Re: 4.3 BVT automation result on Xen

Rayees, cloudstack-qa jobs are based on master branch, we need to be checking the results for cloudstack-qa-4.3 that Talluri just setup friday. -sebastien On Jan 17, 2014, at 11:43 PM, Rayees Namathponnan wrote: > > Hi All, > > Here 4.3 BVT automation result on Xen, > http://jenkins.builda

Re: UI blocker

On Jan 17, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Brian Federle wrote: > OK, I'm dropping this subject after this, but one more thing -- the new UI > has been up for months now. There was plenty of time to make feedback and > improve the UI. I don't appreciate the fact that these issues are being > mentioned so l

Re: Restricting the use of a template to certain minimum resources

On 19.01.2014 11:13, Nux! wrote: On 19.01.2014 10:03, Geolemo Gmail wrote: I think you can't do it directly with ACS; you can control these types of rules from other layer that integrate with ACS. For example, with Citrix CloudPortal Bussiness Manager you can define the relation between template

What does this UI thing do? "Root disk size"

Hi, Does this do what I hope it does? http://i.imgur.com/xrs0mu4.png I tried putting in some values, but it doesn't seem to have any effect. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

VXLAN problems

Hi, I'm currently trying to play with VXLAN on 4.3.0 SNAPSHOT. I am however encountering some issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5908 Besides this, I did not find any documentation for this feature at all. What are the requirements of getting this to work? Clearly we nee

Re: DB upgrade fails on 4.3

Lucian, I read your ticket and think that playing with a snapshot is the problem most likely. To be sure you might want to setup your env (including vms) on a clean 4.2.1 and see if it happens then. The db upgrade scheme we use is not repeatable and on a snapshot you might have missed or gotten st

Re: VXLAN problems

You probably need an IP address on the physical network that you're running vxlan on, since this host needs to communicate with other hosts to send vxlan packets. Where prevously you could just bring up a bridge on an ethernet interface with no config, you can put all of your hosts on one untagged

Re: DB upgrade fails on 4.3

Yes, there's no support for upgrading between dev builds, as the schema is changing often. Devs start fresh with the current db schema as they work on features. Upgrade scripts are only created between release schemas. On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Lucian, > > I read you

Re: DB upgrade fails on 4.3

If it helps at all, in the past when i've run into this I've edited the script to comment out the line that errored, and everything prior to it, then restarted the mgmt server so it could pick up the upgrade where it left off. It sometimes takes 2-3 times, but you essentially just skip over whateve

Re: DB upgrade fails on 4.3

On 19.01.2014 15:41, Marcus Sorensen wrote: If it helps at all, in the past when i've run into this I've edited the script to comment out the line that errored, and everything prior to it, then restarted the mgmt server so it could pick up the upgrade where it left off. It sometimes takes 2-3 tim

Re: VXLAN problems

On 19.01.2014 14:37, Marcus Sorensen wrote: You probably need an IP address on the physical network that you're running vxlan on, since this host needs to communicate with other hosts to send vxlan packets. Where prevously you could just bring up a bridge on an ethernet interface with no config,

CLVM volumes shown under the wrong hypervisor type (OVM)

Hi, Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5907 for this. There doesn't seem to be any lack of functionality with these volumes, but it seems wrong to display OVM there instead of KVM and may cause other issues in the future. Anyone aware of any workarounds? -- Sent from th

Anyone else having trouble starting up a VM in 4.3?

Hi, I rebased on top of 4.3 yesterday (previous rebase on top of 4.3 was just a few days earlier) and now I get an "Insufficient Space" exception when trying to start up a VM. Anyone else having this trouble? I didn't dig into this too deeply, though...perhaps there was a schema change and I'll

RE: Hyper-V Issues

Thanks Donal, I'll add some info in the wiki, although I'll check the validity of what I've been doing with you guys before telling everyone else what they should be doing. In the meantime - has something changed in the way CloudStack contacts the agent in hyper-v in the last 3 days? I suddenly

Re: Hyper-V Issues

On Jan 19, 2014, at 2:14 PM, Paul Angus wrote: > Thanks Donal, > > I'll add some info in the wiki, although I'll check the validity of what I've > been doing with you guys before telling everyone else what they should be > doing. > > In the meantime - has something changed in the way CloudSt

RE: Hyper-V Issues

Thanks Sebastien. @Hyperv-people I ran the new commands in the wiki PS C:\Users\Administrator> New-SelfSignedCertificate -DnsName apachecloudstack -CertStoreLocation Cert:\LocalMachine\M Directory: Microsoft.PowerShell.Security\Certificate::LocalMachine\My Thumbprint

RE: Hyper-V Issues

Forget that I built a new agent as well and I can connect again. I'll try an advanced network now. Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]

Re: Anyone else having trouble starting up a VM in 4.3?

Putting your logs here will be more helpful. Thanks, Yitao 2014/1/20 Mike Tutkowski > Hi, > > I rebased on top of 4.3 yesterday (previous rebase on top of 4.3 was just a > few days earlier) and now I get an "Insufficient Space" exception when > trying to start up a VM. > > Anyone else having

Re: Anyone else having trouble starting up a VM in 4.3?

Hi, Yeah, I just wanted to see first if anyone else had observed this issue. I have re-created my environment from scratch. The SSVM and CPVM start; however, I cannot start up a user VM. I have to head out for a bit, but can attach my logs when I return. Thanks On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:30 PM

Re: Anyone else having trouble starting up a VM in 4.3?

Just as an FYI, it claims an upgrade is in progress in part of the log. Not sure why that would be. On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Yeah, I just wanted to see first if anyone else had observed this issue. > > I have re-created my e

Re: Anyone else having trouble starting up a VM in 4.3?

This issue is reported with automation run https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5901 On 1/19/14 5:43 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote: >Just as an FYI, it claims an upgrade is in progress in part of the log. >Not >sure why that would be. > > >On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Mike Tutko

Re: Review Request 15746: Service Offering being created without host tags due to mismatch with base for test_vpc_vm_life_cycle.py.

> On Nov. 26, 2013, 8:17 a.m., Girish Shilamkar wrote: > > Ship It! Parth, Could you please close this item. Thanks, Girish - Girish --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/15746/#r

RE: Hyper-V Issues

Glad to know it worked for you. Do let me know if you face any issue. Regards, Devdeep -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 3:21 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Donal Lafferty; Devdeep Singh; Rajesh Battala; Anshul Gang

Re: Anyone else having trouble starting up a VM in 4.3?

Thanks! I updated the ticket to note that I have observed this in a basic zone (the ticket mentioned this has not been observed in a basic zone). On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Rayees Namathponnan < rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote: > This issue is reported with automation run > > https:

Re: Anyone else having trouble starting up a VM in 4.3?

I have updated the ticket with a couple exceptions from my log. On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > Thanks! > > I updated the ticket to note that I have observed this in a basic zone > (the ticket mentioned this has not been observed in a bas

Re: What does this UI thing do? "Root disk size"

Hi Nux, This for the root disk resize feature, we do not have it in this release. so I think we need to remove this box form the UI. created a bug to track this Bug link https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5909 Thanks, Bharat. On 19-Jan-2014, at 5:58 pm, Nux! wrote: > Hi, >

Re: Review Request 16780: Added new Configuration parameter to configuration table and checked for max value reached or not before acquiring an IP in a nic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16780/#review32280 --- engine/schema/src/com/cloud/vm/dao/NicSecondaryIpDaoImpl.java

Review Request 17113: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17113/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5498, CLOU

Re: Review Request 17113: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17113/ --- (Updated Jan. 20, 2014, 6:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shi

Re: Review Request 17113: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17113/ --- (Updated Jan. 20, 2014, 6:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shi

SSH issue in SG enabled advanced zone

Hello all, I am facing issue while SSHing to VM in security groups enabled advanced zone (XenServer host) even after applying the ingress rule for the security group in which VM is deployed. Also, even if I can see the ingress rule being applied through API listing and on UI, I can't see the ipta

Re: Review Request 16780: Added new Configuration parameter to configuration table and checked for max value reached or not before acquiring an IP in a nic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16780/ --- (Updated Jan. 20, 2014, 7:11 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: Review Request 16780: Added new Configuration parameter to configuration table and checked for max value reached or not before acquiring an IP in a nic

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16780/ --- (Updated Jan. 20, 2014, 7:14 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: Review Request 17113: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17113/#review32283 --- Ship it! Moving forward, could you please organise commits/patches