On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Rafael Fonseca <rsafons...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is a good point David, but ideally, if we are recommending the use of > a reverse proxy because our out of the box solution isn't good enough for > production, i'd propose either: > > It's not really about 'not good enough', but most shops have their own way of doing things. We use Netscaler to load balance cloudstack, others use F5, others use HAProxy, some use nginx and a bunch is probably using httpd. I'm not saying that it's a bad idea to provide some default configs, but I don't think any production clouds are going to use it, basically because everyone has their own way of doing things. Preferably in a separate package, otherwise you have to require httpd (or whatever) to be installed, which easily becomes a PITA if you don't use httpd. -- Erik
