RE: The given command does not exist or it is not available for user

Thanks, I found the error earlier in the log. (long story involving changing ISP) Cheers. Regards, Paul Angus S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 paul.an...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] Sent: 12 April 2013 16:01 To: dev@cloudsta

Re: [PROPOSAL] [CLOUDSTACK-2056] DeploymentPlanner choice via ServiceOffering

On 18/04/13 11:01 AM, "Koushik Das" wrote: >I have some comments inline > >> -Original Message- >> From: Prachi Damle [mailto:prachi.da...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:17 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] [CLOUDSTACK-2056] DeploymentPlann

Re: New Committer: Go Chiba

Congratulation :) On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go > Chiba to become a committer and we are pleased to announced that they have > accepted. > > Go has contributed tremendously to the Japanese

Re: New Committer: Go Chiba

Congrats Go Chiba On 18/04/13 12:26 PM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go >Chiba to become a committer and we are pleased to announced that they >have accepted. > >Go has contributed tremendously to the Japanese translations of

Re: [DISCUSS] labels for cloudstack university and GSoC

On Apr 16, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT) wrote: > I like Joe's proposition of potentially housing the [ACSEDU] tag under > marketing. I do agree that [GSoC] is 'Dev' related and belongs on that list. > > I agree that [GSOC] should be on dev for [ACSEDU] the only issue I see is about

RE: New Committer: Go Chiba

Congrats! -Original Message- From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:56 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: New Committer: Go Chiba The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Go Chiba to become a committer and

Re: [RFC][FS]PVLAN for isolation within a VLAN

On 18/04/13 6:29 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 05:49:23PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote: >> In fact that's the requirement for this design. We need this very strict >> restriction to implement isolation for the VMs. PVLAN is the way we >>used to >> approach this requirement. > >As

Re: [DISCUSS] labels for cloudstack university and GSoC

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:04 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Sebastien Goasguen > wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Some of you may have seen: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+University > > > > I also emailed about the Google Summer

Re: devcloud hanging

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > 32-bit dom0 but 64-bit hypervisor. > o.O As far as I remember and know, at the time of building DevCloud2, I had used 32-bit xen smp pae (xen-4.1-i386 from Debian Wheezy public repo) which is 32-bit (and we

failing mvn -P deps in CS 4.0.1

# mvn -P deps [INFO] Scanning for projects... Downloading: http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/apache/11/apache-11.pom [ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1] [ERROR] [ERROR] The project org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack:4.0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT (/usr/local/apache-clouds

RE: physical network is in incorrect state:Disabled

I am running into the same issue and I am not able to enable physical network through API also > -Original Message- > From: Gavin Lee [mailto:gavin@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 10:46 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: physical network is in incorrect s

Re: physical network is in incorrect state:Disabled

Move the ticket to API issue, the command does emit ( order has been changed ? bad memory :( ) but doesn't modify the database, my apology. Regards Isaac On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Srikanteswararao Talluri < srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com> wrote: > I am running into the same issue an

RE: physical network is in incorrect state:Disabled

Isaac, Did you manage to find out which code commit alters the order for the API calls here ? Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:59 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: physical network is in in

RE: physical network is in incorrect state:Disabled

Yes, updatePhysicalNetwork API call to enable physical network is not modifying "cloud.physical_network" table. Work around is to update the table in the database. Thanks, ~Talluri > -Original Message- > From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2

RE: physical network is in incorrect state:Disabled

Yeah that is fine. I already did that but what I was asking Isaac is which code commit modified that particular API so that we can fix it asap. -Original Message- From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 3:11 PM To: dev@cl

RE: Review Request: Storage motion changes for xenserver

Hi, The feature was given a “Ship It” after the review comments were addressed. Can someone apply and commit these changes to the master branch. I have verified that the patch applies cleanly to the latest master. Regards, Devdeep From: edison su [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf O

Re: CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

Hello, Thanks for your response. However, do you know in production cases, what are the maximum bandwidth i can manage with a vpc vr ? Are there limitations or any recommendations (sizing limit in order to avoid performance loss) concerning provisionning of the vpc ? Thanks for your advices.

Re: physical network is in incorrect state:Disabled

Hi Pranav: It's 8b40e393b845c4c3d7ca23c8e297dc43288f6863 On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Yeah that is fine. I already did that but what I was asking Isaac is which > code commit modified that particular API so that we can fix it asap. > > -Origi

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741: Granular Global Parameters

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10548/#review19380 --- api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/ConfigurationResponse.ja

Re: failing mvn -P deps in CS 4.0.1

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:11:42PM +0700, Ajimangun lintang mas wrote: > # mvn -P deps > [INFO] Scanning for projects... > Downloading: > http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/apache/11/apache-11.pom > [ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1] > [ERROR] > [ERROR] The project

Re: [DISCUSS] labels for cloudstack university and GSoC

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:27:07AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Apr 16, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Kelcey Damage (BT) > wrote: > > > I like Joe's proposition of potentially housing the [ACSEDU] tag under > > marketing. I do agree that [GSoC] is 'Dev' related and belongs on that list. > > > >

issues with add remove Network to VM

Hi I was testing Add /Remove Network to Virtual Machine Feature and found the following issues https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2086 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2083 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2061 These are breaking some basic scenario

CS 4.0.0 - mysql server connections aborted

Hello, I'm using a cs 4.0.0 preproduction server onto centos 5.3. I have launched a mysqltuner.pl onto the mysql server of the mgmt server. So it gives me connections aborted. Have you an explication why it show this ? How can i troubleshoot this ? Here is my mysqltuner.pl output : [root@clo

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2053: fixed if/else logic to address redundant entires, fixed boto/cloud-init support by adding metadata rewrite rule

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Ilya, the review has not posted cleanly. Can you redo? > > This almost looks like a RB problem. --David

CLOUDSTACK-1876

While debugging the VMWare system template fixed the cd rom device name that was causing the systemvm.iso not to load. After this the SSVM and CPVM are coming up fine. On router VM creation though it failed as this file /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules was present in the template as

CLOUDSTACK-1876

While debugging the VMWare system template fixed the cd rom device name that was causing the systemvm.iso not to load. After this the SSVM and CPVM are coming up fine. On router VM creation though it failed as this file /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules was present in the template as a d

Re: CLOUDSTACK-1876

This is the new 4.2 system vm template for VMWare http://aprateek.com/store/systemvmtemplate-4.2.ova with the below mentioned fix. On 18/04/13 7:47 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: > >While debugging the VMWare system template fixed the cd rom device name >that >was causing the systemvm.iso not

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2077 : The updatePhysicalNetwork command fails to update the database

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10605/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Pranav Saxena. Description --- The root

Re: issues with add remove Network to VM

2061 is marked as resolved at the moment. 2086 and 2083, commented on. Since 4.2 isn't really on my radar right now I haven't assigned them to myself yet, but if they're around for awhile I'll probably get to them. On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:00 AM, Shweta Agarwal wrote: > Hi > I was testing Add

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2077 : The updatePhysicalNetwork command fails to update the database

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10605/#review19389 --- Ship it! It looks a valid fix to me .The physical network db state

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2077 : The updatePhysicalNetwork command fails to update the database

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10605/#review19390 --- Commit 34899f9b999e0d92573aa7b8872e07a111811b53 in branch refs/heads

Re: IP tables blocking KVM/Console

Maurice, I was having the same issues, I tried a number of iptables rule changes, but it seems that whenever a new instance was deployed it would overwrite my changes and break things again. My temporary fix is to run a cron job that runs every minute that issues a service iptables stop. It's

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2077 : The updatePhysicalNetwork command fails to update the database

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10605/#review19391 --- Isaac , Thanks for the patch . Could you please mark the review requ

RE: physical network is in incorrect state:Disabled

Fix for this blocker has been pushed to master . Thanks Isaac for investigating the issue . Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Isaac Chiang [mailto:isaacchi...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 3:33 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: physical network is in incor

[ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

Min / Rohit, Joe ran into some changes (documented in CLOUDSTACK-2091) when reviewing the generated API documentation for 4.1 vs 4.0.x. Can either of you look at the bug for us and determine if we do in fact have an issue [1] to resolve? -chip https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-20

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

Chip, I am looking into the bug to see if this is a real issue. Thanks -min On 4/18/13 9:00 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Min / Rohit, > >Joe ran into some changes (documented in CLOUDSTACK-2091) when reviewing >the generated API documentation for 4.1 vs 4.0.x. Can either of you look >at the >bu

Re: CLOUDSTACK-1876

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > > While debugging the VMWare system template fixed the cd rom device name > that was causing the systemvm.iso not to load. > After this the SSVM and CPVM are coming up fine. > > On router VM creation though it failed as this file > /etc

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Min / Rohit, > > Joe ran into some changes (documented in CLOUDSTACK-2091) when reviewing > the generated API documentation for 4.1 vs 4.0.x. Can either of you look > at the > bug for us and determine if we do in fact have an issue [1] to re

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

I updated on the bug, I compared both 4.0 and 4.1 code, TrafficMonitorResponse is exactly the same, no change at all except that id to uuid field change. deleteUser api will also just return a SuccessResponse, no mentioned response parameters at all since 4.0 or even earlier. So I am not sure if I

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Min Chen wrote: > I updated on the bug, I compared both 4.0 and 4.1 code, > TrafficMonitorResponse is exactly the same, no change at all except that > id to uuid field change. deleteUser api will also just return a > SuccessResponse, no mentioned response paramet

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

I myself haven't used ApiXmlDocReader tool yet. Where are the old and new xml file in our repo? Thanks -min On 4/18/13 9:47 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Min Chen wrote: > >> I updated on the bug, I compared both 4.0 and 4.1 code, >> TrafficMonitorResponse is exa

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Min Chen wrote: > I myself haven't used ApiXmlDocReader tool yet. Where are the old and new > xml file in our repo? > > Thanks > -min > > They don't exist - you need to generate API docs in 4.0 and then generate API docs in 4.1 and take the resulting XML file fro

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

I am not quite familiar with this. Alena, are you able to chip in to take a look? As far as code and functionality is concerned, I don't see API compatibility issue here. Thanks -min On 4/18/13 9:56 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Min Chen wrote: > >> I myself have

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Min Chen wrote: > I am not quite familiar with this. Alena, are you able to chip in to take > a look? As far as code and functionality is concerned, I don't see API > compatibility issue here. > > Thanks > -min > > There are two potential problems (we're discussin

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1748: IP Reservation results in reserving the broadcast IP of the network as well

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10078/#review19395 --- server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseHelper.java

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

I've just looked at 4.0 code for addTrafficMonitorCmd.java API command, it had a bug. The "responseOjbect" annotation has incorrect value - ExternalFirewallResponse. And as API doc writer relies on this info for the doc generation, it was generated the wrong way. 4.0: @Implementation(description=

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1647: IP Reservation should not happen if the guest-vm cidr and network cidr is not same but their start ip and end ip are same.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10005/#review19396 --- server/src/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

Thanks Alena. I will close the bug as not a problem then. -min On 4/18/13 10:18 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >I've just looked at 4.0 code for addTrafficMonitorCmd.java API command, it >had a bug. The "responseOjbect" annotation has incorrect value - >ExternalFirewallResponse. And as API doc

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > The same issue for DeleteUser. Basically there are no changes in the > commands, they were just documented wrong in 4.0. Would it be possible to do up a quick patch for this, or just leave it for 4.0.2? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j.

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for 4.0 Chip, what do you think? -Alena. On 4/18/13 10:34 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> The same issue for DeleteUser. Basically there are no changes in the >> comman

[ACS41] CLOUDSTACK-2093 is a new critical bug for the storage-focused folks!

Can someone please look at this (Edison, I CC'ed you, perhaps inappropriately, with the hope that you would be able to look at this). https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2093 The reporter noted a very specific example of where the call to create_privatetemplate_from_snapshot is passi

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for 4.0 > > Chip, what do you think? Doesn't 4.1 actually have the right code in it already? I think Joe is asking about the 4.0 branch, since he's about to cut

Re: DevCloud

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Aaron Paradowski wrote: > Hi Rohit, > > ** ** > > I’m having some problems deploying DevCloud2 and wonder if you could help > please. So far I have done the following > > ** ** > > **1. **Downloaded and imported the DevCloud2 image into VirtualBox >

Re: Review Request: Documentation changes for VMware dvSwitch and Nexus dvSwitch

> On April 10, 2013, 7:42 a.m., Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote: > > Section 8.3.7.5 Removing Nexus Virtual Switch is specifying steps to delete > > VMware dvSwitch. This is not correct. There is no notion of deletion of > > VMware dvSwitch (please refer to FS for the feature) in CloudStack. Please

Re: deployDataCenter.py doesn't work for me on master

Is this similar to the problem you are now having? I get the following output from the python script to create DevCloud: mtutkowski-LT:devcloud mtutkowski$ python ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg Traceback (most recent call last): File "../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py",

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On 4/18/13 10:48 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for >>4.0 >> >> Chip, what do you think? > >Doesn't 4.1 actually have the right code in it already? > >I think Joe

Re: DevCloud

I have a related issue. I sent it out under a different thread, but should put it here, too. This is my issue. I'm not sure how to get around it. Thanks!! mtutkowski-LT:devcloud mtutkowski$ python ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg Traceback (most recent call last): File ".

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:57:51AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > On 4/18/13 10:48 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > >> I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the release notes for > >>4.0 > >> > >> Chip, what do you

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On 4/18/13 11:02 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:57:51AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> On 4/18/13 10:48 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >> >> >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> >> I would probably leave it for 4.2.0. And update the rele

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:07:18AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > On 4/18/13 11:02 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:57:51AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: > >> On 4/18/13 10:48 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >> > >> >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:46:38AM -0700, Alena Pr

Re: CS 4.0.1 | KVM | CentOS 6.3

Maurice, it appears to be something specific to the sequence of actions you took or your environment. Developers and QA kill and restart their management servers dozens of times a day and have (AFAIK) never seen this issue. What are the entries in the mshost table? On 4/17/13 11:20 PM, "Maurice

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

I can provide a quick fix on 4.0 branch. For 4.0 branch, what is the process to commit a fix? Submit a patch for Joe to commit, or I can directly commit? Thanks -min On 4/18/13 11:08 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:07:18AM -0700, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> On 4/18/13 11:

Re: CS 4.0.0 - mysql server connections aborted

There should be a way for MySQL to log the connections that get aborted. At least it will tell you if it was the client that aborted the connection. On 4/18/13 6:16 AM, "benoit lair" wrote: >Hello, > > >I'm using a cs 4.0.0 preproduction server onto centos 5.3. > >I have launched a mysqltuner.

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 01:15 PM, Min Chen wrote: > I can provide a quick fix on 4.0 branch. For 4.0 branch, what is the > process to commit a fix? Submit a patch for Joe to commit, or I can > directly commit? I'd love a fix for this, yes. You can commit directly, reverts are easy. ;-) Thanks!

Re: CS 4.0.0 - vpc deployment - why tier network limited to 200mb/s ?

Really depends on - your CPU configuration - your hypervisor - your physical network speed - noisy neighbors around the VR / around the physical network - how many ipsec vpns - how many LB - load on the LB - number of connections If you just test the VR in isolation with a 512GB RAM/1core

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

Done. Commit number f797d450261d8a4d2734db2cfc7e40c67167cd14. -min On 4/18/13 11:20 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote: >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 01:15 PM, Min Chen wrote: >> I can provide a quick fix on 4.0 branch. For 4.0 branch, what is the >> process to commit a fix? Submit a patch for Joe to commi

Re: [ACS41] API Compatibility Bug?

Thanks, Min! Checking now, much appreciated. On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 01:35 PM, Min Chen wrote: > Done. Commit number f797d450261d8a4d2734db2cfc7e40c67167cd14. > > -min > > On 4/18/13 11:20 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" wrote: > > >On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 01:15 PM, Min Chen wrote: > >> I can provide a

RE: DevCloud

Hi, I tried again. This time between steps 8 and 9 I ran the following command export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xmx1024m -XX:MaxPermSize=800m -Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt_socket,address=8787,server=y,suspend=n" It still hung again after running the mvn-pl client jetty:run command - see below. The command

[ACS41] Nicira Blocker Bug - CLOUDSTACK-2092

Hugo, Mind looking into this one? CLOUDSTACK-2092 -chip

qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

LS, At Schuberg Philis we did some tests on the 4.1 code for the tests in the following table Test Case ID Test Description Results Infrastructure NVP-001 Create NVP Element pass NVP-002 Disable NVP Elementpass NVP-003 Enable NVP Element pas

RE: devcloud hanging

Running 32 bit macosx was the problem. I overlooked the line where it mentioned this from all the docs. Macosx 10.6 works fine. -Original Message- From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav Sent: donderdag 18 april 2013 10:59 To: dev@cloudstack.

Re: [ACS402] CLOUDSTACK-528 needs love! (Failed to create secondary storage)

Bumping this. I'm about to put out another 4.0.2 for a VOTE and if anyone is working on this, now would be a very good time to speak up. On Wed, Apr 17, 2013, at 09:25 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Howdy all, > > As noted in the previous thread, we've stopped the vote on 4.0.2 due to > another iss

Re: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 07:38:13PM +, Daan Hoogland wrote: > LS, > > At Schuberg Philis we did some tests on the 4.1 code for the tests in the > following table > Test Case ID Test Description Results >Infrastructure > NVP-001 Create NVP Element pass > NVP-002

Re: [ACS402] CLOUDSTACK-528 needs love! (Failed to create secondary storage)

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:02:03PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Bumping this. I'm about to put out another 4.0.2 for a VOTE and if > anyone is working on this, now would be a very good time to speak up. Joe, IMO we go forward without this for 4.0.2. If this is a problem for 4.1.0, then we can

Supported Source NAT Type?

In the 'Create network service offering' flow there is this dropdown: [image: Inline image 1] What are the implications for picking one or the other? This code seems related in 'com.cloud.network.ExternalFirewallDeviceManagerImpl.manageGuestNetworkWithExternalFirewall()' : NetworkOffering offeri

Re: New Committer: Go Chiba

Awesome news, good work Go! On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Mice Xia wrote: > Congrats! > > -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 2:56 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: New Committer: Go Chiba > > The Projec

Re: Supported Source NAT Type?

Will, Images and other attachments are stripped on this list (text only please!) Can you post the image somewhere or describe the list? On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 04:05:36PM -0400, Will Stevens wrote: > In the 'Create network service offering' flow there is this dropdown: > > [image: Inline image

Re: [ACS402] CLOUDSTACK-528 needs love! (Failed to create secondary storage)

On Thu, Apr 18, 2013, at 03:04 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 03:02:03PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Bumping this. I'm about to put out another 4.0.2 for a VOTE and if > > anyone is working on this, now would be a very good time to speak up. > > Joe, IMO we go forward wit

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-741: Granular Global Parameters

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10548/ --- (Updated April 18, 2013, 8:16 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan P

RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

Thanks Daan for posting test results ! I have created a place holder for you to update test results [1] - You can update it at your convenience. Does this execution cover both of these stories for Nicira [2], [3]. If it covers both of these stories, may be these can be closed. Looks like doc is

[VOTE][ACS402] Apache CloudStack 4.0.2 (Second Round)

Hi All, I've created a 4.0.2 release, and am asking for you to test the artifacts and *after* testing, please submit a vote. Suggested testing procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+test+procedure (Please don't just +1 a release without any testing!)

RE: DevCloud

Hi All, Updated screenshot of what happens once the "Notifying management server join event took 56ms" proceeds. This is where it just goes displays these types of messages continuously. It went for 19 hours before I stopped it last time. [cid:image002.png@01CE3C7A.EF547790] Aaron From: Aaron

Re: DevCloud

Hey Aaron, the mailserver strips attachments. You'll need to use an external image hosting provider to convey images. On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Aaron Paradowski wrote: > Hi All, > > ** ** > > Updated screenshot of what happens once the “Notifying management server > join event took 56

Re: Supported Source NAT Type?

Oh, my bad. I forgot about that. On the 'create network service offering' overlay, if you select 'SourceNat' in Supported Services, there is a drop down which get added. The drop down has the title of 'Supported Source Nat Type' and has two options: 'Per zone' and 'Per account' Thanks, Will

Re: Supported Source NAT Type?

Hi Will, "Per zone" is mostly for external network devices(e.g. SRX). We can configure one public network address on SRX, and use that one(which is out of Cloudstack's control) for all the public traffic go through the device. That's "Per zone". "Per account" is the other way, used by VR in Cloud

Re: DevCloud

Perhaps I'm using the wrong version of Python? I'm on 2.7. On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote: > I have a related issue. I sent it out under a different thread, but > should put it here, too. > > This is my issue. I'm not sure how to get aro

Re: Supported Source NAT Type?

Thanks for the answer Sheng. I currently have the Palo Alto firewall using the 'per account' method and when 'IpAssocCommand' is run (when the first VM is added to a palo alto network ), I am dynamically creating a public sub-interface and assigning a public IP (provided by cloudstack). I am also

Re: DevCloud

I tried port install py27-requests (MacPorts), but it didn't change the behavior of running python ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg Still claims to be unable to find the requests module (for CS 4.2). On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski < mike.tutkow...@solidfir

RE: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1

Hi Daan, These test cases are in ASF repo ? Regards, Rayees -Original Message- From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:dhoogl...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 12:38 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: qa tests for nicira code in 4.1 LS, At Schuberg Philis we did some t

Re: Supported Source NAT Type?

Hi Will, "per account" is perfectly fine in your case. "per zone" can be used if user want to preserve some public IPs. And with "per zone", CloudStack just won't care about source nat ip allocation etc any more, it would assume that the firewall should already has taken care of that. Source NAT I

Ifocnfig - Question.

Hello -- Previously it was told to me that this cloud0 being first in ifconfig is and would cause an issue, is this the case; as anyone had issues. Seems as though eth0 is passing most traffic, where as previously it was cloud0. Unsure if this is the case, or an issue.- Mauricecloud0    Link encap:

RE: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 7:22 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ASFCS42] Proposed schedule for our next release > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:50:0

Re: Supported Source NAT Type?

Great. Thanks again, this is very helpful. So the way I am doing it is good for now. If IP space becomes an issue (when people are actually using it), I could implement the 'per zone' approach as well. In the per zone approach, the firewall would be initially configured with a public IP and a g

Could use a little DevCloud/Python help

Hi, Running the Python script to create a DevCloud environment in 4.1 works fine for me, but I get this error in 4.2: mtutkowski-LT:devcloud mtutkowski$ python ../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py -i devcloud.cfg Traceback (most recent call last): File "../marvin/marvin/deployDataCenter.py", li

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9871/#review19414 --- Looks good. Is this the final? - Chiradeep Vittal On April 11, 20

Wizard to create cloud broken?

Hi, Since the DevCloud script wasn't working for me, I decided to use the wizard to create a cloud from scratch (using info in DevCloud's devcloud.cfg file). I think there is a problem with zone-wide versus cluster-wide storage? Now building your cloud... Creating primary storage Something went

Re: Could use a little DevCloud/Python help

Your message dated: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 16:30:56 -0600 Hi: I ran across this same problem this morning... I stumbled on the solution: pip install requests -ron > > Hi, > > Running the Python script to create a DevCloud environment in 4.1 works > fine for me, b

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2053: Fix bash if/else logic to avoid redundant entries in htaccess file, fixed boto/cloud-init support by adding metadata RewriteRules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10614/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chiradeep Vittal. Description --- Addres

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2053: Fix bash if/else logic to avoid redundant entries in htaccess file, fixed boto/cloud-init support by adding metadata RewriteRules

Hi Chiradeep, I've reposted the patch. Thanks ilya > -Original Message- > From: ilya musayev [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of ilya > musayev > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2013 7:03 PM > To: Chiradeep Vittal > Cc: ilya musayev; cloudstack > Subject: Review Request: CLOUDSTAC

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2053: Fix bash if/else logic to avoid redundant entries in htaccess file, fixed boto/cloud-init support by adding metadata RewriteRules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10614/#review19416 --- Is the fundamental problem that the data is available under /latest/

  1   2   >