Fwd: CLOUDSTACK-5502 [Automation] createVlanIpRange API failing, if you pass VLAN

H Marcus, concerning https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5502 Is this still a problem for you? Can I have some more info? I was aware of the setting of vlan back to untagged when I wrote it. That's why I thought it wouldn't be a problem. In a prior mail of you you downwrote the issue

CentOS Special Interest Group

Hi, With the recent CentOS announcement there is a call for Special Interest Group (SIG): http://www.centos.org/variants/ This might be an opportunity to create an official centos variant for our management server and hypervisor setup as well as CentOS templates with Cloud-init support. I sen

edit access for cwiki

Can some one with the privilege give edit access to cwiki for the user 'murali.reddy'

Re: Review Request 16736: reverted encryption changes for ldap hostname and port. handled encryption during upgrade

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16736/#review31428 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On Jan. 8, 2014, 1:03 p.m

Review Request 16749: add updateCloudToUseObjecStore API to 'Image Store' category

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16749/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Min Chen, and Radhika PC. Bu

build is broken for 4.3

updateCloudToUseObjectStoreCategory is not not found in the known_categories dictionary which is causing apidoc to fail. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/talluri/asf/cloudstack/tools/apidoc/gen_toc.py", line 194, in category = choose_category(fn) File "/Users/talluri/

Re: Review Request 16361: CLOUDSTACK-5535: Do not allow addNetwork to create NIC across VPC tiers and Isolated Networks

> On Jan. 9, 2014, 12:39 a.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > One more check is needed: don't let to add vm to VPC network if its already > > a part of another VPC network. This check is already in place unless I am missing something: if (existingNetwork.getVpcId() != null && network.getGuestType

Review Request 16750: CLOUDSTACK-5651 deployVm: customparameters param name has to be changed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Repository: cloudstack-git D

Re: Trying to add Amazon S3 to CloudPlatform?

I agree with John. It's fine as implemented it just wasn't stated clearly in the documentation (or the error message) and it appears we have a migration path in place for 4.3 when wanting to convert from NFS to S3. -Aaron (+ @dev) Min, I don't think that the current implementation is a limita

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

Daan, I don't get the idea behind making the methods static. Making getter/setters static will lead to instance vars losing their meaning and we need each instance to let us know its sensitivity. I assume you are not suggesting changing the abstract method into static. Can you please explain?

[JENKINS] Jenkins upgraded to version 1.546

Hey All, I’ve upgraded Jenkins to version 1.546. There are some performance improvements that i found interesting enough to warrant the upgrade. I’ve also upgraded all plugins that had pending updates. If you notice any strange behavior let me know. Cheers, Hugo

Re: CentOS Special Interest Group

On 09.01.2014 09:11, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: Hi, With the recent CentOS announcement there is a call for Special Interest Group (SIG): http://www.centos.org/variants/ This might be an opportunity to create an official centos variant for our management server and hypervisor setup as well as Ce

Re: Review Request 16126: CLOUDSTACK-5404: Fix timezone bug in network usages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16126/#review31431 --- Commit d5277a81e644c6db30cff12878cd3708aa28cc86 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16126: CLOUDSTACK-5404: Fix timezone bug in network usages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16126/#review31432 --- Commit f012a2655d38fb8aa0f9e6cb6ee740e89b12359d in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16126: CLOUDSTACK-5404: Fix timezone bug in network usages

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16126/#review31433 --- Commit 3af4cf4488a857984872c4275b5486b8e23c16fd in branch refs/heads

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #22

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace Fetching changes from the

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #23

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace Fetching changes from the

Re: CentOS Special Interest Group

On Jan 9, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Nux! wrote: > On 09.01.2014 09:11, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> Hi, >> With the recent CentOS announcement there is a call for Special >> Interest Group (SIG): >> http://www.centos.org/variants/ >> This might be an opportunity to create an official centos variant for

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #24

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace Fetching changes from the

Re: edit access for cwiki

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > murali.reddy is in

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #25

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace Fetching changes from the

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

I mean to have the setting of the vars and the vars them selves be static , not the retrieving method. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Mandar Barve wrote: > Daan, > I don't get the idea behind making the methods static. Making > getter/setters static will lead to instance vars losing their m

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #26

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace Fetching changes from the

Build failed in Jenkins: build-4.2 #27

See -- Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on rpmbuilder-2 in workspace Fetching changes from the

RE: Hyper-V agent

I've added my hyper-v server into CloudStack (after dropping firewall and discovering I need to set the service to start automatically - sc config "CloudStack Hyper-V Agent" start= automatic). Now I can't find the hyper-v system vm template. I've found a ticket which says it's built by Jenkins

RE: Hyper-V agent

Hi Paul, Systemvm template for HyperV is already pushed to download.cloud.com Here is the url for the same.: http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2013-12-23-hyperv.vhd.bz2 Please download and use it. If you find issues with the template, please post the details. Thanks Raj

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.2 #28

See

RE: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

H Marcus, We had a small session on how we plan to go about ipv6 configuration with your bullet list present. Comments are still brainstorming phase quality but hopefully they will lead to something. > * VPC has no global IPv6 prefix (super CIDR as current private space), it's > simply IPv6 ena

RE: Hyper-V agent

CloudStack can't start hyper-v system vms with the following error: 2014-01-09 15:56:09,840 WARN [o.a.c.s.d.ObjectInDataStoreManagerImpl] (consoleproxy-1:ctx-da5fc066) Unsupported data object (VOLUME, org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6e3c7871), no need to delete fro

Re: Hyper-V agent

H Rajesh, How is the hyperv template build? And can it be build in the jenkins process that builds the other templates? thanks, Daan On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Rajesh Battala wrote: > Hi Paul, > Systemvm template for HyperV is already pushed to download.cloud.com > Here is the url for the

Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

Good info. I think seeing another use case helps us narrow the requirements a bit more. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H Marcus, We had a small session on how we plan to go about ipv6 > configuration with your bullet list present. Comments are still brainstorming > phase

Re: Hyper-V agent

Daan, It is build using the jenkins jobs, however at the moment they are not archived. See http://markmail.org/message/hyknsi5udiirdd7p Cheers, Hugo On 9 jan. 2014, at 17:28, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H Rajesh, > > How is the hyperv template build? And can it be build in the jenkins > process

Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Do you have any specific reasoning or need for the > VPC itself to have a configured contiguous block, rather than just > assign the /64s the networks? convenience in configuring the upstream router. The idea is that everything on the netw

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5502 [Automation] createVlanIpRange API failing, if you pass VLAN

Let me see if I can dig up the specifics. If I remember right, it just seemed backward. No vlan id should be treated as untagged, not untagged treated as null. There's a lot of code that is skipped if vlanid is null, but does useful things if UNTAGGED. Ill be back in an hour or two with the results

Re: IPv6 in VPC (was Re: IPv6 plan - questions)

On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> Do you have any specific reasoning or need for the >> VPC itself to have a configured contiguous block, rather than just >> assign the /64s the networks? > > > convenience in configuri

RE: Hyper-V agent

Hi Daan, The hyperv systemvm is generated from the jenkisn.buildacloud.org. Vhd generated with name tag xenserver is used for hyperv as xenserver and hyperv supports vhd. The uploaded template to download.cloud.com is generated from Jenkins only. After testing it, it got zipped pushed. Tha

RE: Hyper-V agent

Hi Paul, Are you using SMB as secondary store? Is the secondary store is reachable and has necessary permission for the Host to access the storage. Thanks Rajesh battala -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2014 9:56 PM To: d

Unfamiliar with checkstyle

Hi, I was merging some code from 4.3 to master and received three checkstyle errors. I'm not really familiar with how to find out details of these errors. Can someone point me to the right place to begin my investigation? All I see right now is the following: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.

RE: Hyper-V agent

Hi Rajesh, Yes I'm using SMB for the secondary storage, the system vm image gets copied over to the local storage (2.6GB routing-9.vhd ) this gets copied to as ROOT-1.vhd then deployment fails, then it creates ROOT-2.vhd and fails, then creates ROOT-3.vhd and fails etc... Regards Paul Angu

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5502 [Automation] createVlanIpRange API failing, if you pass VLAN

Currently if I create my public range with 'untagged', I get: "Vlan id is required when add ip range to the public network" So at the very least it seems the patch is not working. It may be better to edit CreateVlanIpRangeCmd and change the parameter at the source if 'untagged' is passed in,

Re: build is broken for 4.3

Thanks Talluri for fixing this. It is my bad for forgetting this extra step in replacing old API. -min On 1/9/14 2:39 AM, "Srikanteswararao Talluri" wrote: >updateCloudToUseObjectStoreCategory is not not found in the >known_categories dictionary which is causing apidoc to fail. > > >Traceback (

Re: Review Request 16361: CLOUDSTACK-5535: Do not allow addNetwork to create NIC across VPC tiers and Isolated Networks

> On Jan. 9, 2014, 12:39 a.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > One more check is needed: don't let to add vm to VPC network if its already > > a part of another VPC network. > > Saksham Srivastava wrote: > This check is already in place unless I am missing something: > if (existingNetwork.

Re: Review Request 16361: CLOUDSTACK-5535: Do not allow addNetwork to create NIC across VPC tiers and Isolated Networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16361/#review31444 --- Saksham, The patch fails on 4.3 branch with the error: Applying: C

RE: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

Mike, If you're using eclipse, checkstyle has a plugin that you can install. Point the plugin to the style file in tools/checkstyle/cloud-style.xml and it will use the same syntax. I've always found it much easier to use the plugin than to read the build outputs. If you don't want to install

RE: Hyper-V agent

Can you post the agent log and mgmt. server log. Look like agent is trying to clone the template disk to create root volumes for the VM's and failing to clone/copy. -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2014 11:15 PM To: dev@clo

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5502 [Automation] createVlanIpRange API failing, if you pass VLAN

Oops, the list got dropped off accidentally. My previous two messages were in regards to CS 4.2. To recap, in 4.2 the UI would interpret no vlan entered as 'untagged' and pass that as a parameter. Undocumented or not, it was being used by the API's biggest customer. with 4.2, passing 'untagged' r

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5502 [Automation] createVlanIpRange API failing, if you pass VLAN

I think we simply make "" == untagged in CreateVlanIpRangeCmd and be done with it. It maintains compatibility with the UI and any installations that have taken advantage of it. Will post a patch review. On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Sound like we need to implement 4 diff

Review Request 16758: vlan="" should end up as untagged vlan URI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16758/ --- Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogland. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5502 http

Re: Review Request 16758: vlan="" should end up as untagged vlan URI

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16758/ --- (Updated Jan. 9, 2014, 6:52 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and daan Hoogla

Re: CLOUDSTACK-5502 [Automation] createVlanIpRange API failing, if you pass VLAN

Oops, I stated the problem incorrectly a few messages up, it's confusing. Here's the proper issue, for posterity: To recap, in 4.2 the UI would interpret no vlan entered as 'untagged' and pass that as a parameter. Undocumented or not, it was being used by the API's biggest customer. with 4.2, pa

SSL and Nagle

In CloudStack's various uses of SSL, I never see that we disable Nagle. Isn't this a performance killer?

Re: Review Request 16361: CLOUDSTACK-5535: Do not allow addNetwork to create NIC across VPC tiers and Isolated Networks

> On Jan. 9, 2014, 6:22 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > > Saksham, > > > > The patch fails on 4.3 branch with the error: > > > > Applying: CLOUDSTACK-5535 : Do not allow addNetwork to create NIC across > > VPC tiers and Isolated Networks > > error: patch failed: server/src/com/cloud/vm/UserVm

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #316

See -- [...truncated 551 lines...] Receiving objects: 62% (288765/460815), 82.12 MiB | 213 KiB/s Receiving objects: 62% (289086/460815), 82.47 MiB | 255 KiB/s Receiving objects: 63

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #317

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 74% (341859/460815), 123.92 MiB | 456 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (345612/460815), 124.21 MiB | 483 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #318

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349826/460815), 128.75 MiB | 307 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349827/460815), 129.15 MiB | 318 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: CentOS Special Interest Group

Le 09/01/2014 09:11, Sebastien Goasguen a ecrit : Hi, With the recent CentOS announcement there is a call for Special Interest Group (SIG): http://www.centos.org/variants/ This might be an opportunity to create an official centos variant for our management server and hypervisor setup as well

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

I can install the plug-in for Eclipse. Thanks, Alex! On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > Mike, > > If you're using eclipse, checkstyle has a plugin that you can install. > Point the plugin to the style file in tools/checkstyle/cloud-style.xml and > it will use the same syntax

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #319

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349827/460815), 137.28 MiB | 457 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349827/460815), 137.61 MiB | 447 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #320

See -- [...truncated 558 lines...] Receiving objects: 73% (336502/460815), 104.87 MiB | 195 KiB/s Receiving objects: 73% (336505/460815), 105.04 MiB | 180 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #321

See -- [...truncated 558 lines...] Receiving objects: 71% (331649/460815), 92.47 MiB | 256 KiB/s Receiving objects: 71% (331649/460815), 92.73 MiB | 248 KiB/s Receiving objects: 71

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

It looks like we need to apply the checkstyle rules on a project-by-project basis. Are we currently applying these rules to every project or just a subset? Thanks On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > I can install the plug-in for Eclipse. > > Thanks, Alex! > > > On Thu, Jan

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #322

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349816/460815), 125.79 MiB | 410 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349816/460815), 125.91 MiB | 370 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #323

See -- [...truncated 563 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349821/460815), 126.31 MiB | 428 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349821/460815), 126.60 MiB | 379 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #324

See -- [...truncated 565 lines...] Receiving objects: 73% (339137/460815), 123.14 MiB | 273 KiB/s Receiving objects: 73% (339143/460815), 123.30 MiB | 278 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

I see two of the issues are in CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreImpl and are related to imports. One complains about using * and the other about having duplicate imports. I did not actually make these changes, so this makes me wonder if checkstyle is not typically being run on every project (so maybe I

RE: Hyper-V agent

Agent log: http://pastebin.com/40Tan8UG mgmt log: http://pastebin.com/ZATWt7Nb Regards, Paul Angus Cloud Architect S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: 09 Janua

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #325

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349813/460815), 127.44 MiB | 466 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349813/460815), 127.75 MiB | 497 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build issues on master (POM related)

Hi, I haven't tried to build master in Eclipse in quite a while and am noticing at least 88 POM-related problems. http://i.imgur.com/io2SJRn.png Is there an easy and safe way to fix these so Eclipse is happy? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tu

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #326

See -- [...truncated 562 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349827/460815), 134.96 MiB | 403 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349827/460815), 135.50 MiB | 451 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #327

See -- [...truncated 559 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349762/460815), 144.28 MiB | 370 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349763/460815), 144.36 MiB | 346 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #328

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 73% (339109/460815), 120.35 MiB | 251 KiB/s Receiving objects: 73% (339109/460815), 120.65 MiB | 256 KiB/s Receiving objects:

RE: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

Mike, My guess is it's been brought back in during the merge. I fixed most of those things in master. You can go back to a previous version to double check. Checkstyle is being run for every single project, unless someone specifically disabled it. --Alex > -Original Message- > From

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #329

See -- [...truncated 559 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349821/460815), 132.36 MiB | 669 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349821/460815), 132.70 MiB | 551 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

You are correct, Alex. I did not notice until after I sent my e-mail that the merge brought back in a few imports that checkstyle did not like. Thanks! On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > Mike, > > My guess is it's been brought back in during the merge. I fixed most of > those

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

Hey Alex, While we're on the subject, do you know of a good way to easily apply the checkstyle rules to all projects without having to go into the project properties of each project? Sometimes I find it useful in Eclipse after a big update from Git (where directories have been changed or somethin

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #330

See -- [...truncated 563 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (348807/460905), 124.96 MiB | 270 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349843/460905), 125.44 MiB | 276 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: Review Request 16750: CLOUDSTACK-5651 deployVm: customparameters param name has to be changed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/#review31468 --- One minor suggestion - can you please change this place: private M

Re: Review Request 16750: CLOUDSTACK-5651 deployVm: customparameters param name has to be changed

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16750/#review31467 --- One minor suggestion - can you please change this place: private M

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #331

See -- [...truncated 562 lines...] Receiving objects: 73% (338296/460905), 118.73 MiB | 474 KiB/s Receiving objects: 73% (338296/460905), 118.98 MiB | 410 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #332

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349934/460931), 133.21 MiB | 331 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349934/460931), 133.69 MiB | 336 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #333

See -- [...truncated 566 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349915/460945), 146.11 MiB | 696 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349916/460945), 146.81 MiB | 711 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #334

See -- [...truncated 560 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (349930/460945), 131.74 MiB | 313 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (349930/460945), 132.17 MiB | 319 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: Review Request 16729: CLOUDSTACK-4904: Unable to see a derieved template if the parent template is deleted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16729/#review31476 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On Jan. 9, 2014, 6:47 a.m., Hari

Re: Review Request 16729: CLOUDSTACK-4904: Unable to see a derieved template if the parent template is deleted

> On Jan. 9, 2014, 10:46 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > Ship It! Get the following error applying for 4.3. Also for master you might have to submit a different patch because of checkstyles. Do check. Nitins-MacBook-Air:cloudstack nitinmehta$ git apply ../../Desktop/0001-CLOUDSTACK-4904-Unable-t

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #335

See -- [...truncated 563 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350165/461220), 130.60 MiB | 201 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350165/461220), 130.82 MiB | 202 KiB/s Receiving objects:

[ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Sanjay Tripathi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #336

See -- [...truncated 561 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350440/461262), 151.28 MiB | 394 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350442/461262), 151.71 MiB | 390 KiB/s Receiving objects:

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Sanjay, congratulations! On 1/9/14, 2:53 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >Sanjay Tripathi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce >that they have >accepted. > >Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #400

See -- [...truncated 586 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350608/461267), 168.86 MiB | 355 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350610/461267), 169.40 MiB | 421 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350611/46

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Sanjay Tripathi

Congrats Sanjay.. :) On 09/01/14 3:06 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Sanjay, congratulations! > >On 1/9/14, 2:53 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > >>The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked >>Sanjay Tripathi to become a committer and we are pleased to announce >>that th

Review Request 16774: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-5053; KVM QEMU need to be present in agent hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16774/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang. Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/

Re: Review Request 16774: Fix for defect CLOUDSTACK-5053; KVM QEMU need to be present in agent hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16774/ --- (Updated Jan. 9, 2014, 11:11 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhan

Jenkins build is back to normal : cloudstack-4.3-maven-build #337

See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #401

See -- [...truncated 567 lines...] Receiving objects: 75% (350458/461267), 171.21 MiB | 283 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350458/461267), 171.72 MiB | 289 KiB/s Receiving objects: 75% (350460/46

netapp plugin

Hello, What's Netapp storage plugin doing? Thanks, Victor Rodionov

Re: netapp plugin

This might help: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI8xIV38Oiw On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote: > Hello, > > What's Netapp storage plugin doing? > > Thanks, > Victor Rodionov > -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.c

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #310

See -- [...truncated 558 lines...] Receiving objects: 76% (350590/461267), 163.00 MiB | 500 KiB/s Receiving objects: 76% (350592/461267), 163.61 MiB | 546 KiB/s Receiving

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #402

See -- [...truncated 572 lines...] Receiving objects: 77% (357575/461283), 188.74 MiB | 396 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (357869/461283), 188.88 MiB | 384 KiB/s Receiving objects: 77% (358317/46

Re: netapp plugin

Mike - thanks for pointing Victor to our video. Victor - I’m not sure that everyone on the dev list wants to see this whole conversation, so feel free to contact David (cc’d) and I off list and we can talk more in depth. -Chris -- Chris Suich chris.su...@netapp.com NetApp Software Engineer Dat

Re: Unfamiliar with checkstyle

Any thoughts on this checkstyle issue? [INFO] Starting audit... /Users/mtutkowski/Documents/CloudStack/src/CloudStack/vmware-base/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/mo/HostMO.java:712:9: Got an exception - expecting EOF, found 'ObjectContent' Audit done. Everything looks OK in the method in question

  1   2   >