Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
@yvsubhash I did not mean we need clean up the snapshots.
in my understanding, if the volume has snapshots left, it is Expunged, but
not marked as Removed
your change just delete one
GitHub user pdumbre opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1833
BUG-ID:CLOUDSTACK-9678
listNetworkOfferings API is listing all the offerings which has same prefix
in their name
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pu
Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
@ustcweizhou In case of volume snapsnots, volume gets set to removed
irrespective of the presence of snapshots. I have verified the same just now
and I am only removing volume not any of the
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
@yvsubhash so, the question is , in what condition the volume is Expunged
but not removed ? if it does not happen, then the change from line 2211 to 2215
is not needed.
however, to be ho
Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
@ustcweizhou As I understand, Volume goes to Expunged state when it is
removed from primary and gets removed when it is removed from secondary
storage. line 2211 to 2215 is to handle specific
Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1725
@rhtyd Can you please merge this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user dsclose commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519
@murali-reddy I haven't worked on Cloudstack for many months but one thing
I do recall; without d582358 and bf285e1, networks with redundant virtual
routers will simply not work.
Whethe
Github user dsclose closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
@yvsubhash yes, you are right, it is 'download links', not 'volume
snapshots'. I made changes on this long time ago and almost forgot how it works.
so, my question is, should we 'Rem
Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1726
@ustcweizhou thats good point. It should be removed after all download
links expire. I will address this case
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1833
Why this is a bug? Most of ACS searches using name field work exactly this
way to bring list of VMs, templates etc when partial name is specified. If
exact name match is expected it needs to be p
GitHub user pdumbre opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1834
CLOUDSTACK-9679:Allow master user to manage subordinate user uploadedâ¦
⦠template
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/Accele
All,
After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.9.1.0 [1] *passes* with 3
PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
3 person (Bruno, Wido, Rohit)
+1 (non binding)
1 person (Murali)
0
none
-1
none
Thanks to everyone participating.
I will now prepare the release announcement to go ou
All,
Given the upcoming holidays, and missed set dates for 4.10.0.0-rc1, we'll be
unfreezing the master branches to accept few more bugfixes and feature PRs.
I will work with the community towards reviewing, testing and merging few
useful PRs such as support for XenServer7, the strongswan PR,
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Checked mostr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Trillian test result (tid-686)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 31480 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Trillian test result (tid-687)
Environment: vmware-65 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32652 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueorangutan/
It seems we have consistently more failures in 4.9 and 4.10 than few weeks ago
e.g. In templates, dhcphosts, list_ids
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Trillian test result (tid-688)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 38915 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
XenServer 7 support would be an amazing Holiday present.. :)
Regards,
Marty Godsey
Principal Engineer
nSource Solutions, LLC
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2016 10:30 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: 4.8.2.0
22 matches
Mail list logo
