OK, thanks :)

On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Harikrishna Patnala <
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Hi
> Yes Mike, currently there is no way to get the old root disk back, since a
> new root disk is already attached to VM and old disk is marked as destroyed.
> With this API we can also specify templateId to restore the VM from the
> new template.
>
> -Harikrishna
>
> On 20-Mar-2014, at 10:29 am, Mike Tutkowski <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but there does not appear to be a way to
> > "save" the old root disk once it has gone into the Destroy state in this
> > situation, is there?
> >
> > In other words, the new root disk is created, the old is put into the
> > Destroy state, and the old will get deleted at the next clean-up
> cycle...no
> > chance to restore that volume (even for use as a data disk).
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> >> OK, I went back an re-ran my test.
> >>
> >> I see how this works now.
> >>
> >> I was aware that volumes in the Destroy state get expunged by a
> background
> >> thread at some point; however, what tricked me here is that my "old"
> root
> >> disk no longer showed up in the Storage tab of the GUI.
> >>
> >> When I looked in the volumes table, though, I saw that that disk was in
> >> the Destroy state.
> >>
> >> I speed up the frequency of the clean-up background thread to run once
> >> every minute and I saw the old root disk got put into the Expunged state
> >> (as you'd expect, it was no longer present in the SR).
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> >> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yeah, usually "reset" (for hypervisors) means "shut down the VM and
> >>> re-start it."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 to reset being a bad verb for this. It's too late now, however.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:22 PM, Marcus <shadow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> The storage gets marked as 'Destroy' state. Then it goes to
> >>>>> 'Expunging' when the storage cleanup interval occurs. I've actually
> >>>>> thought about leveraging that for data disks, the current delete data
> >>>>> disk immediately cleans up the disk, when we could create an api call
> >>>>> that just moves the data disk to destroy state. Then there'd actually
> >>>>> be room for an 'undo' operation where the state could be moved back
> to
> >>>>> Ready, so long as the cleanup hasn't occurred.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Nitin Mehta <nitin.me...@citrix.com
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> Please feel free to open a documentation bug on JIRA if the info
> >>>> doesn't
> >>>>>> exist.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 19/03/14 3:16 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks for that background-cleanup info. I was not aware of that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'll probably take a look into it and see how that works.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <
> >>>>>>> alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> CS destroys the Root volume in CS DB, then its up to the storage
> >>>> pool
> >>>>>>>> cleanup task to clean it up on the backend. This is a background
> >>>> task
> >>>>>>>> running every storage.cleanup.interval seconds.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> For how long do you see the volume being present on the SR?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 3/19/14, 3:03 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> OK, sounds good; however, if this is desired behavior, does
> anyone
> >>>> know
> >>>>>>>>> why
> >>>>>>>>> we abandon the old root disk in the XenServer SR? It seems that
> >>>>>>>> CloudStack
> >>>>>>>>> "forgets" about it and it just stays in the SR taking up space.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do people think it should be deleted?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Nitin Mehta <
> >>>> nitin.me...@citrix.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I think that's what it is supposed to do. It discards the old
> >>>> root
> >>>>>>>> disk
> >>>>>>>>>> and creates a fresh root disk for the vm and in case an optional
> >>>>>>>> field
> >>>>>>>>>> template id is passed in the root disk is created from this new
> >>>>>>>> template
> >>>>>>>>>> id.
> >>>>>>>>>> The api name is restoreVirtualMachine. Please check that the UI
> >>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> internally invoking this api
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> -Nitin
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 19/03/14 1:55 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" <
> >>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I noticed today while running through some test cases for 4.4
> >>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>> resetting a VM does not work as expected.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Instead of the typical stop and re-start behavior where the VM
> >>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> booted
> >>>>>>>>>>> back up using the same root disk, the VM gets a new root disk
> >>>> when
> >>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>> booted back up.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone confirm this finding for me with his or her setup?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
> >>>>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >>>>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
> >>>>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the
> >>>>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> >>>>>>>>>>> *(tm)*
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
> >>>>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >>>>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >>>>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
> >>>>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the
> >>>>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> >>>>>>>>> *(tm)*
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> *Mike Tutkowski*
> >>>>>>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >>>>>>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >>>>>>> o: 303.746.7302
> >>>>>>> Advancing the way the world uses the
> >>>>>>> cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> >>>>>>> *(tm)*
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *Mike Tutkowski*
> >>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >>> o: 303.746.7302
> >>> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> >>> *(tm)*
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> *Mike Tutkowski*
> >> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> >> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> >> o: 303.746.7302
> >> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> >> *(tm)*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
>
>


-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud<http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
*(tm)*

Reply via email to