Hate to be a pain, but could you make sure to keep the exact list of Features
merged, so that the Release notes are accurate ?
thanks
On Dec 4, 2015, at 11:58 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Next Monday we'll feature freeze for our upcoming 4.7 release. We looked
> through all open Pul
Github user snuf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1177#issuecomment-162448978
Seems like we have the same problem in the XenServer code, as I stated
earlier in another pull request somewhere out there, where this code originates
from (XenServerG
Github user agneya2001 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#discussion_r46796541
--- Diff:
framework/quota/test/org/apache/cloudstack/quota/QuotaAlertManagerImplTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user agneya2001 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#discussion_r46796893
--- Diff:
framework/quota/test/org/apache/cloudstack/quota/QuotaAlertManagerImplTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user agneya2001 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#discussion_r46796854
--- Diff:
framework/quota/test/org/apache/cloudstack/quota/QuotaManagerImplTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1177#issuecomment-162450640
@snuf
The procedure getCommandHostDelegation are overrided in three hypervisor:
XenserverGuru, VmwareGuru and Ovm3HypervisorGuru.
We should make su
Rohit, Sebastien,
I think we do not need to hurry any issues. work on 4.8 will start in
January or february at the latest.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:55 AM, sebgoa wrote:
> Hate to be a pain, but could you make sure to keep the exact list of
> Features merged, so that the Release notes are accura
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#discussion_r46797933
--- Diff:
framework/quota/test/org/apache/cloudstack/quota/QuotaAlertManagerImplTest.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/830#issuecomment-162453199
Though I would like to see how this situation is reproduced, the code is
fine and sensible.
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#discussion_r46797960
--- Diff:
framework/quota/test/org/apache/cloudstack/quota/QuotaManagerImplTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/823#issuecomment-162454833
The code looks good but I am wondering about the functionality. The prior
situation was that the new offering should have a subset of the old one. Now it
has to
On Dec 7, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Rohit, Sebastien,
>
> I think we do not need to hurry any issues. work on 4.8 will start in
> January or february at the latest.
I don't want to hurry anything, I want to be able to have release notes that
describe *all* the features added.
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/815#issuecomment-162455918
Does what it says but probably more. Do we not mind any other version?
@priyankparihar can you show how ACS doesn't allow invalid migrations, "Storage
XenMotion
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1179#issuecomment-162460207
@remibergsma @DaanHoogland
I'm closing this PR and will create a new one against 4.6.
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user wilderrodrigues closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1179
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/21
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user nlivens commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1142#issuecomment-162462731
@jburwell, thanks for the review! I've handled your comments. Thanks
@bhaisaab, would be great if we can still get this in 4.7
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1142#issuecomment-162464119
@nlivens cool, LGTM. Will merge on 4.6 once the build checks complete.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1142#issuecomment-162464159
s/4.6/master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1140#issuecomment-162464615
Guys, this got merged on only code review. No tests are described showing
the old and new behaviours. No unit tests are added. No regression tests are
added. I
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162464916
@terbolous your real question is: Can we get this in 4.6/4.7? right? I
sugest you start a discuss thread on dev@ if you feel it should.
---
If your project is
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1140#issuecomment-162465934
@DaanHoogland let's revert, and ask @harikrishna-patnala to add more tests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162466163
@jayapalu I see some new commits. Did you change anything yet? Should we
start testing?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and ha
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162466433
@terbolous @DaanHoogland This seems like a bug fix, but since it needs a
new systemvm template there is no way we will add this to 4.6. For the same
reason, I wa
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162467255
@DaanHoogland: yes, we're unable to use 4.6 due to the bug mentioned. now,
the original issue may be fixed in 4.6 with openswan later, but i would much
rather see
Github user koushik-das commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1140#issuecomment-162468306
Actually I was looking at the history and this is what I found. This was
originally fixed with commit
commit e444a03819ccf72f61cb04e8428d20cc65b145e1
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1140#issuecomment-162469279
@koushik-das good find, that means we also need to fix this for 4.6. We
would still need a round of tests just in case.
@harikrishna-patnala can you open a
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872#issuecomment-162469649
@jayapalu looks like you're still working on this, making progress. Please
ping us when you want us to start some testing today (hopefully before EOD
12PM/CET). Ple
Github user kansal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1125#issuecomment-162471051
cc @bhaisaab @DaanHoogland . Added test cases and made some minor changes
to the function. Please have a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply t
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1140#issuecomment-162472783
Thanks for picking this up, guys.
I still think there is calling code that should not be allowed to call
start twice. It should skip the VirtualNetwork
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/830#issuecomment-162473175
I have the same concern with Daan. How to reproduce this issue ?
Check my env
mysql> select * from volumes where volume_type is null or provisioning_t
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1125#issuecomment-162474888
LGTM
I will run a test build on this
also github reports conflicts on this branch, did you fork this of master?
and when? It may need a rebase to merge
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1044#issuecomment-162476357
regression tests executed:
[1044.network.results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/53778/1044.network.results.txt)
[1044.vpc.results.txt]
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1125#discussion_r46805977
--- Diff: utils/src/main/java/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java ---
@@ -1523,7 +1524,15 @@ public static boolean isIpWithtInCidrRange(final
String i
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1125#issuecomment-162480371
Not sure if it is related but
```
Running com.cloud.utils.net.NetUtilsTest
2015-12-07 11:33:08,471 INFO [utils.net.NetUtils] (main:) Invalid va
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1082#issuecomment-162481574
@nitin-maharana How do I test this? I tried adding a project but the page
keeps loading forever. Which dropdown should I look at?

---
If your p
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1142#issuecomment-162549079
@nlivens I like your patch, can you send that as a separate PR please?
LGTM, cc @remibergsma please merge this (do you need to run your tests, if
necessary?)
GitHub user nlivens opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1185
Adapted HypervisorUtilsTest to no longer give false positives
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/nlivens/cloudstack test_impro
Github user nlivens commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1185#issuecomment-162551073
@bhaisaab, this is the PR for the test adaptation discussed in PR#1142
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/977#issuecomment-162565931
Run the tests again. LGTM based on these tests:
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
tags=advanced,required_hardware=true \
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#issuecomment-162572129
@agneya2001 OK, please ping me when done!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#issuecomment-162572535
@bhaisaab Minor thing: could you also rename the title to "Implement Quota
service"?
I will make sure it will be merged before we freeze.
---
If your p
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#issuecomment-162573927
@remibergsma sure, I'm discussing with Abhi on that minor fix. After that,
will squash/amend the message in the git log.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184#issuecomment-162574201
Ping @remibergsma @miguelaferreira @DaanHoogland @borisroman
Problem with my PR! I havenât seen that one failing before. Will
investigate.
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1185#issuecomment-162578278
Great thanks, LGTM.
cc @remibergsma - let's merge this, just so to have less Travis failures?
(possibly also merge on 4.6?)
---
If your project is set up for
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1185#issuecomment-162588761
@nlivens @bhaisaab If you guys want this in 4.6 as well (which seems like a
good idea) please open a PR against 4.6. That will then be forward merged to
master.
Github user agneya2001 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#issuecomment-162595100
@bhaisaab the issue is resolved.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184#issuecomment-162598613
Ping @remibergsma @DaanHoogland @miguelaferreira @borisroman
Deployed another DC and followed the same step as the test, but did it
manually:
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#issuecomment-162601030
@agneya2001 thanks, squashing the change and pushing now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768#issuecomment-162601662
@remibergsma LGTM, final issue fixed. Let's merge now!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1185#issuecomment-162603163
Good idea. @nlivens please open the same patch/PR again 4.6 branch, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184#issuecomment-162611887
Although it worked manually, I'm running the test again... in an brand new
DC.
```
nosetests --with-marvin
--marvin-config=/data/shared/marvin/
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1150#issuecomment-162612180
@bhaisaab @DaanHoogland I updated the change with current 4.6 branch and
removed the commented codes. @remibergsma This only supports in VMware. Thanks
:)
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/830#issuecomment-162612642
@ustcweizhou , Yes. I agree. In case on instance id, vm_state is not null.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/768
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1184#issuecomment-162614546
Went through the code. Looks Good To Me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo