---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/15349/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta.
Bugs: Cloudstack-5077.
https
Folks one final reminder I will cut the 4.3 branch tomorrow morning.
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 9:58 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ACS43] Schedule reminder : feat
I have created the branch and kicked off jenkins build job
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2013 4:16 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS43] Schedule reminder : feature fre
C0 C3 DD
D5
There are extra line breaks in the .md5 file [1]. Although I'd actually prefer
to get the process to switch to the md5sum tool's format anyway, can you
correct this formatting before we continue with the release voting?
707
Is it appropriate to add the filter in the ³CHANGES² file or just add the full
listing ?
-abhi
Animesh> For 4.2 we had added the Known Issues and Fixed Issues filter to
Release Notes. The changes file just refers to Release Notes
>
Unless there are objection to the RC, I would prefer to have it released and
make the announcement sooner and showcase in collab conference. As Chip
mentions docs were broken out separately anyway.
Animesh
On 14/11/13 8:12 pm, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote:
>Anyway we can wait
It will still take us couple of day to work on release announcement if the VOTE
passes. Can we finish up docs in that timeframe?
Thanks
Animesh
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 1:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc
ne if "Changes" is in bad shape for this release
personally, as long as the release notes are accurate.
Animesh> Yes we followed the same approach for 4.2 as I was pointed out to me
that there was a prior discussion on keeping things in release notes. I had
added link to JIRA filte
built from testing
various RCs. I just chose one and tried to upgrade it. Thanks for clearing that
up.
Animesh> So Marcus this is not a -1 then right?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> Marcus,
>
> I am trying to understand the upgrade issue that you are f
notes, yes,
I'm +1.
Animesh> Yes that should be in release notes
On a side note, we have an upgradeRouterScripts API call (in our
plugin) that just scps the new systemvm tar up to a given router and extracts
it, which allows us to avoid reboots, but we've been leary of pushing it
So I am confused looks like Nicolas was not using this feature as it was not
supported for Vmware any way so how is upgrade blocked?
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:xuefei...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:18 AM
> To: 'Chip Childers'; dev@cloudstack.apache
in 4.1 vs 4.2
>
>
> On May 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>
> > So I am confused looks like Nicolas was not using this feature as it was not
> supported for Vmware any way so how is upgrade blocked?
> >
>
> Animesh, I talked with nicola
tha Hariharan
> Critical
> Open
> >
>
> Thanks for catching that Sudha.
>
> I think most if not all of these should be fixed before it merges. We don't
> want to merge known problems into master.
[Animesh>] To identify issues early on we started testing on feature branch, so
yes these need to be addressed
50PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> >
> > On May 17, 2013, at 3:01 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Friday,
;t help but notice that we continue to have features being developed
> and proposed / merged into master while I struggle to get opinions / help on
> 4.1. I doubt that we (as a community) want to abandon 4.1, but I can't be
> certain.
[Animesh>] No we should channelize to g
iguration
> that the bug reporter has was never supported. Even with 4.2, VMWare will
> not have security group support. Since it is a non-standard configuration, it
> suggests to me that it requires bespoke upgrade support.
[Animesh>] Out of 33 issues created in last 30 days we h
t one
>
> And we couldn't have that if we had chosen in our Zone configuration an
> Advanced Network with VLAN instead of Security Groups. But we don't use
> the Security Groups feature itself.
>
> Regarding these needs what do you think is the best way for us to upgrade
Alena and I discussed with folks at Orange, their use-case can be supported in
AdvancedZone without SecurityGroup by creating account specific guest network.
Alena will look at their database to help them migrate the db
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chat
4.1,
> which is a perfectly fine release for 99% of the users out there.
>
[Animesh>] I agree we have to draw the line at some point or we can keep
tinkering to make it perfect and then some new issue will come up, we have
maintenance release to iron out issues anyway that we should leve
ay. Based on other $dayjob
> responsibilities, it may take me a couple of days.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
[Animesh>] John we are just a few days away from 4.2 feature freeze, can you
provide your comments by Friday 5/24. I would like all feature threads to be
resolved sooner so that we d
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 12:08 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 07:00:51PM +, Ani
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:41PM +, Ani
Animesh
oup
> works fine
> Wei zhou added devcloud tests and integration tests, devcloud
> test works fine.
>
>
>
> You can find more information in below bug.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-737
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Anthony
[Animesh>] That's good collaborative effort, good job Anthony, Alena, Wei
, Edison Su wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 1:26 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
ng Sangeetha!
>
> --Alex
> on behalf of the CloudStack PMC
[Animesh>] Congratulations Sangeetha
Congratualtions Venkata
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:22 PM
> To:
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Venkata Swamy
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Venkata Swamy
Congratulations Sailaja
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:21 PM
> To:
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Sailaja Mada
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Sailaja Mada t
Congratulations Wei
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 2:23 PM
> To:
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New committer: Wei Zhou
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Wei Zhou to become a c
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 1:18 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 05:50:49PM +, Animesh Chaturved
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:42 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On May 24, 2013, at 5:25 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>
> &g
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 2:54 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [MERGE]object_store branch into master
>
> On May 24, 2013, at 5:50 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>
> &g
+1
Tested with Management Sever on CentOS 6.4 and Xen
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 6:48 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've
I will attend
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 7:44 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: IRC Meeting Tomorrow? (Wednesday, May 29)
>
> Hey all,
>
> The regular scheduled time for the weekly IRC meeting is 17:00 UT
that ensures UI comes in when the feature is
working and integration tested. Please share your thoughts.
Thanks
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 10:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Baremetal and UCS UI when to check in
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:19:53PM +, Ani
wledging the likelihood that
> 4.1.0 delay will cascade into the 4.2.0 cycle. Rather than hoping we
> can absorb the impact, we embrace it early to reduce the time pressure
> on the community, reset expectations with our users, and increase the
> probability of high quality release.
>
ts on the merge of the branch, but imho those can be
> fixed after it's merged in.
>
> It's feature freeze, but it doesn't mean that we can't do any squashing
> of bugs.
>
> Other developers are also waiting on merging their stuff in after the
> freeze so
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:34 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Baremetal and UCS UI when to check in
>
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:19:53PM +, Ani
, so -1 votes are not
> vetos.
> We'd only abort the vote if we failed to get three binding +1 votes, or
> there were more -1 votes than +1 votes.
>
>
[Animesh>] Noah thanks for clarifying, can you point me to a reference which
clarifies what can/cannot be vetoed?
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 3:24 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.1.0 (fifth round)
>
> Check the by laws for the project.
[Animesh>] Thanks Chip
>
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:20 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> Hi Animesh,
>
> I know you and I talked abou
Accidently sent too soon, updated my response in-line to Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:50 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Pushback 4.2.0
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11479/
---
(Updated May 31, 2013, 12:08 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, edison su and
Pranav
Can you review the updated patch and submit if it is good to go
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
> Isaac Chiang
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 12:37 AM
> To: Pranav Saxena
> Cc: cloudstack; Isaac Ch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11327/
---
(Updated May 31, 2013, 12:41 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Sax
> On Jan. 29, 2013, 9:43 a.m., Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> > The change looks good. Could you update the patch to the latest state of
> > master?
>
> Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> Hiroaki can you update the patch to latetst master.
Any upda
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11540/
---
(Updated May 31, 2013, 12:44 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaer
en't.) Thanks!
>
> Pascal Borreli wrote:
> my original plan was to target 4.1 branch, are you sure you want me to
> rebase to master ?
>
> Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hi Pascal,
>
> Sorry, I'm still waking up! This also doesn't apply clean
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9818/
---
(Updated May 31, 2013, 1:01 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prat
Mike please start your proposal in a separate email thread.
Thanks
Animesh
On May 30, 2013, at 6:26 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> Here is my design document:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Implement+SolidFire+(storage)+plug-in+and+expose+contro
On May 30, 2013, at 1:57 PM, "John Burwell" wrote:
> All,
>
> I apologize for a lack of clarity in the original proposal, but I intended
> for 4 week extension on the feature freeze to be added onto the release and
> not encroach on the test window.
>
> Thanks
ss on your
comments.
Thanks
Animesh
On May 30, 2013, at 9:09 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I apologize for being unfamiliar with how I should have gone about getting
> consensus for the storage plug-in I developed for 4.2.
>
> I talked with Anime
Thanks Chip
Thanks
Animesh
On May 31, 2013, at 7:34 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> This thread does *not* appear to have reached a consensus. As a
> project, we typically work to achieve consensus without any sort of
> formal VOTE. However, I believe that we are going to
have to be targeted for 4.3 or beyond.
Thanks
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:00 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> Following
the release and has a risk of lowering
> the quality due to a pre-freeze rush.
>
[Animesh>] Hugo I share your concern but with this proposal all the other dates
move out by 4 weeks means. The feature proposal freeze date which was
originally at 5/04 would have been 6/1 which means we are al
+1 [binding]
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 10:32 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
>
> +1 to move feature freeze da
Vijay thanks for sharing this good news
> -Original Message-
> From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 7:13 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: netscaler jars hosted in maven central
>
> Hi,
>
> The Apache licensed netscal
Congratulations John
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 6:35 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New CloudStack PMC Member: John Burwell
>
> The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John Burwell to j
.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 12:36 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE][RESULT] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> This vote has *passed* with the following results:
>
> +1 : John, Marcus, Clayton, Ilya, Animesh, Sudha, Min, Will, Alex
Also marked the open unresolved bugs for 4.2
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 2:52 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE][RESULT] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
&g
On Jun 4, 2013, at 4:51 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> wrote:
>> Also marked the open unresolved bugs for 4.2
>
> If they didn't have a fix version, then why 4.2? What about a 4.1.x
> release or a la
ise for supporting the Apache
> CloudStack Community and choosing to donate this feature.
> >
> >
>
> First - awesome of both of you to work on this and to be interested in
> donating the work.
>
> Second - is this up publicly anywhere for review?
>
> --David
[Animesh>] David this will have to go through IP clearance right?
th release branch
> > and master if everyone agrees this is a good thing.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Unless there's something I'm missing, I can't think of any reason why
> tests would need to be frozen. I'm +1 for this. Thanks for raising it!
bugs that are not closed yet. This number is big (61 blocker, 90 critical, 171
majors) and we need to start closing these issues.
Thanks
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 4:30 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS42] Release Status Update
>
> Animesh,
>
> Couple of things :
>
> - Thinking t
Seeing this again, shouldn't jenkins just pull and compile?
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 6:06 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #1468
>
> Why is jenkins tryin
Congratulations Chip and David.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mohammad Nour El-Din [mailto:nour.moham...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:37 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Chip and David elected ASF Members
>
> Congrats ;)
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at
://s.apache.org/M5k for the current status.
Thanks
Animesh
omment if they have comments). Think of
> the outcome of the discussions as "proposals" that will be brought back
> to the list.
>
> Sorry for sounding preachy, but it's important to keep remembering that
> the list is where decisions are made... and discussions s
rogress" but simply not
> updated in Jira?
[Animesh>] That's my understanding, but it is always best to reflect the
correct status. I see that 40 issues moved from Open to Resolved without being
marked as "In Progress". I see two open issues were moved out of 4.2 last
at you are working on that item.
If for whatever reason you stop working on that item and will not attend to it
you can always mark it back as "Open".
For 4.2 I see that 40 features/ improvement tickets changed from "Open" to
"Resolved" directly. And for Bugs "509" bugs moved from "Open" to "Resolved"
directly.
Thanks
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 10:55 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Object_Store storage refactor Meeting Notes
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 05:52:01PM +, Ani
I will be off next week and will have very limited access to email.
I will have to skip the IRC meeting tomorrow because of another conflicting
meeting. I will send out my regular status email tomorrow evening
Thanks
Animesh
http://s.apache.org/M5k for the current status.
Thanks
Animesh
er, this patch is large and
> complicated. Without adequate review, we run that the risk getting it
> wrong which would be worse than not having it. If you feel it is a must
> have, you can propose extending the freeze to allow time to perform the
> review.
[Animesh>] IMO I would not
Do you have redirectPort set to 8443 in In Tomcat's server.xml connector
element which specifies port 8080
> -Original Message-
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 2:16 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: force all SSL for mgmt
>
>
Folks
Today is the feature freeze date, if you plan to get your features into 4.2 it
needs to be in master today. I will cut 4.2 branch tomorrow morning PST.
Thanks
Animesh
Yes that's the one
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 4:07 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS42] Feature Freeze reminder
>
> Hi Animesh,
>
> Just to make s
I have created 4.2 branch
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:34 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS42] Branch created
>
> Hi Animesh,
> Can you please let me know if comm
> -Original Message-
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 12:00 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [ACS42] Branch created
>
> Just want to confirm if upgrades are all enabled for 4.2??
[Anim
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:02 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [ACS42] Branch created
>
> On Jun 30, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 30, 201
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:27 PM
> To: CloudStack Dev
> Subject: changing bug severity
>
> I've noticed bugs change severity from Major->Critical->Blocker and
> vice-versa without reason. Can the bug reporte
TACK-1191 Wido den HollanderImplement RBD
snapshotting, backups and cloning
Thanks
Animesh
I see the review request https://reviews.apache.org/r/9241/ is marked as
submitted on 2/7 but don't see the changes
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 9:51 AM
> To: dev@cloudstac
visit the 4.2 Release dashboard http://s.apache.org/M5k for the current status.
Thanks
Animesh
Sudha was Swift working for 4.0 or 4.1?
Edison couldn't we use S3 API for Swift? The support is probably not
comprehensive [1][2]
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison
[2]
http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-object-storage/admin/content/configuring-openstack-obje
ware
> > >of the Swift API's stability between their releases)
> >
> > I think you get into the same situation as I did, without input from
> users who is using Swift, or the company who is supporting Swift, what
> we are talking about here is just hypothetic
http://s.apache.org/mzj and help close out resolved issues.
Thanks
Animesh
ion and we work to support new versions.
> We get the right resources in to assist, and we make it an immediate
> priority to address. If we can fix and test properly before the cut of
> 4.2, WONDERFUL! If not, then it doesn't block the release, but it goes
> out with 4.2.1 asap.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12398/#review23039
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Animesh Chaturvedi
On July 10, 2013, 2:50
> On July 11, 2013, 11:59 p.m., Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > Ship It!
Applied to master and 4.2
commitID: 0331b8fe5d2c89f91597bc7033565e1bf66bc57c
- Animesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vis
CLOUDSTACK-3229
Object_Store_Refactor - Snapshot fails due to an internal error
CLOUDSTACK-3288
[BVT] DeployVM in Affinity Group Test fails
CLOUDSTACK-3485
"When RabbitMQ plugin enabled with the simulator, simulator setup results in
Unable to schedule async job for command
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.network.UpdateNetworkServiceProviderCmd"
Thanks
Animesh
We have large number of issues (510) that are resolved but not closed yet. Here
is the list by reporter. Please review the issues and help bring them to
closure.
Abhinandan Prateek
CLOUDSTACK-2321
Fix the response of scaleVMCmd
CLOUDSTACK-3136
Support for "Ubuntu
As a community we made good progress and closed 80 issues since Thursday night
and 192 issues in last 7 days. Thank you everyone
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 11:24 PM
from
4.2
You can always visit the 4.2 Release dashboard http://s.apache.org/M5k for the
current status.
Thanks
Animesh
Yes I also got the permission by opening up Infra ticket. The turnaround was
quick too.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 3:07 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: Is it possible for reviewer to add other reviewers in the
>
proposed upgrade paths are CCP3.0.4, CCP3.0.5, CCP3.06, CCP3.0.7 to ACS4.2.
Please provide your feedback.
Thanks
Animesh
101 - 200 of 735 matches
Mail list logo
