RE: Please cherry pick 2 doc fixes

Done > -Original Message- > From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomec...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:58 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi > Subject: Please cherry pick 2 doc fixes > > From 4.2-forward: > > (1) > Commit aeb962ad13dba2f67ed5

[PATCH] CLOUDSTACK-4437: Fix iso usage event count to match the number of image stores

Please apply on 4.2. cherry-pick from 502b2ff0f Signed-off-by: Prasanna Santhanam --- test/integration/component/test_project_usage.py |5 +++-- test/integration/component/test_usage.py |6 +++--- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/integration/com

Re: Review Request 13728: Fix iso usage event count to match the number of image stores

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13728/#review25407 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 22, 2013, 5:48 a.m., Srikan

registerSSHKeyPair

Hi folks, I am troubled by: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/user/registerSSHKeyPair.html It says that it returns the private key . This can't be right. I tried it with cloudmonkey and it does not return the private key (does not know it..) Unless I am missing something with w

Re: Api doc categories

Marcus, I recall a mail in this list where a naming convention was mentioned. Look along those lines for categories. regards, Daan On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I've spent a few minutes trying to figure out how API commands are linked > with their categories in the A

Re: registerSSHKeyPair

Hello, you have to use the keypair with: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/domain_admin/resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine.html for reset on vm Il 22/08/2013 10:51, Sebastien Goasguen ha scritto: Hi folks, I am troubled by: http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/user/reg

Re: registerSSHKeyPair

Hi, RegisterSSHKey API is used when we have SSH key pair and if we want to register that key pair in Cloudstack. So when we provide public key it just calculates fingerprint and registers the SSH key pair. CS doesn't know about private key. It just returns null as private key. Our doc is showi

Re: registerSSHKeyPair

*privatekey is set to null if registerSSHKeyPair * 2013/8/22 Sebastien Goasguen > Hi folks, > > I am troubled by: > > http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/api/apidocs-4.1/user/registerSSHKeyPair.html > > It says that it returns the private key . This can't be right. > > I tried it with cloudmonkey

Review Request 13731: Marivn test for cpu and memory overcommit feature.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13731/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

Review Request 13732: AWSAPI server fails to start because of error in bean creation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13732/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang and Prachi Damle. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4

Re: Review Request 13560: CLOUDSTACK-4021 : Update the test test_explicit_dedication.py according to new changes to dedicated resources

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13560/ --- (Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 10:27 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Sing

HA redundant virtual router

LS, Schuberg Philis guarantees 100% functional uptime for their customers. Infrastructure is of course part of this promise and the easier factor to provide strong levels of resiliency. For this reason we want to make use of redundant virtual routers together with HA functionality. We see HA a

Review Request 13733: Fix router tests by listing Routers for that account of type 'Isolated'.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13733/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4447 R

Review Request 13734: Fix test_03_RouterStartOnVmDeploy to stop all the pre-existing VMs before starting the test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13734/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4448 R

Re: registerSSHKeyPair

it's not returned at all.. so even if it's stored as null in the db, the apidoc should not say it returns 'privatkey' thoughts ? On Aug 22, 2013, at 5:31 AM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > *privatekey is set to null if registerSSHKeyPair > * > > > 2013/8/22 Sebastien Goasguen > >> Hi folks, >> >> I a

System VMs not running

Hi folks, I am running CloudStack 4.1.1. & running the NFS share on the same box as CloudStack management server (CentOS 6). The hypervisor is a separate Xen server. I am not able to get the system vms in a running state. We had not downloaded the vhd-util initially but it has been downloaded now

RE: System VMs not running

Did you seed the secondary storage with the systemvm template before starting the setup? If not, can you check if under your secondary storage the ../template/tmpl/1/1 directory is present? Regards, Devdeep > -Original Message- > From: Amit Das [mailto:amit@cloudbyte.com] > Sent: Th

[DISCUSS] HA on redundant virtual router

LS See also: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4374 Cheers, Roeland -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: donderdag 22 augustus 2013 12:32 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: HA redundant virtual router LS, Schuberg Philis

Re: Review Request 13731: Marivn test for cpu and memory overcommit feature.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13731/#review25412 --- test/integration/smoke/test_cpu_memory_overcommit.py

Re: System VMs not running

Hi, I have not seeded the secondary storage with system vm template. The directory ../template/tmpl/1/1 is not present. Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Devdeep Singh wrote: > Did you seed the secondary storage with the systemvm temp

Re: Review Request 13731: Marivn test for cpu and memory overcommit feature.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13731/#review25413 --- test/integration/smoke/test_cpu_memory_overcommit.py

Re: System VMs not running

Please follow the link to seed the system template http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.1/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#prepare-system-vm-template -Harikrishna On 22-Aug-2013, at 5:08 PM, Amit Das wrote: > Hi, > > I have not seeded the se

Re: registerSSHKeyPair

We generate docs based on the response object. Since we use the same response object for create/register ssh key pair APIs, doc shows same return values. We follow this for all API responses. Say list virtual machine API response does not include all the fields that are in api doc. -Harikrishna

Re: registerSSHKeyPair

On Aug 22, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Harikrishna Patnala wrote: > We generate docs based on the response object. Since we use the same response > object for create/register ssh key pair APIs, doc shows same return values. > We follow this for all API responses. Say list virtual machine API response >

Review Request 13735: CLOUDSTACK-4450: Possibility of /tmp/xapilog filling up the Root disk on Xenserver.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13735/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Devdeep Singh. Bugs: CLOU

Review Request 13736: Resolved Cloudstack: 4452 - fixed test cases in test_snapshots.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13736/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

[PATCH] CLOUDSTACK-4115 : Encrypt password in cluster_details table

Animesh, Please apply bbe8a6d266cd9aff659b697ea1fcbc36ec854f5a from 4.2-forward to 4.2 Updated Branches: refs/heads/4.2-forward a0f23d0f9 -> bbe8a6d26 CLOUDSTACK-4115 : Encrypt password in cluster_details table. This fix is to handle upgrades from versions earlier than 3.0.5 and 4.0. Upgrade

Re: Source NAT not applied on network startup (See Jira CLOUDSTACK-234)

I made a commit in 4.2-forward, will wait for BVT to run before raising a pull request to 4.2. On 22/08/13 12:12 PM, "Dave Cahill" wrote: >Adding Chiradeep for guidance, as Murali seems to be away at the moment. > >Prasanna kindly verified that this is an issue with Virtual Router as well >as M

About the Upgrade Path in 4.X

Hi, I am working on couple defects around upgrade, and I am trying understand the history behind the various upgrade paths in 4.x. In the RN, I could see an upgrade path from 3.0.2 to 4.1, but not 3.0.x to 4.x. If you have worked on upgrade/ RN, please help me understand why 3.0.x to 4.2 upgra

Re: Source NAT not applied on network startup (See Jira CLOUDSTACK-234)

Sounds great Murali, thanks for the quick response! On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Murali Reddy wrote: > > I made a commit in 4.2-forward, will wait for BVT to run before raising a > pull request to 4.2. > > On 22/08/13 12:12 PM, "Dave Cahill" wrote: > > >Adding Chiradeep for guidance, as Mu

FW: [ACS42] Upgrade from 4.0 and 4.1 to 4.2

From: Sudha Ponnaganti Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:02 AM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ACS42] Upgrade from 4.0 and 4.1 to 4.2 Hi, Reaching out to community to see if someone would be interested to upgrade from ACS 4.0/4.1 to ACS 4.2. If you do, can you share your results with

Re: About the Upgrade Path in 4.X

The file ./engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java lists the upgrade paths. 2013/8/22 Radhika Puthiyetath > Hi, > > I am working on couple defects around upgrade, and I am trying understand > the history behind the various upgrade paths in 4.x. > > In the RN, I could see

RE: About the Upgrade Path in 4.X

Thanks Wei. I am trying to find out whether https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4185 applies to all the upgrade path. -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:39 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: About

Cloudstack Ports

Greetings,I find the following open on my Cloud Management Server.PORT     STATE    SERVICE22/tcp   open     ssh23/tcp   filtered telnet111/tcp  open     rpcbind2049/tcp open     nfs5900/tcp open     vnc5901/tcp open     vnc-15902/tcp open     vnc-25903/tcp open     vnc-35904/tcp open     unknown59

RE: Cloudstack Ports

Are you using this host as both CloudStack management and also hypervisor? I have several instances of ACS installed, I don't have telnet or vnc enabled by default. This is indicative of your server configuration (and services installed) and not cloudstack. From: Maurice Lawler [mailto:maurice

Re: Cloudstack Ports

Yes, it's all under one server; KVM.On Aug 22, 2013, at 10:56 AM, "Musayev, Ilya" wrote:Are you using this host as both CloudStack management and also hypervisor? I have several instances of ACS installed, I don't have telnet or vnc enabled by default. This is indicative of your server configurat

Re: Review Request 13735: CLOUDSTACK-4450: Possibility of /tmp/xapilog filling up the Root disk on Xenserver.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13735/ --- (Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 3:45 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

why is configuration.default_value = value

Completely random, but I was just reading through SQL and stumbled upon schema-420to430.sql and noticed UPDATE `cloud`.`configuration` SET `default_value` = `value`; Seems bad to just set the default value as what was currently set at that time. If we want defaults, should probably go through

Re: Api doc categories

Thanks, in looking through the mail history, I can see various suggestions of adding categories to gen_toc.py, but I don't see a concrete explanation of how this works. In experimenting it seems that the category is matched against the api command name. That seems quite limiting from a third party

Re: Review Request 13732: AWSAPI server fails to start because of error in bean creation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13732/#review25417 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Kelven Yang On Aug. 22, 2013, 10:27 a.m., Li

[ACS42] CHANGES file

I am working on preparing for RC and we have a CHANGES file that lists new features and critical fixes. In ACS 4.2 we have resolved 800+ blocker and critical issues and it seems impractical to list such a huge list in the file. I am considering putting in a link to a public JIRA filter instead.

RE: [ACS42] CHANGES file

+1 on JIRA filter -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 10:23 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ACS42] CHANGES file I am working on preparing for RC and we have a CHANGES file that lists new features

RE: why is configuration.default_value = value

There's code that changes the default value if the default value in the db differs from the default value of the current cloudstack codebase. Can't change value itself because that's set by the sysadmin. So as an upgrade step, we set it to value. And then if it varies from the current shippin

Re: [ACS42] CHANGES file

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > I am working on preparing for RC and we have a CHANGES file that lists new > features and critical fixes. In ACS 4.2 we have resolved 800+ blocker and > critical issues and it seems impractical to list such a huge list in the > file

Re: About the Upgrade Path in 4.X

I believe the encryption for vCenter password was implemented as a part of 3.0.x, so the Cloudstack-4185 won't apply if the upgrade is done from freshly installed 3.0.x. Vijay should be able to provide more info on the topic as I remember him fixing this particular upgrade related bug. Vijay,

[DESIGN] Access entities directly...

Hi Everyone, I've been doing a lot of refactoring and I noticed the following type of code in our code base. Interface VpcService { Vpc getVpc(long id); PrivateGateway getPrviateGateway(long id); } Interface VpcManager extends VpcService { ... } Class VpcManager implements VpcManager { P

RE: [ACS42] CHANGES file

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 10:26 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS42] CHANGES file > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi > wrote: > > > > I am working on preparing for RC and w

Review Request 13745: CLOUDSTACK-4329: [DOC] Added Linux template creation documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13745/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4329 Repository: cloudstack-g

Re: Api doc categories

I've confirmed that mismatches can happen, for example if you say both VPN and VPC in an api name. It would be nice to have an explicit annotation for doc category. On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Thanks, in looking through the mail history, I can see various > suggesti

Re: why is configuration.default_value = value

Alex, I'm quite interested in a common dynamic settings/configuration framework and looked a little bit at what you've done with ConfigDepot. I think I do want to take it little further though. I'll have to write up what I'm thinking, but that won't probably come until next week. But I will for

Re: [DESIGN] Access entities directly...

These are great points Alex is making here and I was just noticing the same thing. One if the things I've noticed is that most managers inject a lot of DAOs. When you look at the code usually about half those DAOs are needed only for findById. So if you are consuming an object use the interface

Re: [DESIGN] Access entities directly...

Sorry clicked something that send that last email... To finish if ( obj instance VMInstanceVO ) return (VMInstanceVO)obj else return findByIdIncludingRemoved(obj.getId()) Just a thought Darren On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Darren Shepherd < darren.s.sheph...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thes

Git repo down error: no DAV locking support

I am cherry-picking few fixes for the RC build and just when I am ready to push to the repo it fails with following error $ git push origin 4.2 Password for 'https://anim...@git-wip-us.apache.org': error: no DAV locking support on https://anim...@git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack.git

Re: Git repo down error: no DAV locking support

I got the same thing. On Aug 22, 2013 3:25 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > > I am cherry-picking few fixes for the RC build and just when I am ready to > push to the repo it fails with following error > > > $ git push origin 4.2 > Password for 'https://anim...@git-wip-us.apache.org': > error:

Re: Git repo down error: no DAV locking support

I should mention that I tried a different host with a newer got client and it said "502 proxy error". Do we need to contact infra? On Aug 22, 2013 3:28 PM, "Marcus Sorensen" wrote: > I got the same thing. > On Aug 22, 2013 3:25 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" < > animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: >

RE: Git repo down error: no DAV locking support

Same here. I've tried pushing to both master and 4.2-forward. I can git pull fine, but it just hangs forever when I try to git push. Maybe something up with the authentication system? -Brian -Original Message- From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursd

RE: Git repo down error: no DAV locking support

I have created INFRA ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6686 > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 2:29 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Git repo down error: no DAV locking support > >

[ACS42] Need help on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4405

Marcus can you check on this issue? Wei looked at the code and it seems to be caused by your old commit. Animesh

Re: Git repo down error: no DAV locking support

seems fixed On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > I have created INFRA ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6686 > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 2:29 PM >> To: dev@clou

Re: Review Request 13745: CLOUDSTACK-4329: [DOC] Added Linux template creation documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13745/#review25431 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. Tested builds. Applied to master commi

Re: Review Request 13128: Zone Chart Extension

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13128/#review25435 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Brian Federle On Aug. 2, 2013, 1:37 p.m., Ch

[ACS42]CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456

Need to apply a0de0d0177a9251756d57ebdbea93f51a597ac1f and d157e2970ebd6d8d4c5a98a6d2adbc5da013f59b on 4.2 During the automation test, sometimes, KVM can't find volume, so add the code to look up volume for a few times(refresh storage pool).

RE: [ACS42]CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456

I was not able to cherry-pick a0de0d0177a9251756d57ebdbea93f51a597ac1f Gave error fatal: badobject From: Edison Su Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 3:29 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi Subject: [ACS42]CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456 Need to apply a0de0d0177

[ACS42] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-4454 and CLOUDSTACK-4455

Hi Animesh, Can you please cherry-pick the following two commits to 4.2? 52f08a4f36c35ac9827a1d253b000bfcd6f9d723 (CLOUDSTACK-4454) 18aacd48a2cac2f66b6ff7c70a73dc39b8d6ece1 (CLOUDSTACK-4455) Thanks -min

RE: [ACS42]CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456

Fixed my local repo was out of sync > -Original Message- > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 3:40 PM > To: Edison Su; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS42]CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456,CLOUDSTACK-4456 > > I was n

RE: [ACS42] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-4454 and CLOUDSTACK-4455

Done, pushing to 4.2 as soon as the build completes > -Original Message- > From: Min Chen > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 3:42 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi > Subject: [ACS42] Cherry pick for CLOUDSTACK-4454 and CLOUDSTACK-4455 > > Hi Animesh, > > Ca

Re: [DISCUSS/PROPOSAL] Upgrading Driver Model

Spring is not meant to be used as a solution for run-time "plug-ins". Darren is correct that Spring XML should be treated as code (ideal place for it is the resource section inside the jar). Why we end up the way now is mainly for practical reason. Since most of our current pluggable features are n

[ACS42] Cherry-pick for CLOUDSTACK-4199

Please cherry-pick following commit from MASTER for fixing CLOUDSTACK-4199. Thanks! --Sheng commit 2a26823ec19524051dd3cc11a338b36e2cecf437 Author: Sheng Yang Date: Thu Aug 22 17:45:12 2013 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-4199: Only use ifdown/ifup for the un-configured eth2 Seems the behavior of

Re: HA redundant virtual router

It's a design choice, the only reason is it would be a very complex situation to deal with. In fact the redundant router itself's policy has already been very complex... We didn't look into details at the time of implementing redundant router, but there are lots of concerns e.g. a network glitch m

Question about rate limiting (disk throttling) on the hypervisor side

Hi Wei, I have a question about the disk throttling feature you implemented in 4.2. Is it for KVM only? If so, are there any plans to extend it to other hypervisors going forward? Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com o: 303.

[ACS42] Cherry-pick for the fix of CLOUDSTACK-1670

Thanks! --Sheng commit 8daf3e3c23158cdab09af05b5f3a29fd2d9ca501 Author: Sheng Yang Date: Thu Aug 22 19:17:54 2013 -0700 CLOUDSTACK-1670: Fix multiple nic routing issue when dhcp_release available dnsmasq.conf need to contain /etc/dhcpopts.txt from the beginning, otherwise SIGHUP

RE: [ACS42] Upgrade from 4.0 and 4.1 to 4.2

Wanted to recheck if anyone is interested to do this. If you have done it already, pl do share the results with community. There are quite a few users that are using 4.1/ 4.0, can you try this upgrade path. Thanks /sudha From: Sudha Ponnaganti Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:02 AM To: dev@clo

Review Request 13759: Fix CLOUDSTACK-4466 - DHCP capability breaks in 4.2 for MidoNet

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13759/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-4466 Repository: cloudstack-g

[ACS42] Cherry pick commit 17ffe48ad2d78a9e145ada915ae40fa6792943f4

Hi Animesh, There is a bug related to concurrent xenserver snapshot, currently, we don't support take concurrent snapshot on one volume, so need to disable it. Previously, A volume state machine is used to prevent concurrent snapshot, but it's not enough, so acquire a table lock on snapshot

Re: Review Request 13727: Fix to attach uploaded volume to a stopped VM test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13727/#review25454 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 22, 2013, 6:20 a.m., Srikan

Re: Review Request 13733: Fix router tests by listing Routers for that account of type 'Isolated'.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13733/#review25455 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 22, 2013, 10:34 a.m., Srika

Re: System VMs not running

The step worked fine after seeding system VM into secondary storage location. However, i see the next error: WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-446:) Catch Exception com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException on host:21318624-cfd9-412d-aeb4-b1418424f287 for template: nfs://

Re: System VMs not running

this usually indicates that you missed the step where you prep vhd-util on the hypervisor. On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Amit Das wrote: > The step worked fine after seeding system VM into secondary storage > location. > > However, i see the next error: > > WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResource

Re: System VMs not running

Yes. The step was missed. However, i tried out the steps on 'vhd_util' later & restarted nfs, rpcbind & management services. Do i need to reset the DB as well ? Is there any work around for this ? Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 9:56 AM, Ahma

RE: About the Upgrade Path in 4.X

Radhika, Cloudstack-4185 applies to upgrades from 4.0 and 4.1 only. Upgrades from 3.0.2 and earlier won't require this workaround. ~kishan > -Original Message- > From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2013 11:09 PM > To: dev@cloudst

Re: Review Request 13734: Fix test_03_RouterStartOnVmDeploy to stop all the pre-existing VMs before starting the test

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13734/#review25458 --- Ship it! - Prasanna Santhanam On Aug. 22, 2013, 10:53 a.m., Srika

RE: About the Upgrade Path in 4.X

Got it. Thank you. Will close this issue. -Radhika -Original Message- From: Kishan Kavala [mailto:kishan.kav...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 10:25 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Vijayendra Bhamidipati Subject: RE: About the Upgrade Path in 4.X Radhika, Cloudstack-4185

Re: Review Request 13736: Resolved Cloudstack: 4452 - fixed test cases in test_snapshots.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13736/#review25459 --- Gaurav, there's more occurrences of is_snapshot_on_nfs in the same s

RE: CloudStack VPC <- VPN -> VPC

Hello Is it possible to make site-to-site VPN connection between VPC and VPC on CloudStack? Thanks Kimi -Original Message- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:38 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re:

Re: CloudStack VPC <- VPN -> VPC

Not now. But I think it's in the road map. --Sheng On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Kimihiko Kitase < kimihiko.kit...@citrix.co.jp> wrote: > Hello > > Is it possible to make site-to-site VPN connection between VPC and VPC on > CloudStack? > > Thanks > Kimi > > -Original Message- > From

[ACS42] Packaging changes

I had built a release candidate this evening but the packaging build fails, http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/package-rhel63-4.2-nonoss/84/console. I am not sure what changes are needed for RPM packaging in 4.2 branch. David, Hugo, Chip need help on this ? Thanks Animesh

RE: CloudStack VPC <- VPN -> VPC

Thanks! Is it in 4.2? -Original Message- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 2:52 PM To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack VPC <- VPN -> VPC Not now. But I think it's in the road map. --Sheng On Thu,

RE: CloudStack VPC <- VPN -> VPC

It is possible, sort of. You have to bring both up at the same time, otherwise they will time out and fail. There is no mode to make one side or the other just listen for connections. On Aug 23, 2013 12:37 AM, "Kimihiko Kitase" wrote: > Thanks! Is it in 4.2? > > -Original Message- > From: