On Sep 3, 2013, at 7:39 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:19 AM, sebgoa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After seeing lots of frustrated people with folks I decided to try something
>> out with markdown.
>>
>> I used pandoc to convert some docbook files to markdown and I used a
>> stru
Sebastien, are you referring to the installation guide?
I noticed a few defects too. I have created -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4602 and updated -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-829 to track them.
Please update these bugs if you see any other gaps.
Thank
All,
We are pleased to announce that the registration for the CloudStack
Collaboration Conference Europe is open. We would like to invite you all to
Amsterdam on November 20,21 and 22 to participate in this conference. Early
bird registrations are now available, so head over to the website
htt
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13934/#review25884
---
This looks reasonable to me.
For future reviews though, could you a
Hi Daan,
My take on things is to add a network offering for vpc private gateways. I
> extend the api
> call with the optional netoffer.
I read the wiki page on that feature [1] and the most recent code review,
but I don't fully understand it yet - is there any other documentation /
code around?
*hi folks ,*
*
*
*i'm building my cloudstack (4.2) inside DevCloud2 , i ran all the mvn
commands and the management jetty server is up*
*
*
*but i'm getting following exceptions is deploying the pre configured
infrastructure . after trying either of the commands,*
*
*
*mvn -P developer -pl tools/de
When and where did you get 4.2 ?
The latest version on git should have the fix for your problem
-sebastien
On Sep 4, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Punith s wrote:
> *hi folks ,*
> *
> *
> *i'm building my cloudstack (4.2) inside DevCloud2 , i ran all the mvn
> commands and the management jetty server is u
*hi folks ,*
*
*
*i'm building my cloudstack (4.2) inside DevCloud2 , i ran all the mvn
commands and the management jetty server is up*
*
*
*but i'm getting following exceptions is deploying the pre configured
infrastructure . ...after trying either of the commands or by configuring
it manually*
*
i'm trying with the (4.2) zip i downloaded 4 days back , so should i try
with 4.2 forward ??
regards,
punith s
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:17 PM, sebgoa wrote:
> When and where did you get 4.2 ?
>
> The latest version on git should have the fix for your problem
>
> -sebastien
>
> On Sep 4, 2013,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13964/
---
Review request for cloudstack, SrikanteswaraRao Talluri and Prasanna Santhanam.
I think it will work if you pull the latest code of 4.2 branch
Some commits have been cherry-picked from 4.2-forward to 4.2 branch by
Animesh today.
2013/9/4 Punith s
> i'm trying with the (4.2) zip i downloaded 4 days back , so should i try
> with 4.2 forward ??
>
> regards,
> punith s
>
>
> O
thanks for the info wei,
but the thing is , i'm building all my code inside debian instance in
Devcloud2 by doing a #scp /home/cs4.2.zip 192.168.56.10:/cloudstack4.2
so is this the way to do it ??
or should i git clone 4.2 and build the code in my host machine and use
Devcloud2 only for running
4.2 forward is working seamlessly inside Devcloud2 , all the system vm's
are up , looking forward to debug it interactively using eclipse at port
8787.
regards,
punith s
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Punith s wrote:
> thanks for the info wei,
>
> but the thing is , i'm building all my code i
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> [Animesh>] Any change should be done post 4.2
>
I agree, this should be post 4.2.
Hi all.
We're use CS 4.1.1.
I think there is no way to change network or networks to which VM
belongs _after_ it was created.
To change the network in which it is, it's required to create template
from it and then a new VM. Is there another way?
Is functionality to change network in which VM
I really like markdown, very readable in the state that it is in before it
is converted to whatever else. I also like reStructuredText.
Outputting to different formats is important I guess, however, I would say
that most real reading that is done is done in html.
With that said, I love beautiful
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 10:53:14PM +, Kelven Yang wrote:
> This is a design issue that we need to improve in general. However, a
> simple roll back logic does not solve the problem, since abnormal
> terminate can happen at any time, which means it can happen in the middle
> of job cancellation
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 12:26:36AM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> [Animesh>] Any change should be done post 4.2
>
Actually, now's the time IMO. Master is the 4.3 target at this point, so
shouldn't we make larger changes now? (moving docs to their own repo and
re-designing any tooling choice
I agree on splitting the docs out into their own repo that pull requests can be
sent to as bugs in the docs are found or different installations are tested and
documented.
With the current state of the docs being one of the greatest barriers to entry
for new CloudStackers, or even when running
Hi,
Could someone enlighten me with the various reasons for making a strategic
change in the tools we use for documentation ?
I loved DocBook and publican.
What are the advantages of having the new system in place other than a new look
and feel?
I am open to learning, but how easy for a write
Hi Swamy,
As observed, if portable ip range is created with IPs overlapping with any
of the existing public ip ranges, then it gives "Entity already exists"
error while associating any portable ip from the created range. (But it
doesn't give any error while creating portable ip range in this case)
On Sep 4, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could someone enlighten me with the various reasons for making a strategic
> change in the tools we use for documentation ?
>
> I loved DocBook and publican.
>
> What are the advantages of having the new system in place other
Michael,
Yes, if I see features that would be beneficial "now" rather than later when
4.3 comes out. What will happen then is, I take the feature from 4.3 (master)
and backport it to CloudSand 4.2, test it, and if goes well, I push it to
github, release rpms and virt appliance. Think of it as h
Hi Sebastien,
I am game. I am all there to do anything to enhance the documentation.
As far as I know, API documentation is not in good shape. I heard about
Installation Guide, as well.
I would also like to know what are the improvement areas around the
Administration Guide.
We can take it a
The current impl of the transaction interceptor is that its placed on
all public/protected methods of anything that extends GenericDaoBase.
This means that a simple findX() call ends up going through that
interceptor about 4 or more times as it goes through other methods likes
searchIncludingRe
On 09/04/2013 10:04 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
Kelven and Darren should review this.
That attribute used to be always read to determine if a method should be
intercepted at load time. My understanding is the switch to using spring as
the injection mechanism caused this to be turned off and now eve
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12134/#review25888
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Darren Shepherd
On Sept. 4, 2013, 4:55 p.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12134/#review25889
---
Ship it!
Ship It: Not committed, Pending review from alexh
- Darre
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12134/
---
(Updated Sept. 4, 2013, 4:55 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang an
So to get around this limitation, should we be looking at making appropriate
changes to deployDataCenter.py to not try to add NS device if it's not
supplied? The test would take care anyway of adding the device and configuring
the provider.
Thoughts?
> -Original Message-
> From: Soheil
Believe so. Here's a review removing that txn reference:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12134/
It hasn't been applied yet. Still waiting for more eyes on it.
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 09:46:37AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote:
> I see @DB(txn=false) a lot in the code. The javadoc says "By
> marking t
Kelven and Darren should review this.
That attribute used to be always read to determine if a method should be
intercepted at load time. My understanding is the switch to using spring as
the injection mechanism caused this to be turned off and now every single
method is intercepted, which is t
Resending this with the appropriate email for Darren.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 10:05 AM
> To: Prasanna Santhanam; Darren Shepherd
> Cc: Laszlo Hornyak; cloudstack; Kelven Yang
> Subject: RE: Review R
I see @DB(txn=false) a lot in the code. The javadoc says "By marking
txn=false the method is not surrounded with transaction code" but I
can't find any code that backs up this claim. I only can find the below
code in com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionContextBuilder that seems to point
to the fact
Why do we need an unauthenticated backdoor? Is there any chance we can
just get rid of that entry point to CloudStack?
Darren
Hi Darren,
It's a very commonly used port for many installations that want an
unauthenticated API access, especially from other tools and systems. I
think getting rid of this would be really bad idea.
Matt
On 9/4/13 1:49 PM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote:
>Why do we need an unauthenticated backdoo
Its only available by default on dev builds, helps with executing commands
quickly and not worry about api key signing.
If you install via RPM/DEB, 8096 is not enabled by default.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mull...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, Septem
On 09/04/2013 10:52 AM, Mathias Mullins wrote:
Hi Darren,
It's a very commonly used port for many installations that want an
unauthenticated API access, especially from other tools and systems. I
think getting rid of this would be really bad idea.
Sigh, I just hate the "totally insecure by de
It's not default, and it is nice to have. Users have to set the
integration port to enabled.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Darren Shepherd
wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 10:52 AM, Mathias Mullins wrote:
>>
>> Hi Darren,
>>
>> It's a very commonly used port for many installations that want an
>> unauth
On 9/4/13 10:18 AM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote:
>On 09/04/2013 10:04 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> Kelven and Darren should review this.
>>
>> That attribute used to be always read to determine if a method should
>>be intercepted at load time. My understanding is the switch to using
>>spring as the in
txn attribute is no longer meaningful after Spring change
Kelven
On 9/4/13 9:46 AM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote:
>I see @DB(txn=false) a lot in the code. The javadoc says "By marking
>txn=false the method is not surrounded with transaction code" but I
>can't find any code that backs up this claim.
On 09/04/2013 08:03 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
On 09/04/2013 10:52 AM, Mathias Mullins wrote:
Hi Darren,
It's a very commonly used port for many installations that want an
unauthenticated API access, especially from other tools and systems. I
think getting rid of this would be really bad idea.
On 9/4/13 9:36 AM, "Darren Shepherd" wrote:
>The current impl of the transaction interceptor is that its placed on
>all public/protected methods of anything that extends GenericDaoBase.
>This means that a simple findX() call ends up going through that
>interceptor about 4 or more times as it go
On 09/04/2013 11:04 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
It's not default, and it is nice to have. Users have to set the
integration port to enabled.
Ah thats good to know. That makes me feel a little better.
Darren
Hi Dev!
We have experienced a serious customers outage due to the OOM killer on a
redundant routing vm pair member. Somehow the MASTER node ran Out of Memory and
the OOM killer decided to kill random processes causing HAproxy to go down. But
since keepalived was still running and functioning, a
On 09/04/2013 11:15 AM, Roeland Kuipers wrote:
It would be nice to see that the VPC router config is persistent across reboots
even when rebooted outside cloudstack and using the same mechanism as the other
system vm's to make things more consistent and reliable.
What is your opinion on this?
Hi Darren,
Thanks for your reply! Could you share a bit more on your plans/ideas?
We also have been braining on other approaches of managing the systemvm's,
especially small customizations for specific tenants. And maybe even leveraging
a config mgmt tools like chef or puppet with the ability
On 09/04/2013 11:37 AM, Roeland Kuipers wrote:
Hi Darren,
Thanks for your reply! Could you share a bit more on your plans/ideas?
We also have been braining on other approaches of managing the systemvm's,
especially small customizations for specific tenants. And maybe even leveraging
a config
H Dave,
Sorry about the white space.
The creste neroffer api accepts system=true. The creation should be part of
the plugin install, though.
I will have to write more doc and any specific questions would help.
mobile biligual spell checker used
Op 4 sep. 2013 11:45 schreef "Dave Cahill" het
vo
I thought I'd be able to download systemvmtemplate-2013-09-03-master-hyperv.vhd
from http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-systemvm-master/
However, I don't see a link to do so.
Is systemvmtemplate-2013-09-03-master-hyperv.vhd or other recent copy online
anywhere?
DL
Not just Hyper-V but looks like none of the sytemvm images e.g. Xen/VMware are
posted on the site. -Soheil
From: Donal Lafferty [donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 12:35 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: SystemVM download
Would anyone know if Citrix CloudPlatform Source Code, specifically version
3.0.5 is out on the open?
What would be the closest match in Apache CloudStack and are there major
differences?
We've developed a feature for CCP 3.0.5 and used ACS 4.0.0 as code based. Since
we are touching few files,
Ilya,
I think the closest may be 4.1.0. For most of last year, Citrix CloudPlatform
was on its own development branch and source was not open. Back in January,
all of that was once again donated to Apache and went through IP clearance. So
the closest that matches the latest 3.0.x in functio
Have you tried
addNicToVirtualMachine
updateDefaultNicForVirtualMachine
removeNicFromVirtualMachine
http://goo.gl/qUKIgT
On 9/4/13 5:50 AM, "France" wrote:
>Hi all.
>
>We're use CS 4.1.1.
>I think there is no way to change network or networks to which VM
>belongs _after_ it was created.
>To
Hi Soheil,
You can get the template from below location; it's not latest but tested
extensively
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-06-12-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.2/systemvmtemplate-2013-07-12-master-xen.vhd.bz2
http://download.cl
You can still get CCP 3.0.5 from Citrix downloads.
On Wednesday, September 4, 2013, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> Would anyone know if Citrix CloudPlatform Source Code, specifically
> version 3.0.5 is out on the open?
>
> What would be the closest match in Apache CloudStack and are there major
> diff
Source?
> -Original Message-
> From: Todd Pigram [mailto:t...@toddpigram.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 4:54 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Citrix CloudPlatform Source Code
>
> You can still get CCP 3.0.5 from Citrix downloads.
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, Se
What would work as a quick fix for this sort of situation would be if
the machine could be configured to power off rather than rebooting on
oom. Then the HA system would restart the VM, applying all configs.
Anyone know how to do that? :-)
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Darren Shepherd
wrote:
>
Yes I cherry-picked a number of commits into 4.22 from 4.2-forward, including
devcloud issue
> -Original Message-
> From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 5:00 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Issues with 4.2
>
> I think it wi
Hi,
I'm having trouble running this command on one of my CS setups:
mvn -P developer -pl developer,tools/devcloud -Ddeploydb
Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: NO)
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.
Well, you can't as far as I've looked in the source of panic.c. So I'm thinking
of investigating of adding -1 as an option and seeing if I can push halt in,
let's hope the guys that do kernel stuff find this useful too.
Cheers,
Funs
Sent from my iPhone
On 4 sep. 2013, at 23:35, "Marcus S
No idea...I just completely uninstalled, then reinstalled MySQL and get the
same error message.
Never had this problem before. Weird.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble running this command on one of my CS setups:
>
> mvn -P developer -pl develop
Is there a root password set?
What do you get for:
mysql -u root
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Tutkowski"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 5:11:47 PM
Subject: Re: Clearing out DB in 4.2
No idea...I just completely uninstalled, then reinstalled MySQ
Typo I meant 4.2 not 4.22
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 1:40 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Issues with 4.2
>
> Yes I cherry-picked a number of commits into 4.22 from 4.2-forw
Here is the output:
Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password: NO)
I fear I'm somehow messed something up (not sure how since I haven't been
using this setup for a week or so). I'm pretty sure the root password is
just 'password'.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Jonathan Creasy
So does "mysql -u root -ppassword" work?
-Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Tutkowski"
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 5:23:23 PM
Subject: Re: Clearing out DB in 4.2
Here is the output:
Access denied for user 'root'@'localhost' (using password:
That does allow me entry into the MySQL shell. Progress :)
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Creasy <
jonathan.cre...@contegix.com> wrote:
> So does "mysql -u root -ppassword" work?
>
> -Jonathan
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Tutkowski"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>
+1.
Tested all steps in the release procedure.
On 9/3/13 9:43 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
wrote:
>
>
>I've created a 4.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>vote:
>
>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
>/heads/4.2
>Com
Wait a sec...just tried mysql -u root -p password
When I enter in cloud, it gives me the same error message.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> That does allow me entry into the MySQL shell. Progress :)
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Jonathan Creasy <
> jonathan.cre
But this time, it says Using Password: YES
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Wait a sec...just tried mysql -u root -p password
>
> When I enter in cloud, it gives me the same error message.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.c
If you have a password for your MySql, then you need to put a
db.properties.override in utils/conf folder. The default db.properties in
that folder has db.root.password as null.
Thanks
-min
On 9/4/13 3:28 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote:
>But this time, it says Using Password: YES
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 4
Let me give that a shot, Min.
This used to work OK (clearing out the DB), but then just mysteriously
stopped working for whatever reason today.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Min Chen wrote:
> If you have a password for your MySql, then you need to put a
> db.properties.override in utils/conf
Thanks, guys!
The db.properties.override file was missing - not sure why.
I should have thought of that. Been sick the past couple days am not
thinking all that clearly.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Let me give that a shot, Min.
>
> This used to work OK (clearing ou
Hi,
I think this has been discussed a few times on the list before.
When I start up the CSMS, I get prompted for my password about nine times.
I thought updating the sudoers file would fix this, but it still happens.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Develo
I'd support adding these parameters in some form in
/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config. Agree that OOM killer is of no use.
On 9/4/13 11:15 AM, "Roeland Kuipers" wrote:
>Hi Dev!
>
>We have experienced a serious customers outage due to the OOM killer on a
>redundant routing vm pair member. Somehow th
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think this has been discussed a few times on the list before.
>
> When I start up the CSMS, I get prompted for my password about nine times.
>
> I thought updating the sudoers file would fix this, but it still happens.
>
> Any thou
You need to make sudo-ers no-password required
Kelven
On 9/4/13 4:10 PM, "Tracy Phillips" wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Mike Tutkowski
>> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think this has been discussed a few times on the list before.
>>
>> When I start up the CSMS, I get prompted for my passwor
So I'm trying to setup a cloudstack environment from scratch. Not a
devcloud environment, but more like a production setup. Anyhow, so I
managed to get the cpvm and ssvm running, but there is no host entry for
them. Is that supposed to happen?
Darren
On 09/04/2013 03:27 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
Wait a sec...just tried mysql -u root -p password
That's a fun nuisance of the mysql CLI. There can't be a space between
-p and the password. So that command is actually doing a password of ""
and trying to switch to the database named password
I've been reading over the storage code and have come to the conclusion
that the async aspects of the storage framework should be removed.
Whenever one introduces an async pattern you have to give a lot of
consideration to its use, benefits, and impact. Within the context of
ACS and given the
Ah, that would explain why my first attempt like this worked:
mysql -u root -ppassword
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 03:27 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
>
>> Wait a sec...just tried mysql -u root -p password
>>
>
> That's a fun nuisance of the mysql CLI. T
Yeah, CSMS = CloudStack Management Server
Should this work?
root ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> You need to make sudo-ers no-password required
>
> Kelven
>
> On 9/4/13 4:10 PM, "Tracy Phillips" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Mike Tut
Hi,
The creste neroffer api accepts system=true. The creation should be part of
> the plugin install, though.
Ah, sounds interesting! Does it also accept creating networkofferings for
Traffic types other than Guest? Looking at 4.2, createNetworkOffering does
a check to restrict to Guest traffic
That is weird, do you have entries for them in the console_proxy and
secondary_storage_vm tables?
Have you tried to destroy them and let the Management server recreate them to
see if that creates the entry in the hosts table?
Travis
On Sep 4, 2013, at 7:38 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
> So I'm
This is what the relevant part of my sudoers file (on Mac OS X and Ubuntu
12.04.1) looks like:
# User privilege specification
rootALL=(ALL) ALL
mtutkowski ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL
%admin ALL=(ALL) ALL
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> Yeah, CSMS = CloudStack Managemen
This is what I have been using. I didn't want to give my cloudstack full
root access via sudo.
cloudstack ALL=NOPASSWD: /usr/bin/keytool*
cloudstack ALL=NOPASSWD: /bin/mkdir -p /home/cloudstack/*
cloudstack ALL=NOPASSWD: /bin/mount -o loop /home/cloudstack/*
On 5 September 2013 03:05, Mike Tutko
I've been trying to set up a CS env without devcloud, as well, with 4.2
recently and having trouble.
I notice my system VMs come up, but - in the CSMS console - it continues to
say SSVM is not running. When I look at them in the GUI, they show as Up,
but the Agent Status is just a hyphen.
On Wed
Interesting, Ian.
Although maybe not as ideal as your setup, do you see any error in what I'm
doing in that little clip I provided of my sudoers file? It doesn't seem to
stop the password prompts.
Thanks!
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Ian Duffy wrote:
> This is what I have been using. I did
+1
Tested basic VM operations with Xenserver and KVM and nfs as primary storage
with Advance Zone.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 10:13 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject
> do you see any error in what I'm doing in that little clip I provided of
my sudoers file?
Its to do with the way sudo permissions are resolved. To quote the sudoers
man pages: "When multiple entries match for a user, they are applied in
order. Where there are multiple matches, the last match is
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:10:28AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote:
>
> The state of documentation of an open source projects says a lot
> about the community that develops it...
>
Esp. for XML documentation: I say we write our own docs if we want
our feature to be used. Or it dies a natural death
Hi Gaurav,
The VLAN parameter is not mandatory. Depending on your environment you can
either pass a VLAN tag / untagged one.
We have updated our documents about the issue with adding same ip range
across portable and public VLANs. This is punted for 4.2.1.
Thanks,
SWAMY
On 04/09/13 8:26 PM, "Gau
Hi Swamy,
Thanks for setting up a call, the other day, we were able resolve this issue
quickly.
In what scenario would vlan id be passed? How does passing vlan id
change/affect Portable IP range to be created ?
I am guessing that Portable IP range created would be within IP range assigned
for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13895/#review25921
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- venkata swamy babu budumuru
On Sept. 3, 201
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 08:21:10PM +0200, Ove Ewerlid wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 08:03 PM, Darren Shepherd wrote:
> >On 09/04/2013 10:52 AM, Mathias Mullins wrote:
> >>Hi Darren,
> >>
> >>It's a very commonly used port for many installations that want an
> >>unauthenticated API access, especially from
Hi,
We do not have a doc team as such :-)
We have a set of doc contributors that so far have not worked as a team.
Probably, we should think about aligning the doc efforts and having a process
and style guide in place.
If the FS is good enough, we need not trouble the code committers to write
Seems like in both the cases agent is not up.
please try troubleshooting SSVM
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/ssvm-templates-secondary-storage-troubleshooting.html
-Harikrishna
On 05-Sep-2013, at 8:13 AM, Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> I've been trying to set up a CS env without devcloud, as wel
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13895/#review25923
---
Commit 4f3b411d4cf9a6986337dea98cd902b25efefb95 in branch
refs/head
I think prasanna hit the nail on the head. I'm sure there are features
there no one knows about, or ever will...
+1 for developers documenting what features/functions are abound.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath <
radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We do not hav
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13895/#review25924
---
Commit 0fb2014d19832a6e747a5c0775cd7c16f5ff786b in branch refs/heads
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
