DNS service on VR not responding

Dear all, All our guest VMs are having our virtual router (VR)'s IP address on /etc/resolv.conf. In the past two weeks, I just realised that the DNS service on the VR is not working, and doesn't respond to DNS queries from the DNS clients on the guest VM. I have tried to stop and start back the V

Re: DNS service on VR not responding

Have you taken a look at dnsmasq.log in the VR ? What do you mean with not responding? The addresses are not being resolved to ip addresses? On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Indra Pramana wrote: > Dear all, > > All our guest VMs are having our virtual router (VR)'s IP address on > /etc/resolv.

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAML2 plugin for SSO/SLO in CloudStack

Hi, I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward with the first implementation starting next week but will be mostly offline till 28th July. Regards. Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi guys, There has been a lot of interest [4] around auth related problems in CloudStach such as

Re: DNS service on VR not responding

Hi Rafael, Good day to you, and thank you for your reply. Can't find anything wrong on dnsmasq.log / daemon.log, just some log entries related to DHCP, nothing on DNS. I masked the IP addresses since they are public. === Jul 20 16:21:51 r-2606-VM dnsmasq[3519]: DHCPDISCOVER(eth0) X.X.X.X 06:62:a

Re: DNS service on VR not responding

Good day to you too, Sure I guess I point a way, so you can start troubleshooting. 1. Check if the VMs can reach the VR. 2. Check if the VMs are really configured to use VR as the DNS server. 3. Change the DNS server to be any other such as 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 (just to see if there is

RE: DNS service on VR not responding

Run trace route from guest vms, the result will yield to the point where packet drop is happening, could be a network acl rule issue, but tracert command can lead to some answers. List running ports as well on VR, do a telnet to dns port on router from guest vm to verify for its response. Sant

Re: DNS service on VR not responding

Hi Rafael, Good day to you, and thank you for your reply. 1. Yes, the guest VMs can reach the VR. Able to ping. 64 bytes from X.X.X.2: icmp_req=4 ttl=64 time=2.00 ms 64 bytes from X.X.X.2: icmp_req=5 ttl=64 time=0.291 ms 64 bytes from X.X.X.2: icmp_req=6 ttl=64 time=0.384 ms ^C --- X.X.X.2 ping

Re: What to modify to increase instance password length?

Hi Harikrishna, Pulled over the related commits. Had some merge conflicts. On 19 July 2014 21:14, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi sorry about the slow response. Will get on this tomorrow away from a > computer for the weekend. > On 18 Jul 2014 13:36, "Harikrishna Patnala" < > harikrishna.patn...@citrix.

Re: DNS service on VR not responding

Hi Santhosh, Good day to you, and thank you for your email. Traceroute packets seems to be dropped, I think it's by default. See result below: # traceroute X.X.X.2 traceroute to X.X.X.2 (X.X.X.2), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 * * * 2 * * * 3 * * * However, I am able to ping, and there i

RE: DNS service on VR not responding

Do a traceroute to an external domain say google.com from guest vm, as you mentioned below, both by commenting out vr ip and not, in resolv.conf, you may see the difference. "Yes, if I remove or comment out the first nameserver entry for the VR's IP, and only leaving 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4, guest V

Re: What to modify to increase instance password length?

Thanks Ian. On 20-Jul-2014, at 11:07 pm, Ian Duffy mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie>> wrote: Hi Harikrishna, Pulled over the related commits. Had some merge conflicts. On 19 July 2014 21:14, Ian Duffy mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie>> wrote: Hi sorry about the slow response. Will get on this tomorrow away f

Re: [DISCUSS] [PROPOSAL] SAML2 plugin for SSO/SLO in CloudStack

> On 20 Jul 2014, at 17:35, Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm assuming no one objects the proposal and the spec, I'll move forward > with the first implementation starting next week but will be mostly > offline till 28th July. > +1 from me , most definitely. Your email was clear, thanks fo

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/22799/ --- (Updated July 21, 2014, 3:56 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowsk

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

> On July 18, 2014, 4:16 a.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It's been a while since we've had any activity review wise on this feature. > > > > Can you guys tell me where we're currently at? > > > > Thanks! > > Mike Sorry Mike, There are some troubles with my machines last week. I

Review Request 23723: Added the extra space in the error message which was having readability issue.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23723/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Repository: cloudstack-git

Re: Review Request 23723: Added the extra space in the error message which was having readability issue.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23723/#review48197 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On July 21, 2014, 4:04 a.m

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

Thanks! Adding Marvin tests is not a prerequisite to your code being committed. I just strongly recommend you consider such tests. Essentially it is ideal to have Marvin tests, but not required. I'm glad to see the list of tests you've performed manually. Thanks for adding that to Review Board.

RE: DNS service on VR not responding

Hi, Can you check if the VR is able to resolve the domain names by pinging from VR ? -Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Vihar [mailto:vih1...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 5:43 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: DNS service on VR not

Re: Review Request 23550: Fixed coverity reported issues in UserVmManagerImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23550/#review48198 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Santhosh Edukulla On July 16, 2014, 12:37 p.

Re: Review Request 23550: Fixed coverity reported issues in UserVmManagerImpl

> On July 16, 2014, 3:35 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVmManagerImpl.java, line 856 > > > > > > I believe we are verifying the max size of an integer? If yes, use > > limits, somethin

RE: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

Mike / Hieu, Thank you for your consideration. Even if it is not needed at the review time, can Marvin tests ( if applicable, simulator tests) can be added before you close on the feature. That would help to run regression tests on this feature for all releases. Some sort of automated tests (

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

Thanks for the note, Sudha. I was not aware we were treating Marvin tests are a requirement. That is interesting to know as I've not seen that rule followed all the time (as you say, perhaps people have been backing off on that informally). I agree, though, that automated tests are critical and g

Re: Why is the I/O speed of VM so terrible when using CloudStack4.2 + KVM deployment

IIRC, virtio wasn't the default until EL6.4. --David On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:12 PM, evanitsharp wrote: > Dear all: > I/O speed of our guest VMs are so slow when uploading or downloading > file from them. > I have tried Basic and Advanced network, but I got the same result. > > Our

Re: DNS service on VR not responding

Hi Vihar, Yes I can. Looking forward to your reply, thank you. Cheers. On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Vihar wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, if I remove or comment out the first nameserver entry for the VR's > IP, and only leaving 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4, guest VMs will be running fine > and will be abl

Re: DNS service on VR not responding

Hi Sanjeev, Good day to you, and thank you for your reply. Yes, I can resolve domains without any issues from within the VR itself. root@r-2606-VM:/etc# ping yahoo.com PING yahoo.com (98.139.183.24): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 98.139.183.24: icmp_seq=0 ttl=47 time=250.473 ms 64 bytes from 98.13

Re: Review Request 23550: Fixed coverity reported issues in UserVmManagerImpl

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23550/ --- (Updated July 21, 2014, 4:58 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland

Re: Review Request 23723: Added the extra space in the error message which was having readability issue.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23723/ --- (Updated July 21, 2014, 4:59 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh E

Re: Review Request 23723: Added the extra space in the error message which was having readability issue.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23723/ --- (Updated July 21, 2014, 5 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Eduk

Re: Review Request 23603: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-6983: unable to register lxc template

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23603/#review48201 --- utils/src/org/apache/cloudstack/utils/template/TemplateUtils.java <

Re: Review Request 23605: CLOUDSTACK-7107: Disabling failed test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23605/#review48203 --- Commit 43dffaad5fd197c87a8dab087066f677a095dee7 in cloudstack's bran

Re: Review Request 22799: Golden (Base) Primary Storage feature

Thank you, Sudha and Mike, So I will implement some regression test on Marvin to ensure this feature. BRs. On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Thanks for the note, Sudha. > > I was not aware we were treating Marvin tests are a requirement.