Daan,
That's fine. There were no critical issues to be addressed really by a 4.4.3
AFAIK.
Let's get 4.5 right. :)
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Daan Hoogland"
> To: "dev"
> Sent: Monday, 9 February, 2015 07:29:13
Hi All,
I am using CloudStack 4.3.1.Previously the usage records are generated,but
when i observed recently the usage records are not generating.The usage
records ends at 2014-12-27
mysql>select * from job_usage\G
id: 79
host: testcs01.test.local/xx.xx.xx.xx
pid: 167
anything in /var/log/cloudstack/usage/usage.log ?
I guess log4j-cloud.xml is missing ? (it should be log4j-cloud.xml , not
log4j-cloud-usage.xml)
2015-02-09 10:47 GMT+01:00 raja sekhar :
> Hi All,
>
> I am using CloudStack 4.3.1.Previously the usage records are generated,but
> when i observed rec
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30793/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-82
That is the answer I wanted to hear. If we can migrate system VMs, why are
the systems VMs’ VDI allocated in the local SR on Xen hypervisor?
It is not possible to migrate those system VMs, hence they are using a
local SR.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu <
sanjeev.neelar...@citr
Hi Wei,
Thanks for your reply.
I have found the file in "cd /etc/cloudstack/management/log4j-cloud.xml"
and "cd /etc/cloudstack/usage/log4j-cloud.xml".it is same as you told.
The log file i have captured in "/var/log/cloudstack/usage/usage.log" is:
2014-12-28 07:15:05,773 DEBUG [db.Transaction.
+0 (no point voting with -1s above)
Tested this using Devcloud4 on an advanced zone worked without issue,
environment came up, template downloaded was able to create a VM and a
egress rule to allow outbound connectivity. Great to see the xen
server networking label stuff fixed, this caused som
Yes, with -1s no point voting further.
Tested local storage in Advance zone.
Live VM migration is working with local storage (Xen 6.5 cluster) that was
broken in RC1, and RC2.
-abhi
> On 09-Feb-2015, at 6:27 pm, Ian Duffy wrote:
>
> +0 (no point voting with -1s above)
>
> Tested this usin
Hi All,
I am testing on CentOS 6.5. Now I am stuck while the primary storage adding
Something went wrong; please correct the following:
Failed to add data store: Can not create storage pool through host 1 due to
Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException, create
StoragePool f
-1
When trying to add XenServers to a new 'Basic Zone without Security Groups" the
Hosts remain in 'Alert' state because they are running OVS and not Linux Bridge.
There is no requirement to revert to Linux Bridge unless you are using Security
Groups, so this test is incorrect.
In 4.3.x this w
Geoff, as far as I know Basic Networking with Security group never worked
with XenServer + OVS, only with Bridge, please correct me if I'm wrong.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
[email protected]> wrote:
> -1
>
> When trying to add XenServers to a new 'Basic
Hi Pierre-Luc,
You are right Basic Networking 'With' security Groups requires Linux Bridge,
and will not work with OVS.
This is a Basic Zone 'Without' security groups so OVS should work. Linux
Bridge is only required if you use Security Groups.
I know of a CloudStack install running a Basic Z
1-Yes we can migrate system vm , I have done it many times
2-Even if vm is deployed with local storage you can migrate to another
local storage . Check out this api migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.4/root_admin/migrateVirtual
MachineWithVolume.html
I also tried and it did not work. I am using CS 4.3.0.
I used the UI button. I got the error "VM_REQUIRES_SR".
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Prashant Kumar Mishra <
[email protected]> wrote:
> 1-Yes we can migrate system vm , I have done it many times
>
>
> 2-Even if vm is deploye
Update:
The UI may not be working because it uses the command "migrateSystemVm",
instead of "migrateVirtualMachineWithVolume".
Shoud I open a bug report?
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Rafael Weingartner <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I also tried and it did not work. I am using CS 4.3.
How do you migrate systemVM’s in UI?
If you just put the host, where the systemVM’s are running, into
“maintenance” mode, then you may have hit this bug which was fixed in
4.4.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5660
Yiping
On 2/9/15, 11:01 AM, "Rafael Weingartner"
wrote:
>Upd
Well,
There is a button, take a look at the SS I took:
http://postimg.org/image/5sr7yxyud/
I am curious, why does the CS allocate system VMs’ VDI on local SR on Xen
hypervisor? Why not use the primary storage of the cluster in which the
host is in?
I looked at the code, and it is hard coded there,
Hi,
I'd like to know what SystemVM template we will use in ACS450, Jenkins'
ones or thoses from CloudPlatform 4.5.0 that are in the Release Notes of
CCP?
I think all tests made by the community have been made using latest 4.5.0
systemvm template from Jenkins, right?
Thanks,
I used Jenkins for the 4.5 system templates for my 4.5 testing.
On Monday, February 9, 2015, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to know what SystemVM template we will use in ACS450, Jenkins'
> ones or thoses from CloudPlatform 4.5.0 that are in the Release Notes of
> CCP?
>
> I think all
The ones build by jenkins are also available for download from here (for 4.5)
http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
-abhi
> On 10-Feb-2015, at 9:06 am, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
>
> I used Jenkins for the 4.5 system templates for my 4.5 testing.
>
> On Monday, February 9, 2015, Pi
While creating a zone you can configure the use of local storage. It seems you
configured it erroneously.
In 4.3 as per my knowledge live vm migration with local storage is broken. Use
it in 4,5 it works I have tested it.
If you do not want to use local storage make sure you turn it off while
cr
edit the global setting "system.vm.use.local.storage", restart mgmt server.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:20 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
> While creating a zone you can configure the use of local storage. It seems
> you configured it erroneously.
> In 4.3 as per my knowledge live vm migration with
We discussed this very thing awhile back, and decided the correct fix
was to have the storage drivers contain a method that would decide if
a pool type is capable of thin provisioning. It's a bigger fix than
this though.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:27 PM, ghxandsky wrote:
> GitHub user ghxandsky op
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/30821/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-82
24 matches
Mail list logo
