[VOTE] CloudStack Project Blog Migration

2023-05-17 Thread Rohit Yadav
All, The ASF-infra had announced a hard deadline [0][1] to decommission our project’s Roller based blog [3] on the 31st May 2023. For the blog migration, ASF-infra has exported CloudStack blog posts from the current Roller’s database-backed infra to markdown files. These were put together in clou

Re: [VOTE] CloudStack Project Blog Migration

2023-05-17 Thread Ivet Petrova
+1 from me Sent from my iPhone > On 17 May 2023, at 9:58, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > All, > > The ASF-infra had announced a hard deadline [0][1] to decommission our > project’s Roller based blog [3] on the 31st May 2023. > > For the blog migration, ASF-infra has exported CloudStack blog post

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
-0 Joao, Daniel reacted negatively to my question to create a proxy with bad arguments and I had no time to respond yet. I think not adding a proxy at this time is a missed opportunity and I would full heartedly +1 if we had. Not creating a proxy class (with or without configurability) is a waste

Re: ACS upgrade to Log4J2 version 2.19

2023-05-17 Thread Daan Hoogland
Daniel, comparing a dependency injection framework (or any larger framework) with a utility for something like logging is a false one. such a framework is implying design to a large part. The most complicated aspect of logging is its cross-cutting quality. I see this as a non-discussion and we shou

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade Log4j to Log4j2

2023-05-17 Thread Rodrigo D. Lopez
Thanks for the great work! Based on discussions in PR and the discussion thread[1]. My vote is +1. Log4j v1 (deprecated) and its current alternative reload4j in use in ACS are not ideal for the long run. Therefore, for the future of ACS, and to enable us to keep evolving, the upgrade is most welc