Review Request 24542: CLOUDSTACK-7302: UI: Removed Hover Interaction from breadcrumbs at top page

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24542/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang. Repository: clou

Re: [ACS44] 4.4.1 release candidate

On 10-Aug-2014, at 10:14 pm, Erik Weber wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Ian Duffy wrote: > >> Erik, >> >>> Don't know about Rohit, but I don't have infrastructure for it at home. >> >> If you have a machine with a decent amount of ram its handy enough to do it >> all within nested vir

Re: Review Request 17941: CLOUDSTACK-6075: Increase the ram size for router service offering

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/ --- (Updated Aug. 11, 2014, 9:24 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal Re

Re: Review Request 17941: CLOUDSTACK-6075: Increase the ram size for router service offering

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17941/#review50172 --- Looks GTM, but we'll wait for Jayapal to test/review it. - Rohit Ya

Review Request 24544: CLOUDSTACK-7294: Passing listall =True for listUsers api admin call

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24544/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTA

Zones, Domains and Templates

Hi,  I have a customer with several departments like : dept1, dept2, dept3 etc etc. I installed CS and am done with the provisioning process.  Now, I want to create a vm for each dept. For ex: vm1->for->dept1, vm2->for->dept2, vm3->for->dept3. Each vm's will have its own set of application sui

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #94

See

Review Request 24547: CLOUDSTACK-7304: Fixed Exception not raised issue in portable IP test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24547/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTA

Template or root Volume VHD not able to run on standalone xenserver

Hi, I am using ACS 4.2 with Xenserver 6.2 SP1.. Also I have .vhd of template & root volume & want to run on standalone xen server but, while trying to import vhd from import wizard in xencenter it says, 'VHD is not suitable for xenserver' . Is it related to vhd-util, what we are importing in CS M

Review Request 24549: CLOUDSTACK-7305: hypervisor type parameter is mandatory when deploying VM using ISO

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24549/ --- Review request for cloudstack and koushik pv. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7305 https:/

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #95

See

4.5 RM

Hi folks; So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your perspective. :) If no one else steps up by midweek I'm happy to be the RM for 4.5. My plan would be to likely hit feature freeze nearly immediate

Re: Zones, Domains and Templates

You could create a different domain for each department, or you could create separate projects for every department. I would think projects would be easier in terms of user management if you have lateral movement between those groups. On 8/11/14, 5:36 AM, "Giri Prasad" wrote: >Hi, > > I have

Review Request 24550: CLOUDSTACK-7306 Don't run test_01_primary_storage_iscsi on KVM or HyperV

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24550/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7306

Jenkins build is unstable: simulator-hotfix-trigger #17

See

Review Request 24552: CLOUDSTACK-7307 Add simulator_only attribute to tests which need it

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24552/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Gaurav Aradhye and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOU

Re: Review Request 24552: CLOUDSTACK-7307 Add simulator_only attribute to tests which need it

Santhosh, I agree with Alex here. We should adopt this new tag if it adds to simplicity. Good thing is minimal change is needed. Regards, Gaurav On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Alex Brett wrote: >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/24

Re: 4.5 RM

On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks; > > So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So > you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your > perspective. :) > > If no one else steps up by midweek I'm happy to be the RM for 4

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #96

See

Review Request 24557: Adds tagging support for security group rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24557/ --- Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Wei Zhou. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-730

Re: Review Request 24557: Adds tagging support for security group rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24557/ --- (Updated Aug. 11, 2014, 4:04 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 24557: Adds tagging support for security group rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24557/ --- (Updated Aug. 11, 2014, 4:13 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 23610: New script for verifying multiple shared networks with overlapped cidrs in different vlans

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23610/#review50185 --- test/integration/component/test_shared_networks.py

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing template URL format checking logic

Yes, I have filed and fixed that bug a month ago. Thanks -min On 8/10/14 10:39 PM, "Harikrishna Patnala" wrote: >Hi Rohit, > >This was already fixed for templates >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6940 > >We have to do the same for registering ISOs as well. > > >Thanks, >Harikri

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing template URL format checking logic

Thanks for fixing that Min! I personally did not check the current state of code other than discussing it with Marcus on the issue. Cheers. On 11-Aug-2014, at 6:54 pm, Min Chen wrote: > Yes, I have filed and fixed that bug a month ago. > > Thanks > -min > > On 8/10/14 10:39 PM, "Harikrishna P

Re: 4.5 RM

Hey David, On 11-Aug-2014, at 3:24 pm, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks; > > So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So > you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your > perspective. :) Awesome, go for it! > If no one else steps up by midweek

Re: 4.5 RM

Hi Sebastien, On 11-Aug-2014, at 5:35 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, David Nalley wrote: > >> Hi folks; >> >> So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So >> you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your >> persp

Re: 4.5 RM

On Aug 11, 2014, at 1:34 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > On 11-Aug-2014, at 5:35 pm, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> >> On Aug 11, 2014, at 9:24 AM, David Nalley wrote: >> >>> Hi folks; >>> >>> So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So >>> you consid

Re: 4.5 RM

Thanks for being willing to take on this role, David! On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:24 AM, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks; > > So we haven't had anyone step up to be release manager for 4.5 yet. So > you consider this either a threat or me volunteering depending on your > perspective. :) > > If no

Re: Review Request 24557: CLOUDSTACK-7308 - Adds tagging support for security group rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24557/ --- (Updated Aug. 11, 2014, 6:06 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 24557: CLOUDSTACK-7308 - Adds tagging support for security group rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24557/#review50199 --- server/src/com/cloud/api/query/dao/SecurityGroupJoinDaoImpl.java

Review Request 24571: Bugfix CS-7309: Null pointer in usage records listing

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24571/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOU

UI 404 Error

On August 11, 2014 at 4:17:16 PM, mo (m...@daoenix.com) wrote: This is one of the errors I mentioned:  Unable to connect to remote: is there a server running on port 8250 Also this one. https://gist.github.com/anonymous/ea821c3e00d9b2baa7b6 - Mo On August 11, 2014 at 4:05:23 PM, mo (m...@da

Re: UI 404 Error

it would appear that you must start management first & then agent? I did so, ad I am back online. Still would like to know if there is a particular process to start up.  On August 11, 2014 at 5:08:45 PM, mo (m...@daoenix.com) wrote: On August 11, 2014 at 4:17:16 PM, mo (m...@daoenix.com) wrot

Re: UI 404 Error

Did you recently update tomcat? I've seen it happen where if you update tomcat it will stop the cloudstack service and start the generic tomcat service therefore giving 404 errors. On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:32 PM, mo wrote: > it would appear that you must start management first & then agent? I

Re: UI 404 Error

No updates have been performed. Automatic or otherwise.  On August 11, 2014 at 5:38:57 PM, Carlos Reategui (car...@reategui.com) wrote: Did you recently update tomcat? I've seen it happen where if you update tomcat it will stop the cloudstack service and start the generic tomcat service there

Re: UI 404 Error

Wow! I lied, I swear I disabled automatic updates, that’s exactly what happened. Systematic updates including Tomcat were updated 8/8.  They are disabled now, for sure! =P - Mo On August 11, 2014 at 5:38:57 PM, Carlos Reategui (car...@reategui.com) wrote: Did you recently update tomcat? I've s

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing template URL format checking logic

Just checked in a fix to remove similar format check for ISO for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7312. Thanks -min On 8/11/14 9:59 AM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: >Thanks for fixing that Min! > >I personally did not check the current state of code other than >discussing it with Marcus

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #97

See

Re: Template or root Volume VHD not able to run on standalone xenserver

Not sure if this is related, but the only time i've had issues with starting vms with XenServer + CloudStack was vhd-utils were not copied to /opt/xensource/bin folder. Make sure the file is there. Andrei - Original Message - From: "Tejas Gadaria" To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org, dev

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #98

See

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing template URL format checking logic

Hi Min, We need to do this for Upload Volume as well - right ? Thanks, -Nitin On 11/08/14 3:01 PM, "Min Chen" wrote: >Just checked in a fix to remove similar format check for ISO for >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7312. > >Thanks >-min > >On 8/11/14 9:59 AM, "Rohit Yadav" w

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing template URL format checking logic

Yes. But on second thought, I think that purely removing template url format checking is too brute force and aggressive, and will cause hard time in debugging issues thrown by later orchestration flow that relies on template/volume in specific file format. A better fix to address the issue raised i

Re: [DISCUSS] Removing template URL format checking logic

Yes, its important to fail fast and suggest the user that he/she didn't register the correct format URI. Also we shouldn’t have boiler plate code for checking the url format for register iso/template/volume. It should be one util method. But would you know all the valid formats a URL can be - or wi

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-hotfix-trigger #18

See -- [...truncated 7095 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Developer Mode 4.4.1-SNAPSHOT [INFO] -

Cloud Stack 4.4, Xen 6.2 SP1 does not establish VPC site2site

Hello, We did install new CS 4.4 version using Xen Server 6.2 SP1 and the latest updates, then tried to establish VPC site 2 site it is not working. New template used 10th of August. Thanks for sharing

[SHOW] Authentication refactoring

Hi, The way we handle login and logout is hardcoded and since there is no APICommand/BaseCmd implementation the apidoc, apidiscovery and other don’t discover these apis. For supporting SAML as an authentication mechanism, I’ve refactored the Auth mechanism as a pluggable service that loads with

Review Request 24589: Test script to verify fix for CS-5332

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24589/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CS-5332 https://

Re: Cloud Stack 4.4, Xen 6.2 SP1 does not establish VPC site2site

Anything in the logs? Erik 12. aug. 2014 03:49 skrev "Amin Samir" følgende: > Hello, > > > > > We did install new CS 4.4 version using Xen Server 6.2 SP1 and the latest > updates, then tried to establish VPC site 2 site it is not working. > > > New template used 10th < > http://cloudstack.apt-ge