We have three binding +1 and no -1. It is thin but sufices according to our
bylaws. This RC is up for GA.
After (more then) 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.4.1 *passes* with
3 PMC + 3 non-PMC votes.
+1 (PMC / binding)
3 people
+1 (non binding)
3 people
0
2 people
-1
none
Thanks to everyon
Hi Daan,
Can you make the 4.4.1 tag available on the 4.4 branch, right now the tag is
pushed/seen on origin/4.4-RC20141014T2316 branch.
Regards.
> On 20-Oct-2014, at 12:01 am, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> We have three binding +1 and no -1. It is thin but sufices according to our
> bylaws. This RC
Hi Pierre,
> On 17-Oct-2014, at 6:13 pm, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
>
> I'm aware of this behavior, it start with 4.3.0, if you upgrade to 4.3.0 or
> 4.3.1 without having the new systemvm prior the upgrade, the db upgrade
> will fail. which is why upgrading from 4.2.x to 4.4.1 require 2 new
> systemv
Thanks everyone :)
~Rajani
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Ian Duffy wrote:
> Congrats Rajani! :)
>
> On 17 October 2014 16:47, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > On Friday, October 17, 2014, Daan Hoogland
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Ap
Hi,
do we have solution for this in 4.5 ?
An ideal solution would be to have a single Network created, but let each of
the NetworkGuru do the implementation
-Pradeep
From: Chiradeep Vittal
To: Pradeep Cloudstack ;
"dev@cloudstack.apache.org"
Cc: Sheng Yan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26442/
---
Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-76
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26442/
---
(Updated Oct. 20, 2014, 11:09 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Srikantes
