+1. I like it!
On 5/19/17, 11:58 AM, "Wei ZHOU" <ustcweiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
gooood idea
2017-05-19 15:33 GMT+02:00 Marc-Aurèle Brothier <ma...@exoscale.ch>:
> Hi Widoo,
>
> That sounds like a pretty good idea in my opinion. +1 for adding it
>
> Marco
>
>
> > On 19 May 2017, at 15:15, Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Yesterday at ApacheCon Kris from Nuage networks gave a great
> presentation about alternatives for userdata from the VR: Config Drive
> >
> > In short, a CD-ROM/ISO attached to the Instance containing the
> meta/userdata instead of having the VR serve it.
> >
> > The outstanding PR [0] uses it's own format on the ISO while cloud-init
> already has support for config drive [1].
> >
> > This format uses 'openstack' in the name, but it seems to be in
> cloud-init natively and well supported.
> >
> > I started the discussion yesterday during the talk and thought to take
> it to the list.
> >
> > My opinion is that we should use the OpenStack format for the config
> drive:
> >
> > - It's already in cloud-init
> > - Easier to templates to be used on CloudStack
> > - Easier adoption
> >
> > We can always write a file like "GENERATED_BY_APACHE_CLOUDSTACK" or
> something on the ISO.
> >
> > We can also symlink the 'openstack' directory to a directory called
> 'cloudstack' on the ISO.
> >
> > Does anybody else have a opinion on this one?
> >
> > Wido
> >
> > [0]: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2097
> > [1]: http://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/
> datasources/configdrive.html#version-2
>
>
