[IP clearance] merge IP cleared features into master

I revoked the code for the features 'optional public IP assignment for EIP' [1] and 'network services in shared network' [2] features from master due to IP clearance issues. Both the features have passed IP clearance window [3][4]. Due to multiple refactors that happened at 4.1 code freeze time,

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

> On March 29, 2013, 8 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > I do think an explicit migration interface on NetworkElement is the right > > way to do it. This way, network elements can decide explicitly when and how > > to handle this state. > > Sprinkling > >if(!nic.getReservationId().equals(c

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1453: support restore for VM created from ISO

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9779/#review18578 --- api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/vm/RestoreVMCmd.java

Review Request: debian: adding ipset as part of agent install.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10216/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Hugo Trippaers, Wido den Hollander

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1689

> On March 29, 2013, 12:46 p.m., ASF Subversion and Git Services wrote: > > Commit 5a66ec35ad08ff3313e72b54eba7e1754868eee4 in branch refs/heads/bvt > > from Prasanna Santhanam > > [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=5a66ec3 ] > > > > CLOUDSTACK-1689: KVM agent install

Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects

On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Wanted to check if anyone is interested to pick up the following upgrade > defects. Once upgrade testing is done, we would get a little closer to 4.1 > RC. > > CLOUDSTACK-1839 Upgrade 4.0 ->

Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

Hi Justin, thanks for your first patch. As per our workflows, we use git for our version control and have a reviewboard for reviewing patches and an issue tracker for tracking bugs/features. Git: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git Review board: https://reviews.apache.org

RE: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects

> -Original Message- > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Rohit Yadav > Sent: 01 April 2013 13:31 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects > > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti <

Re: Review Request: Mulitiple ip address per nic support for advacned shared networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10040/ --- (Updated April 1, 2013, 8:32 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects

>> > CLOUDSTACK-1856 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Fresh install of 4.1 has 3 >> > parameters missing in db. Properties compared to an upgraded 4.0 set up. >> > >> >> Properties files should be backed up or ask user to replace/keep the file, >> this >> is a packaging issue. > > I see following com

RE: [ACS41] Ubuntu upgrade process from 4.0.X to 4.1

Hi, I tried to upgrade 4.0 Ubuntu Management server to 4.1 with below instructions : Procedure 1: 1. Add/Modify the line "deb http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu precise 4.1 " in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cloudstack.list 2. apt-get update Observation: It failed with GPG Error. Reading pac

Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

Thanks for the information. If you haven't already put the patch for review I would like to do so and follow the directions so I can get used to the process. Let me know. Also, I saw the lambda functions and chose not to use them because I think they make the code harder to read for the more novice

Re: Review Request: Mulitiple ip address per nic support for advacned shared networks

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10040/#review18583 --- Ship it! submitted with 8dd0b7747b2da1aa71110e871b0bd4ffdbcdfcb4 -

Re: [ACS41] Ubuntu upgrade process from 4.0.X to 4.1

The keys are found here : http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/cloudstack/KEYS On 1 April 2013 16:13, Sailaja Mada wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to upgrade 4.0 Ubuntu Management server to 4.1 with below > instructions : > > Procedure 1: > > 1. Add/Modify the line "deb http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ub

Re: [ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects

On 04/01/2013 10:00 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote: Hi, Wanted to check if anyone is interested to pick up the following upgrade defects. Once upgrade testing is done, we would get a little closer to 4.1 RC. CLOU

Re: [ACS41] Ubuntu upgrade process from 4.0.X to 4.1

On 04/01/2013 12:43 PM, Sailaja Mada wrote: Hi, I tried to upgrade 4.0 Ubuntu Management server to 4.1 with below instructions : Procedure 1: 1. Add/Modify the line "deb http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/ubuntu precise 4.1 " in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/cloudstack.list 2. apt-get update Observa

RE: [ACS41] Ubuntu upgrade process from 4.0.X to 4.1

Hi, Retried with latest packages and with change in steps . Now 4.1 deb packages got installed. 1 wget http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/cloudstack/KEYS 2) gpg --import KEYS 3) apt-get install cloudstack* But it failed while connecting to DB and upgrade is not initiated . Thanks, Sailaj

Re: [IP clearance] merge IP cleared features into master

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 07:00:07AM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > I revoked the code for the features 'optional public IP assignment for EIP' > [1] and 'network services in shared network' [2] features from master due to > IP clearance issues. Both the features have passed IP clearance window > [3

Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 05:56:11AM -0500, Justin Grudzien wrote: > Thanks for the information. If you haven't already put the patch for review > I would like to do so and follow the directions so I can get used to the > process. Let me know. Go for it Justin. Also, give me your Jira ID once you

[IP Reservation] Is VM creation using the reserved IPs on cloudstack managed hosts supported?

Hi, Is creation of VMs using the reserved IP (after doing IP reservation) on cloudstack managed hosts supported? Because when I tried to do that the VM got destroyed as soon as it was created. While on hosts which are not managed by cloudstack VM creation using reserved IPs went through. Tha

Re: VM not obtaing DHCP address when migrating to another host.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:44:54PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > > On 3/29/13 7:04 AM, "Sean Truman" wrote: > > >All, > > > >When I use the migrate to another host option for a running VM (Basic > >networking), the VM refuses to get a DHCP address? Is this a known issue? > >or is somethin

Re: [ACS41][PACKAGING] Fixes from master into 4.1

On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 05:25:09PM +0200, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hello, > > I've been working on the Deb packaging today and I've committed some > stuff into the 4.1 branch as well. > > All fixes first went into master and I did one big commit > (11892d34d7ec0e37e3b5cf568a2a30d4be23590f) int

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1689

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9946/#review18585 --- Commit 9eed6586092d4ecd268d403f1fec83ad196569b4 in branch refs/heads/

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1689

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9946/#review18586 --- Commit 6eac4229434b46ee74b5952d3abd26b646166b39 in branch refs/heads/

Re: Review Request: debian: adding ipset as part of agent install.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10216/#review18587 --- Ship it! applied to 4.1 and master - Chip Childers On April 1, 2

Re: Review Request: BUG-ID: CLOUDSTACK-1689

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 07:51:20AM +, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote: > > > > On March 29, 2013, 12:46 p.m., ASF Subversion and Git Services wrote: > > > Commit 5a66ec35ad08ff3313e72b54eba7e1754868eee4 in branch refs/heads/bvt > > > from Prasanna Santhanam > > > [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] EIP across zones

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > On 01/04/13 1:47 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: > >>On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Murali Reddy >>wrote: >>> On 26/03/13 8:10 PM, "Adam Grochowski" >>>wrote: >>> Hi, So I'm curious - what is the proposed method to move a single IP a

Re: [DISCUSS] Palo Alto Integration

Thank you for all your help Murali... So my Provider has been setup with isExternal = true this whole time. public static final Provider PaloAlto = new Provider("PaloAlto", true); If I run a debugger and then create a guest network, I see it enter the 'design' function of the ExternalGuestNetwork

Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])

Dear podling, This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly board report. The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 April 2013, 10:30:00:00 PST. The report for your podling wil

Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])

We actually owe this to the board itself, so I'll go and update our IPMC status to "graduated" now. I'll post a board report in the next couple of days for everyone to review. On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 03:27:22PM +, Marvin wrote: > > > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated sy

[DISCUSS] VMWare Snapshot Issue

Hi, I think you should consider to "upgrade" this bug to critical for 4.1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1224 We just replicated the exact same thing on our setup today. We use up-to-date 4.1 with couple commit behind maybe. This bug kills a key feature (snapshots!). Tha

RE: Unable to start domR(VR) in devcloud using laster 4.1/master.

I had debugged and found that from devcloud unable to ssh to the router vm. When it tries to execute the GetDomRVersionCmd its getting failing and router vm is getting destroyed. I had tried manually ssh to router vm am getting Permission denied (publickey) I had tried changing the permission

Re: [DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013, at 06:36 PM, Edison Su wrote: >Should we advocate "git rebase" in >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Git? Would you mind documenting how you think we should do it, step-by-step on this page on the wiki? Right now the committer section is pretty

Re: [DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:36:06PM -0700, Edison Su wrote: > Hi all, > I am trying to review some feature branches, when I see merge requests > coming from mailing list, one thing that makes code review almost unrealistic > is that, developers tend to use "git merge" to master branch wheneve

maven build failed for nonoss

Hi, master non-oss build got failed in netscaler. deps folder has cloud-netscaler-sdx.jar and cloud-netscaler.jar and ran the install-non-oss.sh Can any one suggest me how to build non-oss . Please find below fail build logs. [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - F5 . SUCC

Re: [DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

On 3/30/13 3:00 AM, "Wido den Hollander" wrote: >Hi, > >On 03/30/2013 12:36 AM, Edison Su wrote: >> Hi all, >> I am trying to review some feature branches, when I see merge >>requests coming from mailing list, one thing that makes code review >>almost unrealistic is that, developers tend

Re: [DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 10:08:52AM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > -0 on squash > Sometimes features need to modify core components. Squashing loses the > history /reasoning behind that modification. I would leave the decision of > selective squashing to the committer. Agreed. It totally depends

Re: maven build failed for nonoss

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 05:06:06PM +, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi, > master non-oss build got failed in netscaler. > deps folder has cloud-netscaler-sdx.jar and cloud-netscaler.jar and ran the > install-non-oss.sh > > Can any one suggest me how to build non-oss . > > Please find bel

RE: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

> -Original Message- > From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 29, 2013 10:16 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal > > On 30 March 2013 09:20, Justin Grudzien wrote: > > > > My company is building

RE: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

> -Original Message- > From: Justin Grudzien [mailto:grudz...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 3:56 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal > > Thanks for the information. If you haven't already put the patch for review I > wou

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

> On March 29, 2013, 5:22 p.m., Min Chen wrote: > > api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/admin/account/CreateAccountCmd.java, > > line 66 > > > > > > If password is default hashed to SHA256SALT, then it should not

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

Putting in a new authenticator/encoder for SHA512 would be good - I'll log a ticket to track it as a separate effort and work on it when time permits. Until then, let's use SHA256 as the default since it's the best we've got implemented as of now. Regards, Vijay On 3/29/13 5:56 PM, "Justin Grudzi

Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Justin Grudzien wrote: > Thanks for the information. If you haven't already put the patch for review > I would like to do so and follow the directions so I can get used to the > process. Let me know. Also, I saw the lambda functions and chose not to use > them beca

Re: [DISCUSS] Palo Alto Integration

So I have been stepping through the code and I can confirm that the 'design' method of ExternalGuestNetworkGuru is being hit, but it doesn't do anything, so it passes off work of creating the network to the 'design' method of GuestNetworkGuru which assigns 10.1.1.0/24 to the network every time I cr

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1814: Add LXC documentation

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10224/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Jessica Tomechak and Joe Brockmeier. Description

CLOUDSTACK-1839: Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1 DB.

Rohit, I know you are quasi-offline right now, but do you think you'd be able to take a look at CLOUDSTACK-1839 for me in the next day or so? If not, just say so and we'll try to find someone else to review / fix it. Thanks! -chip

CLOUDSTACK-1842: ASF 4.0 to 4.1 Upgrade: Missing Ubuntu 12.04 Guest OS Types on the Upgraded Setup

I went digging into CLOUDSTACK-1842, and I see the following: In looking at the SQL scripts, I see that the guest_os and guest_os_hypervisor tables are typically populated via the upgrade scripts during an upgrade. I also see that templates.sql has the data to populate these tables: INSERT INTO

CLOUDSTACK-1868: GetVmStatsCommand throws NullPointerException with VMWare

Can I get a volunteer to look at CLOUSTACK-1868 ASAP? It's one of a *handful* of remaining bugs for 4.1. -chip

Re: [DISCUSS] VMWare Snapshot Issue

Edison, I bumped CLOUDSTACK-1224 up to critical, as Francois is mentioning that it breaks snapshotting. It appears to be already assigned to you. Can you look at the bug as soon as possible (or reply to let us know if you aren't able to get to it)? Thanks! -chip On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:42:

[DOCS] LXC documentation

Hi, I have been working on adding LXC documentation [1]. LXC is very similar to KVM in terms of setup, so I would like to reuse most of the KVM sections to avoid duplicate documentation. With the unique IDs in the KVM sections, Publican will error out during build because it will find duplicate I

[ACS41] Final push to an RC?

Hi all, We're getting there... Here's what I see as outstanding: * Edison - CLOUDSTACK-1224 Volume snapshot creation failing This bug was recently bumped from major to Critical. Edison, please shout if you disagree with the priority bump. * Rohit - CLOUDSTACK-1839 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded

RE: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

Upgrade resolved defects are being validated tonight and tomorrow morning. 1839/1842 are required but they can be validated in RC Candidate drop as it seem to be isolated fix and may not impact anything else. I need to cleanup some of the New and Improved feature list i.e mark them closed bas

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:30:16AM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote: > Putting in a new authenticator/encoder for SHA512 would be good - I'll log > a ticket to track it as a separate effort and work on it when time > permits. Until then, let's use SHA256 as the default since it's the best > we'v

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1846, CLOUDSTACK-1845 - KVM Storage, sometimes KVMHA will remount deleted NFS pools, causing failures when defining new storage pools.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10227/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Joe Brockmeier. Description --- CLOUDSTA

Re: [IP clearance] merge IP cleared features into master

+1 On 4/1/13 12:00 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >I revoked the code for the features 'optional public IP assignment for >EIP' [1] and 'network services in shared network' [2] features from >master due to IP clearance issues. Both the features have passed IP >clearance window [3][4]. Due to multiple

Re: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

I've put a patch for jzb on review board for 4.0, re 1845/1846 https://reviews.apache.org/r/10227/ On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti < sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote: > Upgrade resolved defects are being validated tonight and tomorrow morning. > 1839/1842 are required but th

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

Yes, please. If you add a no-op implementation for all the existing network elements then there is no impact. On 4/1/13 12:28 AM, "Hiroaki Kawai" wrote: > > >> On March 29, 2013, 8 p.m., Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> > I do think an explicit migration interface on NetworkElement is the >>right way

RE: CLOUDSTACK-1868: GetVmStatsCommand throws NullPointerException with VMWare

Chip, It happened for me as well only once and cannot find a way to reproduce it. Regards ilya -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 3:52 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: CLOUDSTACK-1868: GetVmStatsCommand throws

Re: CLOUDSTACK-1842: ASF 4.0 to 4.1 Upgrade: Missing Ubuntu 12.04 Guest OS Types on the Upgraded Setup

On 4/1/13 12:46 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >I went digging into CLOUDSTACK-1842, and I see the following: > >In looking at the SQL scripts, I see that the guest_os and >guest_os_hypervisor tables are typically populated via the upgrade >scripts during an upgrade. > >I also see that templates.sq

Re: CLOUDSTACK-1842: ASF 4.0 to 4.1 Upgrade: Missing Ubuntu 12.04 Guest OS Types on the Upgraded Setup

On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 01:44:39PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > > > On 4/1/13 12:46 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > >I went digging into CLOUDSTACK-1842, and I see the following: > > > >In looking at the SQL scripts, I see that the guest_os and > >guest_os_hypervisor tables are typically pop

Re: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013, at 03:08 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > * Joe - Release Notes > I think that the upgrade portion of the docs probably needs to be > updated to reflect Wido's notes on the wiki for how to perform the > upgrade process itself. Do you have this one under control, or do you > want hel

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

Sure Chip, I'll xfer the bug over to you. Regards, Vijay On 4/1/13 1:27 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:30:16AM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote: >> Putting in a new authenticator/encoder for SHA512 would be good - I'll >>log >> a ticket to track it as a separate eff

Re: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013, at 03:08 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> * Joe - Release Notes >> I think that the upgrade portion of the docs probably needs to be >> updated to reflect Wido's notes on the wiki for how to perform the >> upgrade process itse

Re: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

On Mon, Apr 1, 2013, at 04:25 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > Are we going directly to a vote or are we going to have an RC for > > comments and *then* a vote? > > > > What's the difference? Stopping and re-starting votes when more people start

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-922: LXC Support in Cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10122/#review18603 --- Commit aa79ccf985a172603a9ff15fbaa71dbfb3dad99d in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-922: LXC Support in Cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10122/#review18604 --- Ship it! Ship It! - edison su On March 26, 2013, 9:02 p.m., Phon

RE: Call for 4.2 and 4.1.1 Release Managers!

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 7:20 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Call for 4.2 and 4.1.1 Release Managers! > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:00:52PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > > On Thu, Ma

RE: [DISCUSS] VMWare Snapshot Issue

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 12:55 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com > Cc: Edison Su > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMWare Snapshot Issue > > Edison, > > I bumped CLOUDSTACK-1224 up to c

Re: Can same Xen Server Host be used for different Management Servers?

This can be made to work (but YMMV, not for production) The configuration table has an entry with name = 'instance.value'. This is set to 'VM' by default (and hence the vm names on the hypervisors have 'VM') on them. Change this to something else (e.g., KM) on the 4.0 installation. On 3/28/13 10:5

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Had the following questions after going over the spec - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+Affinity-Anti-affinity+groups : 1.In the API changes section - For all the API calls listed can we include if the parameters are optional/Required? 2.Can new DB changes introduce

Review Request: Change StatsCollector to be of a normal CloudStack manager component to ensure proper initialization order

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10232/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers. Description --- Change St

[VMWARE]Any way to allow concurrent operations?

If I need to do a mass operation on my vmware cluster, all jobs will be schedule and executed one at a time. If you need to do a mass migration from one storage to another, this may take enormous amount of time. vSphere allows at least 4 concurrent operations and others are scheduled until the

Re: [DISCUSS] VMWare Snapshot Issue

Fang told me the snapshot feature works on her environment(which is on 4.1), so I need more mgt server logs to identify the issue. I'll get you the log first thing tomorrow morning. Thanks! -chip On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:42:32AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: Hi, I think you should c

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

If we spread a new implementation all over the network elements, then we might silently break third party network elements that is not included in apache repository. IMHO, that's the impact. (2013/04/02 5:30), Chiradeep Vittal wrote: Yes, please. If you add a no-op implementation for all the exi

RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules

Comments inline. Thanks, Prachi -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 5:45 PM To: cloudstack-...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules Had the following questions after goin

Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

I created CLOUDSTACK-1875 for the JSON enhancements. I am going to begin filling out the ticket with the work that I have done and I will submit the first patch as soon as I figure out the rest of the non-comitter steps. I should be able to make my first patch submission attempt tomorrow. Thanks fo

RE: [IP Reservation] Is VM creation using the reserved IPs on cloudstack managed hosts supported?

Hi, Is creation of VMs using the reserved IP (after doing IP reservation) on cloudstack managed hosts supported? Because when I tried to do that the VM got destroyed as soon as it was created. While on hosts which are not managed by cloudstack VM creation using reserved IPs went through. Th

Re: Review Request: Make SHA256Salt the default password encoding and authentication mechanism for cloudstack

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/ --- (Updated April 2, 2013, 5:42 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaer

[ACS41][QA]Regarding 4.0.1 to 4.1 upgrade path verification

Hi, Sangeetha & Myself validated the upgrade path from 4.0 to 4.1 [KVM & Ubuntu Management server, KVM agent ]. It would be good if any one interested to pick and validate 4.0.1 to 4.1 upgrade path if not done already. Please comment. Thanks, Sailaja.M

RE: [ACS41] Final push to an RC?

Hi, I have one more issue with upgrade parh from 4.0 to 4.1 [Ubuntu]: CLOUDSTACK-1877 Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:46 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Edison Su; bhais...@apache.org;

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

Understood. However it is hard to hold an interface steady in such an early project. I hope there are not too many of these non-public implementations (at least, I have not heard of any). On 4/1/13 7:22 PM, "Hiroaki KAWAI" wrote: >If we spread a new implementation all over the network elements,

Re: [DISCUSS] Palo Alto Integration

The 'Network' has a life cycle associated with it. Network goes from 'allocated' state (after the design phase) to 'implemented' (after implement phase). Unless a network is implemented it is not ready for use in 'isolated network' case. Only after network is implemented, it gets full identity.

Re: [IP clearance] merge IP cleared features into master

On 01/04/13 7:03 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 07:00:07AM +, Murali Reddy wrote: >> I revoked the code for the features 'optional public IP assignment for >>EIP' [1] and 'network services in shared network' [2] features from >>master due to IP clearance issues. Both the