st of the changes functional will be inside the Java class:
VpcVirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl
Have I missed any critical differences?
Karl Harris
Cloud Software Engineer
Sungard Availability Systems
Listed below, lifted from the CloudStack Documentation, are the
characteristics of
re, address people's
> comment, and also would keep the people involved know what's going on.
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Karl Harris >wrote:
>
> > Comments/Critiques/Additions to this list as well as implementation
> > suggestions are requested.
&g
, the Redundant VR
>>> > can be enabled only for the source nat service. I guess the mention of
>>> the
>>> > source nat router is in relation to that. I could be wrong though. It
>>> > appears that the other services like vpn, dhcp, dns do not benefit much
>>
burn any of our ships.
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Karl Harris wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> At first redundant DHCP seemed like a good idea. I did some cursory
>> research and the more I read the more I'm convinced it may be
>> more trouble than its worth for t
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> On 03 Feb 2014, at 18:03, Karl Harris wrote:
>
> > After discussion with my colleagues questions about initial
> > configuration of the open network redundant routers and the
> > applicability of the existin
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> On 03 Feb 2014, at 19:45, Karl Harris wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Daan Hoogland >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 03 Feb 2014, at 18:03, Karl Harris wrote:
> >>
> >>&g
kGuru would be a appropriate design path.
Comments?
Karl
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:58 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Karl Harris >wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Karl Harris wrote:
> Would implementing a VPC Redundant Router Network Guru using the an
> extension of the NetworkGuru interface be an appropriate way to create a
> VPC network with redundant routers. It seems that extending Network Guru
> interface
twork()), and how to program them(through
> cmdline parameter in the VR). I think the VPC implementation would face the
> same issues as well. You can take a look at current implementation and
> follow the code flow, to see if it would help you.
>
> --Sheng
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 a
sting
---
None, yet still coding
Thanks,
Karl Harris
s
> redundant or not.
>
> - daan Hoogland
>
>
> On March 5, 2014, 8:20 p.m., Karl Harris wrote:
> >
> > ---
> > This is an automatically gener
e router needs to be in the air
> twice anyway. I would not like to save data that has no use. What CRUD
> are you thinking of? Or are you maybe putting some effort into keeping
> VPC and standalone networks alligned?
>
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Karl Harris
> wrote:
&g
ed when a guest network create, update or delete
takes place.
- Karl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18795/#review36352
-------
t "designs" using the above criteria?
Karl
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Karl Harris wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> ht
the criteria you mention
> must not conflict but I think it makes sense to have a admin created
> offering override the standard algorithm.
>
> regards,
> Daan
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Karl Harris
> wrote:
> > The functional spec for Redundant Virtual Router f
Daan,
I appears your response was truncated.
Karl
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> One answer inline...
>
> mobile bilingual spell checker used
>
> Op 24 apr. 2014 16:54 schreef "Karl Harris" :
>
> > A related question i
tional private gateway network and the management
> and possibly even the public interface.
>
> maybe I was a little short on words describing this.
>
> Daan
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Karl Harris
> wrote:
> > Daan,
> >
> > I appears your response wa
console by setting the appropriate keys
similar to the console proxy.
I am asking the list if there are any other ways of testing this and
generating unit tests.
What was used in the past to test the system vm's?
Karl
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Karl Harris
I will be happy to join!
On Saturday, June 7, 2014, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> At Schuberg Philis, the urge to have virtual routers in a redundant
> way is getting to be pressing. It seems Citrix wants to move away from
> it entirely and Sungard is working on it but has to little resources
> for i
Work division
> >>
> >> - (next meeting needed?)
> >>
> >> Any additions?
> >>
> >> \DaanH
> >>
> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> >> Sent: dinsdag 10 juni 2014 1:39
> >> To: Sander
20:00 utc ;-) missed the last change in time!
Karl
On Tuesday, June 10, 2014, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Karl, That’s midnight over here! :(
>
>
>
> *\*DaanH
>
>
>
> *From:* Karl Harris [mailto:karl.har...@sungardas.com
> ]
> *Sent:* dinsdag 10 juni 2014
the state of this feature and the way to go. I
> > have no karma for ASFBot meetings so here is my excerpt from the
> transcript:
> >
> > Attendance:
> > K3KH Karl Harris
> > Yasker Sheng Yang
> > Spark404 Hugo Trippaers
> > echaz Eric Chazas
> >
What is the current framework used to test a Cloudstack Virtual Router
(SystemVM) in isolation aka without Management Server if any?
I'd like to call a SystemVM script with a set of configuration parameters
(changes for VPCVrr, etc.) and observe the changes to the virtual routers
configuration.
S
arl,
>
> Karl Harris wrote:
>
>> What is the current framework used to test a Cloudstack Virtual Router
>> (SystemVM) in isolation aka without Management Server if any?
>>
>
> AFAIK we don't have any such testing/automation framework within Apache
> CloudStack.
&g
Sorry for the duplicate questions!
Most were answered in you previous response!
Thanks Rohit!
On Tuesday, July 8, 2014, Karl Harris wrote:
> How is the unit testing accomplished for changes to the
> configuration/startup scripts? I can obviously run the scripts in a
> different Deb
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Karl,
>
>
> Karl Harris wrote:
>
>> What is the current framework used to test a Cloudstack Virtual Router
>> (SystemVM) in isolation aka without Management Server if any?
>>
>
> AFAIK we don'
Daan,
Is it safe to assume that the most of the refactoring work mentioned
(pushed) in your email is outlined in CLOUDSTACK-7143?
Karl
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> H,
>
> I just pushed a huge branch with work that my colleagues did [1]. It is
> prerequisite to adding
Here is a update of the work in support of Cloudstack-764:
The overall idea of this effort is to implement VPC Virtual Redundant
Routing and automate the unit
tests for system virtual machine for virtual routers both redundant and
non-redundant, for Cloudstack-764.
Current work areas.
Modify s
quot; and posted for review and comment.
Karl
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Karl Harris
wrote:
>
>
> Here is a update of the work in support of Cloudstack-764:
>
> The overall idea of this effort is to implement VPC Virtual Redundant
> Routing and automate the unit
>
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 3:50 AM, lsimons wrote:
> Github user lsimons commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/33#issuecomment-65199170
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Karl thanks for contributing. Looks like quite a bit of work!
>
> Rohit thanks for CC-ing m
Daan,
Good to hear from you! Hope all is well.
Yes, we should talk, but I'm afraid my schedule is such that I cannot put a
meeting on the calendar until the new year.
We have looked at the Java refactoring work. I seems most of that work was
a true refactoring in that it didn't change the interf
I started posting my initial comments in JIRA and was advised
dev@cloudstack.apache.org is the place to post/ask/communicate.
Here is a set of threads which, from this time on, will be continued on
this mailing list:
>From JIRA:
Karl
Harris<https://issues.apache.org/jira/
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daan Hoogland
Date: Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 2:51 PM
Subject: Re: rvr4vpc
To: Karl Harris
Cc: Christopher Litsinger
H Karl,
Thanks for sharing. I didn't want to initiate this but I encourage you
to share this on the dev list (not in jira) as t
Jan 15, 2014 at 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: rvr4vpc
To: Karl Harris
Cc: Christopher Litsinger
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Karl Harris
wrote:
> I found a reference here which seems to imply only Source Nat Routers can
be
> made redundant in
> guest networks.
I see, AFAIK you misinterprete
34 matches
Mail list logo
