Ok...so bear with me on this one.
"Hypervisor" was a little white lie. What I actually want to do is
implement OpenStack as a backend for CloudStack (yo dawg, I hear you like
cloud in your clouds, etc). I know I can use KVM and OVS as backends for
CloudStack natively but, as I said, this is for
Cool, I like it ;-)
I can already hear the slogan in my head "CloudStack - making
OpenStack great again" :-p
Can't help you with the your actual questions, but best of luck :-)
--
Erik
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:57 PM, John Smith wrote:
> Ok...so bear with me on this one.
>
> "Hypervisor" was
John, I never implemented one but I am about to investigate the ovm3 one to see
if I can maintain it for a customer. I know the guy that wrote it and he says
it’s fairly simple given the constraint of a hypervisor plugin, so I’d have a
look at that one if I where you.
Important thing to conside
Hi,
Yesterday at ApacheCon Kris from Nuage networks gave a great presentation about
alternatives for userdata from the VR: Config Drive
In short, a CD-ROM/ISO attached to the Instance containing the meta/userdata
instead of having the VR serve it.
The outstanding PR [0] uses it's own format on
Hi Widoo,
That sounds like a pretty good idea in my opinion. +1 for adding it
Marco
> On 19 May 2017, at 15:15, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday at ApacheCon Kris from Nuage networks gave a great presentation
> about alternatives for userdata from the VR: Config Drive
>
> In
This seems a very interesting idea.
+1
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier
wrote:
> Hi Widoo,
>
> That sounds like a pretty good idea in my opinion. +1 for adding it
>
> Marco
>
>
> > On 19 May 2017, at 15:15, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday at ApacheCo
+1
Simon Weller/615-312-6068
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Weingärtner [rafaelweingart...@gmail.com]
Received: Friday, 19 May 2017, 11:24AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudstack.apache.org]
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Config Drive: Using the OpenStack format?
This seems a very inter
Awesome
We ll explore the symlink approach and document a suggested approach in the
design spec for review and upon consensus update the PR.
Thanks Wido!
Kris
On May 19, 2017 11:42, "Simon Weller" wrote:
> +1
>
> Simon Weller/615-312-6068
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael Weingärt
gd idea
2017-05-19 15:33 GMT+02:00 Marc-Aurèle Brothier :
> Hi Widoo,
>
> That sounds like a pretty good idea in my opinion. +1 for adding it
>
> Marco
>
>
> > On 19 May 2017, at 15:15, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday at ApacheCon Kris from Nuage networks gave a great
I wonder how you plan to present the OpenStack environment to CloudStack; a
huge host with lots of resources? Or, do you intend to present all of the
clusters and hosts that the OpenStack system may have?
I think you would be better with a direct attach solution; meaning,
CloudStack calling dire
+1. I like it!
On 5/19/17, 11:58 AM, "Wei ZHOU" wrote:
gd idea
2017-05-19 15:33 GMT+02:00 Marc-Aurèle Brothier :
> Hi Widoo,
>
> That sounds like a pretty good idea in my opinion. +1 for adding it
>
> Marco
>
>
> > On 19 May 2017, at 15:15,
I have a similar question. I want to use VirtualBox for a project that I
have. And to the best of my knowledge, cloudstack doesn't support type II
hypervisors like VirtualBox. What should I do to support VirtualBox in
CloudStack.
Regards,
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Simon Weller
wrote:
> W
FYI
Slides are here :
https://www.slideshare.net/2000monkeys/apache-cloudstack-collab-miami-user-data-alternatives-to-the-vr
Thanks
- Kris
On 19 May 2017 at 12:58, Wei ZHOU wrote:
> gd idea
>
> 2017-05-19 15:33 GMT+02:00 Marc-Aurèle Brothier :
>
> > Hi Widoo,
> >
> > That sounds like a pr
13 matches
Mail list logo
