OK - thanks, Stephen On Friday, November 7, 2014, Stephen Turner <stephen.tur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> I believe it was part of a general clean-up to try and use XenServer > public APIs; rather than modify the XenServer itself, which may or may not > work in future XenServer versions. > > -- > Stephen Turner > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;>] > Sent: 05 November 2014 01:23 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org <javascript:;> > Subject: Question about XenServer plug-ins > > Hi, > > In XenServerStorageProcessor there are several times when we make calls to > XenServer plug-ins (for example, to download a template from secondary > storage to a XenServer SR). > > In Xenserver625StorageProcessor we seem to handle this kind of work in > Java code instead of calling into the XenServer plug-ins. > > I was curious if anyone remembers the history behind this transition? > > Thanks! > > -- > *Mike Tutkowski* > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com <javascript:;> > o: 303.746.7302 > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud > <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™* > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.746.7302 Advancing the way the world uses the cloud <http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>*™*
