We have three binding +1 and no -1. It is thin but sufices according to our bylaws. This RC is up for GA.
After (more then) 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.4.1 *passes* with 3 PMC + 3 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 3 people +1 (non binding) 3 people 0 2 people -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > CLOUDSTACK-7365 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7365> > was created by you Pierre-Luc. I am looking into the other side of the > medal. have a generic systemvm upgrade api. It is related and I haven't > found a ticket yet. > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion <pdion...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> Hi Rohit, >> >> I'm aware of this behavior, it start with 4.3.0, if you upgrade to 4.3.0 >> or >> 4.3.1 without having the new systemvm prior the upgrade, the db upgrade >> will fail. which is why upgrading from 4.2.x to 4.4.1 require 2 new >> systemvm to be install prior the upgrade. >> >> Further more, if you have multiple hypervisor type, let say you have >> XenServer and KVM clusters but forced system vm to run on xenserver only. >> by default you might only install the new sysvmtemplate for xenserver, >> but, >> if you upgrade without having install the kvm systemvm version the db >> upgrade will fail. >> >> I think their is jira issue around this already. >> >> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi Pierre, >> > >> > On 17-Oct-2014, at 4:42 pm, Pierre-Luc Dion <pd...@cloudops.com> wrote: >> > > Hi Rohit, >> > > The doc in /latest is not the 4.4.1 latest, the correct documentation >> is >> > in >> > > /4.4.1 it should have been corrected for the behavior describe and >> also >> > > contain correct url for sysvm ( not jenkins.bac.o). >> > > >> > > Once the 4.4.1 is released ill change the defaut url and update issues >> > > lists in the RN. >> > >> > Thanks, that would be much needed. >> > >> > The issue is not that docs have those links, but that the Java class >> > (440to441, the upgrade path) that upgrades CloudStack db has hard coded >> URL >> > and MD5 checksums of 4.4.0 template. >> > >> > The real issue is when a user tries to upgrade from any prior version of >> > CloudStack to 4.4.1 or later version, they would be required to >> register a >> > 4.4.0-6 template (from Wido’s repo) before the upgrade which is >> something >> > they skip or forget to do it which would result in messed up upgraded >> DB. >> > For example, if I’m on 4.2.1 and I want to upgrade to 4.4.1 or later >> (say >> > 4.5.0 in future) if I don’t follow the docs (i.e. register 4.4.0-06 >> > template, that too not any 4.4.0 template, but the specific one from >> Wido’s >> > repo or some other url) my upgrade will fail. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Rohit Yadav >> > Software Architect, ShapeBlue >> > M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com >> > Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab >> > >> > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related >> services >> > >> > IaaS Cloud Design & Build< >> > http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//> >> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/ >> > >> > CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/> >> > CloudStack Infrastructure Support< >> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> >> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses< >> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> >> > >> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are >> intended >> > solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views >> or >> > opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily >> > represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not >> the >> > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based >> > upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the >> sender >> > if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is >> a >> > company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP >> is a >> > company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape >> Blue >> > Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in >> Brasil >> > and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd >> is >> > a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under >> > license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. >> > >> > > > > -- > Daan > -- Daan
