That's my read on the proposal also but, Chris, please clarify. I don't think
the end user will see the change. It's an optimization for interfacing with
the storage backend.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September
I don't have much problem with switching to jdk1.7. My eclipse is running with
jdk1.7 as the builder and it can't find any problems in cs code. The main
question I think will come from the Linux variants. Are all of them shipping
with jdk1.7 now?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From:
+1(binding) followed release procedure and tested on devCloud.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 4:13 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Apache CloudStack 4.2.0 (fifth round)
>
>
>
I think it should be removed.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:26 AM
> To:
> Subject: Removal of cloud-plugin-netapp
>
> I remember seeing/hearing some discussion about removing the cloud-
>
I actually did a quick try to update cloudstack to use newest gson version
about 3 months back. Had to roll it back but I didn't try very hard though.
Part of the reason why I decided to rollback is due to gson is used differently
by various components in CloudStack and I didn't have time to g
Around 4.1 timeframe, Rohit added DatabaseCreator to call
DatabaseUpgradeChecker to create and upgrade the database but forgot to remove
it from the server configuration. We should simply add a DatabaseVesionChecker
for the server configuration to check if the database is at the version
expect
y
> looking
> for 4.3.0-SNAPSHOT that is put in the MANIFEST.MF in the mvn build. The
> patch I put on review board is to remove the getSuperclass() check as that
> seems to be never a good idea.
>
> Darren
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Alex Huang
>
hat is this madness? Why are there two db
> upgrade classes?
>
> Darren
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Alex Huang
> wrote:
>
> > Around 4.1 timeframe, Rohit added DatabaseCreator to call
> > DatabaseUpgradeChecker to create and upgrade the dat
Hi黑洞,
CloudStack has a few properties files with tokens within them. These tokens
are usually replace during installation of cloudstack. For developers,
replace.properties contains replacement values files for these tokens so that
after you build, cloudstack already have the proper values for
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Darren Shepherd <
> darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I can do some analysis on this. I'm always up for a terribly painful
> > refactor :)
> >
> > Darren
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4
Nice! Can't wait to look at this!
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 3:40 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Moved the systemvm to its own maven project
>
> Hey all,
>
> Just a
-
>
> (Updated Aug. 28, 2013, 7:40 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack and Alex Huang.
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> ---
>
> volatile int ++ and -- operations do not guarantee thread safety, these
So this discussion took a big turn that I did not expect. I am very strongly
against creating a "plugin" layer just to interface with VmWare. I appreciate
both the effort from Darren and Hugo and each hold some merit. I think we
should discuss this out and drive a consensus rather than spendi
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 4:23 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: VmWare SDK to vijava
>
> So this discussion took a big turn that I did not expect. I am very strongly
Agreed. If we can do it is the big question. Although, AFAIK, vijava is also
generated from the same set of wsdl. So if we can't get the license, I have to
wonder how did vijava get their BSD license?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail
Wow good guess...Hugo had me scratching my head on that oneIs Prussian some
code name for Apache legalShould I askWould it make me look stupid if I
askedall sorts of doubts going through my mind.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit.
+1 (binding)
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 10:13 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Accept the donation of a Contrail plugin into Apache
> CloudStack
>
> Hi all!
>
> As stated in
Agreed. If you look at what a release manager has to do today
- triage bugs
- follow up on reviews and ask people to commit them
- cherry-pick fixes
To me it is a lot of work for one person to do for CloudStack. We can
certainly divide up the work. For example,
- One RM is responsible for o
Using SNMP for alert notification is not a bad idea though. I don't see why we
can't do that instead of posting to the management server. This is
specifically referring to the second part of the proposal. Why reinvent that
part of it?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vi
mail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 11:07 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chiradeep Vittal; Alex Huang
> Subject: NetworkElement and other *ServiceProviders often have useless
> return values
>
> On NetworkElement and many other *ServiceProvider interfaces (ie
> DhcpS
Likitha,
This is not of value to VmWare only. We should make sure it works or has
plugin points for all of the hypervisors. In general, how we support this
today is through hypervisor capabilities to determine during orchestration and
then on the Resource for each hypervisor, it can determine
I don't really understand what purpose would this serve. Would we ever use
newer marvin against older CloudStack or vice versa? What's the benefit?
I can understand it for cloudmonkey because cloudmonkey is an admin cli tool
and reving it differently is not a bad idea. I just don't see it f
Yeah...I'm more amendable to this proposal. I just don't see tests being
separated from the source release. In fact, I see a lot of problems with
matching versions and releases.
I still question the value of separating out a framework where both ends (tests
and the server it tests) stay in th
+1 on running the BVT on it. We've been through this one once before. Should
be careful.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelven Yang [mailto:kelven.y...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2013 4:39 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [MERGE] spring-modularizati
+1. That's the way to do it with no downtime. Tighter control needs to be
formed on the VR to VR version compatibility though. It's one reason I always
support that we break VR into smaller pieces. Redundant VRs work great as
routing but then if you have to handle DHCP, DNS, Load Balancing,
m: Koushik Das
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 2:11 AM
> To:
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: Re: Command sequence logic in agent code
>
> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4944 to track
> this issue.
>
> Alex, Any reason for adding requests based
In order to use an link local address inside the end user vm, that metadata
service must be setup on every hypervisor's dom0 or it has to be proxied out of
the dom0. That's not doable for VmWare. Instead, CloudStack uses VR to serve
the data, which works for all three hypervisors.
--Alex
>
ructions that I gave in the earlier
> email
> was changes to the VR to serve metadata from the VR.
> Regardless of hypervisor, it should work.
>
> Darren
>
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Alex Huang
> wrote:
> > In order to use an link local address inside the
I'm getting this failing unit test when building with the latest from master.
Anyone working on it or know what it is already? From the stack, it looks like
it's a problem location the jdbc driver. This was working just yesterday.
Test set: com.cloud.alert.AlertControlsUnitTest
--
: failing unit tests
>
> I'll fix that.
>
> Darren
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> > I'm getting this failing unit test when building with the latest from
> > master.
> Anyone working on it or know what it is already? From the st
t; I'll fix that.
> >
> > Darren
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Alex Huang
> wrote:
> > > I'm getting this failing unit test when building with the latest
> > > from
> > master. Anyone working on it or know what it is
I can confirm the code's only there because Java didn't have it before.
--Alex
From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 11:50 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Alex Huang; Kelven Yang
Subject: Re: ifconfig and MacAddress
Hi,
I not
n NetworkElement can work with the
L2-L3 technology deployed.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 10:11 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alex Huang; Chiradeep Vittal
> Subject: Re: [MER
Hi all,
I have a chance to convince xenserver to upload their java stubs to maven so
that we don't have to keep a copy of it in ours source code. They're stuck on
the whole upload process as they've never dealt with maven before. Is there
anyone who can walk me through how to do it?
Reading
Usually problems like that goes away if you refresh your project or do a clean
on the project. Eclipse just get confused.
I never know which one helps for sure but when this gets really bad, these are
the steps I do.
Project->Turn off Build Automatically
Project->Clean
Highlight all projects ->
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Sangeetha Hariharan to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
they have accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For
developers, it makes it easier to submit chan
+1 on adding the constraints. Just make sure you add them after upgrading the
data.
Populating with id in the upgrade prevents exactly the problem you've
described. That's why we're doing it.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thu
Daan,
The other possibility is that the test is affected by another test so that it
breaks when the tests are in a certain order. Have you noticed what's the
order of the tests ran when it breaks?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com]
bject: RE: master build breaks at com.cloud.vpc.NetworkACLServiceTest
>
> Alex,
>
> Can this change out of the box? I had the problem on a clean checkout of
> master.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent:
ceTest
>
> Alex,
>
> Can this change out of the box? I had the problem on a clean checkout of
> master.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: maandag 27 mei 2013 15:55
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subj
turn(new NetworkACLItemVO());
_aclService.createNetworkACLItem(createACLItemCmd);
}
> -Original Message-
> From: Kishan Kavala
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:48 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Alex Huang
> Subject: RE: master build breaks at com.clou
t;))
> .thenReturn("one", "two");
> //is the same as:
> when(mock.someMethod("some arg"))
> .thenReturn("one")
> .thenReturn("two");
>
> Regards,
> Daan (not new to unit-tests sec but to mockito though)
Daan,
We have a procedure for doing that. The problem in general has to do with the
large capacity of the secondary storage so it's actually better to do migration
of data outside of cloudstack with some manual process in stages and then just
fix up the secondary storage in the database.
I
+1 [binding]
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2013 11:08 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Pushback 4.2.0 Feature Freeze
>
> +1 [Binding]
>
> It looks like there are a couple of last minute feature
Congrats! Well deserved!
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 6:35 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New CloudStack PMC Member: John Burwell
>
> The Apache CloudStack PMC has invited John
It should not affect tests. We want to move to mostly if not all automated
tests. If we freeze the tests that means no more testing for the release. :P
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 10:20 PM
> To: CloudS
Mike,
The Data Access Layer page[1] have the answer to this. Specifically this
particular part in the example.
// getters and setters must follow the Java
// convention of putting get/set in front of
// the field name.
public String getText() {
return text;
}
get_i
: a1a68ed0c4b722f6f83733d0b110debde2a1041e
- Alex Huang
On June 8, 2013, 9:12 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache
to resubmit
anyways, I think why not just change all of the code to use the commons.lang
version. I see no point in keeping the method in StringUtils if it's
replaceable by one in a standard library.
- Alex Huang
On June 9, 2013, 7:47 p.m., Laszlo Hornyak
Paul,
That line is old. You should follow this page.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Setting+up+CloudStack+Development+Environment
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 6:41 AM
> To: dev@clo
> Forget about eclipse for now :) just use vi :)
Why don't we just go back to ed?
--Alex
I don't know much about Jenkins. Can this be fix? It's not good to keep
getting these build errors. It hides actual errors.
Anyone know how to fix it?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 1:43 AM
> To
Ok...please resubmit.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
> Laszlo Hornyak
> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 11:48 AM
> To: cloudstack; Laszlo Hornyak; Alex Huang
> Subject: Re: Review Request: use common
Hi All,
CloudStack code have many asserts to guarantee code is written correctly for
the developers. I recently realized that since we've converted to maven, we no
longer run with assert on as developers. It is very important that we do
because it will find problems for you during load time a
I thought about this a bit yesterday after Chiradeep talked to me.
The first fix is definitely allow multiple local storage per host. That
requires some work on cloudstack but I don't see it as a big problem.
Then a storage-pool allocator can be written such that it always allocates
separate l
Congratulations Chip and Dave!
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:31 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Chip and David elected ASF Members
>
> Congratulations to Chip and David for being elected m
Soheil,
Yes there is. Look under the plugins folder for all the current plugins.
CloudStack plugins allow not only code to be inserted to add functionality but
APIs can be added to facilitate new functionalities.
I do ask everyone who are developing plugins to consider and discuss end user
esting of the server anyways because
you can easily attach for debugging purposes.
The drawback to doing it this way is that the unit tests that are ran during
the install stage do not hit asserts. (I think but haven't confirmed yet.)
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huan
Dan,
It's tough to write unit tests for engine-schema because the requirement is for
all unit tests to work without a DB so testing DB access without a DB is kinda
useless.
The tests themselves probably won't be very interesting anyways. All of the
classes are actually based off one class, Ge
Daan,
You can enable trace logging on the category
"com.cloud.utils.db.Transaction.Statement" in log4j-cloud.xml. It will log
every SQL statement sent to the DB. Look for update to the specific table,
that will give you an indication what the db layer thinks is being set. The
logs grow very
didn't think of live stock yet, but that is a good backronym as well. The
> original is latin : lectori salutem (I hope I have the inclinations right)
> meaning
> readers be greeted
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.
Hi All,
I didn't follow this thread as much so maybe it's already been discussed. If
so, let me know.
I don't see why these limits should be used as a way to do allocation. CS
already supports storage tiering through tags. Why not reuse that concept?
A use case would be.
An admin wants to u
them. I suppose I chose the one
> from secondary-storage and they all get picked up? I also see some .in files.
> No need to worry about those?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: donderdag 13 juni 2013 0:44
> To: dev@clouds
om]
> Sent: donderdag 13 juni 2013 1:08
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: help on db code wanted
>
> Ok,
>
> 2013-06-13 00:54:21,841 INFO [cloud.utils.LogUtils] (main:null) log4j
> configuration found at
> C:\Users\dhoogland\cloudstack\cloudstack\client\t
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Mike
Tutkowski to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have
accepted.
Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For
developers, it makes it easier to submit changes a
Sorry. I had to drop out due to day job as well.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 10:19 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: IRC meeting today
>
> We had about 4 of us in the meeting, so we just dropped it until next week.
Hi All,
Kelven had an emergency so I'm submitting the changes on vmsync for him. The
patch are on
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12126.
Hugo took a look and already had some questions on why so many files were
changed and added/deleted, So I like to explain a bit in this email.
As part of the
Dave,
Chip has asked this before and we also stated specifically that we won't merge
it in unless we see equivalent pass rate on the BVT as master. We're doing
that right now.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 4:34
>>>>> a reviewer to increase the probability that a feature will make a
> >>>>> particular
> >> release train.
> >>>>> Finally, it appears that reviewers are growing less and less
> >>>>> tolerant of large patches that appear just
entation and stability. Without wanting to rip open old wounds, i can
> imagine we all want to avoid a javelin incident.
> >
> > I respect the work going into this and the effort it will take to keep this
> > up
> to date with the current speed of master, but still i&#x
After Dave's complain in the vmsync [MERGE] thread about BVT in horrible shape
on master, I went around to figure out what exactly happened. The best I can
figure is that after a certain merge (I will leave out which merge as that's
not important), BVT no longer runs automatically. It was prom
> This only thing i'm a bit afraid of is the technical side of reverting a
> merge. It's
> one of those this that you need to be careful with in git.
I think this means all merges must come in as one big squashed patch. If they
come in as multiple commits or rebase, then it gets reverted automa
Given the current state of BVT, I don't think we can reliably merge this into
master. It will have to wait for 4.3. I apologize to those who really want to
see this feature in. I myself have slaved over this for some weeks, including
missing the collab conference, but I just cannot conscienti
op on the progress. If its
> functional to some extent - i.e. at least build succeeds without errors and
> major functionality is there, I can merge the code into CloudSand CS distro -
> to test it out and share it with whoever wants to try it.
>
> Thanks
> ilya
>
>
Ryan,
There's explicit code to remove those two columns. IIRC, the reason is because
asyncjob actually uses those two fields to sequence jobs on the same id and
type. So when the job is done, then it removes those two fields so it doesn't
block the next job.
--Alex
> -Original Message--
I like to remind everyone to review our coding conventions. Our coding
conventions have been going all over the place recently. Please take a look.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Coding+conventions
I also like to propose that we extend the 120 column limit to 180 column
ate for reference.
> > >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 5:08 PM
> > >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >Subject: RE: Coding Convention Reminder
> > >
>
Hi All,
Hugo showed me this really cool eclipse plugin from Atlassian which makes Jira.
It allows you to list all of the bugs assigned to you and then changes the
workspace and the files opened based on which bug you're working on. You can
also make changes to the bug itself. Very cool! Tha
these changes, I will not be asking for review requests. They're
refactoring done by Eclipse..
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2013 10:20 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [MERGE]
he
> resource is not on the include path of a javascript project"
>
> Thanks!
> Ian
>
> On 3 July 2013 07:36, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > On 07/03/2013 12:11 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> >>
> >> I like to remind everyone to review our coding conventions
>
> Consider using the simulator plugin, which will simulate hosts. You can
> follow
> the testing instructions on the Marvin testing page [1], but modify your setup
> to implement whatever number of hosts you want to test against. From
> there, you would need to modify the allocator that's ena
STACK/Automated+Tests+Rules+and+Guidelines
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 8:44 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] If BVT breaks, revert the commits...
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at
Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something that was
tried before ASF but no longer tested and used.
I'm all for coming up with this list but I don't see how this list can be
conclusive. The problem that Edison dealt with in swift su
John,
I'm concerned that object store implementations that's going into 4.2 will
repeat this fate if we don't add them into the automated test environment.
Perhaps, you, me, Edison, Prassana, and perhaps Thomas can work together about
how to add the current implementations into the regression
You might have to force a reconnection to the xenserver in order for CS to see
it. On every connection, CS checks these items and updates its database.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:14 PM
> To:
>
>
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 5:06 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 08:44:24PM +, Alex Huang wrote:
> >> Thanks Chip for starting this thread.
> >>
> >> I can at least think of the netapp plugin integration as something tha
; When you say, "force a reconnection," I'm not sure to what part of the
> system you're referring. Is this an action performed on the CloudStack side?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> > You might have to force
>
> I agree with your points above, but think that we need to take this step by
> step. Let's figure out what code isn't actually in shape, based on historical
> understanding first. We then at least have a target to ask the next question:
> what's covered by testing (automated or manual) for ea
n maintenance mode to evacuate the VM,
> when you cancel maintenance mode for the primary storage, CS will get the
> new size of the primary storage.
>
>
> Anthony
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July
Dave,
It also has to be with native swift API. It can't be exposing S3 API or their
own API but using swift in the back end.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 7:45 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sw
Hi All,
I added the branch and git commit id to the war file. You can find it by
opening the war file and retrieving the META-INF/MANIFEST.MF. Inside, there is
a Implementation-Revision which contains the git commit id and a
Implementation-Branch which contains the branch.
We should add the
Branch: UNKNOWN_BRANCH
> > Archiver-Version: Plexus Archiver
> >
> > --David
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Chip Childers
> > wrote:
> >> Is it off by default?
> >>
> >> Our releases aren't from git.
> >&g
m: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 6:53 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adding git commit ids to our packaging...
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:48:12AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Alex Huang
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 7:25 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Edison Su
> Subject: Re: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in
> 4.2?
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 07:08:41PM
Chris,
You should be able to just create the command instances yourself and feed it to
the service class. It does not require the handler.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 7:36 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc:
Donal,
Our coding convention says 180. It was discussed about a week or two back.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Coding+conventions
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:02 AM
> To:
Chris,
If it is then it was written wrong. You can change it to public and send in a
patch.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: SuichII, Christopher [mailto:chris.su...@netapp.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 9:23 PM
> To:
> Cc: Alex Huang; Chiradeep Vittal; Min Che
s are already
using it.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 7:26 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [discuss] 80 char max length leads to illegiable source
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 201
Windows->Preferences
Java->Formatter
Click on Edit in Active Profiles
Line Wrapping tab
Look for 'enum' declaration->Constants
Select Wrap all elements, every element on a new line in the "Line Wrapping
policy:" drop down
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.ho
com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: code formatting for enums
>
> thanks,
> it doesn't correct back to the one per line format, but at least it doesn't
> garble the enum when right anymore.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4
1 - 100 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
