Build master from scratch using pull from this morning.
Master builds, but does not run using 'mvn -pl :cloud-client-ui jetty:run' due
using to the following issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3919
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3918 (work around: delet
Hi,
I'd like to make several changes to our by-laws, but before I continue,
I've prepared a changset that tidies up whitespace and hard wraps. This
will make it easier to edit.
The only non-whitespace change my patch makes is to correct two spelling
errors:
Transparancy -> Transparency
desicion
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to make several changes to our by-laws, but before I continue,
> I've prepared a changset that tidies up whitespace and hard wraps. This
> will make it easier to edit.
>
> The only non-whitespace change my patch makes is to cor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12905/#review24182
---
Also the response format is incorrect. The vlan ranges have to be se
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 2:55 PM
> To: CloudStack, Dev
> Subject: [VOTE] Whitespace changes to bylaws.mdtext
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to make several changes to our by-laws, but before I continue, I've
> prepared a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13047/
---
Review request for cloudstack and mice xia.
Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jir
Hi all,
I'm wondering what the next steps on this[1] review is. I think someone
needs to merge the patch in before I close but I'm not sure what the
flow is. Maybe I need to close as submitted first? Can someone advise?
Thanks,
Tom.
[1] https://reviews.apache.org/r/12963/
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at
The person who reviewed and approved should commit the patch for you.
Thanks
-min
On 7/29/13 5:40 PM, "Thomas O'Dowd" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm wondering what the next steps on this[1] review is. I think someone
>needs to merge the patch in before I close but I'm not sure what the
>flow is. Maybe
Daan,
In my opinion, it's responsibility of the developer to provide
information and to stop Ops from failing over cliff.
Obviously Dev knows how code works (sometime not :), but Ops doesn't.
So, if Dev deny to help Ops, how can Ops setup the cloud in proper way?
When someone enhance hypervisor a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13047/#review24186
---
Review 13047 failed the build test : FAILURE
The url of build clouds
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13004/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 12:58 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, daan Hooglan
Hi ,
Basic Network will setup the security group, and it will deny all the
inbound traffic and allow outbound traffic.
you should manually add some ingress rules.
offical document:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.0.2/html/Installation_Guide/security-groups.html
O
Thanks for the replies, I posted the message as I was going to fix it and
submit a patch but wanted to know if there were any issues I should be aware of
in this area.
Actually the problem is not with ConfigurationServerImpl, but with the call to
CreateGuestNetwork(). I am actually a little con
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13047/#review24200
---
the chainSize for a volume is the total size of all nodes, not a sin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/
---
(Updated July 30, 2013, 3:46 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, C
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12883/#review24205
---
In researching this more look like there is a code in NetworkManager
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13025/#review24207
---
Commit 238815759664eb2a0e8c000389c976a8b1c5b269 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13025/#review24208
---
Ship it!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On July 29, 2013, 7:20 p.m., Jonath
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13025/#review24206
---
Commit 650de7998d989c1bc4a6b5a0a98e3fad49bf2247 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12963/#review24212
---
Ship it!
commit 5552d26872a13e7eab584412f787ae99551df23e (master)
c
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13004/#review24213
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- daan Hoogland
On July 30, 2013, 12:58 a.m.,
Cool will add it to my to do list.
On 29 July 2013 20:15, David Nalley wrote:
> Bah. Autocorrect. Make.
> On Jul 29, 2013 3:15 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>
>> Not that I am aware of. Feel free to male it so.
>> On Jul 29, 2013 2:11 PM, "Ian Duffy" wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just wondering, is the
Thanks Ian. I had a look at this file. It's an easy fix to remove the
check from here but it's a general utility function so will also affect
other uris... If there is no reason to limit any uri to those ports then
I'd like to remove this check and open them up.
Interested to hear opinions,
Tom.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 03:37:39PM +0900, Thomas O'Dowd wrote:
> Thanks Ian. I had a look at this file. It's an easy fix to remove the
> check from here but it's a general utility function so will also affect
> other uris... If there is no reason to limit any uri to those ports then
> I'd like to r
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/13055/
---
Review request for cloudstack, venkata swamy babu budumuru and Prasanna
Santhan
101 - 125 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
