I think prasanna hit the nail on the head. I'm sure there are features there no one knows about, or ever will... +1 for developers documenting what features/functions are abound.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath < radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We do not have a doc team as such :-) > > We have a set of doc contributors that so far have not worked as a team. > Probably, we should think about aligning the doc efforts and having a > process and style guide in place. > > If the FS is good enough, we need not trouble the code committers to write > own docs is what I feel. > > Regards > -Radhika > > -----Original Message----- > From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:t...@apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 9:34 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: documentation/wiki is a mess > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:10:28AM -0700, Darren Shepherd wrote: > > > > The state of documentation of an open source projects says a lot about > > the community that develops it... > > > > Esp. for XML documentation: I say we write our own docs if we want our > feature to be used. Or it dies a natural death in quiet isolation with no > one ever using it. Docs team can handle the editing and organizing bits. > That should go for Wikis too. If you want the wiki to be useful then write > it, organize it and maintain it. Don't just put it there to fill a > template. It'll never recieve any love. > > -- > Prasanna., > > ------------------------ > Powered by BigRock.com > >
