-0 Joao, Daniel reacted negatively to my question to create a proxy with bad arguments and I had no time to respond yet. I think not adding a proxy at this time is a missed opportunity and I would full heartedly +1 if we had. Not creating a proxy class (with or without configurability) is a waste of your effort. All the standardisation of calls is very useful irrespective.
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 8:45 PM Daniel Salvador <gutoveron...@apache.org> wrote: > Hello, João > > Considering the discussion we had in the thread[1] and that the conflicts > will be mostly regarding loggers names (which is simple to fix), I am +1 on > the proposal. > > Best regards, > Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi) > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/261j7m0p5mr4q7yclvo49mwhkxz4yov2 > > On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 1:28 PM João Jandre Paraquetti < > j...@scclouds.com.br> > wrote: > > > Hello guys, > > > > I am opening this voting thread as result of the discussion in thread > > "ACS upgrade to Log4J2 version 2.19"[1]. > > > > The voting aims to continue the efforts and conclude the upgrade of the > > ACS logging library to Log4j2 through PR 7131[2]; merge the PR as soon > > as possible and provide ways to contributors solve the conflicts easily, > > so all the contributors have time to fix their merge conflicts before > > 4.19; announce that change in the release notes and provide ways to > > users upgrade their customization made to the default log4j > > configuration files. > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate > > "(binding)" with their vote? > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > Best regards, > > João Jandre (JoaoJandre) > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/261j7m0p5mr4q7yclvo49mwhkxz4yov2 > > [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131 > > > > > -- Daan
