Master broken

Heya all, Master branch appears to be broken. Is anybody working on this? The failed tests are: >>>  >>>org.apache.cloudstack.networkoffering.CreateNetworkOfferingTest.createSharedNtwkOffWithNoVlan >>>  >>>  >>>org.apache.cloudstack.networkoffering.CreateNetworkOfferingTest.createSharedNtwkOffWit

[DISCUSS] Have jenkins.a.o notification mails on broken build sent to dev@cloudstack.apache.org

Heya, Currently broken builds only sent notifications to people with commits when the build was broken. I would like to have those notifications on dev@cloudstack.apache.org as well. Preferably with a random tag so I'm not tempted to build a filter for it soone

RE: Master broken

This commit deals with the tests for create network offering - Commit: 5782abf8f80fce929e3d6e20068bc165f2360426 and I am presuming because of this only the test is failing. You might need to revert the commit if required. Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:

RE: Master broken

Thanks Pranav, I couldn't find an easy way to fix the test so I indeed disabled it. See commit df6b97c194caa8b34fa14bf5164eb2fe1f26b2b1. Raised a ticket for Kelven (CLOUDSTACK-1884) to have a look at it. Cheers, Hugo > -Original Message- > From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.sax...@cit

[ACS42][QA] Host level scope while adding Primary storage

Hi, With 4.2, I see that primary storage scope is defined @ host level along with Cluster and Zone-wide . I am aware of Zone-wide primary storage. Can some one point me about host level primary storage ? Thanks, Sailaja.M

Re: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs

On Mar 31, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Go Chiba wrote: > Hi Sebastien, > > Yes, I could build it w/o any problems... > Could you show us your error message? > > I put the error in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1796 But I fixed it, so it builds fine now , no worries. I am also usin

RE: Master broken

Yeah I saw that . Thanks Hugo . I hope master is stable now though I haven't got a change to build it again. Regards, Pranav -Original Message- From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:37 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...

Re: [DOCS] LXC documentation

On Apr 1, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Phong Nguyen wrote: > Hi, > > I have been working on adding LXC documentation [1]. > > LXC is very similar to KVM in terms of setup, so I would like to reuse most > of the KVM sections to avoid duplicate documentation. With the unique IDs > in the KVM sections, Publ

RE: [ACS42][QA] Host level scope while adding Primary storage

Primary storage scoped at host level is local storage. Regards, Sateesh > -Original Message- > From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] > Sent: 02 April 2013 13:51 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS42][QA] Host level scope while adding Primary storage > > Hi, >

RE: [ACS42][QA] Host level scope while adding Primary storage

Host means the storage is attached to a particular hypervisor host, a.k.a, it's the local storage. Thanks, ~Talluri > -Original Message- > From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:51 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [ACS42][QA] Ho

RE: [ACS42][QA] Host level scope while adding Primary storage

I see. Actually mine is Xenserver. I see that there is a defect created to enable host level scope only for KVM. Thanks Talluri & Sateesh. Regards, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 2:

RE: [ACS42][QA] Host level scope while adding Primary storage

> -Original Message- > From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 2:28 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ACS42][QA] Host level scope while adding Primary storage > > I see. Actually mine is Xenserver. I see that there is a defect

Re: CLOUDSTACK-528

hi, anyone know why this request is closed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528 ? Regards. Le 26/03/2013 19:13, Chiradeep Vittal a écrit : The bug suggests a work around? On 3/26/13 4:12 AM, "nicolas.lamira...@orange.com" wrote: hi our upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.0.x is blocked

Re: [DISCUSS] Have jenkins.a.o notification mails on broken build sent to dev@cloudstack.apache.org

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 07:06:01AM +, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Heya, > > Currently broken builds only sent notifications to people with > commits when the build was broken. I would like to have those > notifications on > dev@cloudstack.apache.org as well. > >

Re: CLOUDSTACK-1839: Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.

Replied on the ticket, pl. reassign for now so as to meet our release schedule. On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > Rohit, > > I know you are quasi-offline right now, but do you think you'd be able > to take a look at CLOUDSTACK-1839 for me in the next day or so? > > If not, j

RE: [DISCUSS] Have jenkins.a.o notification mails on broken build sent to dev@cloudstack.apache.org

The cloudstack builds on build.a.o do not yet email to the dev list. Cheers, Hugo > -Original Message- > From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Prasanna Santhanam > Sent: dinsdag 2 april 2013 11:40 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Have

Review Request: Cloudstack-701

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10238/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Description --- Clou

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-301: Fix validation of VMware cluster associated with Nexus 1000v

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10038/#review18610 --- Commit 009749fb796bc935f610921f1bdc71e8d993198d in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-701 Support for non contiguous vlan ranges.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10238/ --- (Updated April 2, 2013, 12:11 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Abhinanda

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-301: Fix validation of VMware cluster associated with Nexus 1000v

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10038/#review18611 --- Ship it! - Sateesh Chodapuneedi On March 20, 2013, 4:57 a.m., Sat

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1325) add password in response of RestoreVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9539/ --- (Updated April 2, 2013, 1:24 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Sateesh Chodap

Re: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 04:14:47PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013, at 03:08 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > > * Joe - Release Notes > > I think that the upgrade portion of the docs probably needs to be > > updated to reflect Wido's notes on the wiki for how to perform the > > upgrade

RE: Question pertaining to the Support of ACL deny rules

Chiradeep, Thanks for reviewing the spec. Please find my comments inline: > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal > Sent: Saturday, 30 March 2013 3:46 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chandan Purushothama > Cc: Kishan Kavala > Subject: Re: Question pertaining to the Support of A

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1830: ZWPS: NPE while create volume from snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10239/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Description --- CLOU

Re: Call for 4.2 and 4.1.1 Release Managers!

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 03:47:39PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > [Animesh>] Chip my offer is still on. Like Ilya I also have some ambiguity or > unknowns on release management, I am thinking of putting together a wiki page > on release management tasks and responsibilities, and we can collab

Re: Review Request: Change StatsCollector to be of a normal CloudStack manager component to ensure proper initialization order

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10232/#review18612 --- Ship it! Applied to 4.1: commit 195a4ee5260a65b9de264dc0477c8da7aa

Re: [MERGE] bvt branch to master

On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:36:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I'd like to merge the bvt branch into master. The proposal [1] was to > stabilize master by allowing devs to quickly setup CloudStack using > simulated hypervisors and run some basic tests against it. > > The bvt branch integrat

Re: [VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:35:13AM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > If I need to do a mass operation on my vmware cluster, all jobs will be > schedule and executed one at a time. > > If you need to do a mass migration from one storage to another, this may take > enormous amount of time. vSphere all

Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:21:34PM -0500, Justin Grudzien wrote: > I created CLOUDSTACK-1875 for the JSON enhancements. I am going to begin > filling out the ticket with the work that I have done and I will submit the > first patch as soon as I figure out the rest of the non-comitter steps. I > sho

Re: [DISCUSS] Palo Alto Integration

Thank you for clarifying this. This was my assumption after spending a bunch of time stepping through the code. Will On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > The 'Network' has a life cycle associated with it. Network goes from > 'allocated' state (after the design phase) to 'imple

RE: [VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?

Hi Chip, Thanks for the feedback, I'm well aware of that. But here is some food for thought. I was running everything of NFS backend, primary and secondary stores. As I was running out of disk space I decided to decommissioned my primary NFS store and use VMFS instead. Here is a kicker, I've

Re: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 05:57:07AM +, Sailaja Mada wrote: > Hi, > > I have one more issue with upgrade parh from 4.0 to 4.1 [Ubuntu]: > > CLOUDSTACK-1877 > > Thanks, > Sailaja.M I asked a follow up question in the bug.

RE: [VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?

Long story short - due to the fact, we do things serially, any mass operation will be queued, and may take very long time to complete. We need to improve this area, as its going to be one of the major complaints in the near future for corporate users that run vmware. -Original Message-

Re: CLOUDSTACK-1839: Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:16:13PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Replied on the ticket, pl. reassign for now so as to meet our release > schedule. Thanks! OK folks - I need someone to volunteer for this bug. It's DB upgrade related, so experience working with that part of the code would be good.

Re: [VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 02:56:24PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Long story short - due to the fact, we do things serially, any mass operation > will be queued, and may take very long time to complete. > > We need to improve this area, as its going to be one of the major complaints > in the near

Re: [VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?

Edison was saying something about executeInSequence, causing the serial operations, and how it was a compatibility thing. He said he removed it once as a test and it seemed to work for concurrent operations on KVM, but I don't know much about it. Just thought it was worth mentioning. On Tue, Apr

[REMINDER] IRC Meeting tomorrow + moderator needed

Hey all, IRC meeting tomorrow, same Bat-time, same Bat-channel. (#cloudstack-meeting on Freenode, 17:00 UTC). That's 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific, and 6 p.m. in London. Also - I have a meeting that may carry over into the IRC meeting, so I'd like to ask if we can get someone else to moderate

Re: [REMINDER] IRC Meeting tomorrow + moderator needed

Can we have the meeting in the Bat-cave as well? :P On 2 April 2013 17:05, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hey all, > > IRC meeting tomorrow, same Bat-time, same Bat-channel. > (#cloudstack-meeting on Freenode, 17:00 UTC). > > That's 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific, and 6 p.m. in London. > > Also - I h

Re: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

On 04/01/2013 11:14 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On Mon, Apr 1, 2013, at 03:08 PM, Chip Childers wrote: * Joe - Release Notes I think that the upgrade portion of the docs probably needs to be updated to reflect Wido's notes on the wiki for how to perform the upgrade process itself. Do you have t

Re: [REMINDER] IRC Meeting tomorrow + moderator needed

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 11:05:50AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hey all, > > IRC meeting tomorrow, same Bat-time, same Bat-channel. > (#cloudstack-meeting on Freenode, 17:00 UTC). > > That's 1 p.m. Eastern, 10 a.m. Pacific, and 6 p.m. in London. > > Also - I have a meeting that may carry over

Re: [REMINDER] IRC Meeting tomorrow + moderator needed

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Can we have the meeting in the Bat-cave as well? :P That's really up to Adam West... Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Re: Master broken

The test itself is written by me. It doesn't touch the DB - I mock "persist" method of the corresponding Dao. The test was added about 2 weeks ago to master branch, and it was running fine the last time I've checked - last Friday. As Pranav stated, the test got broken with commit 5782abf8f80fce929

RE: CLOUDSTACK-1839: Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.

I'll take it over. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 8:03 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-1839: Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot > more keys and indexes for many tables c

RE: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

Hi, Jira ticket is updated with the details. Yes i can connect DB manually . root@ub12sailaja:~# mysql -u cloud -ppassword Welcome to the MySQL monitor. Commands end with ; or \g. Your MySQL connection id is 759 Server version: 5.5.29-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 (Ubuntu) Copyright (c) 2000, 2012, Oracle

Re: CLOUDSTACK-1839: Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:07:54AM -0700, Alex Huang wrote: > I'll take it over. Many thanks Alex! > > --Alex > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2013 8:03 AM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: C

RE: Notification Center: Should I be concerned?

There was obviously an event of some sort that triggered the alert which is why you see these alerts. If you are sure they are old you can remove them in the database - there is a cloud.alerts table that holds this information in the database - also there is a cloud.event table that holds other

Re: [VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?

We don't use queue facility/concurrency management within CloudStack extensively for now, the orchestration flow (i.e., putting storage into maintenance process) should launch concurrent tasks and manage it properly to achieve maximum of concurrency without breaking integrity of the operation. We

RE: Notification Center: Should I be concerned?

One way is to delete them from the db itself if you aren't interested in what's being showcased on the UI . Other way is to tweak the UI code to not to display these alerts if they don't happen to bother you at all :) . There's no direct way on the UI to clear them off though as of now . Regar

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1830: ZWPS: NPE while create volume from snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10239/#review18614 --- Commit 6110e00c549630e8b08fc6ca4818a60ef6a0c919 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1830: ZWPS: NPE while create volume from snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10239/#review18615 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On April 2, 2013, 1:53 p.m., Harik

Re: Master broken

I've applied a commit 5782abf8f80fce929e3d6e20068bc165f2360426 to address these test configuration fix already. This was done at last Friday. Kelven On 4/2/13 9:39 AM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >The test itself is written by me. It doesn't touch the DB - I mock >"persist" method of the corr

RE: [VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?

Kelven Thanks for the response, As it stands, the serial operations - even for storage maintenance - are unbearably slow - especially if your storage can handle many more concurrent tasks Same applies for host maintenance mode, or any other operation like VM creation/deployment process. Every

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Prachi , Thanks for your response. Had 1 follow up question : 5.DeleteAffinityGroup API: Can this API be used to delete an Affinity Group / Can it be used to only to remove an existing VM from an affinity group? Why is there a need to pass AccountName and DomainId for this API call ? Is Affini

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Hi Sangeetha, Answered inline, Prachi -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:08 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules Pra

[ACS41] Management server closes connection on port 8250

Hi, Since I've upgraded my management server to 4.1 my agents refuse to connect, their log says: 2013-04-02 20:26:11,207 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) Connecting to 31.25.X.X:8250 2013-04-02 20:26:11,209 ERROR [utils.nio.NioConnection] (Agent-Selector:null) Unable to init

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1890: listProjects is not listing state in the response

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10240/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- This patc

Re: [ACS41] Management server closes connection on port 8250

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > Since I've upgraded my management server to 4.1 my agents refuse to connect, > their log says: > > 2013-04-02 20:26:11,207 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:null) > Connecting to 31.25.X.X:8250 > 2013-04-02 20:26:11,209

Re: [ACS41] Management server closes connection on port 8250

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Since I've upgraded my management server to 4.1 my agents refuse to connect, >> their log says: >> >> 2013-04-02 20:26:11,207 INFO [utils.nio.NioClient] (Agent-Selector:nu

[DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents

Could I get some feedback on the following strategy for mapping CloudStack RPC commands to HTTP requests? The general approach is to: 1. map each category of command to a URL. Each category corresponds roughly to a resource type being manipulated. E.g. /cloudstack/latest/storagepool/ 2. make th

Re: [DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents

On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Could I get some feedback on the following strategy for mapping CloudStack > RPC commands to HTTP requests? > > The general approach is to: > 1. map each category of command to a URL. Each category corresponds roughly > to a resource type b

Re: [ACS42][QA] Host level scope while adding Primary storage

just make sure to enable local storage when defining the zone, then each host that gets added will add its local storage as a potential volume destination. On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:16 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri < srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- >

[DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

Dear community, Right now, we have people who are regularly going through JIRA and triaging tickets. This is totally fantastic, and a very valuable activity for the project. (So thank you!) But I also notice that specific individuals are being assigned to the tickets in the process. This is a for

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1890: listProjects is not listing state in the response

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10240/#review18616 --- Commit 1902fc5e2f954b52bb7bd1604cbeb0120752f256 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1890: listProjects is not listing state in the response

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10240/#review18617 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On April 2, 2013, 6:46 p.m., M

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1890: listProjects is not listing state in the response

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10240/#review18618 --- Commit f52820f2fdbede9ad8f4675223a2306b9d89ac51 in branch refs/heads

Re: [DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:14:46PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > > > Could I get some feedback on the following strategy for mapping CloudStack > > RPC commands to HTTP requests? > > > > The general approach is to: > > 1. map each cate

deleteStoragePool API Command

Hi, Is it required that a primary storage be in maintenance mode before calling the deleteStoragePool API command? In the GUI, you have to do this, but I wasn't sure if it was the same for the API. Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.* e: mike.tutkow...@soli

Re: Question pertaining to the Support of ACL deny rules

On 4/2/13 6:46 AM, "Kishan Kavala" wrote: > To implement API alias, APICommand annotation needs to be changed to >support multiple API names for the same Cmd object. Can you call this out in a separate DISCUSS ? > >> * createNetwork - I like this idea of being able to specify at creation >>tim

[ACS41][DOCS] CLOUDSTACK-1837: Document additonal Steps ( Restart of all system Vms , copy vhd-utils) to be included in the upgrade procedure from 4.0 -> 4.1

Can someone take this docs bug for 4.1 please? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1837 Document additonal Steps ( Restart of all system Vms , copy vhd-utils) to be included in the upgrade procedure from 4.0 -> 4.1

Re: deleteStoragePool API Command

Spoke too soon. :) I just ran a quick test and you do have to put the Primary Storage in maintenance mode prior to deleting it with the API, too. On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > Is it required that a primary storage be in maintenance mode before > calling the de

Re: CLOUDSTACK-1842: ASF 4.0 to 4.1 Upgrade: Missing Ubuntu 12.04 Guest OS Types on the Upgraded Setup

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > I went digging into CLOUDSTACK-1842, and I see the following: > > In looking at the SQL scripts, I see that the guest_os and > guest_os_hypervisor tables are typically populated via the upgrade > scripts during an upgrade. > > I also see that

Re: [MERGE] bvt branch to master

Awesome, thanks for your work Prasanna, do we have a jenkins job yet? Cheers. On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:36:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > I'd like to merge the bvt branch into master. The proposal [1] was to > > stabilize m

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1846, CLOUDSTACK-1845 - KVM Storage, sometimes KVMHA will remount deleted NFS pools, causing failures when defining new storage pools.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10227/#review18619 --- Commit 3541aa86e34605e5ac4a99df84c47e6f6e7c71ee in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1846, CLOUDSTACK-1845 - KVM Storage, sometimes KVMHA will remount deleted NFS pools, causing failures when defining new storage pools.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10227/#review18620 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On April 1, 2013, 8:29 p.m., M

wiki.cloudstack.org redirect to cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK ?

Hi all, What do you folks think about redirecting wiki.cloudstack.org over to cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK ? I'd like to remove confusion about the active cloudstack wiki wherever possible. -chip

RE: wiki.cloudstack.org redirect to cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK ?

Would be nice, I have dealt with 2 issues of confusion by users today alone :) -kd   >-Original Message- >From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:53 PM >To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >Subject: wiki.cloudstack.org redirect to >cwiki.apache.o

Re: wiki.cloudstack.org redirect to cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK ?

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 12:54:15PM -0700, Kelcey Damage (BT) wrote: > Would be nice, I have dealt with 2 issues of confusion by users today alone > :) Yeah, watching that is what caused the email. Can someone with the correct rights on the old cloudstack.org infrastructure make this happen? > >

Re: [ACS41] Management server closes connection on port 8250

Hi, On 04/02/2013 08:50 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: Hi, Since I've upgraded my management server to 4.1 my agents refuse to connect, their log says: 2013-04-02 20:26:11,207 INFO [utils.

Re: [ACS41] Management server closes connection on port 8250

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 10:10:28PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > On 04/02/2013 08:50 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > >On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Sheng Yang wrote: > >>On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>Since I've upgraded my management serve

[ACS41][DOCS] Generate diff of APIs changed/added/deleted?

Hi all, So - the build process for generating API docs has changed since 4.0 -> 4.1, and it looks like in the process we've stopped generating a "diff.txt" of APIs changed/added/deleted since the last version. Any idea how we can generate this automagically rather than combing through the new doc

RE: [DISCUSS] RESTful API for CloudStack agents

Donal, This looks very good. I especially like the fact that we didn't go do a bunch of mapping of json to url paths. After all, we're don't need full REST for agents. +1 --Alex > -Original Message- > From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 2,

[ACS41] Another day, another bug list

Hi all, Here's what we're tracking as of today for 4.1. Please jump in and get these bugs knocked out! Blocker: * CLOUDSTACK-1877 * Failed to connect to DB while starting Ubuntu management server after upgrading the packages from 4.0 to 4.1 Currently unassigned. Anyone want to take ownershi

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] CLOUDSTACK-1837: Document additonal Steps ( Restart of all system Vms , copy vhd-utils) to be included in the upgrade procedure from 4.0 -> 4.1

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 02:41 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Can someone take this docs bug for 4.1 please? > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1837 > Document additonal Steps ( Restart of all system Vms , copy vhd-utils) > to be included in the upgrade procedure from 4.0 -> 4.1 This

Re: [ACS41][DOCS] CLOUDSTACK-1837: Document additonal Steps ( Restart of all system Vms , copy vhd-utils) to be included in the upgrade procedure from 4.0 -> 4.1

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 03:44:48PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013, at 02:41 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > > Can someone take this docs bug for 4.1 please? > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1837 > > Document additonal Steps ( Restart of all system Vms , copy

RE: [ACS41] Another day, another bug list

* CLOUDSTACK-1874 * AWS Regions - Account table in cloud_usage DB has region_id. Kishan / Sangeetha - I'm not quite sure if this is actually critical. Frankly it doesn't sound like it is. Can we either resolve it or downgrade it? >>This was logged as Critical only because it is a DB schema cha

Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

On Apr 2, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Dear community, > > Right now, we have people who are regularly going through JIRA and triaging > tickets. This is totally fantastic, and a very valuable activity for the > project. (So thank you!) But I also notice that specific individuals are

Re: [ACS41] Another day, another bug list

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:52:49PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > * CLOUDSTACK-1874 > * AWS Regions - Account table in cloud_usage DB has region_id. > > Kishan / Sangeetha - I'm not quite sure if this is actually critical. > Frankly it doesn't sound like it is. Can we either resolve it or

RE: CLOUDSTACK-1842: ASF 4.0 to 4.1 Upgrade: Missing Ubuntu 12.04 Guest OS Types on the Upgraded Setup

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:44 PM > To: ; Animesh Chaturvedi > Subject: Re: CLOUDSTACK-1842: ASF 4.0 to 4.1 Upgrade: Missing Ubuntu 12.04 > Guest OS Types on the Upgraded Setup > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at

RE: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

I think the purpose of this discussion is that there are people currently today that are auto-assigning bugs to individual developers of the community. Most of these bugs were assigned for two main reasons. 1. It was blatantly obvious the bugs stemmed from the feature developer. - OR - 2. Th

[DISCUSS] UI time conversion for Events and Alerts.

All, CS – 1898 :: UI : incorrect time conversion on UI under Events https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1898 I am proposing to change/redesign the way CS handles times and dates currently. We have time conversion issue on UI due to Time Zones. Time Zones is not a mandatory fiel

RE: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

> -Original Message- > From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 2:22 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging > > I think the purpose of this discussion is that there are people currently

RE: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

So let me start off with I agree in principle with what Noah is talking about here. Cookie licking is an anti-pattern that we should reject as a community. However, I disagree the solution or even what is perceived as cookie licking. We established a while ago as a community that we follow a J

RE: [MERGE] scaleupvm functionality branch to master

Happened to take a look at virtualmachinemanagerimpl on master, during reviewing storage migration code. Just want to know, what's the difference between migrate and migrateforscale in VirtualmachineManagerImpl? Is it necessary to duplicate code? > -Original Message- > From: Nitin Meht

Re: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > So let me start off with I agree in principle with what Noah is talking about > here. Cookie licking is an anti-pattern that we should reject as a > community. However, I disagree the solution or even what is perceived as > cookie licking. >

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/ --- (Updated April 3, 2013, 12:31 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippae

Additional IP Assignment

Greetings,I am attempting to manually assign my instance two additional IP addresses, however, utilizing range0 file and or ifcfg-eth0:1 and :2 are proving to fail.When adding an IP from a different subnet that is not being utilized by CS, how must one do this?Maurice

Re: Review Request: MidoNet Networking Plugin [2/2]

Checking back in - any progress on this review? We're now at the 3 week point from initial submission. Hugo, is your Ship It (once test run completes) equivalent to a "commit now", or is there an additional review required? I don't see any other review activity, so I'm guessing you're the only one

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/#review18622 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Min Chen On April 3, 2013, 12:31 a.m., Venka

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

> On April 3, 2013, 1:03 a.m., Min Chen wrote: > > Ship It! committed to master 2dbdc46337be375940441ac4b41f95f25bbbf21d - Min --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/#review186

RE: [DISCUSS] Don't assign tickets to people when triaging

> I understand the reasoning - but for a newcomer looking to get involved, I > think 'assigning' a bug - whether by default, or otherwise can be construed as > excluding newcomers and no room for them to get involved, so I think it > warrants caution at a minimum. > > Our 'if not 'in progress' any

  1   2   >