I can not make vm snapshot now . Do you guys know why ?
Thanks,
Yitao
2014-03-19 19:23 GMT+08:00 Yitao Jiang :
> Hi, stackers
>
> now i found a weird log happend in xenserver message log when creating a
> snapshot through cloudstack 4.2.1 web ui.
> And the task failed.
> Below are cloudstack l
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19283/#review37851
---
Commit afb58b37a318272299f09c3970d5a615ca602755 in cloudstack's bran
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19283/#review37852
---
Commit afb58b37a318272299f09c3970d5a615ca602755 in cloudstack's bran
GitHub user pdion891 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/2
fixed images links, tables, toctree
* All icons except updatessl.png links updated.
* All tables adapted to .rst format.
* Fixed some toc hierarchy
* fixed .rst markup.
Daan/ Hugo
We need to update the wiki release page for 4.4 and also setup the JIRA
dashboard similar to what I did for 4.2 and 4.3. Let me know if you have
questions on how it was done for 4.3
Thanks
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.
What is the code-freeze date for 4.4 ?
I need to commit the following feature -
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=36274178
-Pradeep
On Friday, March 14, 2014 8:13 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti
wrote:
Other alternative is to block further check-ins till blocking iss
Congratulations, Hugo!
Cheers,
Wilder
Sent from my iPhone
> On 19 Mar 2014, at 21:51, "Chip Childers" wrote:
>
> Per our project bylaws, we are changing our project's chair today!
>
> Over discussions during the last month the PMC had reached a consensus
> to recommend to the ASF board that
I'm not sure if we have a "code freeze" per se, but "feature freeze" was
last week Friday. Technically all features that are to go into 4.4 should
have been in master on that day when the 4.4 branch was cut.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:01 PM, Pradeep Cloudstack <
pradeepcloudst...@yahoo.com> wrote
Hi Mike,
the following feature
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=36274178
is there under 4.4 Design documents.
How do I check if this feature is part of 4.4 ?
I had sent out a Proposal sometime back about this feature
-Pradeep
OK, I went back an re-ran my test.
I see how this works now.
I was aware that volumes in the Destroy state get expunged by a background
thread at some point; however, what tricked me here is that my "old" root
disk no longer showed up in the Storage tab of the GUI.
When I looked in the volumes t
It is too late already - All merges are done last week. It can go in to 4.5
(Master)
-Original Message-
From: Pradeep Cloudstack [mailto:pradeepcloudst...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 9:30 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chiradeep Vittal; Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: Re: 4
At this point, I'd recommend talking to Hugo, who is the release manager
for 4.4.
I've CCed him on this message (although he's on the normal dev@ mailing
list, as well).
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Pradeep Cloudstack <
pradeepcloudst...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> the following feature
Hi Sudha,Mike,Hogo,
this is a new feature (and I am also new to the process)
So I am not quite getting the meaning of "All merges are done last week".
-Pradeep
From: Sudha Ponnaganti
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" ; Pradeep Cloudstack
; Chiradeep Vittal ;
Hugo can talk about this in more depth, but the idea is that you develop
your feature in your own branch (every now and then rebasing your work on
top of what's been put into master to keep it current).
At some point, there is what we call Feature Freeze (that was last week
Friday).
On this day (
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19446/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Mike Tutkowski, Marcus Sorensen, and Wido den
Hol
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but there does not appear to be a way to
"save" the old root disk once it has gone into the Destroy state in this
situation, is there?
In other words, the new root disk is created, the old is put into the
Destroy state, and the old will get deleted at the next clean
It looks like your code is exclusively related to a network plug-in, is
that correct? In other words, you do not modify any CloudStack core code,
but rather solely interface with CloudStack via a plug-in interface.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> w
Hearty Congratulations Hugo :)
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 2:22 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Change of Apache CloudStack PMC Chair
Per our project bylaws, we are changing our project's cha
I see the actual API command is RecoverVMCmd.
I wonder why the GUI says Reset instead of Recover.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Please correct me if I'm wrong, but there does not appear to be a way to
> "save" the old root disk once it
Hi
Yes Mike, currently there is no way to get the old root disk back, since a new
root disk is already attached to VM and old disk is marked as destroyed.
With this API we can also specify templateId to restore the VM from the new
template.
-Harikrishna
On 20-Mar-2014, at 10:29 am, Mike Tutkows
OK, thanks :)
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Harikrishna Patnala <
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi
> Yes Mike, currently there is no way to get the old root disk back, since a
> new root disk is already attached to VM and old disk is marked as destroyed.
> With this API we can als
On 20-Mar-2014, at 3:32 am, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> 1) Didn’t notice “the elephant” - that the Reset Vm option is presented as
> a button unlike the icons for other options. UI folks - Brian/Jessica- why
> we decided to represent this option differently in the UI?
>
> 2) Mike, I’ve looked a
There are two different APIs RestoreVMCmd and RecoverVMCmd
RestoreVMCmd is what we are talking about here to restore the VM to fresh new
root disk
RecoverVMCmd is used to recover the vm back after we try to destroy the VM
(within the time after Destroy and before Expunge)
Thanks
Harikrishna
O
Ah, right - my mistake. I should have thought of that.
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Harikrishna Patnala <
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com> wrote:
> There are two different APIs RestoreVMCmd and RecoverVMCmd
>
> RestoreVMCmd is what we are talking about here to restore the VM to fresh
> new r
Unless I'm reading this incorrectly, it looks like
label.action.restore.instance (Restore Instance) maps
to recoverVirtualMachine
and
label.resetVM (Reset VM) maps to restoreVirtualMachine
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:30 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Ah, right - my
Yes Mike, this needs to be fixed with proper popup and mouse over action
messages.
-Harikrishna
On 20-Mar-2014, at 11:11 am, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Unless I'm reading this incorrectly, it looks like
>
> label.action.restore.instance (Restore Instance) maps
> to recoverVirtualMachine
>
> a
yes, I tried doing that as well and then it gives build failure showing
unit test case failure
for org.apache.cloudstack.affinity.AffinityApiUnitTest
Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Could
not autowire field:
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.Configurati
yes, I tried doing that as well and then it gives build failure showing
unit test case failure
for org.apache.cloudstack.affinity.AffinityApiUnitTest
Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Could
not autowire field:
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.config.dao.Configurati
there must be an another exception stacktrace thrown above this hostconnect
exception from XenApi with certain ERROR code(number) , which you can find
it out in xen docs.
is the storage pool getting attached in the xen hypervisor after this ?
try executing mount in xen and see.
thanks.
On Wed,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19451/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Rajesh Battala.
Bugs: CLOUDSTA
Hi Punith,
I fixed my problem yesterday, but thanks for taking the time to reply. :)
I tried manually to touch the heartbeat file and realised that I had no
permission to do so (error 13 - permission denied). I was mounting an already
existing mountpoint... so I needed to add cross mount and al
Chip: Thanks for your effort. Best wish!
Hugo: Congratulation, bro!
--Tuna
Sent from my GT-N7000
On Mar 20, 2014 12:13 PM, "Rajesh Battala"
wrote:
> Hearty Congratulations Hugo :)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2
Hi,
I figured it out.
Default vmsnapshot.create.wait value in global configuration is 1(s), and
i don't know why the operation takes much more than 10 seconds,so i changed
it to 60s. Now i can make vm snapshot.
Thanks,
Yitao
2014-03-20 9:33 GMT+08:00 Yitao Jiang :
> I can not make vm snaps
Thanks Chip for your great efforts and good luck Hugo.
~Talluri
On 20/03/14 12:17 pm, "Nguyen Anh Tu" wrote:
>Chip: Thanks for your effort. Best wish!
>Hugo: Congratulation, bro!
>
>--Tuna
>
>Sent from my GT-N7000
>On Mar 20, 2014 12:13 PM, "Rajesh Battala"
>wrote:
>
>> Hearty Congratulations
congratulations Chip and good luck Hugo may your vision for the
project be clear and forthcoming.
my support is with you,
Daan
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote:
> Chip: Thanks for your effort. Best wish!
> Hugo: Congratulation, bro!
>
> --Tuna
>
> Sent from my GT-N7000
> On M
101 - 135 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
