RE: [ACS41] Blocker Defects to cut RC

1817 is a duplicate of 1812. ~Talluri > -Original Message- > From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Prasanna > Santhanam > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 11:13 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ACS41] Blocker Defects to cut RC > > The list is

Re: Review Request: Feature Syslog Enhancements

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9870/#review18417 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Rajesh Battala On March 19, 2013, 10:52 a.m.,

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:29 PM, Alex Huang wrote: >> and the C# part is for the ServerResource, right ? >> >> I won't code this, but it would be nice to minimize languages used in >> CloudStack and try to be consistent across hypervisors (as much as possible). >> Introducing another language and s

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On 27 March 2013 13:51, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Mar 26, 2013, at 7:29 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > >>> and the C# part is for the ServerResource, right ? >>> >>> I won't code this, but it would be nice to minimize languages used in >>> CloudStack and try to be consistent across hypervisors (a

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1156: Limit Primary and Secondary storage for domain/accounts

I get the following error on running mvn clean install [INFO] BUILD FAILURE [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 9.373s [INFO] Finished at: Wed Mar 27 14:20:41 GMT+05:30 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 18M/81M [INFO]

Re: Merge 4.1-new-db-schema.sql to db/db/schema-40to410.sql

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:16:12PM +0530, Rohit Yadav wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Koushik Das wrote: >> > Rohit, >> > >> > Currently I see that there are 2 sql files related to upgrade from version >> > A to B, for e.g. schem

Review Request: CS 1773 seems to break build and networking.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10150/ --- Review request for cloudstack. Summary (updated) - CS 1773 see

4.1 build and network problems, fixed (CS-1773 - review #10150)

Hi Guys, After doing a fresh checkout yesterday I noticed that 4.1 would not build due to the client/pom.xml still containing UCS (so I commented it out) and the "plugins/network-elements/dns-notifier/resources/components-example.xml" still had addDefaultBaremetalProvidersToPhysicalNetwork whic

Host disconnected

Hi, Our environment is cloudstack4.0+vmware5.0. There are two hosts in the same cluster.The status of hosts in cloudstack's UI is Disconnected.But the status of hosts in vmware is ok. At first,host1 and host2 are all Disconnected.After that, we update the database using "update cloud.host set s

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1156: Limit Primary and Secondary storage for domain/accounts

Nitin, In my setup I am not facing any compilation issues, Can you check the java version in you system. In my setup I am using jdk 1.7. And the method "getContentLengthLong()" is supported since 7.0 under the class URLConnection. This is the description of the method that I have used: getCon

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1156: Limit Primary and Secondary storage for domain/accounts

I don’t think you should be using a method introduced in 7.0 since its not gonna work with someone using version 6.0 From: Sanjay Tripathi mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com>> Date: Wednesday 27 March 2013 3:21 PM To: Nitin Mehta mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com>>, Sateesh Chodapuneedi mailto:sate

RE: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1156: Limit Primary and Secondary storage for domain/accounts

You are right Nitin, I am working on it and will use methods which are supported in java 6. From: Nitin Mehta Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 3:39 PM To: Sanjay Tripathi; Sateesh Chodapuneedi; mice xia; Min Chen; Devdeep Singh Cc: David Nalley; cloudstack Subject: Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1

RE: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

> -Original Message- > From: srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] > On Behalf Of prasanna > Sent: 27 March 2013 8:47 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance > > On 27 March 2013 13:51, Se

Re: UCS Jar

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 01:39:18PM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Vijay, > > For now, I extended the comment in client/pom.xml to include the ucs module > so the compile passes. I guess that should be sufficient for me, but I > don't know if the dependency is required for something else. >

Re: Review Request: Remove baremetal as default network provider for basic zone configuration.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10144/#review18418 --- Vijay - I missed this request. Sorry about that. I've applied 10150

Re: 4.1 build and network problems, fixed (CS-1773 - review #10150)

On 27 March 2013 14:53, Funs Kessen wrote: > Hi Guys, > > After doing a fresh checkout yesterday I noticed that 4.1 would not build due > to the client/pom.xml still containing UCS (so I commented it out) and the > "plugins/network-elements/dns-notifier/resources/components-example.xml" > still

[ACS4.2] master blockers

Guys, There are many blockers now on master slowing the dev down, please treat these as priority: T Key Summary AssigneeReporterP Status Resolution Created Updated Due [Bug]

[ACS4.1] blockers

Team, I think the 4.1 RC is not yet made as there are still several blockers and criticals, please treat them as high priority. T Key Summary AssigneeReporterP Status Resolution Created Updated Due [Bug

Review Request: adapt marvin deployAndRun to the zwps changes of createStoragePool

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10152/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Description --- - Mo

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1156: Limit Primary and Secondary storage for domain/accounts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9541/ --- (Updated March 27, 2013, 11:43 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Sing

[ACS41] [PATCH REQUEST] CLOUDSTACK-1804 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - DB upgrade fails.

Chip, please pull in this commit in master to 4.1 branch. commit f414b8a850607d20c0a78d455b4c43d90947b41f Author: Murali Reddy Date: Wed Mar 27 18:06:22 2013 +0530 CLOUDSTACK-1804:Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - DB upgrade fails. remove the data migration functions that were accidently introduced by co

Re: [MERGE] GSLB

On 20/03/13 7:15 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >I would like to merge GSLB feature proposed [1] and developed in the >feature branch [2] into master. Code for this feature pretty much >conforms to what was proposed in FS [3]. I added unit tests for all the >new service layer methods introduced[4]. I

Re: Review Request: Custom Spring AOP to fully support legacy CloudStack AOP semantics, Removing Component autoscanning, ensure adapter execution ordering and make sure events be issued from AOP inter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10145/ --- (Updated March 27, 2013, 1:20 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chil

Re: Review Request: Custom Spring AOP to fully support legacy CloudStack AOP semantics, Removing Component autoscanning, ensure adapter execution ordering and make sure events be issued from AOP inter

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10145/#review18419 --- Ship it! 0004-CLOUDSTACK-1818-make-DababaseCreator-ready-to-invoke.

Re: Review Request: CS 1773 seems to break build and networking.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10150/#review18420 --- Ship it! This appears to have already been applied by Prasanna (tha

Re: Review Request: Remove baremetal as default network provider for basic zone configuration.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10144/#review18421 --- https://reviews.apache.org/r/10150/ resolved this - Chip Childers

Re: [ACS41] Bugs blocking our 4.1 release

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:01:11PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > About CLOUDSTACK-1795 Customize AOP to fully support legacy CloudStack @DB > and @ActionEvent semantics, I've done with code changes now, I will have > more tests at tomorrow before check it in. I applied the patches. Thanks for that

RE: [ACS41] [PATCH REQUEST] CLOUDSTACK-1804 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - DB upgrade fails.

Thanks Murali for the fix. Upgrade is one task that has been pending and we are running in to several issues with it. There are couple of other fixes required from Kelven. -Original Message- From: Murali Reddy [mailto:murali.re...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 5:58 AM To:

Re: [ACS41] Bugs blocking our 4.1 release

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 06:05:09PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > >> CLOUDSTACK-1755 IPv6 - When Vm is part of Dual network , > >> /etc/reslov.conf does not have ipv6 router ipaddress an

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:27:44AM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > Let me bring the conversation back to the subject line... > > WRT to ServerResource implementation, I'd suggested using a RESTful API to > hide ServerComponent and ServerResource implementations from each other [1] +1 > > This l

Re: [ACS41] [PATCH REQUEST] CLOUDSTACK-1804 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - DB upgrade fails.

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:57:49PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > > Chip, please pull in this commit in master to 4.1 branch. > > commit f414b8a850607d20c0a78d455b4c43d90947b41f > Author: Murali Reddy > Date: Wed Mar 27 18:06:22 2013 +0530 > > CLOUDSTACK-1804:Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - DB upgrade fai

Re: [MERGE] GSLB

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:08:58PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > On 20/03/13 7:15 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: > > >I would like to merge GSLB feature proposed [1] and developed in the > >feature branch [2] into master. Code for this feature pretty much > >conforms to what was proposed in FS [3]. I a

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 02:14:32PM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Hi, > > Requesting help to resolve the following issue, if you have done upgrade. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1694 > > Upgrade is failing - if there is anyone that can take a look at it during US > time zo

[DISCUSS] Cloud Usage service Start Error

Hi again :) I filed a bug recently about cloud-usage not starting with 4.1. I logged it as Major, but should I increase the priority to block? This is kind of ugly having a service not starting :P Also, some external products may need cloud-usage to work. https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: [ACS41] Blocker Defects to cut RC

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:12:39AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > The list is coming down to cut RC - > > Blockers as of (UTC -0530, Mar 27th) > > CLOUDSTACK-1810 listTemplate API with templatefilter=featured|community is > not returning any list Min's the assignee. Looks like it should be

Re: [ACS4.1] blockers

I'm sorry, but I can't read this email's content particularly well... Can you please be sure to email in plain text? On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 11:28:26AM +, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > Team, > I think the 4.1 RC is not yet made as there are still several blockers and > criticals, please trea

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013, at 05:27 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > WRT to licensing, I was looking for bright line rules [2]. E.g. the > Master repo only gets donated code. A process for developing rules for > tools and frameworks is what I'm looking for. Unless I'm mis-understanding the question, I beli

Re: [ACS4.1] blockers

Text only list of blockers and criticals in 4.1 branch, please treat these with expected urgency: CLOUDSTACK-1819 Kishan Kavala CLOUDSTACK-1811 Kelven Yang CLOUDSTACK-1810 Min Chen CLOUDSTACK-1805 Kelven Yang CLOUDSTACK-1776 Kelven Yang CLOUDSTACK-1755 Sheng Yang CLOUDSTACK-1673 Murali Reddy CLOUD

[ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

Hi all, As Prasanna said, we're getting close to cutting the RC for 4.1! Here's the list of bugs that I'd like to see us address before cutting the RC. This includes Blocker *and* Critical bugs. I've CC'ed the current assignees just to be sure to catch your attention (which is perhaps redundan

Re: [ACS4.1] blockers

1776 is likely redundant with 1811, since if 1811 is resolved and the management server doesn't continue to run on upgrade failure, it won't be running to cause an NPE in checking secondary storage. This is fallout from the failed upgrade. Actually I think several of these are related to the same 4

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud Usage service Start Error

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:08:53AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Hi again :) > > I filed a bug recently about cloud-usage not starting with 4.1. I > logged it as Major, but should I increase the priority to block? > This is kind of ugly having a service not starting :P Also, some > external

Re: [ACS4.2] master blockers

Sending text only list of 4.2 blockers and critical bugs, please treat these with utmost urgency: CLOUDSTACK-1677 Kelven Yang CLOUDSTACK-1687 Mice Xia CLOUDSTACK-1610 frank zhang CLOUDSTACK-1613 Bharat Kumar CLOUDSTACK-1591 edison su CLOUDSTACK-1392 edison su CLOUDSTACK-1732 Sheng Yang CLOUDSTACK-

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud Usage service Start Error

No problem. Gime couple minutes/hours :) I'll update the ticket and the list. Francois On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:08:53AM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > > Hi again :) > > > > I filed a bug recently about cloud-usage not starting wit

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Chip, Will check upgrade once Murali's fix is pushed. There are couple of more issues which seem to be fixed but kelven need to review and mark them https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1811 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1776 thanks /sudha -Original Mes

Re: [MERGE] GSLB

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 01:08:58PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > > On 20/03/13 7:15 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: > > > > I merged this feature into master with below commit. All review comments > > were addressed except one, I will open a bug fo

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On 27/03/13 8:04 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >Murali Reddy - > CLOUDSTACK-1673 AWS Regions - Events - User disable event does not >include the UUID of the user that was disabled. > > Murali, you mentioned that you were working on a fix for this. You > happened to note that you would have it

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 03:39:25PM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > On 27/03/13 8:04 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > > > >Murali Reddy - > > CLOUDSTACK-1673 AWS Regions - Events - User disable event does not > >include the UUID of the user that was disabled. > > > > Murali, you mentioned that you we

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 07:57:14AM -0700, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Chip, > > Will check upgrade once Murali's fix is pushed. There are couple of more > issues which seem to be fixed but kelven need to review and mark them > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1811 > https://is

Re: Call for 4.2 and 4.1.1 Release Managers!

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 08:09:50PM +, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Chip > > Would you please collaborate as to what release manager does. An examples > would be nice. > > Thanks > ilya Ilya, I asked David for some help via IRC on writing it up. Two ways to describe it: 1 - Herding Cats 2 - Mor

Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins

On 25 March 2013 18:44, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > I'm working to include a couple more things: > > a. Allow a developer to run his/her own integration test written in > marvin. > b. new APIs to be synced automatically without marvin reinstallation In doing b. I realized I had to improve the res

Re: Call for 4.2 and 4.1.1 Release Managers!

On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Chip > > Would you please collaborate as to what release manager does. An examples > would be nice. > > Thanks > ilya Hi Ilya: So the short description is 'cat herder' The real tasks/duties - assuming a feature release: Act as the relea

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

These are my observations I have captured during my testing: 1) 'service cloudstack-management start' is failing for the first time since it did not find tomcat6.conf and server.xml. This will get created (symb links) only if you execute "cloudstack-setup-management" for the first time aft

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

For vmware, current cloudstack doesn't create a vmware datastore through vmware's API, admin needs to create the datastore in Vcenter at first, then add it back into cloudstack. I am not familiar with how to create a VMware datastore through Vmware's API, but regarding to add a new host into a c

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

Yes (actually that's what the instructions say) On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote: >would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone) >on one host? > > >On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Chiradeep Vittal < >chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > >> Following the

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Sounds good, Edison Last night I finished up code that uses the VI Java API to create a VMware Datastore. I want to test it a bit more before I have you look at it. Today there is a Citrix CloudPlatform demo I'm participating in to handle part of the SolidFire section of the demo, so I might not

RE: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

> -Original Message- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: 27 March 2013 1:49 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:27:44AM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:24:39PM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > > Sent: 27 March 2013 1:49 PM > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clear

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

CLOUDSTACK-1810 is not a bug, update the bug with detailed explanation. Thanks -min On 3/27/13 7:34 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all, > >As Prasanna said, we're getting close to cutting the RC for 4.1! > >Here's the list of bugs that I'd like to see us address before cutting >the RC. This in

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:27:44AM +, Donal Lafferty wrote: > > > Right, and I believe that people agree that the KVM agent needs to be re- > > written in non-Java. Could we agree on how to do this, and do the same for > > Hyper-V ? > > > > > > > > > Is Iron Python a possibility? Should be su

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

+1 so awesome! On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chiradeep Vittal < chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > Yes (actually that's what the instructions say) > > On 3/26/13 10:46 PM, "Ahmad Emneina" wrote: > > >would someone be able to fire up all those services (say for a basic zone) > >on one hos

Re: Review Request: Custom Spring AOP to fully support legacy CloudStack AOP semantics, Removing Component autoscanning, ensure adapter execution ordering and make sure events be issued from AOP inter

Chip, Thanks, I'll check and test it Kelven On 3/27/13 6:23 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >--- >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >https://reviews.apache.org/r/10145/#review18419 >-

Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & Microsoft Compiler & IP Clearance

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] >> On Behalf Of prasanna >> Sent: 27 March 2013 8:47 AM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Hyper-V Plugin & M

Re: [ACS41] Release Status - Bugs to kill!

On 3/27/13 7:34 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all, > >As Prasanna said, we're getting close to cutting the RC for 4.1! > >Here's the list of bugs that I'd like to see us address before cutting >the RC. This includes Blocker *and* Critical bugs. I've CC'ed the >current >assignees just to be

Summary of IRC meeting in #cloudstack-meeting, Wed Mar 27 17:05:21 2013

Members present: Animesh, sudhap, vogxn, Chandan, sangeetha, chipc, ke4qqq, jzb Meeting summary: 1. Preface 2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status a. http://markmail.org/message/3sh4ftyedjcmycyn (chipc, 2) b. http://markmail.org/message/ibxqqxddzqbxv4bx (

Re: [ACS41][Patch Request]

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:46:20PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Commit a588efc0cc83c067dbe78bf538be32253072290a in branch > refs/heads/master from Marcus Sorensen > [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a588efc ] > > Summary: RPM - recover configs during upgrade > > Det

[ACS41][Patch Request]

Commit a588efc0cc83c067dbe78bf538be32253072290a in branch refs/heads/master from Marcus Sorensen [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=a588efc ] Summary: RPM - recover configs during upgrade Detail: Uninstallation of old RPMs wipes out some of the configs, and makes it dif

RE: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hi All, I was away for couple of days, so sorry for the delay. I’m completely with Mike & John (& others) on separating storage plugins from hypervisor-related functions. If every plugin will need to implement hypervisor-related code, it will be a big mess. Our use-case is very similar to

Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Hi , While starting jetty on latest master , it throws this exception. Could someone resolve the issue , else as discussed with Chip on IRC we'll have to revert the commits which went in yesterday since until day before yesterday , master was stable . - ERROR [web.context.ContextLoader] (mai

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud Usage service Start Error

Still having the issue, I think we are 2 or 3 commit behind. I built those RPM this morning. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Francois Gaudreault < fgaudrea...@cloudops.com> wrote: > No problem. Gime couple minutes/hours :) I'll update the ticket and the > list. > > Francois > > > On Wed, Mar

Re: Storage Subsystem 2.0 plugin docs

Hi Vladimir, I figured you were away and would get back to us when you could. :) I was talking to John Griffith. It sounds like you worked with him on OpenStack. You are correct that I am interested in your Option 1: Mapping a single VM or a single data disk to a single volume on our SAN (via

Re: [DISCUSS] Cloud Usage service Start Error

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:00:23PM -0400, Francois Gaudreault wrote: > Still having the issue, I think we are 2 or 3 commit behind. I built those > RPM this morning. Once more? If HEAD doesn't work, then bump that up to a blocker severity please. > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Francoi

Re: [ACS41] Bugs blocking our 4.1 release

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 06:05:09PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: >> >> CLOUDSTACK-1755 IPv6 - When Vm is part of Dual network ,

[ACS41] New blocker bug, CLOUDSTACK-1746, Cloudstack Usage Server won't start

Hi all, We need someone to take https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1746 Francois is reporting the following exception in the bug: log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger (org.springframework.core.env.StandardEnvironment). log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system pr

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Reverting these two commits makes jetty run successfully and the UI launches and works fine but the user is already logged in as admin the first time instead of the user entering the credentials himself (may be due to single sign on ) - 1) Commit: 99ea4011b18356d09686889205ef5df1b170b0dc ( U

Re: [ACS41] New blocker bug, CLOUDSTACK-1746, Cloudstack Usage Server won't start

I'll take this one Kelven On 3/27/13 2:13 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >Hi all, > >We need someone to take >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1746 > >Francois is reporting the following exception in the bug: > >log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger >(org.springframework.

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

It should be fixed. This should be less difficult in the future, as long as we're not moving the config directories around again. I first tried copying the files over during the upgrade prior to the old RPMs being removed, but RPM's config(noreplace) only seems to work on files that it knew were in

[ACS41][QA] Release Candidate

Chip, Even though we are going to meet the criteria ( no blockers and less than 5 critical failures) today sometime, let QA finish upgrade and verification of some of the resolved issues before cutting RC. Hope that is fine. 1 day should be fine to validate most critical defects. I am skeptica

Re: [ACS41] New blocker bug, CLOUDSTACK-1746, Cloudstack Usage Server won't start

Patch has been submitted Kelven On 3/27/13 2:21 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: >I'll take this one >Kelven > >On 3/27/13 2:13 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>We need someone to take >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1746 >> >>Francois is reporting the following exception

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

No - not done on ubuntu as upgrade hasn't worked at all so far even on CentOS We will test it if CentOS works. These are the two upgrades that are being tested [1] [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.1+Compatibility+Matrix -Original Message- From: Ma

RE: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

Reverting these two commits makes jetty run successfully and the UI launches and works fine but the user is already logged in as admin the first time instead of the user entering the credentials himself (may be due to single sign on ) - 1) Commit: 99ea4011b18356d09686889205ef5df1b170b0dc (

Re: Review Request: Temporarily disabling baremetal functionality in CS 4.1

> On March 24, 2013, 6:08 p.m., Chip Childers wrote: > > This patch still doesn't apply cleanly. Now sure what's going on. Please > > test with a fresh copy of the 4.1 branch to ensure that it's a clean patch. > > > > git am ~/patches/10071.patch > > Applying: CS-1773: Disable baremetal funct

Re: [ACS41][QA] Release Candidate

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Chip, > > Even though we are going to meet the criteria ( no blockers and less than 5 > critical failures) today sometime, let QA finish upgrade and verification of > some of the resolved issues before cutting RC. Hope that is fine. 1 da

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Pranav Saxena wrote: > Reverting these two commits makes jetty run successfully and the UI launches > and works fine but the user is already logged in as admin the first time > instead of the user entering the credentials himself (may be due to single > sign on

Re: [ACS41][QA] Release Candidate

On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:00 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti > wrote: >> Chip, >> >> Even though we are going to meet the criteria ( no blockers and less than 5 >> critical failures) today sometime, let QA finish upgrade and verification of >> some of th

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

Ok. They may need to do something similar for Ubuntu, or perhaps it's already taken care of. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > No - not done on ubuntu as upgrade hasn't worked at all so far even on CentOS > We will test it if CentOS works. These are the two upgrades that

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

UCS issue is a POM dependency issue, the UCS project is not declared to be a dependency in the master project. GSLB autowiring is caused by that a referenced Netscalar network element class is only available in Non-OSS build, if Netscalar element is only available in non-OSS, we need to move its r

Review Request: Remove db id in exception message.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10159/ --- Review request for cloudstack, mice xia and Min Chen. Description --- Repl

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

For UCS issue, I've put a fix in. For GSLB, a work around is to run non-OSS build, hopefully this can unlock developers temporarily on master branch Kelven On 3/27/13 3:03 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Pranav Saxena >wrote: >> Reverting these two commits makes j

RE: Question pertaining to the Support of ACL deny rules

Kishan, I referred to your FS at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+ACL+deny+rules . May I know how does a user choose a rule priority number. Do we allow two rules with the same priority for any reason? Can the user re-use the priority number of the deleted rule?

RE: Question pertaining to the Support of ACL deny rules

Kishan, Can NetworkACLContainer be used for two network tiers belonging to two different VPCs? Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 4:37 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Kishan Kavala

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

This should now be usable for production use as well Follow instructions here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud#QuickClou d-howto2 From: Ahmad Emneina Reply-To: "aemne...@gmail.com" Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:34 AM To: Chiradeep Vittal Cc: "dev@cloud

Question pertaining to NAT on Private Gateway Feature of N-Tier

Hello Jayapal, I referred to the feature's FS at https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/nat-on-private-gateway.html . May I know whether it is applicable for multiple Private Gateways in a single VPC VR (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-767 ) . Does the NAT rules get cleaned up on

Re: [QuickCloud] zero to cloud in less than a minute

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Following the discussion [1], we have QuickCloud in a rough-but-ready state > for developers to try out > Instructions for developers to try it out with DevCloud2 here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/QuickCloud

RE: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

I tried upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 using Rhel6.3 binaries and Xenhost in Advanced zone set up and upgrade succeeds. After upgrade , I was able to deploy Vms in new network without any issues. Deploying Vms in existing networks succeed. But Vms are not given any ip address. In router, I see that th

Re: Review Request: Usage server startup configuration XML needs to be updated to conform to latest changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10157/ --- (Updated March 28, 2013, 1:57 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chil

Re: Review Request: Usage server startup configuration XML needs to be updated to conform to latest changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10157/#review18452 --- Ship it! Applied to 4.1 now. - Chip Childers On March 28, 2013,

Re: [ACS41] New blocker bug, CLOUDSTACK-1746, Cloudstack Usage Server won't start

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:37:57PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > Patch has been submitted And now it's been applied. Thanks for jumping on this Kelven! > > Kelven > > On 3/27/13 2:21 PM, "Kelven Yang" wrote: > > >I'll take this one > >Kelven > > > >On 3/27/13 2:13 PM, "Chip Childers" wrote: >

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:09:24PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > UCS issue is a POM dependency issue, the UCS project is not declared to be > a dependency in the master project. > > GSLB autowiring is caused by that a referenced Netscalar network element > class is only available in Non-OSS build, i

Re: Jetty Failing on latest master due to class UCS manager not Found

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 04:31:05PM -0700, Kelven Yang wrote: > For UCS issue, I've put a fix in. > > For GSLB, a work around is to run non-OSS build, hopefully this can unlock > developers temporarily on master branch Good work-around for now. Murali - This appears to be something that we *all*

Re: [ACS41][QA] Has anyone upgraded from 4.0 to 4.1

On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 06:43:50PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote: > I tried upgrade from 4.0 -> 4.1 using Rhel6.3 binaries and Xenhost in > Advanced zone set up and upgrade succeeds. > > After upgrade , I was able to deploy Vms in new network without any issues. > That's good news! Is anyone

  1   2   >