Re: Review Request 16566: CLOUDSTACK-5551: Search not working for Configuration parameters in (Account/zone/cluster/storage) settings page

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/ --- (Updated Jan. 2, 2014, 9:47 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Das

Re: Review Request 16566: CLOUDSTACK-5551: Search not working for Configuration parameters in (Account/zone/cluster/storage) settings page

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/#review31028 --- Commit bae5be7f4edad6954e5c3ccef5b70803aa8df141 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16566: CLOUDSTACK-5551: Search not working for Configuration parameters in (Account/zone/cluster/storage) settings page

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/ --- (Updated Jan. 2, 2014, 10:20 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da

Re: Review Request 16566: CLOUDSTACK-5551: Search not working for Configuration parameters in (Account/zone/cluster/storage) settings page

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/#review31029 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Koushik Das On Jan. 2, 2014, 10:20 a.m., Har

Re: Review Request 16566: CLOUDSTACK-5551: Search not working for Configuration parameters in (Account/zone/cluster/storage) settings page

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/#review31030 --- Patch doesn't apply on master. - Koushik Das On Jan. 2, 2014, 10:

Re: Error while building

Hey daan problem was solved :). Thank you for helping me. The problems was because my source was in a partition called "TV&Movie" (named in windows). I think java was misinterpreting that name to "TV%26Movie" when I changed the source location to my home folder that problem was solved. Thanks again

Review Request 16568: CLOUDSTACK-5633: Fixed network cleanup issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16568/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5633 h

Re: Review Request 16566: CLOUDSTACK-5551: Search not working for Configuration parameters in (Account/zone/cluster/storage) settings page

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16566/#review31031 --- Commit fd0fabd3e24adb6cea4b7ae2fe771f0422b3cd12 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

> On Dec. 23, 2013, 5:58 p.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/BaseListTemplateOrIsoPermissionsCmd.java, > > line 53 > > > > > > You shouldn't have to override for every cmd. By default its fal

Usage records

Dear Cloudstack developers, I am wondering what would be the impact on CloudStack if I run the following SQL statement on the usage database: #delete from cloud_usage where start_date like "2012-%" AND end_date like "2012-%"; I am planning to remove lots of records that are no longer needed. J

Re: Usage records

no impact, I think. and usage_network table as well. 2014/1/2 Tamas Monos > Dear Cloudstack developers, > > I am wondering what would be the impact on CloudStack if I run the > following SQL statement on the usage database: > > #delete from cloud_usage where start_date like "2012-%" AND end_dat

RE: Usage records

Hi, In the usage_network table I only see "event_time_millis" no start/end. Can I assume that field is the timestamp? Thanks, Tamas -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 January 2014 12:29 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Usage records no

Re: Usage records

yes. You can delete old records (please keep the latest records). 2014/1/2 Tamas Monos > Hi, > > In the usage_network table I only see "event_time_millis" no start/end. > Can I assume that field is the timestamp? > > Thanks, > > Tamas > > -Original Message- > From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ust

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to c024a93

Hugo, Thanks for your commit to fix my mistake. I checked the source codes just now, it looks plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/OvsVifDriver.java also need to be changed. And, these commits also need to be cherry-picked to 4.2 branch, right? -Wei 2014/1/2 > Update

Re: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL]root admin api to deploy default system vm

Daan, Appreciate your feedback. To clarify, yes the plans based on an earlier suggestion by chiradeep is to go ahead and provide a logsearch service which will be available to be used optionally. The service by itself would not require any changes to the cloudstack core and could be made available

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to c024a93

Hey Wei, Thanks for checking, just pushed the fix for OvsVifDriver as well. I didn’t check the 4.2 branch yet for this bug, did you? Cheers, Hugo On 2 jan. 2014, at 14:10, Wei ZHOU wrote: > Hugo, > > Thanks for your commit to fix my mistake. > > I checked the source codes just now, it look

Re: git commit: updated refs/heads/master to c024a93

yes. We need to change "Ok" to "0". 2014/1/2 Hugo Trippaers > Hey Wei, > > Thanks for checking, just pushed the fix for OvsVifDriver as well. I > didn’t check the 4.2 branch yet for this bug, did you? > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > On 2 jan. 2014, at 14:10, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > Hugo, > > > > Thanks

Hyper-V agent

Happy New Year Everyone, Is there somewhere I can download the hyper-v cloudagent (AgentShell.exe) rather than needing to build a windows development environment to build it. + what's the longer term plan? I can't see Microsoft house sysadmins being willing to build their own agents in order t

Review Request 16570: CLOUDSTACK-5185: Fixed test script related to cleanup in test_egress_fw_rules.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16570/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5185 h

About CloudStack PaaS

Happy new year 2014 guys, I started looking around open source PaaS solutions and found some: CloudFoundy, AppScale, OpenShift, Tsuru... I have some questions: Do CloudStack have any plan for PaaS building? if not, which PaaS solution CloudStack work closest? I'm trying AppScale. It is pretty g

Re: untagged as public vlan tag (4.3)

Sorry, this bug is already open for this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5502 On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > Should this be working still? > > *My devcloud config has this (and it has forever):* > "ipranges": [ > { > "startip": "192.168.80.1

Re: untagged as public vlan tag (4.3)

I am experiencing this bug using Xen, so it may or may not be related to the KVM bug... On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > Sorry, this bug is already open for this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5502 > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Will Stevens wr

RE: Hyper-V agent

I agree that we need a distro for the agent. Based on what KVM does, what is the pattern for distributing non-Java agents? DL From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 02 January 2014 15:12 To: Donal Lafferty; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Anshul Gangwar Subject: Hyper-V agent Happ

untagged as public vlan tag (4.3)

Should this be working still? *My devcloud config has this (and it has forever):* "ipranges": [ { "startip": "192.168.80.100", "endip": "192.168.80.199", "netmask": "255.255.255.0", "vlan": "untagged", "gateway": "192.168.80.2" } ], *When I deploy

Re: untagged as public vlan tag (4.3)

No, it's definitely the commit mentioned in CLOUDSTACK-5502. Not hypervisor specific. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > I am experiencing this bug using Xen, so it may or may not be related to > the KVM bug... > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > >> So

Re: untagged as public vlan tag (4.3)

Thank you for your help pointing me in the right direction on this one. Just a note. Interestingly, I was able to get it to deploy using the following in my devcloud.cfg (as per hints in that bug). "ipranges": [ { "startip": "192.168.80.100", "endip": "192.168.80.199",

Re: untagged as public vlan tag (4.3)

It may work for Xen, it still breaks KVM as the agent code watches for Vlan.UNTAGGED On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > Thank you for your help pointing me in the right direction on this one. > > Just a note. Interestingly, I was able to get it to deploy using the > following

RE: TLSv1 vs TLS vs SSL use throughout CS

It might also be good to be able to globally specify other characteristics of the SSL/TLS configuration - for example, the list of supported ciphers. -Original Message- From: Demetrius Tsitrelis [mailto:demetrius.tsitre...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 10:11 AM To: dev@clo

Re: TLSv1 vs TLS vs SSL use throughout CS

Sounds like a good idea. On 1/2/14 9:51 AM, "Demetrius Tsitrelis" wrote: >It might also be good to be able to globally specify other >characteristics of the SSL/TLS configuration - for example, the list of >supported ciphers. > >-Original Message- >From: Demetrius Tsitrelis [mailto:demet

Re: About CloudStack PaaS

On 02.01.2014 16:00, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: Happy new year 2014 guys, I started looking around open source PaaS solutions and found some: CloudFoundy, AppScale, OpenShift, Tsuru... I have some questions: Do CloudStack have any plan for PaaS building? if not, which PaaS solution CloudStack work c

Problems creating a Basic Zone

Hi, Has anyone else tried to create a Basic Zone recently? This is not working for me for at least two reasons: 1) A NullPointerException in NetUtils.java. 2) Once I hack NetUtils.java so it no longer throws a NPE, the Basic Zone is created, but no system VMs start. I see message like, "console

RE: Problems creating a Basic Zone

Yes, I have seen this issue in automation setup; below defect created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5722 Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 10:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.

Re: Problems creating a Basic Zone

OK, thanks! By the way, any thoughts on how to get those system VMs up and running? I'm going to try with KVM and see if that platform works. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Rayees Namathponnan < rayees.namathpon...@citrix.com> wrote: > Yes, I have seen this issue in automation setup; below d

RE: Problems creating a Basic Zone

Is it because of below check-in ? https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=9ec137e75b39a7a462a1160ab3186e4afd156500 Daan - can you please have look on this ? Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Rayees Namathponnan Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014

RE: Problems creating a Basic Zone

Hello, Who can/should I contact to remove an e-mail address from your forwarding or distribution list? Noelle Wang -Original Message- From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 10:22 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Problems cre

RE: Problems creating a Basic Zone

Here the details http://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Noelle Wang [mailto:noe...@backbonetechnology.com] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 10:29 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Problems creating a Basic Zone Hello, Who

Re: Problems creating a Basic Zone

I think this should help you, Noelle: http://cloudstack.apache.org/mailing-lists.html On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Noelle Wang wrote: > Hello, > Who can/should I contact to remove an e-mail address from your forwarding > or > distribution list? > > Noelle Wang > > -Original Message-

Re: Problems creating a Basic Zone

I get the same errors with KVM and am unable to start system VMs. I wonder if we are still planning on hitting our deadline next week for a release candidate? It has been quite difficult testing over the past week or so as several issues have been introduced. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Ray

Re: networks and isolation/broadcast

hey guys, have been sick in bed all day, sorry to react slowly. I saw your explanation Marcus and I should check for the case that only one of the two is null and return false. I will update and if you haven't already I will put in a fix. regards, Daan On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Marcus Sore

Re: networks and isolation/broadcast

Cool...sounds good Does anyone have any thoughts on the system VM issue (with them not starting on Xen or KVM)? Console proxy is not in correct state to be started: Stopped On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > hey guys, > > have been sick in bed all day, sorry to react slowl

Re: networks and isolation/broadcast

I did notice one issue, but I don't think it's the cause because after correcting it the system VMs still do not start. In the wizard, I said I wanted to use local storage; however, I see the system.vm.use.local.storage property was still false after my cloud was created. I changed it to true and

Re: networks and isolation/broadcast

I'm not that familiar with this part of the codebase, but the code in the "Stopped" if block looks incorrect when it assigns to proxy instead of doing a return. Thoughts? @Override public ConsoleProxyVO startProxy(long proxyVmId) { try { ConsoleProxyVO proxy = _cons

Re: networks and isolation/broadcast

I pushed an extra check to 4.3 I'm not sure what you mean with your last post Mike. if (proxy.getState() == VirtualMachine.State.Stopped) { _itMgr.advanceStart(proxy.getUuid(), null, null); proxy = _consoleProxyDao.findById(proxy.getId()); }

Re: networks and isolation/broadcast

Yeah, I'm not sure what's supposed to happen there. I guess it's supposed to enter the Starting state and then when it gets into the Running state is when we stop returning null (so I suppose it's OK). I'm just trying to figure how why my system VMs don't start. :) On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:36 P

Email Address Change

Hi All, Please note that I will no longer be responding from WeMD email address. If would like to reach me, please email me via ilya(at)apache(dot)org I'll be changing the email address on mailing lists shortly. Looking forward to amazing 2014 for ACS community! Thanks ilya

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master » Apache CloudStack #330

See -- maven31-agent.jar already up to date maven31-interceptor.jar already up to date maven3-interceptor-commons.jar already up to date <===[JENKINS REMOTING CAPACITY]=

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #330

See Changes: [sheng.yang] CLOUDSTACK-5723: Add timeout for SSL handshake -- [...truncated 68 lines...] [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Dedicated Resources [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - Hyp

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

-Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 3:48 AM To: Edison Su Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 31.12.2013 23:47, Edison Su wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Nux! [mailto:

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

-Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 2:11 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Edison Su Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2014 3:48 A

Nexenta iSCSI Storage driver

Hello, I'm working on Nexenta iSCSI storage driver for cloudstack, what you think about this guys? Thanks, Victor Rodionov

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #331

See

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master » Apache CloudStack #331

See

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 02.01.2014 22:12, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: [Animesh] Nux, as Edison mentioned KVM Snapshot are not supported in ACS. We use customized qemu internally which allows us to take snapshots but cannot be redistributed in ACS [Animesh] because of license incompatibility I know[1], my issue is no

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

-Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 2:56 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 02.01.2014 22:12, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh] Nux, as Edison mentioned KVM Snapshot are not

ACS 4.2: list networks returns empty, if a VN is created without net mask

Hi Saksham The issue here is if we specify the gateway without specifying the net-mask , the networks table gets updated with the VN name , but in db both gateway cidr are empty . list network bails out because if this. > list zones count = 1 zone: name = default id = 9b5dd877-1fb1-4499-8fe

Re: Nexenta iSCSI Storage driver

I think most of the iscsi stuff has been worked out by the solidfire plugin, the only part to implement is communication with the Nexenta API (if there is one) to create volumes on the storage on-demand. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on Nexenta iS

Re: Nexenta iSCSI Storage driver

BTW, do I need to implement 2 drivers if I want support for iSCSI and NFS protocol? 2014/1/2 Marcus Sorensen > I think most of the iscsi stuff has been worked out by the solidfire > plugin, the only part to implement is communication with the Nexenta > API (if there is one) to create volumes on

RE: Regarding contribution to CloudStack project

Hey Abhinav, You can start here at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+101 It has the basic to start with CloudStack. You can also refer to http://www.slideshare.net/RadhikaNair/cloud-stack-forbeginners Please let us know if you have any queries. -Radhika -

Re: Review Request 16568: CLOUDSTACK-5633: Fixed network cleanup issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16568/#review31109 --- Commit 4251a09ef7ef0df42ffc9ac3f9614c4a5a9bd115 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16568: CLOUDSTACK-5633: Fixed network cleanup issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16568/#review31110 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.3 and master. - Girish Shilamkar On Jan.

Re: Review Request 16568: CLOUDSTACK-5633: Fixed network cleanup issue

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16568/#review3 --- Commit 8fb02e35ef86ffc6300b5cae72e70e279db49a7b in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16570: CLOUDSTACK-5185: Fixed test script related to cleanup in test_egress_fw_rules.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16570/#review31113 --- Commit 914bd1230ce5536bff27a6b354aa347989069381 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 16570: CLOUDSTACK-5185: Fixed test script related to cleanup in test_egress_fw_rules.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16570/#review31112 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.3 and master - Girish Shilamkar On Jan.

Re: Review Request 16570: CLOUDSTACK-5185: Fixed test script related to cleanup in test_egress_fw_rules.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16570/#review31114 --- Commit 17b696e053bff399670f36748a1784ae92bfe0c6 in branch refs/heads

Re: Nexenta iSCSI Storage driver

One driver for both protocols should suffice. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote: > BTW, do I need to implement 2 drivers if I want support for iSCSI and NFS > protocol? > > > 2014/1/2 Marcus Sorensen > > > I think most of the iscsi stuff has been worked out by the solidfire

Re: Nexenta iSCSI Storage driver

I'm not sure what would need to be done for NFS, CloudStack already supports it as primary and secondary storage for most hypervisors. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > One driver for both protocols should suffice. > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote

Re: Nexenta iSCSI Storage driver

Maybe snapshots and such...like what the NetApp guys are doing. On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I'm not sure what would need to be done for NFS, CloudStack already > supports it as primary and secondary storage for most hypervisors. > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:58 PM,

RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC

On 02.01.2014 23:41, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: -Original Message- From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro] Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 2:56 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] 3rd round of voting for ASF 4.2.1 RC On 02.01.2014 22:12, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: [Animesh]