Github user milamberspace commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1217#issuecomment-164242640
@remibergsma Probably yes, no more update on Transifex since the Dutch. You
can merge this just before the start of RC process. Thanks.
---
If your project
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164243359
@agneya2001 looks good, I don't understand all of it yet, partly because
this is rather new functionality. Any plans on integration tests?
I'll add som
Github user agneya2001 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164243999
@DaanHoogland This does have a smoke test here:
test/integration/smoke/test_quota.py. This is very basic, will add more test
scenarios to it.
---
If your pro
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164244364
Thanks abhi, I will run it after the regular suite passes and add it to my
fork of it, and of course report here.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#discussion_r47442747
--- Diff:
plugins/database/quota/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/QuotaResponseBuilderImpl.java
---
@@ -383,31 +383,41 @@ public QuotaTariffV
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#discussion_r47442757
--- Diff:
plugins/database/quota/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/QuotaResponseBuilderImpl.java
---
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
@Inject
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164246827
@agneya2001 is this 'only' a major bug? it seems to me to be the purpose of
the quota system. blocker may be overdone but I really like this in before 4.7
as r
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235
CLOUDSTACK-9155 make sure logrotate is effective for cloud.log
Many processes on the VRs log to cloud.log. When log rotate kicks in, the
file is rotated but the scripts still write to the o
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164247329
Pinging @wilderrodrigues @fborn @DaanHoogland @borisroman to review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user agneya2001 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#discussion_r47443252
--- Diff:
plugins/database/quota/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/QuotaResponseBuilderImpl.java
---
@@ -383,31 +383,41 @@ public QuotaTariffVO
Github user agneya2001 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#discussion_r47443258
--- Diff:
plugins/database/quota/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/QuotaResponseBuilderImpl.java
---
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
@Inject
Github user agneya2001 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164248806
Kept it as a major bug as the account with negative quota will still get
locked if quota is enforced, by the quota service thread, when it runs next.
Whi
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164251561
@remibergsma sounds like the scripts that are the problem do an open for
write instead of log-call, do they? I saw your list of processes and most of
them seem
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#discussion_r47443410
--- Diff:
plugins/database/quota/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/QuotaResponseBuilderImpl.java
---
@@ -383,31 +383,41 @@ public QuotaTariffV
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164253007
@DaanHoogland There are many different solutions in place, some are
bash/python scripts that do `>/var/log/cloud.log` etc, some use `nohup` to keep
running and
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1231#issuecomment-164253054
Thanks @DaanHoogland @remibergsma @bhaisaab and @borisroman for reacting
very quickly!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164253411
@remibergsma agree and let's not close the jira ticket on merging as this
obviously needs tlc.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164253492
The change LGTM. We should get this in and for ACS 4.8 we do a refactor in
order to have a proper solution in place.
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If yo
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164254871
Before PR this was seen after log rotate:
```
root@r-996-VM:/etc# lsof | grep cloud.log.1
_plutorun 767 root 3w REG 202,10 26054919 71 /var/log/cloud.
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164255438
The new script ends up on the router:
```
root@r-15-VM:~# cat /etc/logrotate.d/cloud
# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under on
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-16428
Ping @bhaisaab any chance to get this reviewed today? ;-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164255579
As you asked on im @remibergsma : LGTM more explicitely
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164255956
Based on explanation and code review: LGTM :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1228#issuecomment-164255977
@DaanHoogland That's an LGTM :+1: right? :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1228#issuecomment-164256015
@borisroman I must learn to be less brittish ;) LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235#issuecomment-164258629
Integration tests make no real sense, but tried a few to be sure:
```
Check the password file in the Router VM ... === TestName:
test_isolate_networ
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1235
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1226#issuecomment-164261409
@DaanHoogland It's already in .gitignore, I think these we're never
removed...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164266288
@agneya2001 I ran test_quota.py
```
nosetests --with-marvin
--marvin-config=/data/shared/marvin/mct-zone1-kvm1-kvm2-zwps.cfg -s -a
tags=advanced,requ
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164268405
LGTM
@DaanHoogland to use the plugin and run tests, your zone cfg need to enable
the quota plugin global setting and restart mgmt server before the plugin/apis
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164269573
thanks @bhaisaab I forgot setting indeed, 5 out of 7 tests now succeed.
investigating the other two now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
GitHub user borisroman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1236
CLOUDSTACK-9158: Removed SLF4J, it's abundant due to log4j
In the entire project we use log4j, so why also use slf4j? I've removed
slf4j and all references to it from the codebase.
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1224#issuecomment-164270707
@DaanHoogland @borisroman - I sincerely don't grok the benefits of these
changes, which is why I'm asking what are the benefits of the changes?
Some potent
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164270791
I think the problem is in the tests as it starts with an empty balance. Can
you confirm @bhaisaab , @agneya2001 ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1232#issuecomment-164270851
LGTM, though we might need to ask on dev@ as I remember someone using this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1228#issuecomment-164270975
I think we might need to test if package building still works with the
changes, i.e. is rpm/deb packaging are using or referencing it. Possible test
would be to bu
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1226#issuecomment-164271025
LGTM, not sure why they exist or if anyone (still) uses them.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1225#issuecomment-164271090
@borisroman do you need to remove one of the commits around moving to
default maven project structure? I see two commits.
---
If your project is set up for it, yo
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164271142
@DaanHoogland thanks, I think you're right but only @agneya2001 can confirm
this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1224#issuecomment-164271374
@bhaisaab I don't like maven but we are using it! cherry-picking is really
not an argument and backporting is difficult for worse reasons then this one.
Usi
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1225#issuecomment-164271411
Hi @bhaisaab,
True, that you see 2 commits! Due to the fact that this PR depends heavily
on #1224. The commit id of the first commit is the same as the o
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164271487
I will try a run without this PR to confirm it is not a problem with the
code
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1228#issuecomment-164271512
@bhaisaab I've already build the RPM's! We use them when running
integration tests, so nothing broke in that area.
I'll build the DEB packages now.
---
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1224#issuecomment-164271638
@DaanHoogland I'm not opposed to the change it is just that I think it
makes my life challenging with some of the things I do on day-to-day basis :)
We do follow a
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1225#issuecomment-164272026
@borisroman alright, so we review/merge the other PR first and then come to
this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1224#issuecomment-164272024
@bhaisaab me too, and I am willing to put it on a long track but let's
investigate and discuss more
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to thi
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1225#issuecomment-164272079
@bhaisaab Yes!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164277189
@remibergsma @bhaisaab @agneya2001 confirmed that the problem with the last
two tests is in master as well. I am satisfied nothing breaks in the quota
plugin,
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164277430
@DaanHoogland thanks Daan, I'll look into the failing issues with Abhi
tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1135#issuecomment-164278929
@pdube @remibergsma and i have been noticing extra failures in the
integration tests with such short expunge timeouts. maybe it should work and
can with some e
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1150#issuecomment-164279018
@bhaisaab did you test this? should we merge before the RC tonight?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1209#issuecomment-164279515
LGTM :+1:
Based on code-review and @remibergsma tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1209
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user borisroman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1237
Remove unused folder(s)/file(s); HypervDummyResourceBase.java
Dead code, never called and consist only of auto-generated methods.
As a developer I want
- a clean project to work
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1237#issuecomment-164285184
Integration tests ran fine!
**Environment**
- 2 KVM host on CentOS 7.1
- 1 Management Server on CentOS 7.1
- Agent + Common RPMs built from
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1237#issuecomment-164285459
@borisroman you know by now I agree on those principles but your
integration test results are quite useless as we are talking about hyperv code.
Let's do a sho
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1237#issuecomment-164285932
@DaanHoogland The integration tests show nothing broke on the KVM part, the
code of course does need to be reviewed. But that doesn't mean the tests are
useless.
Hi all,
In the past two weeks (since 4.6.1), 23 pull [1] requests have been merged to
4.6 branch and then to master/4.7.0. Therefore it makes sense to wrap-up the
4.6 release cycle with a final release and bring all the improvements to our
users. Vote e-mail below. Later today we will send anot
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1217
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1237#issuecomment-164286918
@borisroman I can not decide based on these tests if the removal is ok, so
to me they are useless
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234#issuecomment-164288018
For the sake of it, I run a some generic integration tests and they are
happy.
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
tags=
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1234
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1237#issuecomment-164288191
@borisroman @DaanHoogland Let's ask someone to test whether HyperV is still
happy and then we'll know.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1237#issuecomment-164289083
@remibergsma @DaanHoogland Back to the point, who could we ping for a
HyperV review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user borisroman opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1238
CLOUDSTACK-9160: Remove unused folder(s)/file(s); engine/api/src/org/â¦
â¦apache/engine/subsystem/api/storage/disktype
Empty files. Moved DiskFormat.java to
engine/api/src/org/apa
GitHub user remibergsma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1239
build_asf.sh: fix debian changelog altering
The script already adds a new entry so we shouldn't replace the
previous one. That is done only in the next version script.
As discus
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1239#issuecomment-164290759
LGTM, let's merge on my review only as we don't have a second RM to review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1239#issuecomment-164291121
The changelog file will need to be handled more carefully.
LGTM :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1239#issuecomment-164291346
@borisroman we should separate it from the CloudStack repo ;-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1239
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1205#issuecomment-164293808
did a code review and trustin @bhaisaab his testing skills: LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1205
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/815#issuecomment-164294423
a test setup for this is not trivial, I can live with it but would like to
see some proof before merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/826#discussion_r47449550
--- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/storage/ImageStoreUploadMonitorImpl.java ---
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
public boolean configure(String name, Map par
Hi all,
Since our 4.6.0 release (on Nov 13th, exactly 1 month ago), we have merged 100+
pull requests [1] with lots of bug fixes, refactoring and of course new
features. Time for a new release!
I've created a 4.7.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:
Git Branch and
The unfortunate part with that exception is that is could mean a lot of
things.
Off the top of my head, I've encountered it for the following reasons:
* Not enough storage space for the root disk.
* I had not applied the free license for my XenServer 6.1 hosts.
* CloudStack couldn't find primar
Yeah, usually it takes a bit more looking up and down the logfile to realise
the cause, as well as checking the HVs logs.
First thing to do is turn on DEBUG mode in the logging:
sed -i 's/INFO/DEBUG/g' log4j-cloud.xml
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
-
GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/27
4.7.0
Please review what's new section and approuve or not the use of a
screenshot for the Metric section.
Thanks,
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by runn
I'm not sure if this issue start at 4.7.0 or is just related to my test
environment. But I can't get the password provide by cloudstack to the vm,
In this case the instance is centos6.6 using the
usual cloud-set-guest-password
here is the log from the Instance:
/var/log/messages
Dec 14 00:32:56 c
Github user jayapalu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-164340450
@remibergsma This job is success now. I am downloading the template from
this.
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-systemvm64-github/
---
If your project
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1206#issuecomment-164344691
@DaanHoogland : Yes, your idea also looks good. Previously, it was
generating a random value only in case of NULL. But if we pass an empty string,
it was cre
Github user maneesha-p commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1216#issuecomment-164347886
@bhaisaab @agneya2001 @DaanHoogland 2 LGTMs can it be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user priyankparihar commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1165#issuecomment-164348885
@bhaisaab
User with different account cannot create VMs with the same name, which was
possible earlier (I am not sure in which CCP version). That time na
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1196#issuecomment-164350819
Fixed the build.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user priyankparihar commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/815#issuecomment-164354949
@DaanHoogland I have tested it on my machines. what kind of proof do you
need ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
While building Cloudstack on windows, it fails with following exceptions.
Tests run: 4, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.052 sec
<<< FAILURE! - in com.cloud.utils.TestProfiler
testProfilerInNano(com.cloud.utils.TestProfiler) Time elapsed: 1.004 sec
<<< FAILURE!
java.lang.Asser
Github user anshul1886 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1030
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
GitHub user agneya2001 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1240
CLOUDSTACK-9161: fix the quota marvin test
1. Create a dummy user, as existing user may already have stale quota
data
2. fix the tests to use the dummy user
3. a boundary
Github user anshul1886 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1030#issuecomment-164359761
Closing this PR as this got fixed by PR #1176
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user pritisarap12 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1199#discussion_r47465693
--- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_snapshot_limits.py ---
@@ -358,3 +362,129 @@ def test_01_storage_snapshots_limits(self):
)
Github user pritisarap12 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1199#discussion_r47465783
--- Diff: test/integration/testpaths/testpath_snapshot_limits.py ---
@@ -358,3 +362,129 @@ def test_01_storage_snapshots_limits(self):
)
GitHub user kansal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1241
CLOUDSTACK-9162: Unable to add VPN user via API with Required Parametâ¦
â¦ers - Fixed
RCA:
When we do not provide account parameter which is an optional field , API
picks up the a
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1206#issuecomment-164366344
API with non-empty name:
http://10.102.192.122:8080/client/api?command=createVolume&response=json&name=TempVolume&zoneId=18b1cb1a
Github user runseb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/815#issuecomment-164369338
-1
Just on the fact that "it runs on my machine" is the single most horrible
reason to justify working software.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1224#issuecomment-164371097
@DaanHoogland @bhaisaab
The first thing is that using a standard is better than doing the way
nobody else is doing. When one adopts a technology is
95 matches
Mail list logo
