Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1939
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-483
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1939
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1939
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1934
@remibergsma Good point, I was aware of that difference, which I think
doesn't help to make systems reliable.
Another improvement would be to remove this function and refactor the code
to
Github user kishankavala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1939
LGTM
API response:
admin
8c91c04e-f282-11e6-8a09-d4ae52cb9a54
8c91ab6a-f282-11e6-8a09-d4ae52cb9a54
ROOT
a6401f5b-b090-4a64-9d73-c04369d15ca8
VM
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1794
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1244
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1885#discussion_r100985099
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/network/IpAddressManagerImpl.java ---
@@ -460,6 +460,12 @@ boolean checkIfIpAssocRequired(Network network,
boolean postA
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1818
@ustcweizhou in the above snippet, its adding the zoneid if its not
cross-zone. if no zoneid is provided, it will default to -1 which means cross
zone. So, this check is required.
This fix
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1882
unused class is removed. needs BVT
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1881
configuration cleanup. needs BVT
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1818
@karuturi in my understanding, the zoneid is not necessary if template is
not cross-zone.
If template is cross-zone, the zoneid should be passed if template is
deleted from the 'Zones' t
GitHub user jayantpatil1234 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1940
CLOUDSTACK-9781:ACS records ID in events tables instead of UUID.
ISSUE
=
Wrong presentation of volume id in ASC events.
While creating a snapshot, only volume ID is menti
Github user serbaut commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1919
The VPC VR maintains metadata
(http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.8/virtual_machines/user-data.html)
as static files in /var/www/html/metadata. When a VR i
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1940
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1940
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1919
I agree with @serbaut , different from password which is applied to VR only
once, the public keys should be set in VR each time when we recreate a VR.
this LGTM+1
---
If your proje
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1940
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-484
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1940
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1940
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Hi all,
Many people in the CS community maintain forks of CloudStack, and might
have implemented features or bug fixes long before they get into mainline.
I'm curious as to how people handle database migrations with their forks.
To make a DB migration, the CS version must be updated. If a develope
Then you have to create your own branch forked from 4.10.0
In our branch, I moved some table changes (eg ALTER TABLE, CREATE TABLE)
from schema-.sql
to engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/UpgradeXXXtoYYY.java.
If SQLException is throwed, then show a warning message instead upgrade
interrup
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
@deepthimachiraju remember that you need a new system vm built from this PR
for this functionality to work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-485
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
It has required LGTMs and tests. I am merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov unsupported parameters provided. Supported mgmt server os
are: `centos6, centos7, ubuntu`. Supported hypervisors are: `kvm-centos6,
kvm-centos7, kvm-ubuntu, xenserver-65sp1,
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-65sp1)
has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user rashmidixit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1855
@sadhugit I have updated the bug description based on your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user rashmidixit commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1884
@rhtyd Thanks for the update.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1919
Thanks for the explanation @serbaut. That is exactly why I asked; so, it is
not a reboot/restart per se. It is a re-deploy; the old virtual machine is
destroyed and a new one is deploy
Github user swill commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1907#discussion_r101062037
--- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/cs/CsAddress.py ---
@@ -659,7 +663,10 @@ def is_guest_gateway(self, bag, ip):
gw = inte
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@nvazquez, this helped.
I checked the âVmwareResource.javaâ at line 5113 is obtained the CPU
usage of VM. From @jayakarteek explanations I understood that the usage does
n
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1939
Trillian test result (tid-818)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33181 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1758
ping @rajesh-battala @karuturi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1771
ping @karuturi @sateesh-chodapuneedi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1786
ping @sateesh-chodapuneedi @rajesh-battala @karuturi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1792
ping @sateesh-chodapuneedi @karuturi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Hi,
Anyone know why I might be getting this exception starting up the management
server (with master)?
java.lang.Exception: Timeout scanning annotations
at
org.eclipse.jetty.annotations.AnnotationConfiguration.scanForAnnotations(AnnotationConfiguration.java:578)
at
org.eclipse.jetty.an
In case this happens to anyone else, here is how I solved it (maxWait
parameter):
mvn –pl client jetty:run –Dnoredist –Dorg.eclipse.jetty.annotations.maxWait=240
On 2/14/17, 1:20 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
Hi,
Anyone know why I might be getting this exception starting up the
ma
It's been happening to me recently as well Mike. I think there was some
commit after which the management server takes way too long to start
spending time scanning annotations.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
wrote:
> In case this happens to anyone else, here is how I solved it
Hi,
I’m getting a NullPointerException when trying to create a zone using master.
Below is the relevant code in ConfigurationManagerImpl.
In the else block, network.getCidr() returns null and NetUtil.getCidrNetmask
then throws a NullPointerException.
I noticed that network.getGateway() also re
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1928
Thanks @rhtyd for the review. I've moved it to the schema4920to4930.sql
file. @karuturi Can we also push this for 4.10?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
I'd like to include https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1928 to 4.10
as well. This is a simple fix that adds hypervisor capabilities for
XenServer 7
Thanks,
-Syed
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Will Stevens
wrote:
> Not sure, I will see if I can find some time tomorrow to look at this.
By the way, this is for a Basic Zone.
On 2/14/17, 2:44 PM, "Tutkowski, Mike" wrote:
Hi,
I’m getting a NullPointerException when trying to create a zone using
master.
Below is the relevant code in ConfigurationManagerImpl.
In the else block, network.getCidr() retur
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
Trillian test result (tid-821)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 38820 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoran
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/25
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
I’m not very familiar with the networking code that’s failing, but I worked
around it with these changes:
https://github.com/mike-tutkowski/cloudstack/commit/834b7ea7df18f278cbc9eb1bfaa9578fad2debeb
I’m not sure if those are viable changes in this case, but perhaps someone who
works in the netw
Also, for any CloudStack networking person out there who is curious about this,
I see the following in cloud.log for my SSVM:
Wed Feb 15 01:07:50 UTC 2017 Incompleted parameters STORAGE_IP:,
STORAGE_NETMASK:, STORAGE_CIDR:. Cannot setup storage network
Wed Feb 15 01:07:50 UTC 2017 Not setting up
If it helps in debugging, I typically assign 10.117.40.20 - 10.117.40.25 for
Management IPs and 10.117.40.26 - 10.117.40.99 for Guest IPs.
On the network in my lab, I am assigned the following range (by our IT people):
10.117.40.0 /25 (10.117.40.0 - 10.117.40.127)
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.128
G
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@rafaelweingartner sorry for the last example, actually I think we've found
a bug on change service offering, as I've been using that instance for changing
its service offering when it had vm s
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@rafaelweingartner please ommit my last comment, service offering didn't
use reserve CPU, so it didn't limit CPU speed to 500Mhz, it used all the
available frecuency of the CPU instead.
---
I
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1865
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 321
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=104
Failed=0
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (sear
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1867
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 322
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=1
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1868
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 323
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=104
Failed=0
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/843
Rebased against master. This PR changes are for basic zone. CI runs test
cases for advanced zone.
So tested manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1900
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 324
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=1
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user jayapalu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1252
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 327
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=1
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (searc
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872
PR#1741 is closed. So closed this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1246
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 328
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=1
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (sear
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1838
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 336
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=104
Failed=0
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (sear
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1939
merging
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1939
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/858
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/865
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 340
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=103
Failed=1
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder (search
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
LGTM. @karuturi this can be merged.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabl
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
@anshul1886 can you retarget this PR for 4.9? Also rebase against 4.9, fix
conflicts thanks. /cc @karuturi @syed @koushik-das
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
Thanks @swill @jayapalu for the work. I'll build a new systemvmtemplate to
use with upcoming Trilian tests on master/4.10+.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1928
@syed simply moving this to a file is not enough. Please see
Upgrade4910to4920.java and the class usage to see how upgrade paths are
implemented. We'll need a Upgrade4920to4930 upgrade path, after
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1741
thank you sir. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
@karuturi @rhtyd @syed PR #1829 is subset of this PR i.e. that contains
the same fix as one commit of this PR. How to proceed with that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
@anshul1886 I would suggest, if your PR already has @syed 's fix along with
other useful fixes -- please rebase against 4.9, fix the conflicts and we can
help review/test your PR if you've time/ban
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-486
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1836
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
Resolving conflicts and rebasing the PR against 4.9
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
Thanks @anshul1886 kindly also squash your changes and fix the commit
message/jira id etc
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
GitHub user anshul1886 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1941
CLOUDSTACK-8663: Fixed various issues to allow VM snapshots and volume
snapshots to exist together
Reverting VM to disk only snapshot in Xenserver corrupts VM
Stale NFS seco
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
@rhtyd @karuturi @syed Raised #1941 against 4.9.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
@rhtyd @karuturi Should I close this PR then?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Probably related to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1927
On 02/14/2017 10:44 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m getting a NullPointerException when trying to create a zone using master.
>
> Below is the relevant code in ConfigurationManagerImpl.
>
> In the else block, network.
Thanks for pointing this out.
I can incorporate those changes in the morning and see if it does the trick.
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 12:50 AM, Rene Moser wrote:
>
> Probably related to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1927
>
>
>
>> On 02/14/2017 10:44 PM, Tutkowski, Mike wrote:
>> Hi,
>
90 matches
Mail list logo
