---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12051/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen.
Description
---
form
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12052/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen.
Description
---
form
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12053/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen.
Description
---
form
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12054/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen.
Description
---
form
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12055/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien Goasguen.
Description
---
form
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12051/#review22300
---
Ship it!
applied to master 3fdcf1836c22567746c34a42db60505a42fbf6bc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12052/#review22301
---
Ship it!
applied to master 34fc209419dc0f9b6d347e7a33371bc0941069b6
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12053/#review22302
---
Ship it!
applied to master 3f4204b8bc5f31196cbd7c8ff8b343eb7e6ce88f
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12054/#review22303
---
Ship it!
applied to master d53f1c0946ca05504cff4f4af54a6b40413da06b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12055/#review22305
---
This was already patched in https://reviews.apache.org/r/12051/
You
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12051/
---
(Updated June 23, 2013, 3:54 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Sebastien
> On June 23, 2013, 3:35 p.m., Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> > This was already patched in https://reviews.apache.org/r/12051/
> > You are missing testCaseExecuteEngine, I think you attached the wrong patch
> > to 12051.
> > So now we are only missing the testCaseExecuteEngine
You are right, I fi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12051/#review22307
---
Ship it!
ok applied 3e430ccbf07e80656e130fbd42afd5a5fa955af5
- Seb
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/12055/#review22308
---
I guess you can discard this one...
since I applied the patch via 12
Taking vacation first week of July and will offline (for any form of
work purposes) from July 1st through 7th.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
j...@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
I've created this repo based on Rohit's work to preserve history.
The repo is currently read only. I'd like several reviews of this repo
before I open it up for writes.
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git
--David
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:27 PM, David Nalley wro
Uhhh - can we start with a fresh license and notice file.
There are clearly not some of the things mentioned in LICENSE/NOTICE
in this repo.
--David
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:50 PM, wrote:
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master [created] 6abd98356
>
>
> Initial commit with LICENSE, NOTICE, a
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013, at 04:01 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Uhhh - can we start with a fresh license and notice file.
> There are clearly not some of the things mentioned in LICENSE/NOTICE
> in this repo.
NOTICE should have been fine, but I corrected the LICENSE file.
Best,
jzb
--
Joe Brockmeier
Current patch/systemvm/debian is based on debian squeeze,
which kernel is 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem. In that system vm,
cloud-early-config silently fails :
/etc/init.d/cloud-early-config: line 109: /dev/vport0p1: No such file or
directory
So I've upgraded to wheezy (which includes virtio-console.ko)
#
Yes, I brought this up previously and was told that we require systemvm
upgrade between many versions and that it is nothing new. There are other
features in 4.2 as well that require the new system vm, so it will be made
known in the release notes and upgrade instructions.
On Jun 23, 2013 8:33 PM,
I personally thought it had been publicized pretty well on various threads
that there is a new system vm for master/4.2, but if you were unaware of
it, do you think more needs to be done to call it out and make it known to
the devs working on it?
On Jun 23, 2013 8:33 PM, "Hiroaki KAWAI" wrote:
>
No I don't think we need to make such effort (sending emails) for devs,
I think we should fix the code itself (and comments in the codes)
because we're devs.
(2013/06/24 12:20), Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I personally thought it had been publicized pretty well on various threads
that there is a new
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:20 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> I've created this repo based on Rohit's work to preserve history.
>
>
Great, thanks David. Maybe fix the repo description to "Apache CloudStack
CLI" etc.
> The repo is currently read only. I'd like several reviews of this repo
> before I op
Noah,
I agree that there needs to be a delineation. Here's my option on wording
describing what is non-technical:
+3.4.2. Non-Technical Decisions
+Non-technical decisions should normally be made by the entire community
using
+discussion-lead consensus-building, and not through formal voting.
+
Kawai-san,
commit 009da930580fba039b4b8a7532a8a6809d00ed02
+ patches/systemvm/debian/buildsystemvm.sh
The file under there is not used to build systemvm templates as recommended
anymore. The new way to build systemVMs is using veewee-vagrant definitions [1]
and the definition is based on a Debian
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:17:16AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:20 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>
> > I've created this repo based on Rohit's work to preserve history.
> >
> >
> Great, thanks David. Maybe fix the repo description to "Apache CloudStack
> CLI" etc.
Just curious
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013, at 04:01 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > Uhhh - can we start with a fresh license and notice file.
> > There are clearly not some of the things mentioned in LICENSE/NOTICE
> > in this repo.
>
> NOTICE should have b
So what is the proposed fix? Just to find some way to warn when the
user isn't using the correct systemvm template (the new one required
for 4.2 has been based on Wheezy for awhile), other than nothing
working and them having to look in the logs? This is probably a good
idea, we can perhaps have a
If you’re attending the CloudStack Collaboration Conference this week in
Santa Clara, you will see videographer Gregg Witkin shooting footage for
CloudStack videos. We’ll be getting content for both a “Top 10 Coolest
Clouds” video and also a “Conference Highlights” reel. Please note, this is
separ
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:17:16AM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:20 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> > I've created this repo based on Rohit's work to preserve history.
>> >
>> >
>> Great, thanks David. Maybe fix
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11936/#review22317
---
Commit 1eb744fa1600f9400e407c6e3615da40b18758c1 in branch refs/heads
> On June 20, 2013, 10:12 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
> > Ship It!
Please rebase
Nitins-MacBook-Air:cloudstack nitinmehta$ git apply
../0001-CLOUDSTACK-2916-admin-is-not-able-to-login-through-U.patch
error: patch failed:
server/src/com/cloud/configuration/ConfigurationManagerImpl.java:336
error
32 matches
Mail list logo
