The dnsmasq "filterwin2k" option disables SRV record requests, affecting
Kerberos, SIP, Windows KMS licensing, XMPP, and Google Talk.
This was disabled by default in dnsmasq config, but was re-added via
commit 3b75abb, which does not exactly say why.
Does anyone know why dnsmasq is configured thi
Thanks Frank, will do!
-Original Message-
From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 2:12 PM
To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CS dnsmasq DNS services - filterwin2k
>
> On 4/26/13 3:27 PM, "Dennis Lawler"
that SRV records are accessible, enabling Windows
KMS services.
Thanks,
Dennis Lawler
Every time a new VM is started up, there is a 2 second outage in DNS
services that can cause problems in guest VMs that use the router VM for
DNS.
For Cloudstack configurations using both DHCP and DNS services on the router
VM (both implemented with dnsmasq), there is currently a 2 second DNS
s
strange, because the dnsmasq man page explicitly calls out the
> SIGHUP as a way to reconfigure DHCP hosts entries from a --dhcp-hostsfile
> parameter. Or are these not the same thing?
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> w
/
Testing
---
Verified in local environment that SRV records are accessible, enabling Windows
KMS services.
Thanks,
Dennis Lawler
/dnsmasq.conf 7d656cb
patches/systemvm/debian/config/etc/vpcdnsmasq.conf 3717fc8
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10843/diff/
Testing
---
Verified in local environment that SRV records are accessible, enabling Windows
KMS services.
Thanks,
Dennis Lawler
t;
> > I think on new system VM edithosts should preemptively expire lease for
> > the passed ip and then sighup. That avoids complications in having to put
> > in separate calls to the router VM in each agent resource just to expire.
> > On May 1, 2013 9:10 AM, "Dennis Law
ae8f1ad
tools/appliance/definitions/systemvmtemplate64/postinstall.sh ae8f1ad
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10884/diff/
Testing
---
Tested in staging VM destroyed and re-instantiated with same IP.
Did not test adding dnsmasq-utils to system VM build (yet).
Thanks,
Dennis Lawler
efinitions/systemvmtemplate64/postinstall.sh ae8f1ad
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10884/diff/
Testing
---
Tested in staging VM destroyed and re-instantiated with same IP.
Did not test adding dnsmasq-utils to system VM build (yet).
Thanks,
Dennis Lawler
e script, or at least it hasn't in testing.
- Dennis
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10884/#review20025
-------
On May 2, 2013, 5:38 a.m., Dennis Lawler wrote:
>
>
mailing list, so I incorporated them with a few minor changes.
- Dennis
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10884/#review20031
---------
Still pending review:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10843/
Should to good to commit. Any takers? :)
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10884/
/dnsmasq.conf.tmpl 7d656cb
patches/systemvm/debian/config/etc/vpcdnsmasq.conf 3717fc8
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10843/diff/
Testing
---
Verified in local environment that SRV records are accessible, enabling Windows
KMS services.
Thanks,
Dennis Lawler
14 matches
Mail list logo
