Then, a second nic is plugged that gets the s

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.4.3 rc

re >>> KVM fixes back ported. >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:00 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: >>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 04/09/2015 12:26 PM, Rem

CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI

Hi all, In our employee cloud most of our employees have their own Domain to spin up machines. Since we have 150+ domains and the lists are unsorted, it is very hard to find the one you need. The order returned by the API is the order they were added. Without any knowledge of the CloudStack UI

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6543 Sorting the domain list in UI

cause that would remove hierarchy (as a sorting criteria). >> >> Wouldn't it be good to sort just by path? (To me sorting looks like an >> improvement, changing the format is more like a change that may cause >> problem for some.) >> >> Ch

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.2

Hi all, In the past two weeks (since 4.6.1), 23 pull [1] requests have been merged to 4.6 branch and then to master/4.7.0. Therefore it makes sense to wrap-up the 4.6 release cycle with a final release and bring all the improvements to our users. Vote e-mail below. Later today we will send anot

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

Hi all, Since our 4.6.0 release (on Nov 13th, exactly 1 month ago), we have merged 100+ pull requests [1] with lots of bug fixes, refactoring and of course new features. Time for a new release! I've created a 4.7.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and

Upgrading to 4.7.0

Hi, As we’re still working on docs/release notes a quick heads-up for those who want to try upgrades to 4.7.0RC1. The systemvm template does not need to be changed in 4.7.0, the 4.6.0 version is still valid and works fine (the changes are in systemvm.iso). Therefore, all you need to do is stop

Re: PR's and the 2 LGTM Story

Guys, I can see Daan fixed the build and am happy he cares so much about that. But I don't see why we had to do it like this, instead of reverting the PR that caused the build to fail? That's something one can do quickly without review. Now the mess is complete. A broken PR merged (can happen)

Re: PR's and the 2 LGTM Story

Guys, I can see Daan fixed the build and am happy he cares so much about that. But I don't see why we had to do it like this, instead of reverting the PR that caused the build to fail? That's something one can do quickly without review. Now the mess is complete. A broken PR merged (can happen)

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

returned recovery was automatic. We feel confident running production with Apache CloudStack 4.7 and will start doing so later today! Regards, Remi PS: The integration tests we run in the dev/test environments were also successful (the same I executed on the PRs that were merged). From: Remi

Re: CS 4.7.0 RC1: bash: /opt/cloud/bin/getRouterAlerts.sh: No such file or directory

Hi Milamber, Nice find! Yes, the 4.6 systemvm template is fine. The 4.7 systemvm.iso contains all changed files that we need. I see getRouterAlerts.sh in 4.6 but not in 4.7/master. Since I upgraded it still works for me somehow. Will need to investigate why that is. It looks like regression fr

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

Hi Rohit, Thanks for the PR. I think we will do 4.7.1 in about 2 weeks time, so that’s around the time 4.5.3 will also be there. Wouldn’t that just be fine? For now, 4.5.3 is not there yet so blocking a release based on that doesn’t seem fair to me. Let’s get the new stuff to our users (we wil

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.0

Hi all, After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.7.0 [1] *passes* with 5 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) * Wilder * Wido * Milamber * Rohit * Remi +1 (non binding) * Boris 0 * Abhinandan * Dag * Glenn -1 Raja (has been discussed, seems local test configure issue) Thanks to everyon

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.2

Hi all, After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.6.2 [1] *passes* with 4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) * Wilder * Rohit * Wido * Milamber +1 (non binding) * Boris 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hou

Re: 4.7.0 vote passed -> freeze is over

There’s an important difference between “The RM merges to release branches” and “The RM should test everything on its own and then merge”. It’s more like the latter currently. Unfortunately not many people review and test so this is not scalable. I will be offline next week only, so we should b

Re: RM wanted

I don't think we need more RMs per se. I'd rather have more people testing and reviewing the PRs. That will bring more velocity, not more RMs. Being RM now is a hell of a job because only a few people do reviews and tests and I was crazy enough to compensate for that by testing many of them mys

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

+1 If moving to Github means we can use all features without restrictions: labels, issues, editing and merging PRs, wiki, integrations, hooks etc etc. @René, I disagree with testing based on complexity. You simply cannot know the implications upfront, as that is why you run the tests. What seem

Re: Request for assistance with Xenserver

Hi Rafael, This is from my devtest environment: XS62 xe host-param-list uuid=uuid | grep software-version software-version (MRO): product_version: 6.2.0; product_version_text: 6.2; product_version_text_short: 6.2; platform_name: XCP; platform_version: 1.8.0; product_brand:

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to Github

12/19/2015 07:57 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > >> I disagree with testing based on complexity. You simply cannot know the >> implications upfront, as that is why you run the tests. What seems small, >> can break it all. >> >> Example: >> This commit seems an

Re: Request for assistance with Xenserver

t_short” entry. In those Environments, the version that >> we have to retrieve comes from “platform_version” entry. >> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Remi Bergsma >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Rafael, >>> >>> This is from my devtest environment: &

Re: Protocol to add scripts to a newer version of ACS

More things need to change at the same time. I will try to send a PR for all of it today. Regards, Remi Sent from my iPhone > On 21 Dec 2015, at 07:51, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > H Rafael, just make a PR. the 4.7.0 should serve as a proper example. > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Rafae

Re: Protocol to add scripts to a newer version of ACS

ote: > > Remi, What do you mean by 'more things'? It sounds like i would like to see > more then one PR. > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Remi Bergsma > wrote: > >> More things need to change at the same time. I will try to send a PR for >> all of i

Re: Protocol to add scripts to a newer version of ACS

Unfortunately the mirror to Github is broken. Pushed 4.7 branch hours ago but it doesn’t show up. Can only create PR if it arrives. On 21/12/15 12:05, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote: >Thank you guys, >I guess I should wait for Remi's PR. > >On Mon, Dec 21, 20

Re: Protocol to add scripts to a newer version of ACS

e as well. >> >> Will send a PR per branch. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On 21 Dec 2015, at 09:48, Daan Hoogland wrote: >> > >> > Remi, What do you mean by 'more things'? It sounds like i would like to >> see >> > more t

Upcoming releases: ACS 4.7.1 / 4.8.0

Hi all, We will freeze for new features for Apache CloudStack 4.8 on January 15th. The release is expected by the end of the month. So far we have one feature merged. Please go ahead and test/review any additional features. Bug fixes should be pointed towards 4.7 branch and will end up in both

Re: Let’s discuss database upgrades

Hoi Paul, Agree that the user perspective is important, thanks for bringing that up. Remember that the other “Stack” is far worse in upgrades, so it’s all about perspective. Having said that, I also want it to be smooth and we absolutely need it to be outside of the main repo and able to rollba

Re: Upcoming releases: ACS 4.7.1 / 4.8.0

My point was to do only 4.7.1 instead of two like we did with 4.6. Sent from my iPhone On 30 Dec 2015, at 12:26, Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: [ShapeBlue] Rohit Yadav Software Architect , ShapeBlue d: | s: +44 203 603 0540

Re: [Master] Build Failing

Hi, The Jenkins build "Build-master-slowbuild" has been failing since Dec 2. First due to 5 new findbugs issues, and indeed, since 2016 (build #2876) due to the quota unit tests. @abhi @rohit can you guys fix this asap? It is also the reason why Jenkins builds of PR #1300 and #1301 are failing

Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

Hi Andrei, Missed that mail, sorry. I created a PR that allows for longer timeouts [1]. Also, you can bump the router.aggregation.command.each.timeout global setting to say 15-30 so it will allow to boot. Next, we need to find why it takes so long in the first place. In our environment it at l

Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

increasing the > router.aggregation.command.each.timeout didn't help. I've tried setting the > value to 120 at no avail. Still fails with the same error. > > Andrei > > - Original Message - >> From: "Remi Bergsma" >> To: "dev" >>

Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout

anks > >Andrei >- Original Message - >> From: "Remi Bergsma" >> To: "dev" >> Sent: Tuesday, 5 January, 2016 05:49:05 >> Subject: Re: upgrading 4.5.2 -> 4.6.0 virtualrouter upgrade timeout > >> Hi Andrei, >> >> Did you try

Re: Minor releases!

Hi René, all, I simply don’t understand why you need lots and lots of minor versions. I do understand you need a stable cloud, and that’s exactly what we’re achieving here. We changed our way of working from 4.6 on. Before that, it took _a long_ time to release new versions (be it major, minor

Re: Minor releases!

We released: 4.6.0 4.6.1 4.6.2 4.7.0 (4.7.1) (4.8.0) We _do_ release minor releases, and every month one with new features. To be clear: Any branch (be it 4.5, 4.6, 4.7) can have as many minor releases as people want, until the end of time. Just step up and release it. Regards, Remi >We a

Re: Minor releases!

Heaven is closer than you might think. 4.7 did not require a systemvm template change, so we reused the existing one. No impact in upgrading. We need to change it only when needed, it’s that simple. A separate project and version is probably best way forward. Regards, Remi On 07/01/16 15:

Re: [4.7] account table does NOT have AUTO_INCREMENT set for id

Hi Wido, FYI: I run two 4.7 clouds and both have the AUTO_INCREMENT set properly. Regards, Remi On 08/01/16 14:31, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: >Hi, > >I've been investigating a issue with a freshly installed 4.7 CloudStack >setup and I was wondering if somebody else has seen this. > >The ta

What happened to the Jenkins CI test on PRs?

Hi, What happened to the Jenkins test on PRs? It seems PR 1287 was the last one to have both Travis CI and Jenkins. Since then, it’s only Travis CI. Why was it removed? (did I miss the mail?). Regards, Remi

Pull Requests we should include in 4.7.1 / 4.8.0

Hi all, Below is a list of the PRs I'd like to suggest for our upcoming 4.7.1/4.8.0 releases. Please help review and test these. Lots of them already had some form of tesing/review so with little effort we might be able to get them in on time. The new features listed probably take a lot more ti

Re: LTS release or not

Guys, IMHO we should pick 4.7 instead of 4.6 as it has newer features (like the Metrics UI and some more stuff). Apart from that 4.7 has had more bug fixes. These could have been merged to 4.6, but we didn’t always do that. Let’s make sure we keep doing that for 4.7, also when 4.8 is out. Apart

Re: LTS release or not

process as we release source on a given git hash. We’d then vote on the same version multiple times. Technically it works, I deployed 4.7.1-SNAPSHOT several times. Regards, Remi On 11/01/16 16:23, "Rene Moser" wrote: >Hi Remi > >On 01/11/2016 04:16 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:

Re: LTS release or not

>>> once a bug is found and a fix is available. >>> 4.6.5 will run exactly like it did before the bug was found. >>> >>> Bugs that will cause update issues will trigger a new major release. >>> If the current supported releases are 4.6.2 and 4.7.1 then

Re: LTS release or not

>Lucian > >-- >Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >Nux! >www.nux.ro > >- Original Message - >> From: "Remi Bergsma" >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Sent: Tuesday, 12 January, 2016 15:36:52 >> Subject: Re: LTS

Re: BVT Results Google Page -

Hi Raja, Jan 12/13/14 should be the same as there were no commits to master after the 11th of January. I have seen this before, some tests fail without a change. When you run them again, they might succeed. Investigating the actual errors/exceptions might show what’s going on. Regards, Remi

Re: Pull Requests we should include in 4.7.1 / 4.8.0

Update: we managed to merge 2 PRs only… Anyone able to help review and test these PRs? Regards, Remi From: Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> Date: Sunday 10 January 2016 13:23 To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" mailto:dev

Re: 200 PRs open

Glad to see some movement today! If you want to focus, see my e-mail with ~20 PRs I think should have prio to get in. Will spend some time tonight to browse through them and merge those that are ready. Regards, Remi Sent from my iPhone > On 16 Jan 2016, at 11:57, Daan Hoogland wrote: >

Re: Pull Requests we should include in 4.7.1 / 4.8.0

bug fixes https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1289 ==> Let's finally fix all the build failures due to FindBugs (since Dec 2?).. All those build failure mails every day… Pinging @Abhi to process comments. We also need reviewers. Regards, Remi From: Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schuber

Re: [PROPOSAL] LTS Release Cycle

On a certain night when a release had been cut and there was some worry about a security fix not being included. The root cause was that we cherry-picked that fix and as a result its commit hash had changed. Hence we couldn’t find it. I’d recommend using forward merging instead of back porting a

Re: [PROPOSAL] LTS Release Cycle

Hi Paul, I just hope you won’t reinvent the wheel ;-) Feel free to use what was build to test the 500+ PRs that got merged over the last couple of months to build 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8. For results see the comments in all these PRs. More info: https://github.com/schubergphilis/MCT-shared This is

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1

Hi all, I've created a 4.7.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.7.1-RC20160120T2318 Commit: 5ea07dc93799f28dd6c268b17514867d92dc53f7 Source release (checksums and signa

[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.8.0

Hi all, I've created a 4.8.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=4.8.0-RC20160120T2343 Commit: 62f218b7bd005d201d1c8516180d8e6d6797 Source release (checksums and signa

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1

r and better! >> >> Vote: +1 (binding) >> >> All integration tests succeeded and deployment on both Xen and KVM went >> fine. Currently running this release in beta! >> >> >> >> Boris Roman Schrijver >> Mission Critical Engineer >&g

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1

77s OK ``` On 20/01/16 23:27, "Remi Bergsma" wrote: >Hi all, > >I've created a 4.7.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a >vote: > >Git Branch and Commit SH: >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=clou

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1

ntil Saturday afternoon, right? I am seeing >reasonably good results so far but I need to find time to test in an >advanced zone with security groups and zone wide primary storage as we use >in Leaseweb. (tentative +1) > >On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Remi Bergsma >wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.8.0

ated companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. -Original Message- From: Re

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.8.0

>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.8.0 > >Hi Remi, > >No sorry I used the wrong email thread I'm reporting it for 4.8.0 > >Glenn > > >-Original Message- >From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] >S

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.8.0

peblue.com>| > w: www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Friday, January 22, 2016 1:34 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1

.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9251 Best Regards Tom 2016-01-20 23:27 GMT+01:00 Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>>: > Hi all, > > I've created a 4.7.1 release candidate, with the following artifacts > up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.8.0

>./package.sh --distribution centos63 >./package.sh: unrecognized option '--distribution' > >This works though: >./package.sh -d centos63 > > >-- >Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >Nux! >www.nux.ro > >- Original Message --

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.7.1

| >| 13 | 4.6.1 | 2015-12-01 00:52:11 | Complete | >| 14 | 4.7.0 | 2016-01-21 14:16:34 | Complete | >| 15 | 4.7.1 | 2016-01-21 14:16:34 | Complete | >++-+-+--+ > >Hope this help, other then that, so far so good, using xenserver 6.2.0 >S

Re: Issue with VR after upgrade to 4.6.2

Hi, We have seen this issue sometimes in the VRs from 4.6 and on. There have been several improvements in the code in 4.7. Also, setting router.aggregation.command.each.timeout global setting to 15 or 20 also may help (restart mgt server after change). @Milamber can you test this setting with

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.8.0

er ... === TestName: test_04_change_service_offerring_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok Test to destroy the router after creating a VPC ... === TestName: test_05_destroy_router_after_creating_vpc | Status : SUCCESS === ok -- Ran 41 tests in 7269.824s

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.8.0

t; Boris Roman Schrijver >> Mission Critical Engineer >> >> +31 20 7506500 >> Boeingavenue 271 >> 1119 PD Schiphol-Rijk >> >> <https://www.schubergphilis.com/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 24/01/16 19:58, &qu

Re: Issue with VR after upgrade to 4.6.2

ease note, my installation type is Advanced network without security >>> groups (vlan isolation). >>> >>>> On 24/01/2016 06:57, Remi Bergsma wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> We have seen this issue sometimes in the VRs from 4.6 and on. There &

Re: Issue with VR after upgrade to 4.6.2

;>> clean up successfully (around in 3 min). >>>> I thinks that is a timeout problem (or VR scripts performance)... but >>>> which timeout parameter? >>>> >>>>> On 24/01/2016 09:43, Milamber wrote: >>>>> Please note, my installation type

  1   2   3   4   >