Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #6)

Is cloudmonkey following the same project bylaws as CloudStack? If so we need 3 +1 binding votes. On 7 Nov 2014 07:35, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > Hi all, > > After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 *passes* with > 1 PMC + 3 non-PMC votes. > > +1 (PMC / binding) > 1 person > > +1 (n

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #6)

Hi Ian, Yes I think so. I just read the bylaws [1] again and you’re right this voting round would need two more +1 (binding) votes from PMC to be passed. I thought any 3 +1 votes (majority) would make it pass and the 72 hour voting window completed. Sorry, I was not too careful. In this case, w

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #102

See Changes: [sanjay.tripathi] CLOUDSTACK-7859: Host tags are not getting removed in cloud.host_tags table when a Host is deleted from CS. -- [...truncated 4032 lines...] 2014-11-07 07:28:40 INFO

About param of cloudstack api

I know use cloudstack api need to build the sig and python shell can do this through doc, now I want to call 'updateNetworkServiceProvider' via api , but this method has the param 'servicelist' which is a list , I can not find a example for this case , anyone can give a hand ?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #6)

On Nov 7, 2014, at 6:58 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Ian, > > Yes I think so. I just read the bylaws [1] again and you’re right this voting > round would need two more +1 (binding) votes from PMC to be passed. > > I thought any 3 +1 votes (majority) would make it pass and the 72 hour voting >

RE: [CAPACITY STATS][4.4] - Primary storage is 0 + strange behaviour on different VM statuses

Anyone? Or it is being considered as an expected behavior? Kind regards, Ilia Shakitko Innovation Engineer LeaseWeb Technologies B.V. T: +31 20 316 0235 M: E: i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com W: http://www.leaseweb.com Luttenbergweg 8, 1101 EC Amsterdam, Netherlands -Original Message- F

Re: [CAPACITY STATS][4.4] - Primary storage is 0 + strange behaviour on different VM statuses

Ilia, There might be scheduled jobs to calculate and update usage stats, not sure about this. Have you tried leaving it some more time between operations? Like, kill the VM or whatever operations you want in the evening and see if the stats are correct the next day. Lucian -- Sent from the De

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #6)

+1 (binding) Did a quick test. On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Nov 7, 2014, at 6:58 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > > Hi Ian, > > > > Yes I think so. I just read the bylaws [1] again and you’re right this > voting round would need two more +1 (binding) votes from PM

Review Request 27727: CLOUDSTACK-3528: [UI]list calls are in the processing state forever with invalid name provided with Account name search filter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27727/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK

RE: [CAPACITY STATS][4.4] - Primary storage is 0 + strange behaviour on different VM statuses

Hi Lucian, I am looking to it few days playing with VMs. So yes, I did :) Kind regards, Ilia Shakitko Innovation Engineer LeaseWeb Technologies B.V. T: +31 20 316 0235 M: E: i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com W: http://www.leaseweb.com Luttenbergweg 8, 1101 EC Amsterdam, Netherlands -Original

RE: [CAPACITY STATS][4.4] - Primary storage is 0 + strange behaviour on different VM statuses

Maybe it's because of that exception: ERROR [c.c.a.AlertManagerImpl] (CapacityChecker:ctx-334ac971) Caught exception in recalculating capacity java.lang.NullPointerException at com.cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl.updateCapacityForHost(CapacityManagerImpl.java:649) at com.clou

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.5 #103

See Changes: [mike.tutkowski] Allow infrastructure to handle delete of volume from DB -- [...truncated 3615 lines...] [INFO] Compiling 1 source file to

paramiko

While installing cloudstack-management I just realized we have a dependency on python paramiko. which has a dependency of course on pycrypto, and we seem to use an old version 2.0.1. Anyone knows where we use paramiko ?

Re: paramiko

I seem to recall that we had to remove paramiko back in 2012 because it didn't conform to the licensing requirements. (Paramiko is LGPL, which is a Cat X license.) Indeed this message seems to indicate we removed it from the codebase. Not sure why we would add that back in. http://markmail.org/me

ssvm trying to mount nfs secondary/primary through link local

Hi folks, I got this weird behavior in a single node install centos/KVM , acs 4.3.1 where the ssvm is trying to mount the secondary and primary storage using the link local address… If I try to mount manually using the IP of the NFS server it does not even work. thoughts ?

Re: ssvm trying to mount nfs secondary/primary through link local

On Nov 7, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Hi folks, > > I got this weird behavior in a single node install centos/KVM , acs 4.3.1 > where the ssvm is trying to mount the secondary and primary storage using the > link local address… > > If I try to mount manually using the IP o

RE: Question about XenServer plug-ins

I believe it was part of a general clean-up to try and use XenServer public APIs; rather than modify the XenServer itself, which may or may not work in future XenServer versions. -- Stephen Turner -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: 05

Re: Question about XenServer plug-ins

OK - thanks, Stephen On Friday, November 7, 2014, Stephen Turner wrote: > I believe it was part of a general clean-up to try and use XenServer > public APIs; rather than modify the XenServer itself, which may or may not > work in future XenServer versions. > > -- > Stephen Turner > > > -Orig

RE: Creating a backup of a hypervisor snapshot

Mike, are you saying that XenCenter disagrees with xe? That doesn't seem right as they both get their info from the same API. Maybe XenCenter is looking at something subtly different. XenCenter is open source (https://github.com/xenserver/xenadmin), so you can consult the source to see what it'

Re: Question about XenServer plug-ins

Mike, XenServer 6.2 + SP1 + XS62ESP1004 hotfix and the versions after support a new API that allows CloudStack to copy the deltas between two snapshots. With that addition, CloudStack no longer needed the plugin scripts because that's what the plugin scripts were mainly for. Don't try to backport

Re: Question about XenServer plug-ins

Great - thanks, Alex. I remember looking for a version 6.2.5 of XenServer about nine months ago (because of that name in CloudStack) and finding out it doesn't actually exist. :) That it is, in fact, 6.2 + a patch or two. What this mainly interests me for is that I need to perform some activity o

Re: Creating a backup of a hypervisor snapshot

Let me look into this again. At the time, I was busy implementing some other functionality when I came across what seemed like an existing issue in our code. It is odd to me that old (hypervisor) snapshots never get deleted and the code I copy/pasted in has the purpose of deleting those old snapsh

Re: About param of cloudstack api

There should be UI doing the same thing and you can intercept the api logs or use firebug to see how it did. Deployvm takes in a list of network ids as well. You can check that. On 06/11/14 11:57 PM, "lky" wrote: >I know use cloudstack api need to build the sig and python shell can >do >this

Review Request 27751: CLOUDSTACK-7862: Fixed the script 'maint/test_high_availability.py' - Test Cases failing on Simulator as Testcases try to ssh to the VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27751/ --- Review request for cloudstack, sangeetha hariharan and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.

Review Request 27756: CLOUDSTACK-7863 : Fixed the script "test_vpc_vms_deployment.py" - Test Cases failing on Simulator as Testcases try to ssh to the VMs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27756/ --- Review request for cloudstack, sangeetha hariharan and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-noredist #3730

See Changes: [min.chen] BUG-ID: CS-27191: CPVM continues to be in Stopped state after a failure [min.chen] Revert "BUG-ID: CS-27191: CPVM continues to be in Stopped state after a failure" [min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-7864: CPVM

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master-noredist #3731

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5 #104

See

Domains and users

Hi All, I have cloudstack 4.x working correctly. I have created a few domains, respective domain admins and domain users. Also, one instance (with all the os and required apps) is created by every domain admin. Now, I want the domain users, to be able to access and run the the instances, cr

Re: Domains and users

I have cloudstack 4. Pada 8 Nov 2014 14:49, "Giri Prasad" menulis: > > Hi All, > > > I have cloudstack 4.x working correctly. I have created a few domains, respective domain admins and domain users. > > Also, one instance (with all the os and required apps) is created by every domain admin. Now,