Hi Will,
I little while back I created a matrix to attempt to keep track of the tests
and their status.
Various other projects have stopped me getting to the stage where I could start
putting anything in...
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+Test+Matrix
Kind rega
Github user cloudsadhu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1458#issuecomment-213686569
Thanks Swill and now All the checks are passed.Please merge this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1489#issuecomment-213693730
I did some basic tests yesterday. Some comments based on that. Will do some
more testing next week.
- I see that commands.properties is removed altogether an
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-213701028
Ok, leave this PR open or closed?
Keep in mind, the API of both packages is rather similar. Just the
connection creating is different. Atferwards it is getting
> Op 22 april 2016 om 18:02 schreef Sebastien Goasguen :
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been quite silent this past few weeks because aside from voting in a
> new VP (soon to be announced), I have been hard at work for my new endeavors
> with Skippbox.
>
> I am quite excited that today we could
Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r60825819
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/ConfigureOutOfBandManagementCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+// Licensed t
Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#discussion_r60825823
--- Diff:
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/outofbandmanagement/ConfigureOutOfBandManagementCmd.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+// Licensed t
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1502#issuecomment-213702911
I added a few comments, but before I continue:
- Why assume a IP-Address and not a hostname OR IP? I know enough IPMIs why
are available through a DNS hostname
Nice site, Go skipbox
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Madan Ganesh Velayudham <
madangan...@actonmagic.com> wrote:
> +1 Sebastien; This is a great add to CloudStack.
>
> Congratulations to Skippbox and Shapeblue for this milestone.
>
> Would love to give it a real try to embrace it in AoC.
>
>
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#discussion_r60826329
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/capacity/dao/CapacityDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -962,35 +962,58 @@ public boolean removeBy(Short capacityType, Long
z
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#discussion_r60826448
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/capacity/dao/CapacityDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -962,35 +962,58 @@ public boolean removeBy(Short capacityType, Long
z
My local builds (Centos6 on VMware Workstation) run happily using 4 cores.
The speed itself is down to my overclocked processor, but still, it runs stably
on 4 cores running at 25% over there stock speed.
mvn -T 4.0C -Dnoredist install
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
[INFO]
Thanks for the reports guys. :)
On Apr 23, 2016 7:22 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote:
> My local builds (Centos6 on VMware Workstation) run happily using 4 cores.
> The speed itself is down to my overclocked processor, but still, it runs
> stably on 4 cores running at 25% over there stock speed.
>
> mvn -
I plan to do quite a bit of work on this front over the next couple weeks
in prep for the RC next month. I am also trying to push the idea of
distributed CI and I feel that stabilizing and improving the state of our
tests is a big piece of that.
On Apr 23, 2016 3:17 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote:
> Hi W
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1054#issuecomment-213728252
Let's leave this open for now. I want to understand what is needed to fix
this project wide.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Ok ok, point made, we can buy you new hardware Will ;)
On Saturday, 23 April 2016, Will Stevens wrote:
> Thanks for the reports guys. :)
> On Apr 23, 2016 7:22 AM, "Paul Angus" > wrote:
>
> > My local builds (Centos6 on VMware Workstation) run happily using 4
> cores.
> > The speed itself is do
Great stuff Seb, Skippbox and ShapeBlue! Look forward to tire kicking...
On Friday, 22 April 2016, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been quite silent this past few weeks because aside from voting in
> a new VP (soon to be announced), I have been hard at work for my new
> endeavo
Fx"dxxxffzxzsd
Em 21 de abr de 2016 07:10, "jayapalu" escreveu:
> Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1255#issuecomment-212842613
>
> @kansal Can you please complete the localisation changes.
>
>
> ---
> If your project is set
Haha. Awesome. :)
This was more to validate that it was OK that I configure parallelism in my
CI environment.
On Apr 23, 2016 9:34 AM, "Ian Rae" wrote:
> Ok ok, point made, we can buy you new hardware Will ;)
>
> On Saturday, 23 April 2016, Will Stevens wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the reports guys.
No Will, it was to prove you need extra hardware!
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Will Stevens
wrote:
> Haha. Awesome. :)
>
> This was more to validate that it was OK that I configure parallelism in my
> CI environment.
> On Apr 23, 2016 9:34 AM, "Ian Rae" wrote:
>
> > Ok ok, point made, we ca
I'll collect that $5 when i come over Will. 😉
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: 23 Apr 2016 15:02
To: dev
Subject: Re: Multithreaded Builds
No Will, it was to prove you need extra hardware!
On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Will Stevens
wrote:
> Haha. Awesome. :)
>
> This was more to validate that i
Extra hardware is always welcome. :)
Now to automate a bubble run from end to end based on a queue of PRs (which
I definitely have).
Last night I built a marvin result parser that integrates with upr to
automate posting back bubble results automatically. I have a couple loose
ends to finish up, t
I will buy you a beer. :P
On Apr 23, 2016 10:08 AM, "Paul Angus" wrote:
> I'll collect that $5 when i come over Will. 😉
>
>
>
> From: Daan Hoogland
> Sent: 23 Apr 2016 15:02
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Multithreaded Builds
>
> No Will, it was to prove you need extra hardware!
>
> On Sat, Apr 23, 20
Github user pdube commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1477#issuecomment-213822378
LGTM. Do you think we should translate this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1516#issuecomment-213825554
regression suite passed:
[1516.results.network.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/233136/1516.results.network.txt)
[1516.results.vpc_
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1436#issuecomment-213841009
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 9
Skipped: 0
Failed: 0
Errors: 2
```
**Summary of the problem(s):**
```
ER
Github user swill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1436#issuecomment-213841496
Please review the details of the CI run. I am using a KVM
[bubble](https://github.com/MissionCriticalCloud/bubble-toolkit) to test this
and I have not tried to manua
Github user dmabry commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1500#issuecomment-213853837
I made all requested changes. I'm going to run a full bubble CI test
against this PR and I will post the results.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
28 matches
Mail list logo
