Review Request 13102: CLOUDSTACK-3969: Upgrade failed from 3.0.3 to 4.2 in KVM host with error 4.2.0 KVM SystemVm template not found though systemvm-kvm-4.2 template is uploaded during 3.0.3 setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13102/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3969 Reposi

Re: Review Request 12905: Multiple VLAN range API need to accept a list rather than "add" or "remove" per command

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12905/#review24330 --- Since you have changed the vnet range separator from ';' to ',' Phy

Re: [GSoC] Generate API doc

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 01:45:22PM +0700, Nguyen Anh Tu wrote: > Hi guys, > > I need your help about generating api document for some new API I added. > Without this, building failed: > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File > "/home/mint/cloudstack/gsoc/gre/sdnextension/cloudstack/tools/a

RE: Master not running

All issues resolved. DL > -Original Message- > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] > Sent: 29 July 2013 10:45 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Master not running > > Build master from scratch using pull from this morning. > > Master builds, but does not

Re: Review Request 13102: CLOUDSTACK-3969: Upgrade failed from 3.0.3 to 4.2 in KVM host with error 4.2.0 KVM SystemVm template not found though systemvm-kvm-4.2 template is uploaded during 3.0.3 setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13102/#review24331 --- Review 13102 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: Review Request 12905: Multiple VLAN range API need to accept a list rather than "add" or "remove" per command

> On July 31, 2013, 7:35 a.m., Likitha Shetty wrote: > > Since you have changed the vnet range separator from ';' to ',' > > PhysicalNetworkVO -> getVnet needs to be updated. > > This method is referenced in quite a few places. > > > > If not already done, please open a bug to track the UI chan

Re: [GSoC] (Screencast/Demo) LDAP user provisioning

Moving along faster than expected with this. The pending patches do the following: - Disable UI password changes when LDAP is enabled. - Disable API password changes when LDAP is enabled. - Add support for the memberof filter. Hope to get SSL done before the week is out. On 26 July 2013 18:3

Re: Review Request 13062: Disable password change on UI when ldap is enabled

> On July 30, 2013, 1:59 p.m., Jenkins Cloudstack.org wrote: > > Review 13062 failed the build test : FAILURE > > The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #83 is : > > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/83/ Please note jenkins attempted to apply this to the mast

Re: Review Request 13063: Disables password changing from the API when LDAP is enabled.

> On July 30, 2013, 3:43 p.m., Jenkins Cloudstack.org wrote: > > Review 13063 failed the build test : FAILURE > > The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #85 is : > > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/85/ Please note jenkins attempted to apply this to the mast

Re: Review Request 13065: Add support for memberof filter i.e. groups within LDAP.

> On July 30, 2013, 5:30 p.m., Jenkins Cloudstack.org wrote: > > Review 13065 failed the build test : FAILURE > > The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #87 is : > > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/87/ Please note jenkins attempted to apply this to the mast

Generating truststore for LDAPS

Hi, Can anybody instruct me on how I can go about enabling LDAPS on active directory and creating a truststore?

Re: Open up ports beyond 80/443/8080 for downloading templates

What can be done is to include into validateUrl the port provided in the endpoint.url from addImageStore API . That will satisfy both objectstore and NFS based storage. The unorthodox port that comes from object store will anyway be closed on the SSVM so it will return a connection-refused. Would

Re: Review Request 13102: CLOUDSTACK-3969: Upgrade failed from 3.0.3 to 4.2 in KVM host with error 4.2.0 KVM SystemVm template not found though systemvm-kvm-4.2 template is uploaded during 3.0.3 setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13102/#review24337 --- Commit 9939d094558f59ec2c97ccebaa46e32319f8786d in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13016: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-3848: Usage events for dynamic scaling of cpu/ram operation on VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13016/#review24338 --- Commit 2c53ede1de1aae2f919e6235975e3342026a134a in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13102: CLOUDSTACK-3969: Upgrade failed from 3.0.3 to 4.2 in KVM host with error 4.2.0 KVM SystemVm template not found though systemvm-kvm-4.2 template is uploaded during 3.0.3 setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13102/#review24339 --- Ship it! commit 28f04c8ecc26b67b07d21a2ed66edb66a4fef603 - Kishan

Re: Review Request 13102: CLOUDSTACK-3969: Upgrade failed from 3.0.3 to 4.2 in KVM host with error 4.2.0 KVM SystemVm template not found though systemvm-kvm-4.2 template is uploaded during 3.0.3 setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13102/#review24336 --- Commit 28f04c8ecc26b67b07d21a2ed66edb66a4fef603 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 12967: Not enough cpu avialable in cluster according to new overcommit ratio but all stopped Vms can be started without any failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12967/ --- (Updated July 31, 2013, 9:49 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: Review Request 12967: Not enough cpu avialable in cluster according to new overcommit ratio but all stopped Vms can be started without any failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12967/ --- (Updated July 31, 2013, 9:54 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Kishan Kavala

Re: Generating truststore for LDAPS

So far I installed the "Active Directory Certificate Services" Confirmed Domain Controller authentication was present in both Certificate Templates and CA -> Certificate templates. I created a new cert in MMC under personal, exported this and used keytool to create a keystore keytool -import -fi

Re: Generating truststore for LDAPS

For creating trusted connections to LDAP you need to do the following: 1. Generate a test certificate using javatools that come with JDK. 2. Import this certificate in your AD. 2. Now you need to add this certificate(private key) to your truststore from where you will run the LDAP client. This is

Re: Generating truststore for LDAPS

Ian, You are already done with the steps. You just need the path to truststore and password to create the SSL connection to LDAP. -abhi On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > For creating trusted connections to LDAP you need to do the following: > > 1. Generate a test

Re: Generating truststore for LDAPS

Hi Abhi, Cool thanks for confirming that. Simpler than expected... On 31 July 2013 11:04, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > Ian, > You are already done with the steps. You just need the path to truststore > and password to create the SSL connection to LDAP. > > -abhi > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3

Update .gitignore

Hi, Can we add 'engine/storage/integration-test/test-output' to .gitignore? I find it gets generated on compile and then git thinks I want to add it to my repo. Thanks, Ian

Review Request 13107: CLOUDSTACK-2717: Adding optional parameter accuntid to listCapabilities API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2717 Reposito

Re: Review Request 13107: CLOUDSTACK-2717: Adding optional parameter accuntid to listCapabilities API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/#review24340 --- api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/config/ListCapabilit

Re: Review Request 13107: CLOUDSTACK-2717: Adding optional parameter accuntid to listCapabilities API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/ --- (Updated July 31, 2013, 11:19 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Meh

Re: Review Request 13107: CLOUDSTACK-2717: Adding optional parameter accuntid to listCapabilities API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/#review24341 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On July 31, 2013, 11:19 a.m., Ha

Re: Review Request 13107: CLOUDSTACK-2717: Adding optional parameter accuntid to listCapabilities API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/#review24342 --- Commit 798c507c7d9a0241fbaaddb3348eaa3313b4f9a3 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13107: CLOUDSTACK-2717: Adding optional parameter accuntid to listCapabilities API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/#review24343 --- Commit 3d9fc3dbc0e5c19635392593caa61776da02b2b6 in branch refs/heads

Regarding the hypervisor tools in new system vm templates

Hi All, For 4.2 we had started using new system vm template. And the generated system vm template for each target hypervisor don't have hypervisor specific guest tools installed in it. It has open-vm tools not hypervisor specific. I think it would be good to have xentools installed in Xenserver s

RE: Regarding the hypervisor tools in new system vm templates

Any changes to system VM templates require considerable testing. Pl do not make changes at this time for System VM templates unless there is a defect fix needed. -Original Message- From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:35 AM To: dev@cl

Re: Review Request 13107: CLOUDSTACK-2717: Adding optional parameter accuntid to listCapabilities API

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13107/#review24344 --- Review 13107 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Review Request 13109: CLOUDSTACK-3594: Fixes related to affinity groups

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13109/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Repository: cloudstack-gi

Re: Review Request 12967: Not enough cpu avialable in cluster according to new overcommit ratio but all stopped Vms can be started without any failure

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12967/#review24345 --- Ship it! commit ba619ec112170b916f69a7466a779196f74bef7c - Kishan

Re: Network Problem

I disabled it. Le 30/07/2013 17:58, Ahmad Emneina a écrit : > guest os firewall? > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Thomas Schneider < > thomas.schnei...@euskill.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I created a Security Group that allow all traffic by default in both way. >> I can ssh to a VM, but when

Re: Review Request 13109: CLOUDSTACK-3594: Fixes related to affinity groups

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13109/#review24346 --- Review 13109 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: [ACS42] Release Status Update: After Code Freeze Next Steps

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:33:51AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:03:08PM +, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 2:06 PM > > > To: dev@cloudst

[VOTE][RESULTS] Apache Cloudstack 4.1.1 (Second Round)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:04:27PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Hi All, > > I've created a 4.1.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.1 > Commit: d2c646f0a434831bd5a

Review Request 13112: upgrade to ASF 4.2 "cloud" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - Table "volumes"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: Clouds

Re: Review Request 13112: upgrade to ASF 4.2 "cloud" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - Table "volumes"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/#review24349 --- Review 13112 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Re: Review Request 12905: Multiple VLAN range API need to accept a list rather than "add" or "remove" per command

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12905/ --- (Updated July 31, 2013, 3:07 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Alena Prokhar

Re: Update .gitignore

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:35:32AM +0100, Ian Duffy wrote: > Hi, > > Can we add 'engine/storage/integration-test/test-output' to .gitignore? > > I find it gets generated on compile and then git thinks I want to add > it to my repo. > > Thanks, > Ian > Done in ldapplugin branch.

UI Plugin Feature Discussion

I have a couple UI Plugin related features I'm close to wrapping up and I'd like to throw them out to take some feedback: (I realize this is bad form to discuss the feature after implementation, so I apologize for that. However, everything here provides an optional feature for plugin developers

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:04:50AM +0100, Nux! wrote: > On 14.05.2013 15:41, Chip Childers wrote: > >As a way to get more user feedback on our major feature releases, what > >does everyone think about releasing one or two -beta releases for each > >major feature release? > > Hi, > > What has been

Re: Noisy ASFBot

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:14:58AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 03:17:22PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:15:33PM +0200, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > > I agree, > > > > > > @Prasanna, can we make ignore default and /activate ASFBot? That w

Re: [ACS42] Release Status Update: After Code Freeze Next Steps

Does it already fixed all 4.2 docs? If yes, I'd like to update it to transifex to go ahead doc globalization... On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:33:51AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:03:08PM +, Animesh Chatu

Re: [ACS42] Release Status Update: After Code Freeze Next Steps

On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 12:41:16AM +0900, Go Chiba wrote: > Does it already fixed all 4.2 docs? > If yes, I'd like to update it to transifex to go ahead doc globalization... I'm not sure. Animesh? Docs team? > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 31,

RE: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

I run my own hybrid version of 4.1 and with some features of 4.2 in production, since - I needed to backport some features of 4.2 into 4.1 Since this version was not officially released under ACS, I branded it as CloudSand (powered by Apache CloudStack). You can see the code here: http://www.gu

RE: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

Oops, wrong url for github, correct url is: http://www.guthub.com/serverchief/cloudsand > -Original Message- > From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:52 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta re

Re: Open up ports beyond 80/443/8080 for downloading templates

Hi Prasanna, I think what Tom and I mentioned is the url provided in registering a template, which is totally different from the endpoint.url for the object store. I still could not understand your suggestion. Thanks -min On 7/31/13 2:47 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote:

Re: UI Plugin Feature Discussion

Hey Chris , I think whatever proposals you have mentioned here make a lot of sense and should help in a better user experience. I would suggest that you submit a patch/multiple patches as per your convenience for the above mentioned categories and then we can take it forward from there . I would s

RE: [ACS42] Release Status Update: After Code Freeze Next Steps

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 8:44 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS42] Release Status Update: After Code Freeze Next Steps > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 12:41:16AM +0900, Go Chiba wrote:

Re: UI Plugin Feature Discussion

I'll work on the patches and get them into ReviewBoard shortly. There is, however, a Jira issue open for the UI Plugin Internationalization. Could someone please grant me access to assign that issue to me. My Jira username is 'csuich2'. Thanks, Chris On Jul 31, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Pranav Saxena

FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking

The KVM installation guide at http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Installation_Guide/hypervisor-kvm-install-flow.html , is unnecessary complicated and inaccurate. For example, we don't need to configure vlan on kvm host by users themselves, cloudstack-agent will

Re: UI Plugin Feature Discussion

Hi Chip , Just a reminder in case you didn't happen to see this thread . Could you please help out Chris here by granting him access to JIRA ? Thanks, Pranav On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:31 PM, SuichII, Christopher < chris.su...@netapp.com> wrote: > I'll work on the patches and get them into Rev

Re: Regarding the variable names in the VOs.

You can read Alex's tutorial regarding this: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Data+Access+Layer VO fieldname and its getter/setter method have to follow java convention. Thanks -min On 7/29/13 3:47 AM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote: >Hi all, > >I am came across a bug which was c

Re: FW: CS 4.1.0 - this will help a number of people who struggle with Advanced Networking

Yes, that's correct. I think we need to update the documentation. The user simply needs to create a bridge where 'public' traffic will work, and then set that bridge name as the traffic label for public traffic. Then it will create the vlan device and the bridge necessary for public based on the ph

RE: UI Plugin Feature Discussion

Done. --alex > -Original Message- > From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:psb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 11:27 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; chip.child...@sungard.com > Cc: Brian Federle; Jessica Wang; Sonny Chhen > Subject: Re: UI Plugin Feature Discussion > > Hi Chip ,

Re: Review Request 13112: upgrade to ASF 4.2 "cloud" Database Schema Inconsistencies on the Upgraded Setup - Table "volumes"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13112/ --- (Updated July 31, 2013, 7:17 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

H Ilya, I am working on a paralel track. At Schuberg Philis we have a version that contains some code from 4.2 and a patch that I cannot get committed to master. I don't want to release this in the open, but am interested in your considerations on the subject. regards, Daan On Wed, Jul 31, 2013

Re: UI Plugin Feature Discussion

Chris, It doesn't appear that that account exists. What email address does your account use? On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:57:18PM +0530, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Hi Chip , > > Just a reminder in case you didn't happen to see this thread . Could you > please help out Chris here by granting him acces

Re: UI Plugin Feature Discussion

Never mind - Alex handled it. On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:41:06PM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > Chris, > > It doesn't appear that that account exists. What email address does > your account use? > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:57:18PM +0530, Pranav Saxena wrote: > > Hi Chip , > > > > Just a remi

[Publican] What version to use?

What version of publican do we use? I recently rendered all docs for ACS 4.1.1 release and notices minor background inconsistencies along with many warning. Eventually, it all builds and very much similar to what we have online, but perhaps some is different in my version that causes this issue

Re: [Publican] What version to use?

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > What version of publican do we use? > > I recently rendered all docs for ACS 4.1.1 release and notices minor > background inconsistencies along with many warning. > > Eventually, it all builds and very much similar to what we have online, >

Re: [4.1] getVMPassword > how to decrypt

Isn't this encrypted with the ssh keys of the user? (createSshKeyPair) From: Antonio Petrocelli mailto:a.petroce...@netsons.com>> Reply-To: mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 2:46 AM To: mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: [4.1] getVMPassword > how to decrypt

Re: Open up ports beyond 80/443/8080 for downloading templates

Just a security measure, AFAIK. Since this is user-provided input, it causes CloudStack to blindly (CloudStack does not have any blacklists for example) to contact the supplied server. Presumably if the supplied server has the standard ports open, it has a WAF to defend itself. On 7/30/13 10:58 P

RE: UI Plugin Feature Discussion

Chris, > UI Internationalization: > This would allow UI Plugins to contribute their own internationalized strings > to the global js dictionary. Each plugin would define a dictionary.js and > several dictionary_.js files. So, the translation will be done on client-side? > Default value funct

RE: UI Plugin Feature Discussion

> I would suggest you to submit multiple patches for each category because that > way it will be easier to review and merge your changes. +1 -Original Message- From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:psb...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 10:30 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Brian Fe

Re: Review Request 12958: Automation test failure: can't attach volume to a stopped created VM. Fix the null pointer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12958/ --- (Updated July 31, 2013, 10:10 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, edison su an

RE: [DISCUSS] Should we be releasing -beta releases?

Daan, Why can't the patch be committed to master? The reason why CloudSand was created, was to bring in urgently needed features into stable version, such that on the next major upgrade to ACS, all features work as expected and nothing should break. Example, if I have a feature in CloudSand 4.

RE: [Publican] What version to use?

David, El6 is using 2.1.0, let me try out 2.8.2 Thanks ilya > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 5:42 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Publican] What version to use? > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Musa

[ACS42][Request] CLOUDSTACK-1191

Hi, I'd like to request a cherry-pick for b611394cca1bfb3e655212701562ca8b24a61034 into 4.2 This RBD code should have already been in there, but I completely forgot to do so. It changes code how the KVM Agent handles the RBD integration and it will enable snapshotting for RBD. Some time

Re: Review Request 13093: Put retry logic to check existence/non-existence of created/deleted files even though vSphere returns successful completion on wait for asynchronous task.

> On July 31, 2013, 1:49 a.m., Jenkins Cloudstack.org wrote: > > Review 13093 PASSED the build test > > The url of build cloudstack-master-with-patch #90 is : > > http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/cloudstack-master-with-patch/90/ When speaking with Kelven regarding a different bug, Kelven point

Re: UI Plugin Feature Discussion

require.js only requires the appropriate dictionary, depending on the locale, so…kind of =) I have submitted one review request for each of these features on ReviewBoard. Let me know if anything isn't right (this is my first time using ReviewBoard). Chris On Jul 31, 2013, at 6:03 PM, Jessica W

Re: [GSoC] (Screencast/Demo) LDAP user provisioning

Hi Ilya, SSL is now done. Still need to do more testing on it but it appears to be working. > I want to backport this into my customized 4.1 cloudstack edition called > cloudsand. CloudSand is a hybrid of> CloudStack stable version with some > urgently needed features pulled from master to

Re: Review Request 12185: Remove dependency on backport-util.concurrent, and just use built in classes

> On July 2, 2013, 8:50 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > Ship It! > > Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Has this been committed? no - Dave --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12185/#

Re: Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

> On July 2, 2013, 7:11 a.m., daan Hoogland wrote: > > Your change seems fine. > > > > Did you regression test it? Or did you solve a problem with it? Just noticed during code inspection - Dave --- This is an automatically generated e-

Re: Review Request 12941: [GSoC] refactor gre controller

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12941/ --- (Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 1:41 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Sebastien Goas

Re: Review Request 12192: set the field 'state' rather than the unread parameter 'state', if the parameter is null

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12192/#review24405 --- Review 12192 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

2013-08-01 Japanese CloudStack Community Weekly Update

We started to post Japanese CloudStack Community Weekly Update. # # # # New board member Tadashi Mishima: He was the member of Open Source Conference committee. And now he works for cloud implementation at major SIer in Japan. He helped CloudStack community at LinuxCon and CloudOpen Ja

RE: [GSoC] (Screencast/Demo) LDAP user provisioning

Ian, Much appreciated, Can't wait to put this into real world QA :) Thanks ilya > -Original Message- > From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 8:58 PM > To: Musayev, Ilya > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [GSoC] (Screencast/Demo) LDAP user

Re: Review Request 12185: Remove dependency on backport-util.concurrent, and just use built in classes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12185/#review24407 --- Review 12185 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

RE: [ACS42][Request] CLOUDSTACK-1191

> -Original Message- > From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl] > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2013 4:23 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS42][Request] CLOUDSTACK-1191 > > Hi, > > I'd like to request a cherry-pick for > b611394cca1bfb3e655212701562ca8b24a61034 into

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/ --- (Updated Aug. 1, 2013, 6:19 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamk

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

> On July 29, 2013, 12:32 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 374 > > > > > > I think you are not clear with the default egress policy. > > > > - egress po

Review Request 13188: CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up of memory/CPU based on the presence of tools in the template

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13188/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Nitin Mehta. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3042 Reposito

Re: Review Request 13188: CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up of memory/CPU based on the presence of tools in the template

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13188/#review24418 --- Ship it! server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageMa

Re: Review Request 13188: CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up of memory/CPU based on the presence of tools in the template

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13188/#review24420 --- Commit 381318928348289f5dacd9d482302a9be561f6bd in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 13188: CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up of memory/CPU based on the presence of tools in the template

> On Aug. 1, 2013, 6:42 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote: > > server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java, > > line 581 > > > > > > Ideally we should make it part of the constructor. On master you

Re: Review Request 13188: CLOUDSTACK-3042: handle System VM Scaling up of memory/CPU based on the presence of tools in the template

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13188/#review24422 --- Commit f12adfff8a7b51c53466ab556d5efe2c1961fe3e in branch refs/heads