Hi,
"Not found" error is seen for the link - http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/
I do know that the documentation has moved to
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/index.html
but the API guide references are pointing to the link mentioned above which is
getting an error.
Raja
same issue that Abhi reported,
fixed
On May 12, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Raja Pullela wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Not found" error is seen for the link -
> http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/
> I do know that the documentation has moved to
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/master/index.html
> but th
Hi folks,
Our website is now managed via Git.
The build is now using Middleman [1] instead of the Apache CMS.
The source of truth for the site is at:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-www.git;a=summary
It is mirrored on GitHub like all our other repos and we can accept pull
Hello !
Can I get someones attention to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7410 please ?
OVS distributed routing was implemented for 8(?) month already and I
believe its not operatable on KVM platform ever since.
Regards,
Aleksandr
Github user thinktwo closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/240
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Hi all,
I'm reworking the packaging system in cloudstack, and would like to gather
your opinion on the following:
- Fedora 2x runs systemd's cockpit on port 9090 by default
This is a deal breaker for the cluster servlet port on this OS, the two
possibilities would be to either pack changes to f
Hi Sebastien,
Thanks, sounds better than the svn stuff we had to deal with. To test it out, I
pushed a change that works well locally (testing using middleman) but I don’t
see it on the website yet even after waiting for more than half an hour and
trying it in in-cognito mode. Are there additio
Github user shwetaag commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/241#discussion_r30117163
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_project_template.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+from marvin.codes import FAILED, PASS
+from marvin.cloudstack
Github user shwetaag commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/241#discussion_r30117593
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_project_template.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+from marvin.codes import FAILED, PASS
+from marvin.cloudstack
Did you push to the asf-site branch?
--
Erik
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Sebastien,
>
> Thanks, sounds better than the svn stuff we had to deal with. To test it
> out, I pushed a change that works well locally (testing using middleman)
> but I don’t see it on the
Github user shwetaag commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/241#discussion_r30117632
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_project_template.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+from marvin.codes import FAILED, PASS
+from marvin.cloudstack
Github user shwetaag commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/241#discussion_r30118073
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_user_taglisting.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+from marvin.cloudstackTestCase import cloudstackTestCase
+from
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/243
backport of CLOUDSTACK-8197 create MinVRVersion config item
Conflicts:
api/src/com/cloud/network/VirtualNetworkApplianceService.java
engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudsta
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm reworking the packaging system in cloudstack, and would like to gather
> your opinion on the following:
>
> - Fedora 2x runs systemd's cockpit on port 9090 by default
> This is a deal breaker for the cluster servlet port
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/244
backport of CLOUDSTACK-8197 create MinVRVersion config item
Conflicts:
api/src/com/cloud/network/VirtualNetworkApplianceService.java
engine/orchestration/src/org/apache/cloudsta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/2015 11:37 AM, Erik Weber wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Rafael Fonseca
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm reworking the packaging system in cloudstack, and would like
>> to gather your opinion on the following:
>>
>> - Fedora 2
I guess the rationale behind putting it on 8080 is because this is the
default for tomcat :)
Also, by default, unprivileged accounts (non-root) are unable to listen on
ports under 1024 like 80/443 (which is the reason of tomcat shipping it by
default on 8080) this is easily fixable by daemonizing i
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/147#issuecomment-101220064
@sanju1010 @abhinavroy02 should we merge this or is it no longer valid?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user abhinavroy02 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/147#issuecomment-101220516
@DaanHoogland : This is no longer valid Daan, I will create another pull
request and mark this as invalid.
Thanks,
Abhinav
---
If your project is
Github user abhinavroy02 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/147
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featu
Github user abhinavroy02 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/147#issuecomment-101220595
Closing the pull request and marking it invalid
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
> I guess the rationale behind putting it on 8080 is because this is the
> default for tomcat :)
> Also, by default, unprivileged accounts (non-root) are unable to listen on
> ports under 1024 like 80/443 (which is the reason of tomcat shipp
Wido,
If we were to recommend proxying with httpd, shouldn't cloudstack provide
that as well out of the box?
Btw, there isn't really a big performance gain by proxying through httpd
nowadays, the new version of the packaging also includes using tomcat8,
which has an improved http/nio connector, ha
Hi Erik,
Thanks, did not know if it was asf-site that was the live branch, just pushed.
> On 12-May-2015, at 11:26 am, Erik Weber wrote:
>
> Did you push to the asf-site branch?
>
> --
> Erik
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Rohit Yadav
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sebastien,
>>
>> Thanks, sounds bett
No problem, I read it in the README :-)
--
Erik
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> Thanks, did not know if it was asf-site that was the live branch, just
> pushed.
>
> > On 12-May-2015, at 11:26 am, Erik Weber wrote:
> >
> > Did you push to the asf-site branch
GitHub user terbolous opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/245
CLOUDSTACK-1667: Make a better description of the extractable flag
The extractable flag is a bit confusing, as it is easy to imply some sort
of extraction (zip, bzip2, gzip etc.) support, whil
> On 12-May-2015, at 12:15 pm, Erik Weber wrote:
>
> No problem, I read it in the README :-)
I should do that too ;)
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
Find out more about ShapeBlue and o
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/245#issuecomment-101234924
@terbolous thanks, I always knew the createtmpl script that sets up a
template when registers would always extract a template whether or not you tick
the extractabl
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/245
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/245#issuecomment-101235174
Thanks @terbolous merged on 4.5 and master branches.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/244#discussion_r30122724
--- Diff:
engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/service/NetworkOrchestrationService.java
---
@@ -62,9 +63,13 @@
static fina
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/243#discussion_r30122752
--- Diff:
engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/service/NetworkOrchestrationService.java
---
@@ -62,9 +63,13 @@
static fina
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#issuecomment-101235698
@rsafonseca thanks for the updated PR, really like the last update to bring
down the mgmt package size. Unfortunately I'm caught up with dayjob and since
it's a big
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-101235811
@wilderrodrigues any update on this PR, if it's well tested, let's merge it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/243#discussion_r30123116
--- Diff:
engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/service/NetworkOrchestrationService.java
---
@@ -62,9 +63,13 @@
static
Could anyone make 4.5.2 and 4.4.4 (and 4.3.3 if necessary?) versions
available in Jira?
--
Erik
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/244#discussion_r30123159
--- Diff:
engine/api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/engine/orchestration/service/NetworkOrchestrationService.java
---
@@ -62,9 +63,13 @@
static
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-101236981
@bhaisaab
I'm testing since yesterday. My KVM environment is a bit slow, but all the
tests are going okay.
Please check the partial report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/12/2015 12:03 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
> Wido,
>
> If we were to recommend proxying with httpd, shouldn't cloudstack
> provide that as well out of the box?
I'd stay away from that. Providing that out of the box means doing
more stuff which a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just ran into the issue with the Graphite output for the
StatsCollector that the JVM never re-resolved the graphite hostname
after changing the DNS name.
This is due to networkaddress.cache.ttl being defaulted to -1:
"Specified in java.securit
Anyone else get this? Happens when i do "bash package.sh -d centos63"
+ ln -sf /var/cache/cloudstack/management/temp
/home/jenkins/.jenkins/jobs/cloudstack-4.6-fix-extractable-rpm/workspace/dist/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cloudstack-4.6.0-SNAPSHOT.el6.x86_64/usr/share/cloudstack-management/temp
+ ln -sf /
4.4.4 was there. 4.5.2 created
Op di 12 mei 2015 om 13:02 schreef Erik Weber :
> Could anyone make 4.5.2 and 4.4.4 (and 4.3.3 if necessary?) versions
> available in Jira?
>
>
> --
> Erik
>
Thanks Daan.
--
Erik
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> 4.4.4 was there. 4.5.2 created
>
> Op di 12 mei 2015 om 13:02 schreef Erik Weber :
>
> > Could anyone make 4.5.2 and 4.4.4 (and 4.3.3 if necessary?) versions
> > available in Jira?
> >
> >
> > --
> > Erik
> >
>
Congrats, Marco!
Regards
sadhu
2015-05-11 1:50 GMT-07:00 sebgoa :
> It seems we forgot to announce that Marco was made a committer, my
> sincere apologies
> -
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Marco Sinhoreli to becom
Hi dev team,
I was wondering who would be willing to help with:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8451
remote IP not seen in VM behind VPC...
Thanks,
--
Andrija Panić
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hi dev team,
>
> I was wondering who would be willing to help with:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8451
>
> remote IP not seen in VM behind VPC...
>
Could you get the relevant iptables rule with 'iptables-save'? obfuscat
I'll stay away from touching port 80 for now, but isn't saving work to the
admin one of cloudstack's main goals?
That is also the main reason to package this stuff and have rules for
configuration :)
I do see a lot of people complaining that cloudstack is hard to setup and
has very long setup gui
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/244#issuecomment-101265470
adjusted default to 4.5.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#issuecomment-101265715
Hi @bhaisaab :)
I've also made some basic testing with fedora 2x as you asked and got
everything working last night (apart from having the cluster servlet port
I'd say a safe middle-ground might be providing a working proxy config
for Apache and for nginx in the docs or share directories and then
pointing to those in the documentation as references to get the API
proxied on 80/443.
I do agree with leaving the default on 8080 as that's the default for
Tom
How about bundling the httpd/nginx configuration in a separate optional
package?
I have no idea for a name, but it could depend on either httpd and nginx,
and include a site config that works out of the box.
Should work great for those who need an easy setup, and still allow those
who set up exter
Also a good idea, but would be yet another package to be maintained...albeit a
small one.
Might be easier to release a pair of Ansible playbooks/Chef cookbooks/Puppet
manifests/etc.
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 15:11 +0200, Erik Weber wrote:
> How about bundling the httpd/nginx configuration in a separ
It's easier to maintain a playbook/cookbook/manifest than a site-config
(that rarely should change)? :-)
--
Erik
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Jeff Moody wrote:
> Also a good idea, but would be yet another package to be
> maintained...albeit a small one.
> Might be easier to release a pair
Hi Rafael,
I like your ideal. Perhaps you could create a wiki-page and Jira Issue so that
everyone can see your specific proposed changes. And comment.
Regards,
Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
Keeping a couple of config files for httpd/nginx should be quite easy, we
could configure it optionally (with a prompt) when running the
cloud-setup-management script, for instance.
We can optionally also just configure a redirect rule for port 80 on the
same prompt if user doesn't want proxying, t
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
> Keeping a couple of config files for httpd/nginx should be quite easy, we
> could configure it optionally (with a prompt) when running the
> cloud-setup-management script, for instance.
> We can optionally also just configure a redirect rul
That is easy enough to check at install time :)
If we want to avoid that scenario the following could be done:
- Check if anything is using port 80 at config time, warn and don't config
anything if it is
- Load/Unload the redirect rule on tomcat startup, this will make port 80
available to other p
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/233#issuecomment-101284578
@bhaisaab @mlsorensen
I just sent the test report to your emails.
I'm fully confident with the changes and would like to suggest a merge of
Sharing the status of the tests.
Cheers,
Wilder
Begin forwarded message:
From: Wilder Rodrigues
mailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com>>
Subject: LibVirt refactor tests result
Date: 12 May 2015 15:36:59 CEST
To: Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>,
Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widod
Hi Paul,
I'd like to have time to do what you proposed, but unfortunately after
tomorrow i'll be away for almost a week (maybe then, if my changes haven't
been merged yet)
These are just some small details, the bigger changes are noted here:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238
Have a l
On 2015-05-12 02:02, Wei ZHOU wrote:
is /etc/libvirt/hooks/qemu executable?
Yes
Given the announcement of 4.5.1 yesterday and the fact we found this
problem during testing of 4.4 prior to rollout, would it be wise for us
to jump past 4.4 and straight to 4.5? We're currently only evaluating
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
> I'll stay away from touching port 80 for now, but isn't saving work to the
> admin one of cloudstack's main goals?
>
> That is also the main reason to package this stuff and have rules for
> configuration :)
>
> I do see a lot of people comp
Hi Erik,
Thanks for geting back to me.
I have commented the issue and provided example from brand new ACS
installation, and new VPC, 1 network, 1 VM.
http://pastebin.com/ihjiDZ9h - iptables-save from inside VR on pastebin -
this is brand new VPC (1 network, 1 VM in network) on 4.4.3 release.
htt
Hi All,
Finally I am able to mount Secondary Storage path on SSVM.
Our NFS Server Version is v3 and SSVM (Client) version is v4 (Present). So
I tried to mount manually with version 3 and it worked !!!
(Here on SSVM, I did #*man mount.nfs *there it is saying when we hit the
command *#mount -t nfs
That is a good point David, but ideally, if we are recommending the use of
a reverse proxy because our out of the box solution isn't good enough for
production, i'd propose either:
- Fix the performance problems with tomcat and make it production worthy
(in what concerns the application server, i'
Hi all,
Based on the feedback several friends in the community on different use-cases
of using a federated login system based on SAML2 with CloudStack, I’m soon
planning to address them in the SAML plugin implement focusing on pain points
around interoperability, IdP support, security and ease
GitHub user lbtq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-rn/pull/20
Modified Advanced Baremetal support description
Modified Advanced Network baremetal support to clarify that it is only
currently supported in VMware environments.
You can merge this pull re
Great news Rohit,
Would love to see it support Microsoft ADFS as IdP.
Erik
Den tirsdag 12. mai 2015 skrev Rohit Yadav
følgende:
> Hi all,
>
> Based on the feedback several friends in the community on different
> use-cases of using a federated login system based on SAML2 with CloudStack,
> I’m
Hi Rafael,
There is a ticket for fedora packaging: CLOUDSTACK-8163 I have sent patches
with that issue ID. There are quite a lot of things to do...
Are you working on the management server packaging?
Why does the management service have to start as a separate service? It
could be just a webapp und
Hi Lazlo,
I hadn't seen that JIRA issue yet :)
I am indeed working in packaging and have taken a different approach, which
provides for much cleaner distro support.
I'm currently finishing up on having the exact same installer working for
both centos7 and fedora2x without any need for special cust
I don't think we are recommending a reverse proxy (are we?), it was just
brought up as a solution if someone wants port 80 to go to cloudstack. At
past jobs we put Apache on 80, and used it solely to host CS api docs for
the version of the API that the management server was running, as well as a
f
There are some handy tools to get the sense of having likely issues with
other services :)
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Marcus wrote:
> I don't think we are recommending a reverse proxy (are we?), it was just
> brought up as a solution if someone wants port 80 to go to cloudstack. At
> pas
https://www.adminsub.net/tcp-udp-port-finder/9090
vs
https://www.adminsub.net/tcp-udp-port-finder/9190
The latter would most likely hurt the less to a broad user base :)
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
> There are some handy tools to get the sense of having likely issue
And unfortunately, I don't think it's currently configurable even if you
change the config file.. it's hardcoded in:
framework/cluster/src/com/cloud/cluster/ClusterServiceServletAdapter.java
framework/cluster/src/com/cloud/cluster/ClusterServiceServletImpl.java
and in the firewall config in:
pyth
Github user K0zka commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#discussion_r30165536
--- Diff: ui/index.jsp ---
@@ -1761,73 +1761,73 @@
-
-
-
-
-
Github user rsafonseca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#discussion_r30165996
--- Diff: ui/index.jsp ---
@@ -1761,73 +1761,73 @@
-
-
-
-
Github user K0zka commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#discussion_r30166628
--- Diff: client/pom.xml ---
@@ -384,23 +408,6 @@
-com.googlecode.todomap
-maven-jettygzip-plug
should I force dynamic compression or not, does not mean that creating a
duplicate file with .gz extension will make it serve compressed :)
All that this was doing was duplicating content (both files compressed and
uncompressed were being shipped) and installed, but only the uncompressed
version wa
Github user K0zka commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#issuecomment-101387790
Rafael, the gzip compression *alone* indeed does not make the tomcat serve
it compressed
* tomcat 8.0 allows [configuring the default
servlet](https://tomcat.apach
Github user K0zka commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#discussion_r30168912
--- Diff: ui/index.jsp ---
@@ -1761,73 +1761,73 @@
-
-
-
-
-
I understand, but it's the sort of thing most admins will disable or remove
in their kickstart as a liability. RedHat has had default system management
services like this before and they were not well received (I forget the
name of the remote system management utility that shipped with RHEL4/5). If
Github user K0zka commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#discussion_r30169643
--- Diff: ui/index.jsp ---
@@ -1761,73 +1761,73 @@
-
-
-
-
-
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Rafael Fonseca
wrote:
> That is a good point David, but ideally, if we are recommending the use of
> a reverse proxy because our out of the box solution isn't good enough for
> production, i'd propose either:
>
>
It's not really about 'not good enough', but most s
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/58999daafe862ebbe953903ce7f928939c9b85f0#commitcomment-11161993
In packaging/centos63/cloud.spec:
In packaging/centos63/cloud.spec on line 363:
This removed commons-logging.properti
Hi Erik,
Thanks for your feedback, can you share more details about your use-case. I
remember we had a discussion where we tried to make it work, but don’t remember
why it failed for your environment. What SAML bindings do we need to support to
make it work with MS ADFS any other subtle details
Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#issuecomment-101399140
Good catch k0kza, I hadn't noticed that StaticResourceServlet class, but
i'll do some benchmarking on that vs tomcat 8's connector built in compression
features,
Github user rsafonseca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#discussion_r30173402
--- Diff: ui/index.jsp ---
@@ -1761,73 +1761,73 @@
-
-
-
-
I don't actually remember the specifics, and I've scratched the lab.
But I think there was an issue with fetching the metadata (from the IdP)
atleast.
Plus, ADFS is claims based, I don't know if the current SAML 2.0
implementation in CloudStack is claims aware or not?
--
Erik
On Tue, May 12,
Anyone able to build the centos63 packages on master? Seems broken after
awsapi removal and 4.5 merge.
Atleast I keep getting errors.
Trying to fix it, but it takes time to rebuild and fetch new ones.
--
Erik
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> Anyone else get this? Happens
Github user K0zka commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/238#discussion_r30176487
--- Diff: ui/index.jsp ---
@@ -1761,73 +1761,73 @@
-
-
-
-
-
>
>I have no IE righ here, but the 'never' setting seems to be a problem. I
> would love to see it going away but if that creates bugreports or confusion
> for users then it is no fun. Would you agree in having that 'now' thing only
> for IE for safety?
>
Here you go: http://dev.modern.ie/
Nice! I will bookmark this site...
No KVM? :-)
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:47 PM, Carlos Reátegui
wrote:
> >
> >I have no IE righ here, but the 'never' setting seems to be a
> problem. I would love to see it going away but if that creates bugreports
> or confusion for users then it is no fun.
I would agree to having that for safety in IE if it wasn't hurting the
other browsers so much.
I'd do some testing to find out exactly if there is an issue and if
reproducible, find a different workaround.. this just isn't worth the time
waiting for reply from everyone else...
Carlos suggested a ha
Marcus, it has not made it to CentOS/RedHat Server yet, but it's on Fedora
Server, not desktop.. on by default.
I can give a hand with those python scripts next week hopefully :)
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Marcus wrote:
> I understand, but it's the sort of thing most admins will disable o
How about having the installer check if 9090 is in use and ask for an
alternative port if so.
I guess this would mean you first have to make the port configurable. During
upgrades the check would not be made and leave the config as is.
> On May 12, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
>
Sounds like a bug perhaps, but you could always manually update the
cloud.storage_pool table to mark it as removed.
If you have successfully removed primary storage in the past, you could
probably use that as an example row for how to update the applicable row
remotely.
On Tuesday, May 12, 2015,
GitHub user resmo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/246
listFirewallRules: cleanup and fix duplicate params in API
The parts deleted are already defined in the extended class.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
We should allow configurability, but, in the future, we should also
register the port. - you'll note Bacula, for instance, doesn't have
any clashes.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?&page=111
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Carlos Reáteg
GitHub user resmo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/247
debian: allow tomcat7 as optional dependency
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/resmo/cloudstack feature/debian-tomcat7
Alternat
GitHub user resmo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/248
listPortForwardingRules: fix typo in doc
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/resmo/cloudstack
fix/listPortForwardingRules_typo
A
100 matches
Mail list logo
